The Worlds #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • All Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search

Lots of Solar Power May Reduce, Not Increase, Electricity Prices

John Farrell
May 14, 2012  |  17 Comments

Whether German feed-in tariffs or U.S. tax incentives, opponents of solar rail at its perceived high cost. But a story making rounds this week, "why power generators are terrified of solar," presents a powerful image that may flip this conventional wisdom on its head. Building lots of solar power can actually reduce electricity prices, to the dismay of utilities.

The story comes from Germany, where a decade of consistent policy has resulted in thousands of megawatts of distributed solar installed on urban rooftops and rural barns. This year, it was noted that the surge of "solar PV was cutting peak electricity prices by up to 40 percent." The following graphic of prices on the German electricity exchange — which Craig Morris calls "the afternoon dip" — illustrates the effect. The left view is 2008, showing steady, high prices in the market throughout the afternoon. The chart on the right shows the same time period in 2012, where an abundance of solar has sharply cut afternoon power costs.

What's happened is the "merit order effect." Because utilities have purchased all this solar capacity on long-term contracts, there is effectively zero marginal cost to taking the solar electricity onto the grid. And in Germany, there's enough solar electricity on sunny afternoons to completely offset the traditional spike in electricity demand created by air conditioning. So, instead of taking electricity from expensive gas peaking power plants or diesel generators, utilities have low-cost solar filling the gap, undermining the previous price peaks.

The fall in wholesale power costs from so much solar represents a delicious irony. For years, solar advocates have justified high prices as necessary to help the market mature and — because solar is such a small part of total power generation — that solar will cost the average ratepayer very little. The truth is that the impact of solar may be large, but in the opposite direction.

Photo credit: Toyota UK

This post originally appeared on Energy Self-Reliant States, a resource of the Institute for Local Self-Reliance.

Image: manfredxy via Shutterstock

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

17 Comments

Register To Comment
Jan de Boer
Jan de Boer
July 6, 2012
"The German renewable energy surcharge is 3.6 c/kwh. That is all the increase that can be blamed on solar. " Correction: Only half of it is due to solar, the rest is due to wind, biomass and small scale hydro. Th main reason it has become so high is that the current government has freed the largest electricity consumers of this surcharge.
first last
first last
June 12, 2012
The solution is obvious - power generators should build-out solar and wind plants so they can artificially keep electricity prices inflated. They should also support anti-dumping legislatures to ensure prices of domestic product remain artificially high to keep demand low.
J F
J F
May 28, 2012
At this price graph for a Sunday shows, prices may even fall to zero temporarily with high solar production:
http://www.epexspot.com/en/market-data/auction/chart/auction-chart/2012-04-01/DE

Remark that 30 or 200 day averages are the price averages for power to delivered on the respective day, not for delivery on consecutive days.
Less of a dip for a day with up to 40% solar share in the country:
http://www.epexspot.com/en/market-data/auction/chart/auction-chart/2012-05-26/DE/1d/30d

Could anyone provide an example for daily power price fluctuations in southern US markets during summertime?
ANONYMOUS
May 25, 2012
Regarding comments 12 and 13:

Jens (in comment #12) and Aligatorhardt (in comment #13) raise a large number of issues relating to the value of nuclear energy vs. renewable energy, the cost of robust grids, etc. I will resist the temptation to address all of these as this would move this thread far off topic. Instead I will merely point out that none of the issues they raise is an excuse to conflate spot prices and overall prices as the author apparently seeks to do. It is a fact that German electricity prices are increasing due to the costs of adding solar PV. One could argue that at some future time, the impact of solar PV on demand curves (and spot markets) may lead to lower overall prices but instead the author makes the inflated claim that this is already true. In "support" of this spurious claim the author presents a comparison of spot prices on two days separated by ~4 years and cherry picked to exaggerate changes in spot market trends. Selecting two random days would have been an amateurish analysis, selecting non-representative, cherry-picked days is gross deception. Is this really the best that renewable energy advocates can come up with?
Steven
Allen Gerhardt
Allen Gerhardt
May 25, 2012
We often see complaints about the high cost of electricity in Germany, and the nuclear cheerleaders like to claim that renewable energy is responsible for high prices. What they hide from the discussion is the rest of the story.
In Germany, which has public health insurance, they do not allow polluters to offset the cost of pollution onto the general public. This is accomplished in part by the Value Added Tax, (VAT). While utilities in the US do not pay the cost of pollution, in Germany they cannot get away with that. Additionally, German neighborhoods mostly have underground transmission lines, which cost about 3 times as much as overhead lines to install and maintain. Underground lines must be buried in conduit, and wire sizes increased to make up for the lack of air cooling that is available for overhead lines.
Comparisons are made to prices in France, where electric rates are subsidized by government. As others have mentioned, unlike the US, where the grid is outdated, in Germany grid improvements are being done as needed. Even in France the cost of new nuclear power is higher than renewable energy.
http://www.renewablesinternational.net/french-court-finds-nuclear-too-expensive/150/505/33367/

Germany has chosen to invest in their own future. The cost of building new power and transmission is high in the beginning, but the fuel free operations of renewable energy allows a major payoff after the financing period is over. In the next decade Germany's electric costs will be dropping , while those that rely on nuclear power and fossil power will see constantly rising fuel bills. A nuclear accident can be so expensive as to cancel all earning from nuclear power over the previous years. The Germans have already suffered from Chernobyl, with higher health care costs, so they are insuring that those costs will not be repeated . The German move to renewable energy is wise and successful, and that is evident even in the early years of the transition.
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 25, 2012
#11 Hi Steven your conclusions may be right is you look at the market as a frozen picture. This is however delusive as you cannot remove 23% of electricity supply from nuclear as the Germans have decided and expect to keep a stable market.

German nuclear power is not built with a quality up to todays standards and could easily cause huge catastrophes. Whats more they were built in a time before terrorism and very heavy planes.

The government assessed how much it would cost to bring them up to a minimum standard and it turned out that it was impossible to pay, so they made the final decision to phase out nuclear power.

Moreover nuclear plants does not pay insurance that can cover the real risk, which Tepco is a sad proof of.

Filling the gap requires solar that apart from being very easy to deploy also have a few other very benign effects;
* it is distributed so the grid can does not have to be modernised and rebuilt
* it delivers energy when energy demand and prizes are peaking
* it delivers most of it's energy in the summer when wind energy delivers less
* it has far less external cost than Nuclear and coal

Finally solar energy keeps electricity prices at bay because everyone in the business can see that solar along with wind energy is approaching GRID parity fast with no signs of stopping the decline in prices.

New nuclear or coal plants are becoming increasingly bleak investment opportunities because the huge investment needed only will turn a profit if they can expect to maintain a high electricity price and that is completely unlikely.

No one wants to invest in government supported new British nuclear power plants because of the economic outlook.

Another reason energy prices are high in Germany is because they have decided to keep the GRID in perfect working order, so unlike USA the GRID is stable and able to handle severe disturbances including major solar flares that would zap the GRID in USA.
ANONYMOUS
May 24, 2012
Regarding aligatorhardt's remarks in comment #10:
Note carefully the distinction between electricity prices and spot market prices. You can have declining spot market prices AND increasing overall prices because of the very high expense of the added solar PV. Electricity prices in Germany are increasing and the high cost of solar PV is a strong contributor to this trend.
Steven
Allen Gerhardt
Allen Gerhardt
May 24, 2012
The merit order effect on Germany electricity prices is no "assumption". The studies clearly show that daytime peak spot prices are reduced with solar and night prices are reduced from the use of wind. http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/blog/post/2012/05/lots-of-solar-power-may-reduce-not-increase-electricity-prices

http://www.renewablesinternational.net/merit-order-effect-of-pv-in-germany/150/510/33011/

http://www.renewablesinternational.net/renewable-power-cuts-into-baseload-in-germany/150/537/37817/

http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/01/german-utilities-fight-solars-cost-cutting-merit-order-effect/

http://www.awea.org/blog/index.cfm?customel_dataPageID_1699=13058
ANONYMOUS
May 22, 2012
Aligarothardt writes:
"The German renewable energy surcharge is 3.6 c/kwh. That is all the increase that can be blamed on solar. As the article shows, solar is lowering prices, and lowering the cost of electricity more than the incentives have cost."

Well 3.6 Eurocents/kWh is $0.046/kWh and is >75% of the average cost of electricity generation in the US (~$0.06/kWh); this is NOT a small number when it only leads to ~3% solar generation. Furthermore, this is only the direct cost, there are lots of indirect costs associated with the solar buildout.

This article compares spot prices on two random days and proves noting regarding costs. A more detailed comparison would show modest decreases in mean spot prices due to reductions in the mid-day peak, but reductions in spot prices do not imply reductions in average prices as aligatorhardt incorrectly assumes because the reductions from spot prices do not outweight the overall costs of solar PV. The push into PV has lead to higher prices for German electricity, the generation costs for which are more than four times the costs in the US and among the highest in the world. Furthermore, the new peak in the spot market occurs in the evening and is poorly aligned with solar generation so any incremental benefits of the "merit order effect" are over.
Steven
Allen Gerhardt
Allen Gerhardt
May 22, 2012
The German renewable energy surcharge is 3.6 c/kwh. That is all the increase that can be blamed on solar. As the article shows, solar is lowering prices, and lowering the cost of electricity more than the incentives have cost. With coal and nuclear power, costs only go up.
ANONYMOUS
May 21, 2012
Regarding Bob's remarks in comment #1, it is worth noting that these are cherry-picked data for two days only and do not represent typical average spot prices. Using single-day data is a highly inaccurate way to analyze costs because there are large fluctuations in spot prices. Furthermore, if one were to plot the 200-day average (or the 30-day average) compared to the March 7, 2012 data (a feature allowed on the website the data is taken from) you would see that spot prices on March 7, 2012 are dramatically below those for the 200-day (or 30 day) average--it is a cherry-picked day. One would also see that the 12 March 2008 data demand profile is unusually flat compared to longer averages (30 or 200 day) plotted on that day. March is not a good time to examine the effect of solar PV on prices anyway because electricity demand in that month is usually well below average (it is past the heating peak and well before the air-conditioning peak).

If one were to analyze averaged spot prices one probably would find that the large increase in solar PV has reduced midday spot prices. However, electricity purchased on the spot market is only a portion of the total production. Furthermore, Germany's electricity prices are among the highest in Europe and these prices have risen at a high rate which is directly correlated with the portion of the EEG subsidizing solar PV. Solar PV is raising costs--not lowering them.
Steven
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
May 16, 2012
I know that there's a 'Desertec' design for Asia, but tying together Europe/Asia with electricity?

Could you point out where that is in the site you listed? I dug around a bit but not knowing where to look was frustrating.

Also, your second link is giving me a page with on sentence on it.

"Fehler beim Aufbau einer Datenbankverbindung"

"Error establishing a database connection"

Furthermore, are you sure North Africa plans are on hold? The latest I've seen said that solar plants were already being built in the Morocco/Algeria area to take advantage of the existing transmission lines with Spain.

(Don't forget all the hydro Iceland has in addition to its geothermal.)
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 16, 2012
Hi Bob Wallace.

Desertec is indeed the company behind the plans and they have recently teamed up with India, Japan and China.

The solar ressources in western China and North India are the attraction.

Also the wind ressources in western China are excellent.

Britain is also planning to expand the GRID to Iceland in order to import cheap geothermal energy + Iceland has extremely good wind energy ressources.

ABB, Siemens etc. have along with Desertec secured the attention in Brussels and the HVDC GRID is high on the agenda now because they have moved east. The North African plans are however on hold.

Also China is planning high speed trains to Europe so the EuroAsian integration is on track.

I have a friend who is heading the research in battery storage in Vestas and I live in Roskilde the wind R&D capital in Denmark. The general consensus here is that the battery technology still is too expensive and that the initial markets for battery storage therefore will be local GRID's. Think hotels, mines etc. in developing countries or at smaller islands.

http://ec.europa.eu/energy/infrastructure/strategy/2020_en.htm

http://www.windkraft-journal.de/2012/03/10/asian-super-grid-for-renewable-energies-desertec-foundation-signs-memorandum-of-understanding/
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
May 16, 2012
Really? A Europe to India/China transmission line?

I'd like to see some documentation for that claim.

Europe, North Africa and parts of the Middle East, yes, that's Desertec.

--

Battery technology seems to be about ready to offer us affordable grid storage.

One company, as an example, is Aquion. They are currently going into production with a sodium-ion battery which is price pointed at $300/kW and expected to produce 20,000 100% DoD cycles.

That's $0.015/kWh storage.

What does seem to make most sense is to spread the storage around but even distributed it can still send power to where power is needed.
Jens Stubbe
Jens Stubbe
May 16, 2012
The plans here in Europe is to connect the entire European GRID with HVDC cables and extend it to China, India and North Africa so all countries effectively will be sharing a very large pool of different power generation, which enable better energy production match to energy demand.

Further the European Commission is very kean on smartgrid and district heating and ground heat storage and electric vehicles with the idea that excess power can be loaded of when there is more power production than demand.

Battery capacity is expensive and most likely relevant for local GRID's.

Longterm when renewable energy reach lower price points excess power can be used to produce synthetic fuel.

Regarding the economic value of renewable energy it is true that it matches peak power demand remarkably well whereas nuclear has to run with maximal capacity factor and consequently produce the same amount of energy when energy is in demand and when it is not in demand making the average value of nuclear power generation less valuable.

Owners of nuclear and coal plants should plan for their final hours because both wind and solar is nearing GRID parity fast and will continue to become cheaper.

In Europe the power consumption is also falling - in part due to weak economic development but also due to the implemented energy policies. This trend will be fortified over the next few years when LED lighting becomes the standard.
SASA MARINIC
SASA MARINIC
May 15, 2012
Hi Bob,

You are right regarding the storage matter. Not only Germany but all should be considering the storage and the excess of collected energy as well.

Sasa
Bob Wallace
Bob Wallace
May 15, 2012
So during peak hours utilities were paying about €58/MWh for pre-solar electricity but once solar came on line the price dropped to around €45/MWh. Twelve hour average prices.

That's more than a 22% savings. €13 savings per MWh, 12 hours with roughly 27GWh per hour purchased, €4,212,000 in one day.

Is it possible that costs are dropping that much? (Or do I have a math error?)

Wonder how long it might take for the savings to equal government subsidies for solar?

No wonder conventional power generators are running scared. They've got solar taking away huge amounts of peak hour profits and wind driving power costs lower at night. What's a coal/nuclear owner to do? Go out of business?

--

Germany needs a few hours of storage to flatten out the remaining humps....

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
John Farrell

John Farrell

John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at ILSR and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits of local ownership and dispersed generation of renewable energy. His latest paper,...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Most Commented

  • 27
    Fighting Blackouts: Japan Residential PV and Energy Storage Market Flourishing
  • 17
    The Economic Case for Divesting from Fossil Fuels
  • 11
    Breakdown: Penetration of Renewable Energy in Selected Markets
  • 10
    Fracking and Solar: Friends, Foes or the Bridge to Clean Energy Adoption?

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Quick Mount PV
  • SMA America, LLC
  • Richardson RFPD, Inc.
  • Canadian Solar Inc.
  • American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE)
  • SolarInsure, Inc.
  • Solar Electric Power Association
  • 2GreenEnergy.com
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information