Profile Network Activity Comments Articles Blog Bookmarks Contact
 

Don't Count Out Solar Water Heating, It's a $123 Billion Dollar Market

By Chris Williams, HeatSpring
February 7, 2012   |   13 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

13 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 13
February 7, 2012
Solar thermal has struggled as an industry for 40 years. Rebates, tax credits, incentives coming and going directly affect the marketability. Yes it is a mature technology but its never really been challenged on its economics. A recent installation in Richmond BC Canada used unglazed pool heating collectors. This is for pre-heating showers in an Aquatic facility. The load is high enough and the collector bank small enough (only 2200 sq ft with 5000 gallons storage) that the collectors remain cold meaning unglazed collectors are just as efficient as far more expensive boxed and glazed collectors. ..per square foot! In this particular example the economics were improved by a factor of 5 over what is otherwise considered the mature technology of the day with according to the author very little room for improvement in the numbers! There's plenty of room for improvement. The cold portion of the load is 1/3 of the load and this can be done with much less expensive unglazed plastic solar collectors.

On the residential side several years ago Fafco was awarded a large corporate welfare check to develop a residential solar water heater using their plastic unglazed solar panels. The idea being that this lower cost approach would solve the Achilles Heel of the solar thermal field, that being the poor economics. That particular project was a disaster but the concept is sound. Residential solar can in some cases be done with unglazed for much better economics but in the end the economics are still not good enough. We find that people don't buy things that pay for themselves in 10 or 15 years unless there is the carrot of a rebate or incentive. We try to sell solar pool heaters in California at a typical 5-8 year payback but instead people save the space for PV at a 10 year payback after incentives. The market often wants the free money more than it wants the economic return on investment.

www.h2otsun.com/hotwater profiles large scale unglazed solar water heaters
Comment
2 of 13
February 7, 2012
Ken,

Thank you for my comment. Without getting into technical issues, I think part of the reason solar PV seems to growing faster could be due to randomness. Perhaps the state of the CA market depended on a few swing votes that decided to go with PV.

From an "pure" (if you can define this) economices perspective the "product of raw energy / cost of installation" is INCREDIBLY higher for solar thermal. What does this mean? Adoption is not being hinder for technology efficiency reason, but for business efficiency reasons. The same sales person will make 4 to 5X more for the same work selling PV in attractive markets.

With that said, there are some EXTREMELY attractive solar thermal markets. I don't know about payback (it's a useless term in my opinion) but, as the report points out, the right customers (high water use, expensive fuel source) in the right market (the northeast, and southwest) will get 15%+ IRR on their investment. This is just amazing.

I also wouldn't discount small difference in the technology, that impact a companies decision by impacting how 'risky' they view the technology.

Chris
Comment
3 of 13
February 9, 2012
Chris,
Excellent article about solar water heating. As an installer in the northeast, the main obstacle I've found to sales is that customers are not even aware of the technology. Once they are educated and realize the return on investment, solar water heating sells itself.

With hot PV markets, such as NJ, most installers won't even consider solar water heating. They'd rather install PV to generate electricity to run an electric water heater. Even with high SREC prices, solar water heating provides a better return.

Mark
Comment
4 of 13
February 9, 2012
Mark,

I agree, the PV industry has been much better at being extremely loud and associating just solar PV with solar. Also, the fact that solar thermal is a mature technology and solar PV is heavily subsidized is to the determinant of solar thermal and for a very simple reason. I'd argue in many ways how a sales person decides to spend their time drives residential adoption. It will take the same amount of time to sell a residential thermal and residential PV system, but the sales person makes a lot more money on PV. How to solve this? It's all about positioning, and finding the right customers in the right markets. Plumbers could, key word could, up-selling solar thermal but most plumbing shops aren't good sales people, as a rule of thumb.

Chris
Comment
5 of 13
February 9, 2012
New systems are already created and operational since a long time. Hybrid solar modules from Meldynique solar / SolarDuo are much more economical and time saving with higher efficiency of both thermal installations and PV systems.
In 2012 there will be a factory established in Nevada and installations are starting as we speak.
SolarDuo even arranged finance possibilities for its customers up to $25000 for single family homes and $12500 for buildings with 5 appartments.

www.solarduo.eu most efficient solar option you will find.
Comment
6 of 13
February 9, 2012
Futura Solar has a product innovation for you. A multiple solar benefit roofing system for low profile commercial or industrial buildings. A revival of sawtooth roofing, with additional solar benefits, this system provides daylight on the shop floor, process hot air (with incidental air handling), solar water and/or PV. DCM-A&E of Camden, NJ, has technical drawings and fabricators lined up.

Commercial laundries are a scaled up version of laundramats mentioned above. The industry is marked by low margins as a result of high energy bills. That situation can be turned around by lowering the energy bills and raising the margins. This system will scale up to commercial laundries or scale down to coin-op laundramats. Consider also pulp & paper processing, including paper recycling, it's basically a wash & dry operation.

Even in less energy intensive applications (warehousing or big box retail) daylight on the shop floor is known to be better than flourescent. By the way, PV wired into flourescent bulbs always sees efficiency fall to the single digits.

Providing for G&A energy expense is one way to control costs. Harvesting energy from the roof can also contribute to direct energy expense, all before spinning any Utility meters.
Comment
7 of 13
February 9, 2012
Let's be clear about those numbers that some feel are already market viable but as the author of the original article in this thread publishes, are not. Not against low cost natural gas. He's right. There's only about 14 GJ available year round on a 4x8 solar panel area facing the sun in most areas north of the sunbelt. Typical gas costs are about $10/GJ including boiler efficiency. For a ten year simple payback and assuming you're collecting and delivering 50% of what's available you need to be selling installed solar systems at $700 per 4x8 solar panel complete. That's your cost limit so be careful what you promise. A ten year simple payback isn't an easy sell in the first place. In this typical numerical example you can't even buy the storage tank at wholesale at that price. Its better in many areas but not by much if we're talking natural gas and that's the predominant fuel. Larger scale systems still require low cost collectors and that's why we at Hot Sun have always focused our energy on unglazed low cost plastic solar panels. We can be just as efficient as an evacuated tube when the water being heated is cold. There is no need to solar heat hot water. Its already hot. Viable solar water heating is solar cold water heating and cold water can be heated with a garden hose in the sun. We're missing these kinds of key obvious no brainers sometimes when we don't pay close attention to the real numbers and simple payback period is just a simple way to keep track of what makes the most economic sense. If the simple payback is less than about 15 years then the energy savings can finance the capital cost and governments are all over it for the free carbon footprint reduction but its not easy to achieve those kinds of numbers. The only 15% IRR on a residential solar water heater in the US before rebates is a garden hose in the sun plumbed in series with your hot water tank. 50 feet long and 1 inch OD is worth $9/year according to above calculation.
Comment
8 of 13
fsc
February 9, 2012
How in the world does two hundred dollars turn into seven thousand dollars? I live in Mexico. Yes, we have more sun, but no incentives. That means that when I researched my installation my mindset was not "the more I spend the more I get from my government", it was "the less I spend, the more I save". Basic systems cost two hundred dollars in China. Here in Mexico, with its huge market inefficiencies such as high import taxes, a 16% sales tax, poor roads, huge transaction costs etc, I still spend less than $1,500 dollars for my system. I reused my old natural gas boiler for backup. A new one would have been two hundred dollars additional. That $1500 did not cover consultants nor incentives paperwork. With just a little Internet research, it was enough for product, and six hours of a plumber.
With a family of six, I went and bought the biggest self-contained system on the market. In retrospect, I should have bought two medium sized ones and connected them in series. My family goes solar only from March to October, and November to February we use the gas backup and solar as a preheater. I guesstimate over 50% savings during the winter, and 75% year-round.
Just how do you get to seven thousand? I think it is with consultants, incentive paperwork and having to use "certified" equipment and technicians. This is not rocket science for God´s sake. As the article states, this is a tested mature technology.
My recommendations: do your research, especially if you live in cold climates. Use evacuated tubes fitted directly to the hot water tank. For sizing, overshoot and use an isothermal valve. Go low-tech. Save as much as you can, and do not incur in the additional costs needed for the incentives. And DO IT NOW. The payback for me was less than 3 years.
Where I live, domestic natural gas is subsidized and electricity costs over 30 cents. For most of the US, use electric back up. The electric hookup is straightforward.
Comment
9 of 13
February 9, 2012
Chris, congratulations to an excellent article. Well researched and full of fact's. I did my Masterthesis on the US solar thermal market. Your 2 page report basically summed up my 100+ page paper.

Since my completion in 2008, I have started the US arm of a rather large German manufacturer of solar thermal systems in the Northeast. We have had our first full year in business and became the market leader (# installed systems and installation cost) in Massachusetts. The potential is enormous but there are also market barriers:

--- qualified installers with solar thermal background
--- repetitive business to reduce cost of sales
--- stringent permits and administrative burdens for installers

We have been successful with a few installers providing well engineered systems kits, a unique hybrid/drainback system BUT most important a system price which allows for an installed cost/homeowner under $ 7.000! We have been blessed here in Mass with excellent rebate structure. Combined with the above price tag installers can move a system/day. This helps them to become sufficient and to streamline their installations. We are now working hard to cut our cost even further by buying local components and doing the assembly in the state. The goal: an of the shelf solar thermal system, installed, which is only twice the cost of a traditional hot water heater (after rebates).
Comment
10 of 13
February 10, 2012
Joerg (renewable2008),

Thank you for the comment. I'm familiar with Wagner's systems, I linked to the Secusol system in the in the article. I'm a fan of drainbacks because you can use them and size for solar space heating if the application permits. Also, you're claims about installed costs are backed up by the MA CEC Residential Water database. Link here --> http://www.masscec.com/masscec/file/CSHWR%20Awarded%20Project%20Database%2001_27_12%20for%20website.xls

It seems like you have some nice installations partners that are good business people, i.e. they know how to profile customers to find systems that are cheap to install and offset a lot of energy. Congratulations on this.

Also, I like your goal about costs. The benefit of SHW is on a residential level, if you're good, you can size a system with 90% accuracy is about 10 minutes.

Thank you to everyone else who commented, I don't have the time to respond to every point, but I feel they mainly fall into the "technical efficiency vs business efficiency" debate. For the most part, I only think the technical aspects of the system matter in as much as they impact the business aspect of the installation and the surrounding business. Incremental changes or advantages in technology will not be adopted unless the benefit is GREATER then the transition costs for a business (perceived risk, new training, etc). If a new technology is only 10% better it often doesn't matter (unless you're in a commodity market with HIGH volume) because it's difficult to change people's behaviors.

Chris
Comment
11 of 13
February 10, 2012
In San Diego, 85-90% of residences have gas water heating. As long as gas prices (from a therm standpoint) remain much lower as compared to electricity costs I don't see Solar Thermal taking competing with PV...at least locally. Even with a generous CSI Thermal subsidy and a personal tax credit of 30% it takes a long time (as compared to PV which continues to drop in cost) to payback gas displacing thermal given the relatively low cost of a therm. Of course the economics change if therm prices skyrocket. At the same time the thermal market will tank (no pun intended)altogether if the tax credits are eliminated.
Comment
12 of 13
February 10, 2012
Steve,

I agree, SHW should not be installed in places with cheap NG, so it will not catch on in San Diego

The best markets are the northeast due to high inlet water temperatures and high energy costs and the southwest due to high solar resources and use of electric for water heating.

Again, it's about finding the right customers in the right markets and being extremely specific about this equation and realizing SHW like PV and geo is not for everyone.

Chris
Comment
13 of 13
March 8, 2012
I agree the solar water heater is a must for every home
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Chris Williams, HeatSpring

View Chris Williams, HeatSpring's Profile
About: Chris works with HeatSpring developing new products and managing online content. He combines his business education, technical training and hands on experience ... more »

Advertise With Us

Midwest Renewable Energy Association Quick Mount PV Comment:Visions Idaho Department of Commerce Dow Solar Stoel Rives LLP KYOCERA Solar, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters