Profile Network Activity Comments Articles Blog Bookmarks
 

January 2012 SRECTrade Auction Results: Where is Market Demand?

By Steven Eisenberg
January 10, 2012   |   6 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

6 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 6
January 12, 2012
If anyone was wondering why SREC's do not work and are a silly convoluted idea - see table above. I am constantly amazed at how we (the U.S.) ignores a simple, cost effective, toally proven way to do this - Feed in Tariffs.....
Comment
2 of 6
January 12, 2012
Comment 1 distorts an already distorted article. The SREC markets are wavering poorly because the people responsible are finding their balance in keeping it steady in a somewhat resistive and conservative climate. Firstly, except for the DC trade, most states find the need for SREC's satisfied near years end, so little trading occurs in the last month of the year. Using the last month of the year's trading activity is an intentional distortion of the overall trade movement.
.....Second, many states using SREC trading had become oversubscribed because of the popularity in it's use, and the tiny percentage used for their 'solar carveout', usually less than one percent. The DC market, et. al., had been recently oversubscribed and was at very low solar crediting levels, until the last two months. Now it is recovering because of 'carveout' adjustments upward of fractions of a percent. There is a definite need for stability in this market in order to encourage private investment in solar energy hardware. Investment companies have difficulty tapping into homade energy income.
............It seems to be taking much time to stabilize the leveincentive paid for solar power. I feel this may be continually stressed by Ute shills and investors, whom want a cash cow to milk only for themselves. As distributed energy becomes more mainstream, we may hear more grumbling from the 'status quo' of indentured profit streams. The SREC program represents 'distributed profits as well as energy', tho the trading companies, or accumulators, are always seeking ways to increase their margins also. I feel the pioneers in Solar Energy ought to be given the ability to earn recovery on, and encouraged for their investment scaled to carbon producer demand. 'More carbon dioxide produced=more incentive for solar energy producers' with SREC's. The variable that is being adjusted is the ratio of CO2 to solar power incentivizing. The SREC market can take care of this without federal government subsidy
Comment
3 of 6
January 12, 2012
The SREC market seems to be working exactly like it is supposed to and very well from my perspective.

1. I note that the states with SRECs and mandatory RPS with solar cutouts have tremendously more Solar PV installed then states without.

2. I note that until there was a huge glut in solar PV installations, the market was doing great. That huge glut was caused by the SRECs returns being really really good, it will stabilize over the next couple years and the prices will likely go back up. A perfectly balanced SREC market should have the SRECs between $200 and $350 per SREC at this time.

3. Luckily my residential system is grandfathered in the DC market, even though I am in Virginia (and I would like to thank DC very much for that). Every SREC I have sold has been over $200. By being able to show what SRECs can do if properly engineered, I hope someday I can convince Virginia to adopt SRECs and increase their Solar PV capacity. But I am doubting that will happen for the next two years.

4. My favorite part of SRECs is that when you reach the desired goal, they go away naturally. No other planned form of incentives outside of Grants/Credits tend to do that. Feed-In-Tariffs, won't go away without congress critters taking action if those are adopted nationally and given the fine examples of the fossil fuel and agro insustries likely they would take action to sustain them. SRECs go away without intervention, I rather like that.
Comment
4 of 6
January 12, 2012
Phil - Longwatcher

Just curious how many SREC deals over 500KW have you done ?? I have done over a dozen and I have found them to be complex and way over bureaucratized. Maybe just my experience.

Peter
Comment
5 of 6
January 12, 2012
I don't understand the question. An SREC is 1K, KWh's. I let an accumulator handle mine. They take a cut. I sold over 20 this past year at the going rate, minus the cut. Some may forward contract all of theirs for reduced risk and, hopefully, price.
Comment
6 of 6
January 13, 2012
Since I favor small distributed roof-top solar it is working great for me.

The answer is of course I have not done any 500kW SREC deals (excepting of course that an SREC itself is valued at 1mWh of power or 1,000 kWh of power, so in that case 10 2x500kWh per year). However, you are likely talking about a 500kWh system, which would be likely over 50 times what mine produces.

I will say I prefer large solar arrays to increasing coal power plants, but I would prefer even more to fill up every possible reasonable already existing remotely south-facing roof with solar first. That is where it benefits humanity the most, by using already existing land space. I do note some industrial building have enough room for 500kWh arrays, but not all that many, so I may be wrongly presuming your 500kWh arrays are planted in the ground.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Steven Eisenberg

View Steven Eisenberg's Profile
About: No information is available on this user at this time. more »

Advertise With Us

Trojan Battery Company Enphase Energy SunMaxx Solar Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc PLANSEE SE Blue Sky Energy, Inc. Comment:Visions
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters