Recent Activity About Blog Press Releases Calendar Products Feeds Contact
 

Boulder, Colorado: Leading Solar By Example

By Tor 'Solar Fred' Valenza
January 6, 2012   |   4 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

4 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 4
January 8, 2012
Well written, interesting article as most of your's. There was a post in the last few days about racking and infrastructure, and that makes me wonder : What concrete changes or actions will allow the survivors to install reliable, quality PV systems at $4 or $3.50 per W? It seems increased modularity and better electronics are key, working faster or cheaper cannot be the answer. Streamlined permitting and regulations seem key.
Comment
2 of 4
January 9, 2012
Hey, Bruce. Thanks for the shout out.

I think streamlining permitting and regs come under the city/state support that I mentioned above. But all that you've mentioned will get the price down. As the industry becomes more plug and play, that too will bring labor costs down, hopefully not to the detriment of safety, efficiency, and actually kWh produced.
Comment
3 of 4
January 10, 2012
Hey guys:
Couple of comments -
1. In Canada, work is underway on CSA F900 guideline for BAPV installation best practices. When there are credible, national best practices on installing solar on buildings, it can only help in minimizing risk for the home or business owner - reducing the possibility of building damage as a result of the PV system and possible reduction of insurance premiums, for example.
2. I'm really not a fan of $ X / Watt DC rebates, as it bases everything on PV array capacity at STC. This just drives more business to low cost, unproven module manufacturers. We know that a 5kW (STC) array from manufacturer A may not generate the same kWh over the life of the system than manufacturer B (see annual Photon Lab module yield tests). FIT style incentives based on yield (kWh generated / kW installed) are more effective at providing an incentive for high quality PV system design, equipment selection and installation.

Thoughts ?
Comment
4 of 4
January 10, 2012
Vineland, I think any incentive is better than nothing, but of course, SCRECs and FiTs have proven to be great incentives.

What's nice about the upfront rebate, although they may not be completely accurate, they do reduce the upfront stickershock psychology. SRECs go up and down, giving some uncertainty about the investment/ROI. Of course, FiTs are great so long as they're not unexpectedly reduced and made widely available. I think both consumers and large scale installers appreciate "certainty," and upfront rebates provide some level of that.

Regarding Boulder, again I think the community was ripe and ready to go with any incentive.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

UnThink Solar

View UnThink Solar's Profile
About: UnThink Solar is a strategic solar marketing and communications company. Clients include Panasonic, One Block Off the Grid, Free Hot Water and other solar PV an... more »
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters