Profile Network Activity Comments Articles Blog Bookmarks Contact
 

In Australia, Can Renewable Energy Get Over the Tea Party Blues?

By Dan Cass
October 27, 2011   |   11 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

11 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 11
October 28, 2011
The anti-renewable energy brigade will have to be dragged, kicking and screaming into the 21st. Century. They are in denial of the problems that face this world i.e. rapidly expanding population, rapidly expanding industrial base (China/India), depletion of earth's resources and very strong possibility of global warming - just to mention a few. Call me extreme if you like, but I don't there should be anyone in charge of energy policy (and perhaps many other government departments) that does not have at least a Bachelors Degree in Chemistry, Physics, Geology, Biology or Biochemistry. Unless you have a good idea of how nature and science 'works,' then your opinion is just froth, background noise - call it what you will.

To quote philosopher Bertrand Russell: 'The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, but wiser people so full of doubts.'

Nothing changes.
Comment
2 of 11
October 28, 2011
While there are signs that "global warming" is real, I happen to be one of the skeptics of "anthropogenic global warming." That said, I am more pragmatic in my strong support for alternative energy development. Nations who become technological leaders in alternative energy will be better off than those who do not. It is clear that China understands this concept. Incentivizing the development of alternative energy sources will accelerate development and lead to reduced costs sooner, which eventually will make it possible to modernize the areas of the world that currently do not have a regular supply of electrical power. Even though such technology development may not be a solution to a "life or death" problem, it does lead to conservation of coal and oil, which means that they will be available for a longer period.
Comment
3 of 11
October 29, 2011
@geoffrey-gunning-39130: Thanks for the comments and excellent quote.

I appreciate the rage you feel when you see stupidity win so often in public life, on such important issues.


@steve-buchholz-141503: HA ha, if we were in the same City we could have a good argument about global warming!

I agree with you that a pragmatic approach to the opportunity/cost of renewables favours vigorous investment, such as Australia's Clean Energy Future policy.

You have touched on a key issue for me about the decline of conservative thinking in Australia.

Contemporary conservatives fail to take a cautious, pragmatic approach to issues if they can instead find some political 'angle' to grind their opponents with. Its so tedious and irrational!
Comment
4 of 11
October 29, 2011
To Dan J. Cass: Thanks for your response Dan. Politicians and media moguls have always been a dubious bunch of blaggards in the main, but what mystifies me is how they have all become so corrupt, greedy and self-seeking everywhere at the same time. Whether you live in the USA, Britain, continental Europe or apparently, Australia, we find the same phenomena – everybody out for what they can get during their short lives on this earth. All political decisions seem to be based on staying in power or getting elected at the next election - "to hell with the earth and its people, it's all about me." Short-termers all of them. As for Murdoch, he's a prime example of how the dastardly media attempt to shape and control our lives through misinformation. Sadly, most of the population is unaware that they are being manipulated.

I feel that we are, in stockmarket terms, undergoing a "blow-off top" in greed and corruption. When a stock or commodity price goes exponential, there is only one result – collapse. I expect the Western World collapse will take longer than we think and it's going to be painful. Perhaps it will lead to a more benign world where we are in balance with nature, population growth, resources etc. One can only hope.

I'm sure you are familiar with Exxon's ploy to bribe scientists into refuting Global Warming. To those that don't, here's a Guardian report:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2007/feb/02/frontpagenews.climatechange

Beware of any attempt by oil companies to muscle in on solar energy under the guise of "being green" (e.g. B.P.) – it is most likely an attempt to control and stifle it.

(P.S. I lived in Australia for 3 years (40 years ago!) and drove all the way round it and down the middle. Amazing country. If ever a country was ripe for solar energy, Australia is it.)
Comment
5 of 11
October 29, 2011
Part 1-Today, we see the emerging forces of business-as-usual vs. progress in the supply and consumption of energy, each engaged in a titan struggle which resembles more of a David and Goliath face-off that will likely decide the direction and future of energy supply and demand in America, and perhaps the world. Each side recognizes the role that policy and politics play in the availability of investment capital, making this much more than the banter of election cycles.
The Koch brothers represent one of several and formidable organized groups serving as a firewall to progress. Together, they fund millions in global media campaigns, are engaged in effective and a carefully orchestrated strategy of political deceit and the placement of candidates at state and federal offices who are little more than indirect employees of the Koch agenda. The Brothers, however, are not alone. Every industry connected with the fossil fuel supply chain have turned up the political heat by funding candidates, PACS, and well-funded media campaigns via organizations like the American Petroleum Institute. It's difficult not see a nightly TV commercial of well-crafted talking points and graphics aimed at convincing the voting public and consumers the only option for creating American job growth and solving our energy problems is by placing oil, coal, and natural gas at the top of energy pyramid.

The other side of the battle between myth and reality is a somewhat fragmented clean tech and emerging renewable energy sector offering less effective, if not absent, messaging. Clean tech, however, has its allies. Increasingly hammered by losses due to global warming-driven weather events, the P&C insurance industry is calling for action to reduce carbon emissions. In the absence of a coherent national policy on transitioning to clean energy, California, Oregon, Washington states have allied their efforts to make a renewable and environmentally friendly energy economy work.
Comment
6 of 11
October 29, 2011
Part 2-A coherent energy future for North America will be (note, we are not there yet) based on a national strategy and regulatory policies which do more than promote, but commits to an Apollo program style effort that others have already advocated, and one which will enable the full and complete transition off of fossil fueled feed stocks as primary energy sources, couple to building a truly smart national grid system. If there ever was a jobs engine, this is it.

Obstacles to a transition of this scale are not technological or even economic, rather they are orchestrated by the legacy clout of dirty energy industries of coal, oil, and yes, natural gas (the so-called clean energy option). The Citizens United (Koch brothers-funded lawsuit)and resulting Supreme Court (5-to-4) decision in favor opened the flood gates of unlimited funding for campaigns and candidates by shadow front organizations. It also doesn't help the cause of transitioning to a clean energy economy with a 24x7 mis-information machine called Fox News.

With these obstacles flying in the face of reality, are the ever present economic and environmental costs of fossil fuel extraction, consumption and emissions - and the blood and national treasure spent on defending foreign energy supplies.

As we entered the 21st century, most of the world was already at the point deficit energy spending on fossil fuels. For every btu of energy expended in the supply-chain, less the btu of energy returned, there is the intrinsic and escalating cost of consumption (emissions) on the planet, and the corresponding economic impacts of global warming on industries, consumers, and society.

Clearly, policy and politics of vested interests supporting an obsolete model based on fossil-fueled economics is NOT sustainable, and remains a serious obstacle towards achieving a global economy based on clean, sustainable, and renewable energy sources. With 7 billion consumers and growing, the time for debate has passed.
Comment
7 of 11
October 30, 2011
To Bill Bugbee: Beautifully put!
Comment
8 of 11
October 30, 2011
@Bill Bugbee: The fossil fools who pull the strings in the USA are a clearly well organised bunch!
Comment
9 of 11
November 1, 2011
Thank you Steve. I have developed renewable energy projects since the 90s. Pragmatic and/or practical are both good
Comment
10 of 11
November 1, 2011
I think what Australia is doing at the moment with the Solar Rebates is helping a lot more than the Carbon tax will, really once the Solar rebates cease, no one will get Solar as it is was too expensive. They tried to do the same with the Insulation rebates - but that was a whole different story - what a flop.
Comment
11 of 11
November 1, 2011
@solar_people: That's not correct. PV is at residential grid parity now, which is a world first. Australia is the first country where PV electricity costs the same as conventional electricity for the residential consumer.

The issue now is not about rebates but about finance and access.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Dan Cass

View Dan Cass's Profile
About: Dan Cass is a strategy advisor and Registered lobbyist for the renewable energy industry in Australia. He is the Director of Hepburn Wind. Dan has experience in... more »

Advertise With Us

American Council On Renewable Energy (ACORE) Dow Solar Leybold Optics American Solar Energy Society SMA America, LLC Texas Renewable Energy Industries Association RussTech Language Services, Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters