The World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for News & Information
Sign In or Register
Renewable Energy World Logo
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
  • Sections
    • Home
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Solar
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Wind
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Geothermal
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Bio
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Hydro
      • News
      • Opinion & Commentary
      • Featured Blogs
      • Research & Reports
      • Video
      • Press Releases
      • All Blogs
      • Events
      • Products
      • Finance
    • Careers
    • Companies
      • Company Directory
      • Press Releases
      • Products
      • Events Calendar
      • White Papers
    • Webcasts
      • Upcoming Webcasts
      • Featured Webcasts
      • Archived Webcasts
      • Events Calendar
    • White Papers
    • Magazines
      • Renewable Energy World
      • Wind Technology
      • Large Scale Solar
      • Hydro Review
      • HRW - Hydro Review Worldwide
      • Renewable Energy World (North America Edition)
      • Photovoltaics World
    • Awards
  • Account
    • Sign In
    • Register
  • Search
Don't Miss The Great Solar Debate: Where Does the Global Solar Industry Stand? ×

Really Cheap, Really Clean Electricity from Boron

Thomas Blakeslee
August 09, 2011  |  11 Comments


This is going to be an exciting winter. Two different revolutionary green energy solutions are about to take giant steps. After 60 years of dangerous nuclear power based on bomb technology, we may finally see nuclear energy that is clean, safe and cheap as dirt. If we could achieve 100% efficiency, E=MC
² tells us that one ounce of matter could be converted to seventy million dollars worth of electricity! 

But today’s nuclear plants use only a fraction of a percent of the energy in the fuel. The rest remains as dangerous radioactive waste. The neutrons produced create dangerous waste and heat, which must then be converted to electricity. About 80% of the cost of existing nuclear plants is for the steam plant that converts about 1/3 of the heat to electricity and disposes of the other 2/3 as waste heat to a nearby body of water.

Finally, several private companies have broken away from the military-industrial domination of government supported energy research to develop inherently-safe, nuclear reactions that produce electricity directly and produce no neutrons. Tri-Alpha raised $50 million from investors like Paul Allen and Goldman Sachs. They are currently in stealth mode, developing a device that will fire two balls of lightning (plasmoids) into each other to fuse Boron and hydrogen. Boron is cheap, safe and plentiful. If all of the world’s power was generated from boron, it would only use 10% of our current production. Boron fusion produces only safe, non-radioactive helium as a product.

The big problem with Boron is that it requires a temperature of about a billion degrees to fuse. Most fusion research has tried to use hydrogen isotopes that fuse at a much cooler 100 million degrees. Though a billion degrees sounds like an impossible goal, there are natural processes that routinely achieve high temperatures for nanoseconds in tiny micron-sized areas. A very simple device called a dense plasma focus (DPF) can launch a ball of electrical plasma which then shrinks to an infinitesimal point. As the ball shrinks, its energy becomes concentrated in a smaller and smaller volume making the temperature rise incredibly. Power density increases of ten thousand trillion are possible.

The loud pop when you crack a bullwhip uses the same principle: as the pressure wave travels down the whip to smaller and smaller diameters it travels faster and faster, ultimately it exceeds the speed of sound and makes a loud sonic boom. Cavitation bubbles in a liquid similarly concentrate energy as they collapse, often melting pits into the metal on impeller blades. They can even cause fusion flashes of light.

After 55 years of hard work, the US fusion program is still not scheduled to produce any useful power until 2030. Perhaps it’s because they have been fighting nature by trying to stabilize large hot plasmas. Nature doesn’t cooperate. A smarter way is to let the plasma go and harness its natural, unstable collapse.

The plasma created by a simple DPF device creates its own swirling magnetic field as it collapses. This field produces a focused stream of electrons out one side and a positive ions out the other. These beams are perfect for generating electrical power directly with a simple transformer coil and photoelectric cell. The billion degree temperature lasts for only nanoseconds and is confined to a micron-sized spot far from the walls of the device. Things are easier when we don’t try to fight nature but instead learn to follow it. “Go with the flow” is a good motto.
  
Plasmoids are everywhere in the universe and have been accurately modeled by computers and found to scale perfectly from tiny ball lightning (which you can easily demonstrate in your home microwave) to entire galaxies and quasars. Quasars are the most energetic objects in the universe. Focused jets of energy, similar to those produced by DPFs, are seen on astronomical photographs. By copying nature instead of fighting it, we can get the energy we need, easily.

This winter a small, privately financed, company in New Jersey called Lawrenceville Plasma Physics (LPP) will attempt Boron fusion for the very first time. They have been testing and tweaking their DPF device using deuterium as a fusion fuel. Already their SUV-sized machine has produced 3.7 million neutrons per Joule of input energy. Correcting for fuel, this is 60 times better than the $3 billion National Ignition Facility which uses 192 lasers mounted on a stadium-sized dome.

LPP has spent only $3 million so far. They first achieved billion degree temperatures in 2001 under a NASA/JPL contract. Unfortunately, that was the year that NASA was ordered to get out of the fusion business- An apparent turf battle that set back the development at least a decade. Fortunately, small private investors have kept LPP alive. Finally, their test machine is reaching temperatures needed for the boron reaction. This fall they plan to alter their test setup to use boron (pB11) fusion. If it works, it could be the first hot fusion reaction ever to achieve break-even, a very exciting breakthrough and a victory for the little guys who almost got trampled by the “big science” nuclear establishment.

The LPP test machine's DPF is scaled to have a capacity of 5 megawatts of electrical power. This is an excellent size for transportation: Ships, airplanes and trains could carry their own power plant with almost unlimited range and insignificant fuel costs. Distributed power generation at the substation level could eliminate the need for the massive power grid expansion needed for today’s Gigawatt approach. Of course, much work will be required to refine this design into a real mass-produced product. But once a production line is running, the economic advantage of boron fusion could quickly replace coal and fossil fuel power.

Eric Lerner, the founder of LPP wrote a book in 1992 about plasma cosmology. In 1970 Hannes Alfven won the Nobel prize for these ideas, but big science has virtually ignored them. Plasmoids seem to be a key phenomenon in nature and some have even suggested that virtually all matter consists of them. They do scale all the way from the universal to the atomic level.

There is evidence that the excess heat produced in cold fusion experiments comes from microscopic plasmoids that form inside the metal matrix. E. H. Lewis photographed the melted tracks they made in the metal residue of successful cold fusion experiments. Since this was not understood till recently, it may account for the early difficulties in the replication of cold fusion experiments. The plasmoids seem to form in clusters in the metal lattice that may be created by bose-einstein condensation.

For sixty years scientists have been trying to tame fusion as a power source. Tens of billions of dollars have been spent on the task without generating a single watt of net power. But next year I predict the logjam will break because creative people working outside of the groupthink of big science will show the way

In October, Andre Rossi has promised to deliver its first commercial megawatt thermal plant to Ampenergo, a spinoff of Leonardo Technologies Inc, that will market the E-Cat. Daily updates on the Rossi blog claim that everything is built and on track for delivery as scheduled. Using nano-powdered nickel and hydrogen fuel, his approach to generating heat is amazingly simple. Let’s hope that he ships and let’s hope that LPPs boron fusion test works. We badly need them both!

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

11 Comments

Register To Comment
Brian Hall
Brian Hall
September 5, 2011
Slight correction: the 5MW level of the 'FoFu' design requires about a 330Hz cycling. The constraint is cooling of the electrodes. Given effective enough cooling, it could run at perhaps 2000Hz, and generate 25MW.

And the rig generates focused alpha beams (positively charged helium nuclei) which are tapped for power, not electron beams (though there is a counter-beam of electrons, it remains within the device, and reheats the plasma after each shot.) The alpha beam enters a neutralization chamber where it draws electrons from the grid, completing the circuit, and resulting in normal neutral helium atoms. Which will not be in large volume, but will actually have a certain commercial value themselves, as well. [Side note: helium prices are artificially depressed by legislated sale of the US stockpiles at very low, outdated pricing. That will eventually come to an end when the stocks are exhausted. More government brilliance at work 4U!]
It is anticipated that 2-5 yrs of engineering refinement would be required to get to the mass production stage once the experimental rig functions as desired. Reaching 'scientific break-even' should open the investment flows up, fortunately. About $7-20 million will be needed during that phase. Still barely coffee break money for the big projects!

As far as the 'too cheap to meter' dig goes, it won't be that. But down around the ¼-½¢/kwh range to generate. Billing it out at 1¢/kwh, an installation would pay for itself in less than a year, after covering all fuel, maintenance, and personnel costs.
camilo urbina
camilo urbina
August 18, 2011
Thanks for your answer Thomas. My point was only to state that Aneutronic fusion starting mechanisms have been available but somehow have been kept off the radar and under funded. If these projects would have obtained the kind of funding that projects like ITER has had, we would already have solved all our energy problems with safe fusion technologies. I really appreciate your effort of difussion of this new energy alternative arising. BTW, the geographical area where I live is very rich in Boron minerals, so these news are more than well received. Regards!
Thomas Blakeslee
Thomas Blakeslee
August 17, 2011
Thanks! Interesting. They apparantly actually achieved 3.7 billion degrees K (6.6 billion F) according to this article:
http://www.mhdprospects.com/pdf/comments_on_haines_paper.pdf
Unfortunatly, the Sandia setup is the size of two Olympic swimming pools and they are blowing up wires so it's a one-shot reaction. The nice thing about LPP's machine is that it is very compact and designed to ultimatly cycle 1000 times per second for continuous output. It also produces focused electron beams so efficient conversion to electrical output is easy. It's an elegant and simple solution that will cost an estimated $300k to build.
camilo urbina
camilo urbina
August 17, 2011
Phys. Rev. Lett. 96, 075003 (2006) [4 pages]
Ion Viscous Heating in a Magnetohydrodynamically Unstable Z Pinch at Over 2×109 Kelvin
M. G. Haines1,*, P. D. LePell2, C. A. Coverdale3, B. Jones3, C. Deeney3, and J. P. Apruzese4
1Physics Department, Imperial College, London SW7 2BW, United Kingdom
2Ktech Corporation, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
3Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico, USA
4Plasma Physics Division, Naval Research Laboratory, Washington, District of Columbia, USA

[Featured in Physics News Update] Received 13 May 2005; revised 17 October 2005; published 23 February 2006

Pulsed power driven metallic wire-array Z pinches are the most powerful and efficient laboratory x-ray sources. Furthermore, under certain conditions the soft x-ray energy radiated in a 5 ns pulse at stagnation can exceed the estimated kinetic energy of the radial implosion phase by a factor of 3 to 4. A theoretical model is developed here to explain this, allowing the rapid conversion of magnetic energy to a very high ion temperature plasma through the generation of fine scale, fast-growing m=0 interchange MHD instabilities at stagnation. These saturate nonlinearly and provide associated ion viscous heating. Next the ion energy is transferred by equipartition to the electrons and thus to soft x-ray radiation. Recent time-resolved iron spectra at Sandia confirm an ion temperature Ti of over 200 keV (2×109 degrees), as predicted by theory. These are believed to be record temperatures for a magnetically confined plasma.
camilo urbina
camilo urbina
August 17, 2011
Well, Boron is a very abundant mineral, much more than lithium. Has anyone here read about the Sandia Labs Z Machine? Teams working with that machine have published results of achieving over 2 Billion degrees Kelvin. French Astrophycisist Dr. Jean Pierre Petit has been trying to call attention about this for some years now (I think the paper from author Hanes was published in 2006) as this is device opens the feasibility for self sustaining Lithium and /or Boron aneutronic fusion. However, as Sandia Labs is a defense research facility, one can see easily why the informations has not been widely commented and research on that has been stonewalled.

My Best Regards.
Robert Tilden
Robert Tilden
August 13, 2011
We have solar now and the government is making it FREE - to any tax payer.

Utilizing the tax credit and deductions with new lower cost techs, any tax payer can eliminate all his tax liability, keeping about 35% in his pocket (an immediate gain) and 65% going directly into clean power ownership. Info here: powertaxcredit.com
Fred Linn
Fred Linn
August 12, 2011
Thanks Tom, very informative article. I was not aware of any of this. I'm glad you posted it.
Frank Lee
Frank Lee
August 10, 2011
Right On! Keep up the good work. You can't put God's universe in a box. Ther's no such thing as the "n" word in His unlimited realm.
Thomas Blakeslee
Thomas Blakeslee
August 10, 2011
Wow! Try reading the article!
Yes "nuclear", as in bombs and existing power plants, is a bad word. I have been crusading against it for years in my articles in Renewable Energy World. But these new breakthroughs produce no neutrons and are completely clean and sustainable. They will have much less negative environmental impact than utility-scale wind or solar if they work as planned. Open up your mind and don't let "the n word" cloud your thinking. Welcome progress and judge it, not by old prejudices but by looking at the facts. In the meantime let's keep working hard with the best technology we have now. So far we are losing the battle so we need all the help we can get.
Michael Kujawa
Michael Kujawa
August 10, 2011
Wow, nuclear energy too cheap to meter...

Sounds familiar. Lookitup.

Fusion may be better fit as a spaceship propulsion system than a terrestrial waste generator. All those neutrons banging into matter just don't make sense on earth.

As anonymous noted above: solar is here now. As are wind, geothermal, low head hydro, biogas, biomass, and waves and currents.
ANONYMOUS
August 10, 2011
Meanwhile, we have all the safe solar energy we could possibly use radiating on the planet every day to power the world for a very long time. It's here now. Keep researching viable options but solar is here now. Did I mention that the technology is here now?

Add Your Comments

To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.

  • Create a Free Account!
  • Sign-In
Thomas Blakeslee

Thomas Blakeslee

Thomas R Blakeslee’s books have been published in nine different languages. After serving for three years in the U.S. Navy, he earned a degree from CalTech in Pasadena, California in 1962. After working for IT&T in Antwerp, Belgium, he...
  • About
  • Articles
  • Blog
  • Contact
  • FOLLOW
  • CONTACT
Stay Connected
         
To register for our free e-Newsletters, create your free account here:

Create a free account and start adding your blogs.

Create an Account

Total Access Partners

Growing Your Business? Learn More about Total Access
  • Sunetric
  • HydroWorld.com
  • Affordable Solar Group, LLC
  • marcus evans
  • Associated Renewable
  • Renewable Energy World Asia
  • Westinghouse Solar
  • SolPowerPeople, Inc.
News
  • Renewable Energy
  • Solar Energy
  • Wind Energy
  • Bioenergy
  • Geothermal Energy
  • Hyrdo Power
  • Blogs
  • Video
  • Finance
Resources
  • Companies
  • Products
  • Careers
  • Events
  • Webcasts
  • White Papers
  • Magazines
  • Press Releases
  • e-Newsletters
Company
  • About Us
  • Our Team
  • Contact Us
  • Advertising & Services
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
  • Site Map
Network Partners - Magazines
  • Hydro Review Magazine
  • Hydro Review Worldwide Magazine
  • Renewable Energy World Magazine
Network Partners - Events
  • Power-Gen International
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
  • Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India
  • HydroVision International
  • HydroVision Brazil
  • HydroVision India
  • HydroVision Russia
© Copyright 1999-2013 RenewableEnergyWorld.com - All rights reserved.
RenewableEnergyWorld.com - World's #1 Renewable Energy Network for news & Information