Profile Network Activity Comments Articles Blog Bookmarks Contact
 

Mapping Solar PV CLEAN Contracts in the U.S.

By John Farrell
August 25, 2011   |   2 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

2 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 2
August 27, 2011
The important thing is driving down prices. And there is no easy way to do that.

Subsidies are necessary to build the economies of scale needed to compete with fossil fuels. Otherwise, the renewables industry is stuck with engineers manually assembling expensive toys.

Overly generous subsidies stifle competition. There must be enough sticker shock to encourage customers to shop around for lower prices, but not so much that they are put off altogether. The Home Depot model, where homeowners are encouraged to shop before hiring a contractor, is instructive.

One big advantage of FITs is that they encourage participation by low-income homeowners, which includes retirees and rural households, most members of which do not self-identify as poor. These are people who could finance a $5000 solar system on savings or equity, but who don't currently make enough to pay income taxes. And these are people who want to see their electric bills on the other side of zero (i.e. they want to make a small income from their panels).

Another big advantage of FITs is that they reward production, and thus discourage sloppy design and workmanship. The production tax credit that the wind industry enjoys has been very successful at encouraging well-designed wind farms (which are arranged based on extensive studies of local wind patterns).
Comment
2 of 2
August 28, 2011
The map prices greatly overstate the value of the 30% investment tax credit, by taking 1/3 off of all non-o&m cost. The tax credit is not a cash grant for small systems, and therefore will not pay off loans or reduce equity value. Thus it is only worth a few cents per kWh. That is on top of the other issues that Farrell has so valiently noted about the illusions of the ITC tax credit--that it is often sold for a fraction of its value, that it inflates the cost of solar, and that many people cannot take advantage of tax subsidies.

But, even more importantly, the $3.50/watt cost for small rooftop solar PV is pure fiction in the US, where average costs are more like $8 per watt. $3.50 is a blue-sky number that will cut out small scale solar from participation.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

John Farrell

View John Farrell's Profile
About: John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at ILSR and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits o... more »

Advertise With Us

Das Haus: Innovation in Renewables and Energy Efficiency Kipp & Zonen Southwest Windpower Grundfos Direct Sensors REC Solar Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. Biomass Thermal Energy Council (BTEC)
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters