Profile Network Activity Comments Articles Blog Bookmarks Contact
 

Small Government Spells Big Trouble for Renewables

By Dana Blankenhorn
June 28, 2011   |   8 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

8 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 8
June 28, 2011
Obviously, we got them scared and it looks like they will stop at nothing to try and discourage and defeat free energy. Hopefully this time around the public has learned its lesson when it comes to solar energy and its uses and will continue to promote and install systems that will ween the world off the oil greedy barrons and the dirty politicians.
Comment
2 of 8
June 29, 2011
Don't know what the other commenter means by "free energy," but these industrial scale solar plants certainly won't be providing anything for free. In fact, rates will certainly increase since this is "mandated" green energy.
I'd feel sorry for folks like Solar Millenium if they weren't destroying Native American cultural sites with impunity. That's why one group is in court trying to obtain a TRO to halt them. The fast-tracked projects were allowed to run roughshod over public review and tribal consultation processes, and the BLM has stonewalled any attempts to get public information, so no wonder there are lawsuits.
But really, on this issue, why shouldn't Riverside County try to get some money out of this? They're strapped for cash, and they were offered a piece of the pie to look the other way on the proposed Eagle Mountain dump, so who would expect them to not try this on?
Comment
3 of 8
June 29, 2011
This sounds too anecdotal and vague to rate the judgment that RE development is being 'trampled by greedy local governments'. But certainly worthy of a careful look, no? Where do the fees go? What costs would consumers face if local governments were not involved in the expensive process of inspection and permitting?
Comment
4 of 8
June 29, 2011
When will folks wake up and smell the corruption.
Republican
Democrat
Two sides of the same coin
A coin minted specifically to subjugate and control
At least subjugate and control those sheep willingly dropping off the cliff by still believing we have a democracy.
As an old Soviet citizen once stated.
"The only difference between your country and ours is
you Americans think you're free and we know we are not"
Comment
5 of 8
June 29, 2011
The above message was brought to you by Zubrovsky Vodka.
Zubrovsky - When Going Blind Just Isn't Enough.

(Zubrovsky Vodka is trademarked and operated by the Rand Corporation. Drink Responsibly.)
Comment
6 of 8
June 29, 2011
Project much?
Thanks for not making a substantive contribution to constructive dialog.
Better to sleep in bliss and just dismiss just feels better?
Comment
7 of 8
June 30, 2011
Hi, my name is Kurt Newick and I am the one leading the PV Permit Fee Campaign at the Sierra Club, Loma Prieta Chapter and other chapters in California that is tackling hundreds of cities and counties with high solar permit fees in California. We are surveying each city (county by county) writing reports, news releases and contacting the cities with high fees and requesting that these unreasonable PV permit fees be reviewed and lowered to fair levels. I've been doing this as a volunteer for 6 years now. Here is our main web site: www.solarpermitfees.org, that has details for many counties in California (on residential and commercial PV permit fees and recommendations on computing PV permit fees for cost recovery in the reports we've written).

California's municipalities are responsive to make changes to solar permit fee schedules. We are getting lots of ink in some of the local newspapers that helps to keep this in the public eye. It is shocking every time we do another county I am blown away by the huge variance between permit fees for PV projects! 'Basing fees on the value of the solar equipment inflates permit costs to unreasonably high levels, especially for larger, more expensive solar power projects,' our reports say. 'To recover costs, therefore, permit fees should be based on specific review times and billable hourly rates and not on PV project valuations.'

A recent study has been done for all 89 jurisdictions in Los Angeles County. Web site for Los Angeles County PV permit fee report (published April 2011, updated 6/18/2011): http://www.solarpermitfees.org/losangeles.html

In April 2011 the city of Napa, CA. adopted our Sierra Club recommendations on solar permit fee calculation methodologies for residential and commercial projects: View city of Napa resolution/staff report: www.solarpermitfees.org/NapaPVFeeResolutionApril2011.pdf

PV Permit Fee Campaign Methods: http://lomaprieta.sierraclub.org/global_warming/PV_Permit_Campaign_Methodology.htm
Comment
8 of 8
July 1, 2011
Kurt, thanks for your comment above. I think it makes a lot of sense to bill for work rather than as a percentage of solar equipment, except that this might be prohibitive for the smallest installations, which otherwise are effectively subsidized by the larger ones. However, I don't think your claim that the current billing method inflates fees is well founded because each and every piece of equipment must be inspected, and the skill and time involved in inspecting each piece is not presumptively disproportionate to the cost of such inspection. These inspections are vital, and we can not assume that hourly billing will magically lower inflated prices.

P.s. I'd rather see hourly billing to encourage inspectors to be thorough. Not to say there is any scamming, but rather at the other end of this issue are fees that are set too low to allow adequate time.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Dana Blankenhorn

View Dana Blankenhorn's Profile
About: Dana Blankenhorn has covered business and technology since 1978. He covered the Houston oil boom of the 1970s, began making his living online in 1985, and launc... more »

Advertise With Us

Grundfos Direct Sensors FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division SolarTech Solar Leadership Summit 2012 Fairtrade-Messe National Solar Trainers Unirac, Inc. Magnum Energy Inc.
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters