Himin's main products are those humble solar-thermal tubes that covered the rooftops in Rizhao. And as it turns out, they cover a lot of other real estate. Huang Ming, who founded the company, estimates that it's erected more than 160 million square feet of solar water heaters. "That means 60 million families, maybe 250 million people altogether—almost the population of the United States,"
Regarding the skyline in Rizhao:
We clambered over the hotel's solar-thermal system, an array of vacuum tubes that takes the sun's energy and turns it into all the hot water the kitchen and 102 rooms can possibly use. Then, from the edge of the roof, we took in a view of the spreading skyline. On top of every single building for blocks around a similar solar array sprouted.
There are two key elements at work here:
The widespread adoption of a technology
The sufficient urban density to make that adoption efficient and attractive.
In Rizhao, SHW panels are found on all kinds of densely packed urban rooftops from apartment buildings to commercial offices. Perhaps North America’s traditional preference for distanced living/work space – space that must be transversed by gas guzzling automobiles – is one of the contributing factors holding back the wide-spread adoption of solar thermal.
Christopher Leinberger of the Brookings Institution recently made this point at a luncheon I attended in Hamilton, ON. His presentation described generational attitudes towards the American dream and high-density urban vs. suburban lifestyles. Mr. Leinberger believes that as newer generations become more attracted to high-density urban settings, their attitude towards everything – from environmentalism at large to renewable energy in particular – will change drastically (and hopefully, for the better).
Of course, arguments questioning the sustainability of suburbia are nothing new. Consider this music-video clip from Robert Zemeckis’ Back to the Future (1985), which shows a dated 1950s-style urban center. There are lots of independent businesses, a library, kids playing – overall, a depiction of a high-energy, high-density urban center at times 1:19 and 1:57:
And then there is Marty McFly's urban nightmare: people have left the city center for suburban developments and the resulting space vacuum is only occupied by criminals and vagrants which you can watch here.
Both visions of urban space in Back to the Future are certainly exaggerated, but they do effectively express a popular interpretation of what is deemed suitable living space for many North Americans. The current "Gen-Xers" have become friendlier to high-density urban environments - nearly every 1990's sitcom seemed to reflect the “big city.” Seinfeld is one notable series, that in its own unique way, adulated big city living - as exemplified by this scene.
It seems both intuitively and analytically accurate to say that newer generations (and new home and apartment buyers) are significantly more open to working and living in urban landscapes. The high-line in NYC, the city centre revitalizations of Pittsburgh and Nashville, along with many other examples of positive urban planning/renewal across North America, point toward a civic re-engagement with high-density spaces.
I think that this return of attention towards the city will ultimately be one of the most critical factors in pushing for widespread adoption of renewable energy and solar thermal in the US and Canada. Consider these factors:
Rooftop solar for high-density apartment and commercial buildings is more efficient to install and maintain than retrofitting one-residency at a time or serving new houses.
The visibility factor is significantly improved in high-density urban areas, especially for installations serving a large number of residents.
Adding renewable energy to a commercial or large residential building adds value without as much direct personal risk for the customer.
Cities drive the economy and social conversations. While rural deployment of renewable energy is currently attractive due to gas and oil pains, a city is a powerful engine to drive widespread renewable energy adoption efficiently.
Mr. Leinberger predicted a boom in urban renewable energy during his address which you can listen to here.
If you need yet more examples of the connection between urban spaces and SHW, then read SolarFred’s recent accounts of touring renewable energy in China and watch this last video:
A big thank you goes out to “plug and play” solar hot water systems provider Alpha Thermal Systems, the sponsor of this series of blog posts and resources toward helping solar hot water grow in North America.
The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or
the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy,
spelling or grammar.
I full agree with Clee. There is absolutely no connection between dense settlement and solar thermal use. And if there is it's the other way round, because single houses decide faster than investor owned building blocks or co-owned buildings. Also the costs of the installation may be a bit cheaper but it will need more buffer storage and longer pipee.
What is true is that a commanded economy with enough money and determination is much faster in pulling it through - whatever "it" may be.
I suspect that the whole argument is only there to convice people that they should not do it and provide a few more excuses.
Solar thermal for hot water should be mandatory by the building code, just like in Spain or a standard part of a nice house like flowers in the garden like in Austria and Germany. (or have you ever calculated the return on investment of your flower beds?)
In cities with district heating, solar thermal can make a useful contribution to meeting the city heat load in a highly cost effective manner, particularly when large arrays of solar water heaters are deployed. From some figures I have read, the cost of such large systems can be up to 6 times lower than individual family homes due to
1. Bulk purchase of hardware
2. Savings on the time taken to install and plumb each each collector
3. Savings on the planning and preparation of each collector
4. Substantial savings on scaffold cost per collector
5. Savings on selling, delivery and administration per collector installed.
6. Avoidance of the need for dedicated hot water storage, or if such storage is provided, far lower cost per volume of that storage.
7. Avoidance of "wasted heat" - heat goes into the district system and is more likely to be used by someone - with an individual house, there will be many occasions when not all the hot water is needed such as when the owners go on vacation.
5000 yuan = about us$700. But what's more important is that she says it's cheaper than electricity.
My neighbor across the street put thermal solar two years ago, here in central FL. I spoke with him last week; I asked him how was the system working out for him. He told me it was fine; but that it was not a good investment. He is saving $7-$8 per month in his electric bill. He estimates a 30 year payback period (he is in his mid 70s - two adults in the house).
Again, I think renewables' biggest enemy in most of the US is cheap utilities. Here in central FL we pay 9.9c per kwh. Extremely difficult for solar (PV and thermal) to compete against that retail price.
To give you a hint about cost per kWh (thermal) from a solar collector: recently we calculated that it should be between 2,5 - 3,5 Cents (but Euro-Cents!) over the lifetime. Of course there will be difficult circumstances or expensive suppliers, but correctly calculated I am sure it will be cheaper than natural gas.
But all this talk about cost is ridiculous as long as people spend 30.000 USD or more for their car every second year or for a pool or other gadgets that are just money spent.
For me the finest thing is: you set it up, pay for it and the water is warmed for free for 70% (in the Alps!) for the next 30 years or so. Never got an invoice from the sun so far.
Gunther - the problem is that when you get a house, it already has a working hot water supply system. When a hot water tank dies in the United States, your options are: us$400 for a replacement tank installed, about us$1500-$2000 for a tankless system that will bring very little savings and might not be able to supply enough pressure for 2 showers, or us$3000 for a thermal solar system.
Your car and gadget examples are valid; I see people paying over us$70/month for their mobile service on their "smart" phones, and I think their phones are indeed smarter than the users. But these are toys, people will pay for toys and entertainment or fashion statements. But hot water is not sexy.
The solution is regulation (ala Israel). All new construction must have thermal solar, and all new water tank heaters sold must be installed WITH a solar thermal.
If they can force me to buy car insurance; why not solar.
I lived in China (Nanjing area) for a year in 2000. All the apartment buildings were oriented North-South. You can see that from the solar arrays on the rooftops.
Everyone gets a shot at the sun, even on his balcony!
Thanks everyone - great comments and responses here.
@ Gary - that's interesting. Do you happen to have a source on that quote?
@ Juan - I certainly agree. However, RE projects have had so much trouble getting municipal/zoning/bylaw traction that I feel we almost have to try that, but operate with the assumption it won't happen.
@ Richard
That's good to hear. Did you pick up on how the social/sales conversations were taking place in Nanjing? e.g, mass deployments, civic involvement, anything like that?
No. My Chinese is very poor--I observed the siting when walking around or through train windows (it's really dramatic, because the buildings can be seen to be lined up.)
I give them an "A" in solar orientation, but a fail in insulation, except for clothing. Most of the buildings I saw were uninsulated concrete constructiion.
I havn't been able to find the graph I remember seeing showing cost v scale for solar thermal, however I have found some installed costs for large scale solar water heating from Denmark and Germany, and costings for a proposed large scale solar thermal system in Bishkek Kyrgystan.
I live in Mexico and installed a water heater in my home. There are major differences in the way things are done.
Here in Mexico, I bought my solar hot water gizmo at my neighborhood hardware installed, and had it installed for $600 pesos, about $50 dollar by a plumber in about four hours. I deliberately chose a non-certified plumber in order to save money. He did a good job, but if he has screwed up, it would have leaked in MY house, so it was nobody else´s business. I did not require a permit from the city. I did not ask my neighbors if they agreed or they thought it was ugly. They do not OWN the view of my house. I receive no tax breaks neither federal, state nor city. I did not file a single form, and I did not hire a single 'expert'.
This way of doing things lowered my costs to make the heater profitable without tax breaks. The entire system cost me about $15,000 pesos ($1200 dollars) and is giving me a nice 25% return on investment while helping the planet.
Of all the government related things that work better in the US than in Mexico, this is not one of them. The system of increasing costs through regulations and then having your fellow taxpayers pay for half of the total cost is flawed. Americans aw expensive renewables are and the cost to tax payers. They don't realize that much of the cost is artificial.
For the good of the environment, and your own tax dollars, please get the government back into the founding fathers principle of live and let live. This is especially urgent in technologies that benefit not only the user but benefits the entire planet.
Comment
11 of 13
Anonymous
June 18, 2011
@fsc - with all due respect, $1200 dollars for a "who knows if it will work" system installed by a "who knows if it will leak" plumber, in MEXICO! is a ripoff.
The government has nothing to do with anything. You do not have to ask your neighbors for approval (only if you live in a HOA subdivision). There are people in the US that install the systems without permit, they do it themselves, and costs them under $1000.
Your return of investment depends on how much you pay for the utility that heats up your water (electricity or gas).
Live and let live? Sure, you can go back to those days, just hope you are not black, or poor.
In fact, we need more regulation. Certain areas in this country need to require thermal solar water heating, double pane windows, etc.
fsc ... Thank you for your investment and helping to do your bit to resolve the GHG dilemma. Hiring non professionals to install your system may be fine in Mexico but our higher standards are for the protection of the initial purchaser and any potential future home owners. It is for the good of all. The weak live and let live argument is ridiculous in a country fraught with drug wars (thanks in part to US drug policy) and corruption.
richard karl China's uninsulated concrete sttructures are going to come back to haunt them soon. probably the dumbest thing they are doing.
Juan Pelotas ... please walk across the street and thank your neighbor for investing (no matter how small) in a future for those who will come after them. If the collective ROI in all of Florida is one less mountain top removal, it is a small price to pay.
Why the hell should it be a ripoff if someone installs a working system for 1200 USD in Mexico? Just because it shows that many experts and certificates make no difference - except the price?
On top of that I can confirm that the cost of solar thermal gets higher with higher subsidies. The benefits are typically skimmed off by vendors, producers and installers. But nobody notices because not many people buy solar thermal in two different countries.
Add Your Comment
Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions.
If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!
1 of 13
What is true is that a commanded economy with enough money and determination is much faster in pulling it through - whatever "it" may be.
I suspect that the whole argument is only there to convice people that they should not do it and provide a few more excuses.
Solar thermal for hot water should be mandatory by the building code, just like in Spain or a standard part of a nice house like flowers in the garden like in Austria and Germany. (or have you ever calculated the return on investment of your flower beds?)