Profile Network Activity Comments Articles Blog Bookmarks Contact
 

Energy Efficiency, the Nerdy Brother of Renewables

By Elisa Wood
April 18, 2011   |   7 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

7 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 7
April 18, 2011
Hi:

To me, talking about EE as fringe is very funny. It is load that determines energy need. No load, No need.
Its like saying the interest rate you pay on a loan has nothing to do with your monthly payment....LOL...

But hey, that's just me.....

.....Bill
Comment
2 of 7
April 20, 2011
In the bigger picture, lower energy costs (for businesses) translates into higher margins. Of course that requires hard headed decisions better suited to individual business owners than to corporate beaurocracies.

Still, where does America go from here? and how do we get there? The remaining resource to be explointed is our own energy inefficiency, the flip side of which is our OPEC bill.
Comment
3 of 7
April 20, 2011
I hear the music and the bias. Energy efficiency has been around since man lived in caves on a sunny cliff! What is funny is how one pro green space touts solar growth in Italy as they announce they will follow Germany, Spain and other in Europe by cutting
feed in tariffs. People are beginning to realize subsides are another way to say tax by Government. Th US green left is facing the headwind and not with turbines. It makes sense to grab the low hanging fruit first. Nuclear, coal and gas first.
Comment
4 of 7
April 20, 2011
Hi #5:
Ah yes, the low fruit, you mean Tetrodotoxin, Arsenic and Cyanide.

The idea of Left and Right when overlayed on destroying the very place we live is funny isn't it.
Here we have someone calling people who want to live in a sustainable way with the planet being called far left, abnormal or wacky if you wish...LOL...

I think a more logical way to view living in your "home", is that the way you live should be defined by the least damaging and the most sustainable paradigm to promote harmony and longevity.
That occupies origin (0,0). Anything else that deviates from that position is what is abnormal and wacky, be it right, left, up or down.....

Wake up 5.....

.....Bill
Comment
5 of 7
April 21, 2011
Maybe we should start listening to the nerd. We also have to teach that energy efficiency starts with the user. Brainwashing them to turn off the lights when you leave a room should work the same way as "they" use brainwashing to get them accept other forms of ideas and ideals.
Comment
6 of 7
April 22, 2011
I get quite depressed at the constant linking of payback with energy efficiency measures other than as a guide to best direction of resources. Energy efficiency can often be related to improvement in quality of life (how do you monetise that?)and cost reduction of new renewable plant required due to demand reduction. As an example, we spent quite a bit (5% of house value funding local jobs)internally and externally insulating our 1870 house. We now have a very thermally comfortable house, unlike our neighbours, and have reduced the heat input required to the point that we can heat the house using a 5kw wood stove or from a couple of hours of gas central heating, hence some degree of energy security. Quality of life is up! I meet plenty of people that will spend as much on a gas guzzler without giving payback a passing glance.

I agree that a sticking point for many people will be the financing, and there is no doubt that this is a challenge. The conundrum to me is how to encourage people to be able finance energy efficiency and appreciate it for quality of life improvement, whilst not making a financial benefit (as per feed-in tariff) that can simply be spent on more consumer goods and hence more emissions.
Comment
7 of 7
April 22, 2011
HJ,

Your point is well taken, but only a few steer clear of the herd. Commercial success is based on the default option.

But a small number of people will take a hard look and make what is represented as the hard choice, i.e. the smart one.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Elisa Wood

View Elisa Wood's Profile
About: Elisa Wood is a long-time energy writer whose work appears in many of the industry's top magazines and newsletters. A correspondent for McGraw-Hill/Platts Energ... more »

Advertise With Us

Schletter Inc. Asia Solar Expo North American Board of Certified Energy Practitioners SMA America, LLC ONTILITY Solar Training Magnum Energy Inc. 2GreenEnergy.com
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters