Profile Network Activity Comments Articles Blog Bookmarks Contact
 

U.S. Military Sees Great Value in Distributed Renewable Energy

By John Farrell
February 9, 2011   |   8 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

8 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 8
February 10, 2011
This article needs to be clearer. A 60kw genset only uses a 100 gallons a day (60kw x 24hr / 0.33 x 40kwh/g = 108, assuming 33% efficiency). $70,000 buys much more than 1600 watts of solar (with batteries) and much less than enough to power a Marine company. The reports on several different projects are getting mixed together and some math mistakes are being made. The military guys in charge of this program should do a proper (publicly available) white paper on this. If solar panels can avoid some fuel usage, the average avoided cost of fuel would probably in the area of $12 to $15 a gallon (some costs are fixed and can't be factored in). Surely some fuel is purchased from locals.
Comment
2 of 8
February 11, 2011
The US Military should be using Certified Re mediation technology that uses renewable resource fuel called Waste as it's surrogate fuel to produce clean energy.
Not Fossil Fuels
Project deployment of this technology to areas of the world that require vast amounts of clean energy receive additional benefits of clean water and air while enjoying economic growth.
for more info: email orvenc@gmail.com
What's in your water
Comment
3 of 8
February 11, 2011
Interesting policy. Will the "GREENS" be left there when the areas are vacated by the US?
The Armed Forces and hence; Government, can see the value of this in a foreign country we are seeking to (what again?), but not in our own. The level of hiprocracy in this is collosal, and reveals the corruption at most top levels of government. It shows that the spending and research for war is the govt's most important focus. The only possible upside, and probably your point in the article, is that the RE industries may become part of the Military-Industrial-Congressional-Complex.
Comment
4 of 8
February 11, 2011
Careful now. Looks to me like the "Military-Industrial-Congressional-Complex" may be the guys to finally figure out how do make renewable energy feasible.

Question: Would there be more or less corruption in the "Military-Industrial-Congressional-Complex" than in Washington DC? I'm willing to bet on less.

So while we get politically connected boondoggles at home (such as corn ethanol), the military quietly figures this out.

The good news: someday they'll offer it to us. Hopefully by then we will not have spent ALL our money on the connected boondoggles...
Comment
5 of 8
February 12, 2011
------" Marines powered their combat operations center without using the diesel generator for eight days."------

No matter how high tech and expensive your weaponry is, it is worthless without command and control.

No matter how many tanks, planes, fighting vehicles etc. etc. or how sophisticated they are---they are worthless if you don't have any fuel to run them.
Comment
6 of 8
February 12, 2011
tman----" If solar panels can avoid some fuel usage, the average avoided cost of fuel would probably in the area of $12 to $15 a gallon (some costs are fixed and can't be factored in). Surely some fuel is purchased from locals."-----

You may be a good accountant, but you are a lousy military planner. Buying fuel from the locals. What a perfect recipe for sabotage.
Comment
7 of 8
February 12, 2011
According to RAND -not
Comment
8 of 8
March 2, 2011
We've done a lot of analysis of these options using the HOMER software (www.homerenergy.com). This is indeed one of the most cost-effective applications we have ever seen. TMan is absolutely right that at any price above about $10/gallon, hybrid renewable options are cost-effective, even after paying for batteries and controls and the extra cost of military logistics.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

John Farrell

View John Farrell's Profile
About: John Farrell directs the Energy Self-Reliant States and Communities program at ILSR and he focuses on energy policy developments that best expand the benefits o... more »

Advertise With Us

Growth Energy Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc SkyFuel Texas Combined Heat & Power Initiative Maritime Geothermal Geothermal Resources Council Kipp & Zonen
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters