Featured Blog Posts All Blog Posts
 

What Dr. Chu Can Do For Solar Today

By Dana Blankenhorn
January 24, 2011   |   8 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

8 Reader Comments
No image available
Comment
1 of 8
Anonymous
January 24, 2011
Energy secretaries don't have "high public profiles" unless something horribly wrong goes on during their watch (such as a major spy scandal at a weapons lab). Renewable energy is only a small portion of the DOE portfolio and Chu has probably given it more attention than any other DOE secretary.

Building standards have always been the province of localities. It would be a stretch to even assume the US Congress has the power to enforce a nation wide set of building codes (the commence clause was not intended to give the Federal government control over every aspect of every citizen's life).

It would also be a stretch to assume that some central committee CAN design optimal building codes appropriate for every locality for a product that is undergoing very rapid change. Solar PV is a trivially small portion of the US energy market and there is no urgency in formulating uniform permitting requirements--trial and error at the local level will eventually lead to a reasonable result long before solar PV is ready to play a major role in the energy generation market.

Hopefully, Chu has his eye on the big picture, which would be funding the types of energy research that will complete the transformation of our energy infrastructure in time to prevent major climate change. Solar and wind power alone are not going to get us there. The notion that the head of DOE should fight a major battle with localities for some marginal (at best) benefit to the short term solar PV market is strange.
Steven
Comment
2 of 8
January 24, 2011
I think Steven is right. While I think it's ultimately a very good thing that industry is trying to work with DOE on permitting issues, it seems strange that the agency would be tasked with this. I have a hard time believing that the DOE could really come up with a solution that would work for every locality around the country.

I also think that because the DOE deals with so many other things than renewable energy, this particular issue shouldn't determine whether Steven Chu has been effective or not as an energy secretary.

But the crux of the issue remains: standards in permitting should be established in some way to help reduce the installed cost of solar.
No image available
Comment
3 of 8
Anonymous
January 24, 2011
State governments have the authority to act within their borders to create building standards. It is hard to argue that the commerce clause gives the Federal government authority in this area so at most the DOE could be expected to have is an advisory role. CA is the largest market for solar PV in the short run, so if broader standardization is really needed in permitting beyond that specified at the local level we should expect progress there first.
Steven
Comment
4 of 8
January 24, 2011
I think we are approaching renewable energy all wrong. We should concentrate on driving up the price of fossil fuels via carbon taxes, and letting the marketplace and local policies figure out what works best for them with expensive fossil fuels.
Comment
5 of 8
January 24, 2011
January 24, 2011
Excellent comments above, thanks.
Please read the SunRun report, especially the last few pages of cost analysis. Thorough but hyperbolic.
Solar ABC's is a good idea and strategy but SunRun has conflated it into a cure-all. NOT. SR contends that you should have <$50 in system and structural design costs for a 5kW rooftop system. Seems like there are far too many variables to standardize effectively but it would be possible to have standard templates but $50 worth of project information isn't much. SR also objects to the restrictions on supply-side connections. They mention that tap on the supply-side ahead of the main breaker can cost $1100-$10,000. They do not mention that at various points on the residential grid the available fault currentt ranges from ,10,000 Amps to 200,000Amps,enough to blow your inverter through the garage wall. Parents, its 10PM do you know the available fault current at your service disconnect? I suspect not.

As an inspector and plan examiner I look at the field inspection cost analysis and say that to reduce the cost of inspection from $13/visit to $7/visit your better have the ladder up and a reasonable fall protection tie off point for your three story 40 degree pitch roof or it will cost you a red tag, a reinspection fee and attendance requirement on my time schedule. One hour drive time between inspections.

I guess I am glad I do not work in California, I couldn't handle the aggravation.
Comment
6 of 8
January 25, 2011
Cabinet members hold "summits" with the people they're regulating all the time. Many are meant to jump-start industry into creating standards. The history of technology is filled with examples of this.

In this case, standards can not only benefit installers in the short term, but lead to greater U.S. leadership in the long term.

As to the secretary serving an industry, regulation always serves the long term best interest of any industry.
Comment
7 of 8
January 25, 2011
fireofenergy - What the hell is with you and your damned robotic solar PV factories? It's the only freakin' thing you mouth off about in EVERY SINGLE post! That and that YouTube clip of Chu.
Whattsamatta, fella? You got some money tied up in a little robot factory somewhere and you think screeching like a red-assed baboon on these boards is gonna free up some o' dat gub'mint money? Is dat what you think, chuckles?
Good lord, get over yourself, man, and try to think of something else to say. You're about as interesting as watching rats chew on a corpse.
Comment
8 of 8
January 25, 2011
That being said, Chu isn't in a position to champion one type of energy over another, and he shouldn't. Although he is an intelligent individual, and has obviously shown his "green" chops under the administration, he'd be running a fool's errand if he started cheerleading alternative energies.
The politics would come back to bite him and the Obama administration in the ass. Remember that Big Oil and Coal have very deep pockets and they've had them for many years. Many decades, in fact. Too much posturing for altfuels on the administration's side, and BO&C would start lining up their paid politicos and mouthpieces even more than they do now.
Chu and the boys already get enough flack from the Good Ol' Boys that green tech will cost US jobs and other such bullshit, but any hard, willful support would only increase BO&C's attacks tenfold.
I think the administration is taking the better approach - slowly set up new policies and support new technologies, but do it behind the scenes and let those developers of these new altfuels and alt-energies counter the false claims directly. This way, no one can claim a "political" agenda and the bullshit can be swatted down more believably for those on the sides.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Dana Blankenhorn

View Dana Blankenhorn's Profile
About: Dana Blankenhorn has covered business and technology since 1978. He covered the Houston oil boom of the 1970s, began making his living online in 1985, and launc... more »

Advertise With Us

Southwest Windpower SCHOTT Solar PV, Inc. Admirals Bank Green Power Conferences Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut) Rolls Battery Engineering Quick Mount PV
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters