Todd Griset
December 01, 2010
|
5 Comments
Breaking news: today, a group including an organization called "Californians for Renewable Energy" (CARE) filed a complaint with the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) against National Grid, Cape Wind and the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities for approval of Cape Wind's power purchase agreement with National Grid. FERC has docketed this as docket no. EL11-9-000.
[See below for an update, including comments from Cape Wind's communications director Mark Rodgers.]
As you may know, the Massachusetts DPU issued an order approving the PPA between Cape Wind and National Grid. Under the deal, National Grid will buy half of Cape Wind’s output for 18.7 cents per kilowatt-hour, with a 3.5% annual escalator in each of the 15 contract years.
The incendiary Complaint opens with the following summary alleging "ongoing conspiracy" to violate the FPA as well as fraud:
Pursuant to the Federal Power Act (“FPA”), 16 U.S.C. 824d, 824e, 825e, and 825h, (2008) and Rule 206, 16 C.F.R. 385.206 (2008) of the Rules of Practice and Procedure (“Rules”) of the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”), CAlifornians for Renewable Energy, Inc. (“CARE”) and Barbara Durkin hereby files this Complaint against the National Grid, Cape Wind, and the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (“DPU” or “Mass DPU”), for their ongoing conspiracy to violate the Federal Power Act (“FPA”) by approving contracts for capacity and energy that exceeds the utilities’ avoided cost cap and which also usurps FERC’s exclusive jurisdiction to determine the wholesale rates for electricity under its jurisdiction within those territories that it exercises regulatory authority and further for National Grid and DPU and aiding and abetting Cape Wind’s fraudulent actions and claims to defraud taxpayers of ARRA stimulus funds it is seeking for the project in violation of 18 C.F.R. § 1c.
These are serious and bold allegations indeed.
So who is CARE? CARE describes itself in the Complaint as "a nonprofit corporation that works to educate and encourage the use of alternative forms of renewable energy to avoid dependence on declining supplies of fossil fuels, and the harmful air emissions their use entails. All of CARE’s members are residential or small business customers."
What is CARE's interest in this? CARE claims that the alleged actions "harm the interests of CARE’s members by allowing Cape Wind Associates a competitive advantage over land-based wind farm developers who must meet stricter requirements for environmental mitigation and monitoring, including preconstruction monitoring for species protected by the ESA".
Other highlights worth further probing include extensive paragraphs devoted to an attempt to link the Cape Wind project to Italian organized crime. (See page 26 for some of the most lurid of that text.)
At 51 pages, it is a broad-ranging complaint. Here is a link to the FERC docket sheet if you are interested. I will be watching this docket with great interest to see how the Cape Wind PPA weathers this challenge.
12/2/2010 update: this morning, I had a pleasant discussion with Mark Rodgers, Cape Wind's Director of Communications. Mark described CARE's complaint as "baseless", and characterized CARE's allegations of an Italian mafia connection as "false, malicious, and defamatory". I've also taken a deeper look at the substance of the Complaint. For what it's worth, Mark's comments are consistent with those of other people with whom I've spoken about this complaint.
The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.
To add your comments you must sign-in or create a free account.
December 7, 2010
http://ag.ca.gov/newsalerts/release.php?id=2011
CARE has also joined a suit in response to the permitting of Cape Wind anticipated to violate the ESA. Mass Audubon arrived at up to 6,600 avian mortalities per year by Cape Wind in testimony to federal regulators.
"Mark described CARE's complaint as "baseless", and characterized CARE's allegations of an Italian mafia connection as "false, malicious, and defamatory".
The FERC complaint makes no statement that Cape Wind Associates, LLC is involved with the Mafia.
Mark Rodgers of Cape Wind is responding to 21 pages of articles from the New York Times, Boston Biz Journal, Financial Times and other reputable news publications as well as to testimony provided in those pages. Why didn't Mark seek timely retractions regarding "false, malicious, and defamatory" statements made in these publications?
Those with whom I've spoken see more merit in the FERC complaint than in the Cape Wind project anticipated to triple the cost of energy to make it unreliable.
Google Cape Wind spec'd): Siemens 3.6 MW corroding
And: Wind turbines sinking and shifting offshore U.K.