Profile Network Activity Comments Articles Blog Bookmarks Contact
 

Energy Storage Breakthrough is Put to the Test in Bella Coola

By Russell Ray
November 11, 2010   |   7 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

7 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 7
November 11, 2010
The high-tech aspect of this technique -- controlling when to charge and when to discharge -- is very important. There's a power loss at every conversion step (from electricity into H2, then again converting back to electricity). Utilities are desperate for not just storage, but power-dense storage with this kind of control.
Comment
2 of 7
November 12, 2010
I guess there are two things to point out here.

1. This is an application only for isolated grids, i.e. the cost comparison (which isn't done in the article) is against relatively small diesel generators, a far more expensive form of electricity than any grid electricity.

2. The many efficiency losses, as mentioned previously, are only relevant when calculating the final cost per kWh, including the storage technology. Again, if it beats diesel generators, then the proposed solution is a winner. The final criteria is the cost per kWh of dispatchable electricity.
Comment
3 of 7
November 12, 2010
I must say I tend to agree with comments 2 and 3, but having said that about 40% round-trip efficiency is comparable to a diesel engine anyway.
The problem with this type Hydro installation, i.e. 'run of river', is that you can't store the energy from the water and use it later as you would in a dammed system.
With Canada/North America having considerable Hydro resources, a more efficient arrangement might be to let run of river hydro schemes supply all the energy they can and reduce the output from dammed hydro systems to compensate where appropriate.
Alternatively there may be the possibility to convert conventional dammed hydro plants to a hybrid scheme incorporating pumped storage. Large-scale pumped storage, such as the Dinorwig in Wales UK, can achieve round-trip efficiencies of about 80%.
The Hoover Dam on the Colorado River might well be a good candidate for this type of energy storage as it is currently running at a fraction of its full capacity, due to reduced river flows and increased water demand for irrigation and other uses. In particular, the Hoover Dam is in an area of high 'sunfall' which could supply high amounts of cost-effective renewable energy/electricity that requires storage to maximise its availability/utilisation.
Comment
4 of 7
November 12, 2010
PS. Ref Wiki - Clayton Falls is 'off grid'. It is 2MW capacity so 100KW only represents 5% storage capacity but this may be enough to cover the demand peaks.
Comment
5 of 7
November 12, 2010
Denis at post #1 is a bit OTT. As Nick points out there is no store for the water (run of the river), so using only and any excess for elctrolysis seems a simple choice.

All surplus, apart from a known minimum needed to run the electrolysis plant efficiently, can be used for hydrogen, generation, surely?

When the store is full, the hydrogen generator is simply shut down.

The other side (fuel cell electricity generation), surely, is to predict the small run-up time, needed to generate for 'extra demand' situations.

So that is why the controller only needs to be a micro one!

The Dinorwic system uses only 'spare generation' from base-load stations to pump up hill for the storage cycle. The same 'pumps' are used as 'turbines' to drive the generators during the production part of the cycle. There may well be a few occasions when water is pumped with more expensive rate electricity (to more quickly restore the excess capacity to be ready for a known, and expected, surge.

This system at Clayton Falls does not seem to be anywhere near as difficult in the decision making department - probably only a few switching options for this one.

RAB
Comment
6 of 7
November 16, 2010
One or two batteries in every residence would add up to a significant back up that could be implemented directly at the point of use.
Not sure if I agree with you that water is a renewable resource.
Comment
7 of 7
January 11, 2011
Using water as storage is a breakthrough? It certainly was - in about 1890
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Russell Ray

View Russell Ray's Profile
About: Russell Ray is the managing editor Power Engineering magazine, the No. 1 trade magazine for the power generation industry. Russell has 13 years experience as an... more »

Advertise With Us

Solar Power International 2012 AREDAY Grundfos Direct Sensors Met Office Ingeteam Schiller Fairtrade-Messe
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters