Profile Network Activity Comments Articles Blog Bookmarks Contact
 

Why Solar Will Make or Break its Own Future

By Stephen Lacey
September 24, 2010   |   5 Comments

Do you like this blog post?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.

5 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 5
September 26, 2010
Jigar is an industry leader because he consistently says what needs to be said, not just what people want to hear. His recent move to turn the dial on global warming politics through CarbonWarRoom bodes well for us all.

Given the premise that solar now needs to focus 'in house' for substantial growth, here are other issues that should be addressed at Solar Power International in October and taken forward with SEIA working groups:

1) why are financing (PPA and leasing) companies charging $2/W extra for residential PV systems? Does it really cost $2/W to recruit financing and process the paperwork for the ITC?

2) What's the deal with PV firms trying to nix energy efficiency financing? I don't support 'exclusive' EE programs, but if we're all about reducing carbon then we all support both EE and RE.

3)The industry needs to take 100% responsibility for its own environmental costs and demand 100% recycling and reuse of their equipment, including inverters and the rest of BOS. Cradle to cradle. "But the other guys don't have to" is not a viable excuse.
Comment
2 of 5
September 28, 2010
This article was thought provoking and some what disturbing in that
"…understanding how to finance projects across a variety of markets
will be critical to success."

I would like to suggest that manufacturers and installers get creative and
apply Creative Finance techniques (normally used in real estate)
to the Solar world.

I suggest that they hold a percentage of every sale in the form of a
Secured Promissory note. This would allow them the ability to
proprietarily expand the financing available to the industry and
reduce their dependence on commercial lines.

Smart Finance officers at the Manufacturers and Installers could
work in tandem to coordinate mortgage secured positions.

Notes would be transferable so that they could be sold to individual
Investors when money was tight or on an ongoing reduction of risk
basis.

I thank the God Most High for the blessings of the sun and ask that
we have the wisdom to optimize those benefits for the good of
mankind and the alleviation of mankind's damage to the environment.
Comment
3 of 5
September 29, 2010
Nice comment fireofenergy. You may want to take a look at an article parallel to your thoughts...

http://www.cleanfleetreport.com/renewables/ford-focus-electric-car-plugin-hybrid/

3 key items here.
1-Using solar to power a factory (lots of robotics used).
2-Factory happens to build electric cars (they could probably add a swappable lithium battery to expand the range).
3-No mention of using a carport type structure to trickle charge parked vehicles.
http://www.ecofriend.org/entry/11-charging-stations-designed-to-refuel-evs-with-renewable-energy/

This very do-able -and it won't take that long. No need for grid improvisation with commercial and rooftop units accompanied by batteries.
Comment
4 of 5
September 29, 2010
People also need to remember that as a potentially profitable industry, the solar sales/installation market has become flooded with contractors(specifically c10), engineers & anyone else who can get approved to install in their specific territories (regarding incentives). This is very reminiscent of the black marks Solar had on it in the 80's & 90's, the market is flooded with people looking to make a quick cheap buck that have no standards as far as longevity & warranty are concerned, which leaves business owners & homeowners concerned with real world feasibility. From a sales perspective, this isn't just a matter of affordability but moreso a matter of durability on top of the financial aspects of purchasing. The green benefits will always be there as long as regulations are put in place regarding destruction/recycling of potentially hazardous materials (especially with the cadmium-telluride based thin-film that is very inexpensive[for purchase, not over the long run]). People know & understand that we need to do more environmentally but because of the history associated with the industry it makes the customer uneasy about the finality of the decision to buy/install or wait until something more durable comes out. I have heard from numerous people that they would be more interested in considering wind over solar as it doesn't have a dark past. I currently am employed with a solar integrator in Southern California who has been in business for almost 30 years & has seen the effects of limited regulation on the industry, if the requirements for installation were more stringent on appropriate licensing (if the c-10 is knowledgable enough about solar & has real world experience with solar the c-46 exam should be a breeze for them). There is still alot of hearsay & b/s going on in the industry, however if we can maintain & push a positive outlook as well as re-affirm the viability of standardization for integrators, Solar's future may be truly bright.
Comment
5 of 5
September 29, 2010
Liz,

Great comments as always. A few thoughts:
1) why are financing (PPA and leasing) companies charging $2/W extra for residential PV systems? Does it really cost $2/W to recruit financing and process the paperwork for the ITC?
[Agree completely, this doesn't happen in the commercial space and certainly should not happen in the residential space. I think a few residential solar companies got scolded by the IRS so maybe that will scare them straight]

2) What's the deal with PV firms trying to nix energy efficiency financing? I don't support 'exclusive' EE programs, but if we're all about reducing carbon then we all support both EE and RE.
[This is about PACE and frankly not that important even as a lesson. EE can be financed and companies like Metrus are showing how RE and EE can coexist well]

3)The industry needs to take 100% responsibility for its own environmental costs and demand 100% recycling and reuse of their equipment, including inverters and the rest of BOS. Cradle to cradle. "But the other guys don't have to" is not a viable excuse.
[This is true. Have you seen studies estimating what this would cost?]

On the other comments on coal costs, I just hope that you aren't teaching your children that mathematics. The capex for coal is just one part of their costs. They also have variable costs. In Duke's territory their coal plant will raise rates 9%. An equivalent solar DG, energy efficiency, target storage, and demand response solution would be less than a 3% rate increase -- 1/3rd the cost.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Stephen Lacey

View Stephen Lacey's Profile
About: I am a reporter with ClimateProgress.org, a blog published by the Center for American Progress. I am former editor and producer for RenewableEnergyWorld.com, wh... more »

Advertise With Us

Ingeteam Prudent Living, Inc. Advanced Energy Industries, Inc. Apricus, Inc. The Interstate Renewable Energy Council AltaTerra Research FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters