Is Solar PV a Commodity? Our Survey Says: Yes!…and NoThe survey results are finally in. Thank you to the 102 people who took the time to contribute their perspectives. So what’s the answer? Is solar PV in fact a commodity in 2010? If you just want the raw numbers from this unscientific survey, then the answer is... yes. When the 102 responders were asked: Is solar PV a commodity? In other words, when all's said and done, is a solar panel just a cog at a certain price per watt?
So, not a definitive win, but it certainly indicates that a good part of the solar professional community believes that price is more important than anything else right now. However, that's not the full story.... When I only include results from the 56 responders who identified themselves as solar installers, the numbers switch around. Instead the response is:
A little ambivalence there... But wait, there’s even more conflicting news:
Of all 102 respondents, 28% said they made (would have made?) their last purchasing decision based on comparing product specifications. As for price considerations:
There seems to be good news for the solar PV efficiency leaders. When asked what would make them pay more for a PV panel, the number one answer for both installers and non-installers was “significantly higher panel efficiency.”
Of the entire 102 respondents, 39 (39.4%) said that higher panel efficiency was the number one factor that would make them pay more. In second place, it was a tie. 12 (12.1%) said that the most important factor for paying more would be either:
As for the type of panel they prefer (poly, mono, thin film, etc) when space consideration is not important:
So what conclusions can we draw from the above? Let’s first remember that I pulled these questions out of my Solar Fred head without any scientific considerations or accounting for any statistical variables or prejudices. That being said, my personal conclusion is that solar PV panels are not a per watt widget commodity—yet. But I think the pressure is on and without some major efficiency breakthrough, it will be difficult to see installers paying much of a premium when efficiencies start to plateau in the next few years. By that time (2016?) the 30% tax credit may be expiring and local rebates may be scarce. So what can solar PV companies do to compete when the lowest cost per watt overwhelms the benefits of maximum efficiency? Good question. The answer will be in the added values the solar PV panel company provides. Commercial, utility, and residential sectors will want different added values. The results of this survey give companies some hint about what might be desirable, but it should be noted that the majority of responders here (30.4%) had a residential-only perspective. My recommendation? Start your own customer research now. If you're a solar PV manufacturer, get your sales people to pick up the phone and ask current customers one simple question: "How can I help?" The answers you receive should guide your company into creating a great product with added values and service that will make your company (and panel) stand out when price and efficiency become relatively equal. More thoughts on these results in future blog posts. In the mean time, as always, UnThink Solar. Tor Valenza a.k.a. “Solar Fred” advises solar companies on marketing, communications, and public relations. Contact him through Unthink Solar or follow him on Twitter @SolarFred.
The information and views expressed in this blog post are solely those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on this Web site and other publications. This blog was posted directly by the author and was not reviewed for accuracy, spelling or grammar.
2 Reader Comments
|
Tor 'Solar Fred' Valenza
|

Share














1 of 2
Interesting Survey! I'm glad you acknowledge that this survey isn't necessarily scientific or unbiased. My guess is that most people who took this survey are renewable energy enthusiasts to begin with and therefore have a higher motivation to reduce their carbon footprint. Time-tested economic theory will tell you that every market is driven by a percieved cost-benefit comparison. The renewable energy enthusiasts know that solar will not only give them a lower electricity bill, but also gives them the added satisfaction of reducing their carbon footprint, living "greener" and making a better future for their children.
The average American, however, only looks at monetary costs and benefits. Solar has a very marginal monetary benefits. It has a huge upfront cost with very long payback period and a very low profit margin in the end. While solar sales will be somewhat dependent on the added value that the PV companies provide, the most influential factor for the general public is definitely price per watt. Until the solar industry is able to develop higher efficiency technologies and/or cheaper materials and/or lower installation costs that drives the price per watt well below their current electricity bill, the PV market will be slow to grow. As soon as as it breaks that price barrier though, the market will explode and become a huge overnight success.
Trying to convince people that solar is better for the environment only limits you to a small market of environmentally concious people. To reach the general population, it's gotta be cheap.