Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

AWEA and SEIA Call for Refundable Renewable Energy Tax Credits

By Graham Jesmer, Staff Writer
January 15, 2009   |   8 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"We can continue to grow through this difficult period only if the new Administration and the 111th Congress act immediately to make renewable tax incentives refundable so they can work as they are intended to -- even in the current financial context. This is a critical first step to building the new, clean energy economy."

-- Denise Bode, CEO, American Wind Energy Association
8 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 8
January 16, 2009
Innovalight claims $1/watt cells. Nanosolar cells are probably cheaper than that. So one trillion dollars buys us a TerraWatt. There is plenty of room in the SouthWest to put a big array. Better yet, put an array on the roof of every building and save on transmission lines.

If Innovalight has trouble printing ten billion square meters of cells, just sell us the ink, so we can put 10 million inkjet printers to work in parallel. Ten million printers can print 1000 square meters each in less than one month.
Comment
2 of 8
January 16, 2009
US Govt should buy one of these patentholders and give the patent away free, such as the ink mentioned above.
Comment
3 of 8
January 16, 2009
The sad reality of these companies (Innovalight, Nanosolar and many others) is that much of what they say is marketing and "forward looking statements." They promise the world and have yet to deliver. We have heard wonderful theories with little substance or working prototypes. Don't get me wrong; I think they are developing great technologies. The hype surrounding them has to be tempered by what is actually happening: they haven't delivered.
Comment
4 of 8
January 16, 2009
Phase in an eventually heavy carbon tax over the next 5 - 10 years, cap and trade until the tax is fully implemented, level the playing field, tax what we wish to disincentivize (coal, oil), provide tax credits for what we want to see ... solar and wind energy to replace foreign sources of oil in the near term and all oil, gas, and coal in the long term, supplemented by the gamut of renewable and sustainable energy sources ... and slow global warming by keeping CO2 to under 350 ppm. Build no new nuclear or coal-fired facilities ... and eventually systematically, as possible, shut down existing plants. Invest in clean coal technology development research (and once and for all prove that it is a poor solution ... retraining coal industry workers in green collar jobs) and use MUCH less energy (efficiency and non-use when possible ... and there is a lot of room to reduce energy use) and ... voila ... we have a solution. We'll see if this gets done or if the lobbies are stronger than the will of the American people and the incoming administration.
Comment
5 of 8
January 16, 2009
Then there is the copper wire problem.....off shore wind needs under sea transmission cables and that means on shore grid connections and lots of copper.

We are getting our first two turbine generator for a large island; but will still have to maintain a conventional generator to make power when the wind dies down.

Just attended the big organizing kick off yesterday of Maine's SMALL WIND WORKING GROUP yesterday. About 3/4ths of the people who showed up left before the end, despite an availability of $4,000 grant subsidies...I think the $50k price tag and all the problems and regulations and requirements---you need a full energy audit, no you can't install it yourself you have to hire a licensed electrician, etc. discouraged a lot of farmer participants and others.

Some suspect that if history is a guide; a tax credit will only encourage inflated prices.

Other modalities have similar problems that aren't overcome by more subsidies and credits.....the paperwork burden by government agencies is very discouraging....give you an example. The organizers of the meeting---paid out of a grant, suggested that each person getting a wind grant provide output data to a central data base, after all the public wants to know if its getting it's money's worth.

I asked whether the grant amount would be expanded to cover the $600+ anenometer, installation, and other logging equipment so wind speed and generator output could be correlated with siting data.

The answer was no extra money to cover data logging.

This is just wind; solar thermal which should be a no-brainer runs into a thicket of problems because most of the housing stock is old and retrofits are a major problem. Just took a pic of my neighbors fancy double vac tube installation covered with frozen snow...ah winter!

What appears to be happening is that the real winner is geothermal...you get heat and air conditioning in one box; so a $6k solar thermal installation may get scrapped.
Comment
6 of 8
January 16, 2009
Surely the Obama Adminstration wouldn't waste money on wind energy which as stated in a previous post is at best intermittent
Comment
7 of 8
January 17, 2009
re above on geo, it also does most of your hot water. Air to air heat pumps are also in the mix where there are space or cost restrictions. Particularly for retrofits with our old dense housing in the northeast. Mitsubishi and Fujitsu have inverter based multi-stage equipment that will cover most or all of the heating in most of the northeast. In some cases back up is needed. I think Carrier is selling an integrated system with an air to air heat pump and gas furnace back up. I'm not sure how low a temp the air to air goes to. One Fujitsu model goes to 15F, another goes to 0F. Hallowell out of Maine is making a multi stage unit good to -30F. I think stage 4 may be electric resistance. In general, solar thermal on new properly designed, insulated and oriented buildings or geothermal or air to air in that order. On retrofits, geo first choice air to air second.
Comment
8 of 8
January 18, 2009
If the installation of renewable energy generators is financially worth while people will invest in it. It is as simple as that. There are a number of measures that any government could take to half the cost of house insulation, solar electric equipment, electric cars, home wind turbines, commercial wind turbines and so forth.
http://mtkass.blogspot.com/2007/07/solar-electric-government-role.html
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Graham Jesmer

View Graham Jesmer's Profile
About: I am currently a second year Law Student at Vermont Law School where I work as a Research Associate at the Institute for Energy and the Environment writing and ... more »

Advertise With Us

MaRS Schneider Electric Renewables Academy AG (RENAC) SolarNexus Parker Hannifin - Precision Cooling Systems Geothermal Energy Association Puralytics
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters