Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Abu Dhabi: The New Prince of Solar Technology?

By Jane Burgermeister
January 5, 2009   |   15 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Ambitious projects — the rotating tower in Dubai and Abu Dhabi Masdar Initiative being the most prominent examples — can be observed that might express a trend in the UAE region towards more sustainable sources of energy generation."

-- Sebastian Fasbender, Bundesverbandes Solarwirtschaft, BSW
15 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 15
January 5, 2009
Isn't it nice for the USA to be the leader in RE...
Shame on us.....

.....Bill
Comment
2 of 15
January 5, 2009
The article states that Germany's feed-in tariff for pv owners is approximately 55 US cents per kwh over 20 years. Given 24 hours in a day, 365 days in a year, that pays more than 9 million US dollars over 20 years for a single kilowatt-hour of electricity generation. Multiply that large figure by 25% to get a reality check into the equation, the pay is still more than 2 million US dollars over 20 years. Multiply that amount by actual production numbers that accumulate into the kilowatts and megawatts, a very large sum indeed is seen to emerge. Is this true??? The math is as simple and straight forward as can be, so what in the world is the matter here in the USofA?
Comment
3 of 15
January 5, 2009
The Sun Must Come

"The sun, must come" to Abu Dhabi number one,
Masdar, on par, to leadership, a sunny czar,
PV, a spinning tower, makes for solar power,
Send, to others, blessings of the sun.

A plant, to grace, the desert of the middle east,
Thin film, to see, the power from the sun increase,
Masdar, PV, and Colexon Energy,
To use, a source, that never seems to cease.

"The sun, must come", and bring new thoughts to ancient ones,
Jalal, the poet, made this very clear,
The Arab, world, which gave us symbols of our sums,
And magic, tales, today we love to hear.

adrianakau2aol.com
Comment
4 of 15
January 5, 2009
We should be proud that the UAE and the Germans are in the forefront on this issue. They are paving the way for us to follow.

Hopefully, that is to follow at a substantially cheaper and cost effective manner than those fools.
Comment
5 of 15
January 5, 2009
What is the matter in the US of A?

Mr. Etheredge. It is simple.

When you have a monopoly, you are not going to surrender it. Period !

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/story/131562

This is simply "Corporate Welfare".
Comment
6 of 15
January 6, 2009
"Colexon currently exports 15 percent of its production"

So Colexon is already a producer of PV? One learns something new every day :-))

It's great that finally countries with lots of sunshine and deserts take interest in solar technology. Crowded and clouded Germany isn't the right place for the production of solar energy but someone had to pave the way.

"that is to follow at a substantially cheaper and cost effective manner than those fools."

Like the US of A did with building cars? LOL
Comment
7 of 15
January 7, 2009
Yep, it is great what they have started: Masdar Headquarters - The first Energy-Positive Building in the World !

http://www.stichtingmilieunet.nl/andersbekekenblog/?p=2651

See the nice video
Comment
8 of 15
January 7, 2009
R. S. Etheredge....your numbers are a little too "pumped up."
Solar doesn't work 24 hours a day, 365 days a year......the sun does.....but solar electric equipment does not. Here in New Jersey, USA, a 10 kW residential system is rated to produce 12,000 kWh of electricity per year. In Germany, on the same latitude as southern Alaska, I'd say a 10 kW may produce 10,000 kWh per year. At 71 cents per kWh = $7,100 per year times 20 years = $142,000

Believe it or not, New Jersey's solar certificates ( SRECs ) are trading at $660 per 1,000 kWh. Earning 12 per year, that;s $7,900. For 15 years = $118,500. Add in $2,000 saved on electric bill per year for 15 years = $30,000. Add in the NJ rebate = $17,500. Add in the 30% federal tax credit = $18,000 or so (and if you're a business owner you can take depreciation over 5.5 years that about equals the tax credit = $18,000).
So that looks like a pretty good deal. $184,000 on an $80,000.

The problem is the solar certificates ( SRECs) are a trading market (they fluctuate in price), not a fixed feed-jn-tariff. And the bankers have been reluctant to lend based on the moving price.

In the SREC marketplace, MW projects can now get quotes on 7 and 10 year forward sales, whereas 6 months ago only 3 and 5 year were firm. But, the 65 MW of solar built to date in NJ is well short of the June 1st RPS goal of 130 MW

If Obama wants to kick start things, a 50 cent national feed in tariff for solar
would be a good place to start.

Too expensive you say. I say if AIG got $150 billion, then $150 billion is where you start the renewable energy investment tab.

George@RRREC.net
Comment
9 of 15
January 7, 2009
A high feed in tariff could lead to fraud and misallocation of resources. Wind power is a better solution for northern latitudes.

The US SouthWest is the best area for solar and should get a higher priority.

Rural areas where it is difficult to get on the grid or where power isn't reliable make the best case for solar.
Comment
10 of 15
January 7, 2009
I am proud to be a resident of the Abu Dhabi city for past 29 years and watch this place bloom out from desert to real green and garden city and I hope to see in the upcoming Masdar City a futuristic place. Are there any pioneering companies whom I can assist in becoming a part of this change?

qsurti@gmail.com
Comment
11 of 15
January 7, 2009
praise to Abu Dhabi for it's inititive ... but shame for USA ... letting politics and greed drive us is unbearable and immoral ... we have the know how but every time you turn around someone puts more stones in your way ... to the US goverment - get behind us or get out of the way ... we proved it in the 80's and the rug was pulled out ... now we can't afford to be thwarted
this issue is to important to all of us in this world
Comment
12 of 15
January 8, 2009
Very encouraging move to curve global warming.But why are you not interested in the investment of power generation on large scale by the us of solar energy in Nigeria and indeed in the African countries.secondly,the PV industry should be able to add more effort in producing the PV module that can work under the cloud cover effectively.Finally, I think we should employ mechanical procedure to increase the efficiency of the PV module in the world.
Thanks.
Comment
13 of 15
January 11, 2009
Sheik Mo can afford to employ the best engineers from around the world. In contrast to Saudi Arabia, people like to go to Dubai, without the brooding menace of harsh Saudi attitudes toward women and people from other cultures. The Saudis will try to bid against Dubai, but I don't think it will work. China is also looking to gear up renewables. Ironically, because subsidies for old ways persist here in the U.S., much of our innovation may be in small DIY systems that will be under the radar until tipping points are reached. An issue for small DIY is lobbying to make sensible retro-fits and micro-grids legal, but that is happening in some locations.

Every time a protected monopoly system raises prices, people begin brainstorming about how to reduce dependence on large systems. People want to control their access to power, with less vulnerability to weather or earthquake.

Smart people like to hang out with each other. There will be innovations in big projects coming out of Dubai and probably out of China. Brazil and India may have some interesting contributions as well. Brazil's alcohol production is reported to be very efficient, with cane grown on the same roots for many years and minimal water or fertilizer inputs consumed.

California is doing well with some big projects that will generate interesting data.

The U.S. federal government has promoted old ways over new in the recent past. Maybe we will get some change going forward. Keep on eye on Sen. Grassley's corruption-sniffing operations. He is the senator who seems most likely to crack down on corporate misbehavior when when it harms the interests of ordinary people in favor of the already advantaged. In recent years, China has had much success in class mobility, and Brazil is reported to have done well also. People want renewable energy, and they will spend on it when they can afford to.
Comment
14 of 15
July 22, 2010
That is really good publish but examine this superb website Interesting subject. I am really glad to read your blog. I am impressed with your good work. I have gone through many blogs but I found yours the most interesting.
http://www.bayut.com/developments.html
Comment
15 of 15
July 22, 2010
My previous link does not work? Hmm?

http://www.eastvalleytribune.com/article_8d2b45af-ebe3-50c3-91cd-60e32639aeed.html?mode=story
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

SkyFuel KACO new energy, Inc. Canadian Solar Inc. Southwest Windpower Renewables Academy AG (RENAC) Interstate Renewable Energy Council Endurance Wind Power
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters