Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Solar Updraft Towers: Variations and Research

By Tom Bosschaert
October 7, 2008   |   16 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
Content Technologies
 
16 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 16
October 7, 2008
This technology can be compared to ocean thermal energy conversion.

The quickest way to evaluate RE is energy per mass, or specific energy density. This approach is low specific energy density, It is a very large and massive structure for relatively less energy than a Wind Turbine. Not a great start.

The stack is in effect a steam cylinder and operates efficiently in proportion to its thermal isolation from the atmosphere - so it can't be made lighter without consequence.

A greenhouse would create a warm and moist atmosphere which would promote ag; however, the updrafting would evacuate this atmosphere and send both the warmth and the moisture up the stack. If it could be recaptured, that might not be so bad, but recapture would require cooling, cooling would slow down the updraft, and in the end, you'd be right back to a static greenhouse. These ends create a conflict of physics.

Anyone else see an issue there?
Comment
2 of 16
October 7, 2008
The article is very good. I am wondering if algae and fish could be grown in shallow warm water ponds aside from regular agricultural crops. The water could be heated up without too much of a cooling effect on the air if the water is not deep.. The algae and fish might also grow at a faster rate; fish grow much faster in the tropics in warm water as long as the water is oxygenated. The ponds might be located at the greatest distance from the tower with crops inside and then PV modules close to the center.

A complete self-sustaining system might be developed in a desert environment.

adrianakau2aol.com
Comment
3 of 16
October 8, 2008
This looks like a very economical solution, though a couple of modifications might help.
1) If the tower was placed at the highest point on the land, could the tower be a lot shorter? Perhaps placing the membrane on a downslope. This might be ideal for Vineyards?
2) If you added a vertical axis wind turbine at the top of the tower you could create additional updraft
3) Perhaps the top of the tower could be angled and swivel and thus any passing wind will drag the air out of the tower?
I like the addition of the fish tanks, positioned at the outer rim, feeding condensation to the plants. Could a waved membrane trap the water vapour into drips before it reaches the tower?
Anyone planning on building these anywhere yet?

anthonycmccarthy@gmail.com
Comment
4 of 16
October 8, 2008
The idea is not new, I was reading similar text for the use in Australian deserts, but the construction was more a cone than flat top. I thing the cone will improve the air flow. In my country (Macedonia) we use a black cover on the earth and we produce strawberries on it. I thing if we place black sheets of nylon on the land and grow strawberries on it, we will get more warm air and we will have faster crops.
Comment
5 of 16
October 8, 2008
What effect will rain and large storms have on ersosion around the margins? The system could easily be adapted for fresh rain water collection. Storm force winds may be a problem.

John M. Pisciotta
Comment
6 of 16
October 8, 2008
Could someone give us the data on efficiency and resulting requirements for land area?
Comment
7 of 16
October 8, 2008
The solar chimney concept has apparently been around for more than a century. I conceived an application for it at Grand Canyon National Park in 1978 in an energy proposal. The basic idea has languished over the years, never implemented in a significant way, although mentioned periodically in science and energy related magazines.

Though typically pictured as a rural plant requiring hectares of costly land, the idea has great merit in an urban setting where it can benefit city inhabitants by utilizing the "heat Island" effect to good use and lowering incidental heat load on the community at large.

Picture a high-rise office building surrounded by city streets and parking lots that soak up solar heat. Imagine a vertical chimney in the center of the tower structure, and the inner exposed walls of the chimney covered with the heat condensers for the air-conditioning plant for the building. The basement parking garage constructed like the spokes of a wagon wheel, with the support walls creating wind tunnels that radiate outward from the base of the central chimney. The building heat load is used to good effect to drive the convection engine, without having sequestered hectares of land. The updraft through the chimney cools the building and the parking garage, creating ventilation forces that carry away polluting exhaust fumes from the car park, etc.

In essence, modern skyscrapers (office buildings) become solar chimneys that cool the city, carry away polluting fumes from lower street levels, and operate independent turbines that generate power. The combination of effects reduces the overall cost of power generation and the air-conditioning and lighting heat load (power demand) that the building normally creates. The distributed power generation increases community security, an important thing in these terrorist times, and output from individual buildings can be joined together in a common city power grid.

Lee Fellows
Fellows Research Group, Inc.
Comment
8 of 16
October 8, 2008
Wouldn't this concept work as well using the top half of one of Buckminster Fuller's Geodesic domes? Then practically none of the surface area under the dome would be subject to high winds and thus usable for agriculture, solar arrays, or buildings. There would be no vertical supports to interfere with agriculture equipment. We all know that geodesic domes are more stable in high exterior winds than the type of construction shown here.
Comment
9 of 16
October 8, 2008
Some possibilities to wring more services out of the physical plant while generating income to reduce electricity cost: 1. apply solar selective surface on the upper portion of the tower to warm the air more there, thus increasing the solar chimney effect and driving convection within the tower itself. 2. rent the tower for mounting electronic devices for communications (cell phone and HAM radio repeaters), weather service sensors, defense devices. 3. food drying facility (including crops grown there during the growing season) or grass-drying or adobe brick drying or green brick production beneath the membrane (drying by heat and wind evaporation; this will also provide thermal mass to enhance night-time /24 hour convection) 4. mount wind turbines on swivel rings for swinging them to the leeward side of the column, starting 30 feet above the ground, 3 turbines per ring /all facing into the wind 5. where a suitable aquifer is present beneath the tower, wind turbines could pump water from it high up the tower for gravity flow to irrigation pipes mounted on the membrane structure for watering crops beneath 6. use the membrane as a watershed to collect rainwater for irrigation of adjacent crops (if not needed for sub-membrane crops) --the membrane watershed will assure normal crop-watering of an equal area of cropland during a 50% drought (where half the needed rain falls in a growing season), or during a 66% drought (where 1/3 needed rain falls) for a cropland area half the membrane area, etc.
Comment
10 of 16
October 8, 2008
You're on the right track, except for a few things:

You need to focus on algae cultivation, recapture of water vapor and positioning of aquaculture and real estate at the outer rim of the greenhouse where the aquaculture ponds can double as recreational areas for real estate, and where the CO2 and other heat from human habitation can be recaptured by inflowing fresh air.

http://www.geocities.com/jim_bowery/sutabs.html

Brief Proforma for a Solar Updraft Tower Algae Biosphere

by James A. Bowery
July 8, 2006

There is a great need to radically decrease the per person ecological foot-print of developed economies, world-wide -- a need to radically increase carrying capacity while reducing impact on high biodiversity ecosystems such as the Brazilian rainforests or continental shelf fisheries, and reduce concerns about global warming. There may be an economic option that uses sea water pumped to desert areas powered by the fact that ground level temperatures are much higher than temperatures at high altitudes. Indeed, it would dump greenhouse heat to space for its power while producing biodiesel, electricity, fish, fresh water, salt and real estate -- all in quantities demanded by developed-world populations -- without adding to, and possibly even sequestering, greenhouse gases.

Proposals for solar updraft towers have typically assumed that they would be single use structures: solar to electricity via heat differentials between high altitude air and ground level greenhouse-enclosed air. The resulting system has marginal economic value.

Something which would radically enhance the value of the solar updraft tower power structure is to use the greenhouse area for algae ponds to add biodiesel, water, fish and salt production to the production of electricity normally envisioned.
Comment
11 of 16
October 8, 2008
For continuing production of most plants, you will need to replenish certain minerals, the usual suspects being nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium.

Also, plants need carbon dioxide, possibly meaning humans or animals to consume oxygen and exhale CO2, as noted above.

Some plants survive high turbulence and their resiliency and pest-resistance are actually improved by it.

Timber bamboo is available in some locales for supports, and it can be bent so as to deflect wind rather than to sail with it. Pole beans will be good candidates for growing up the supports, if so desired. Beans set nitrogen, which would lessen or end a need for imported nitrogen, over time.

You could also use towers as trellises, growing hops, grapes, and other useful vines up the towers if you want. Providing hand holds will allow your rock-gym enthusiasts to double as grape harvesters, if they choose. Of course, you will charge them for the privilege, if they are wealthy, and make them sign waivers, though presumably if they land on PET, they will bounce.

I think of the acres of greenhouses near Vancouver, B.C. Adding towers to this already-built environment would be interesting in the season when they need cooling.

I appreciate this article and the thread of comments it generated.

I have a friend who grows bamboo under her rabbit cages. The bamboo grows up through the cage for the rabbits to eat. They then excrete useful minerals for the bamboo. It's pretty tidy. So much is possible when we perceive a need to put our brains and hearts in gear.
Comment
12 of 16
October 12, 2008
First, thank you for all the great comments and suggestions. I'll try to address some of the comments here.

Ben:
While some of the moisture would be dragged along, condensation on the membrane would drip down back down and be heavier than would be dragged along. The pilot plant in Manzanares had plant life spontaneously erupt while outside of the plant's membrane it remained barren, so this is supported by empirical research.

Again, thanks for all the comments
Adrian:
That is indeed something we were looking at, not ready for the article at time of writing. What algae plants under the membrane would also achieve is a certain amount of thermal storage to smooth out the diurnal shift. However, it would require a substantial water source nearby, and higher maintenance (algae would tend to want to grow on the moist membrane as well).

Anthony:
A plant on a slope facing south would improve its operation. A vertical axis mill at the top will reduce wind flow and reduce the efficiency of the main turbine. Passing wind already pulls air out of the tower due to the venturi effect (blow over a bottle with water in it, it'll come out).

Igor:
As said in the article the idea is from 1903.

John:
Rainwater collection would be possible through the membrane supports.

Roger:
A dome would null the Venturi effect, I suspect, and in parts also the stack effect, reducing its efficiency, but it'll still work due to thermal rising, but to lesser degree.

Philip:
Great additions, Thanks

James:
There are many ways to apply the towers, no need to focus on just one application.

Fireofenergy:
Land usage to energy capacity is hardly a factor. It's much more important that updraft towers are more consistent and thus more predictable than turbines.
The article itself already mentions diurnal usage

Mary:
Funky original stuff, I'd say. Go for it. Although you'd need to piece the membrane to allow vines to grow up the tower, which I wouldn't recommend.
Comment
13 of 16
October 23, 2008
James, I'm not entirely sure you've accounted for certain needs in your plan. As I understand it, creating bio-diesel from algae requires a closed or at least controlled airflow. With all the wind whipping past the ponds in which it is fermenting, wouldn't the diesel evaporate into the air?
also, though they are useful, the additions you proposed would add significantly to the cost of building the structure. I think the best way of augmenting the technology would be either with agricultural development on the land below AND adding PV at the outer edges of the structure. The only danger to adding development below the installation is the increased activity WILL result in accidents. Combines don't stop or turn on a dime. they never have had to before, and probably never will, so avoiding the supports would be crucial. But collecting run off from rain could not only be used to water crops below, but also clean the darn thing. If you think your wind shield gets dirty in the dustier parts of the south, just think of how this will build up particulate matter. This will in turn reduce efficiency, especially if the structure is built in the cone shape with mildly angled sides. this could more or less be avoided by a flat top, but this, I believe, reduces efficiency.
like any technology there are trade offs, but lets not try to do too much at once.
As a final note, James, on the site you noted, you proposed building several thousand of these towers. WHERE?!

JoECoat@gmail.com
Comment
14 of 16
May 29, 2009
Good-Day,
I would like to be reconized for giving a suggested purposal that could be incorporated into the towers design to condense water for the green house that lies below the canopy.
This design could utilize photo voltaic cells to coltrol a battery charging system that during controlled conditions could be utilized to condense water from the towers interior of rising air, and store the water in a under ground reservior for the greenhouse.
The condensation system in the tower would consist of hundreds if not thousands of Peltier Cooler Thermoelectric panels that would have to be computer controlled in order to control the voltage, and current to keep the temperature at the optimum condesation dew point.
This purposal would quite possibly eliminate the need to provide the lower greenhouse with an long range water source, hence it might make it possible to provide water, food and power to areas that are in extremely remote and inhospitable areas of the globe.
Best Regards Robert Valdez
Comment
15 of 16
August 1, 2010
Garfield: I have been involved in a pre-feasibility study of incorporating water desalination in solar chimneys including thermodynamic modeling for the design so I would be happy to share my thoughts on that. Thermoelectric materials is now my research field and I like your ideas of using hi-tech materials to improve the efficiency of classical yet promising concepts in solar updraft towers.
Comment
16 of 16
August 1, 2010
Underground water storage has potential for adjusting temperature in the greenhouse as well. With on-site power, it would be possible to have two storage areas, one for warm water and a second for cool water. Using wood, cob, rock, concrete (broken concrete is urbanite in permaculture-speak) or whatever is around, benches can be heated or cooled to make micro-climates for particular crops that are desired. If storing water at grade is desired, aquaculture could be added to the mix.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Solar Network International Canadian Solar Inc. RES Offshore 2GreenEnergy.com Nextronex, Inc. Apricus, Inc. SolarNexus
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters