Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
Photo Credit: Warren Gretz
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (14) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
October 28, 2008

New Method Turns Wood into Sugar for Biofuels

by Jane Burgermeister
Vienna, Austria [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

A new method of producing high efficiency and easily available biofuels from wood, grass and plants could soon be available, according to researchers from the Max Planck Institute for Coal Research in Germany.

"With this method, you can even use wood at the beginning of the process. That is why this approach really can be said to allow wood to be converted directly into sugar."

-- Ferdi Schüth, Lead Researcher, Max Planck Institute

The new technology could help unlock the almost unlimited amount of energy stored in plants and in wood.

The researchers in Germany have devised what they say is a more effective method of breaking down the cellulose found in plants into sugar molecules, which can then be used to produce ethanol. The method uses an ionic liquid to first break down cellulose into shorter glucose chains, and then a solid acid resin to split those shorter chains into individual sugar molecules that can then be used for biofuels. The new approach could make for plentiful biofuels that don't compete with food crops.

Even very-tough microcrystalline cellulose can be broken down into sugar molecules by using this approach, said lead researcher Ferdi Schüth of the Max Planck Institute in Mülheim.

"With this method, you can even use wood at the beginning of the process. That is why this approach really can be said to allow wood to be converted directly into sugar," he said.

The sugar molecules obtained at the end of the process can be used in many different ways. For example, they can be fermented to produce ethanol. And because plant, wood and straw waste can be used to produce bioethanol and biodiesel, the new method does not compete with scarce corn or other food crops.

So far, breaking apart the linkages that hold sugar molecules together in cellulose in plants and wood has been very difficult, and as a result they have not been readily available for biofuels. At room temperature and without the addition of microorganisms, cellulose would take millions of years to decay. The strength of these cellulose chains also means that human beings are not able to digest plant fiber or wood. Only some animals such as cows have the bacteria needed to break down chains of cellulose into sugar molecules, and so turn grass into food and energy.

Up to now, conventional methods for converting cellulose to sugar have used acid baths or high temperatures and pressures that require massive amounts of energy. This new method, however, works by first dissolving cellulose in an ionic liquid so that the long chains are broken down into shorter, single stranded chains called oligomers. These ionic baths are organic salts that are liquid at room temperature; they are also capable of giving off H+ protons.

"This step makes the long glucose chains available for further chemical reactions," Schüth said.

By adding water, the shorter cellulose chains can then be filtered out from the ionic solvent, which can be reused as a catalyst. To break down the glucose chains that have been separated out from the ionic solvent into individual sugar molecules, an additional step is needed, which means treatment with an enzyme. The process of converting cellulose into ever shorter chains is called depolymerization.

However, Schüth said the method still has a way to go before it is ready to be commercialized. One problem is that the ionic solvents are very expensive and so using this method in large-scale industrial processes is not yet economically effective.

The new method comes as researchers in Germany are stepping up their efforts to find innovative ways of tapping bioenergy sources to address growing concerns about the merits of using food crops or agricultural land for biofuels because of their impact on food prices and the environment.

Additional research areas include looking for breakthroughs in technology to turn wood into gas or other forms of energy, to use biomass for cooling, and to use old wood to prepare pellets.

The soaring price of oil and gas has made wood an increasingly attractive option.

To generate, for example, the equivalent of 1000 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of heat costs around €35 [US $44] if wood pellets are used compared to €75 and €85 [US $95 and $107] if natural gas or oil is used.

The 14th Austrian Biomass Conference to be held in November in Grieskirchen is just one of the many conferences being held this year that aims to showcase innovative technologies and the new approaches that can be used to tap the energy in biomass.

"The biomass congress can be seen as a kaleidoscope for everything in biomass that can be turned into energy," said Ernst Scheiber, the head of the Austrian Biomass Association, the organization that is hosting the conference.

More than 100,000 people are employed in the bioenergy branch in Germany alone and the sector's turnover is expected to grow by 30 percent this year to €13 billion up from €10 billion in 2007. And as researchers find ever more innovative way to tap the almost limitless energy available in biomass, the bioenergy boom is sure to last.

Jane Burgermeiser is a writer based in Austria.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (14)
 
No image available
October 28, 2008
For more info devoted to breaking down biomass into sugar/biofuels, a good article I found is:

http://www.greentechmedia.com/articles/cellulosic-sugar-could-be-next-sweet-investment-idea-5042.html

what an amazing possibility, if we can begin to convert switchgrass, sweet sorghum, jatropha, wood chips and other nonfood sources into fuel !!!
Comment 1 of 14
No image available
October 28, 2008
Hey tim thanks for the tip on Greentech Media. I like the green light blog. cool site. also earth2tech and wsj are good for cleantech, if interested.
Comment 2 of 14
No image available
October 28, 2008
Yikes, better start planting more trees now... How 'bout down at or below sea level in the low desert, then use siphoned ocean water for the cooling process required for CSP. That water turns to steam itself. If that water isn't all used for cleaning mirrors, then it can be used to grow biofuels (and the soil needed to trap CO2).
Comment 3 of 14
No image available
October 29, 2008
Producing biofuels from plant cellulose is being pursued by a number of companies using a variety of methods, none of which, as far as I know have reached commercial production. Any plant material is good feedstock but I expect Tim Foley's inclusion of Jatropha in his list of possibilities was in error since the oil from Jatropha Curcas can be directly refined (transesterification) into biodiesel.
Fireofenergy's concerns are unfounded because it is unlikely that anything other than waste wood or forestry trimmings will be broken down into cellulose.
One of the objectives of 2nd generation biofuels processes is to add value to farming and forestry operations by utilising the WASTE materials as feedstock for conversion into biofuels.
Not sure about using saltwater as a coolant either. I would imagine it would be very corrosive. Anyway CSP processes don't need cooling, they are designed to generate heat to make steam to drive turbines. They work at temperatures between 250 and 400 deg C.
Comment 4 of 14
No image available
October 29, 2008
There is already an old hat technology, applied in a new way, that ultimately provides greater benefits......Closed-Loop Pyrolysis of biomass.

Charles Mann ("1491")in the Sept. National Geographic has a wonderful soils article which places Terra Preta / Biochar soils center stage.

We need to encourage more coverage now, to ride Mann's coattails to public critical mass.

Please put this (soil) bug in your colleague's ears. These issues need to gain traction among all the various disciplines who have an iron in this fire.
http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2008/09/soil/mann-text

Terra Preta soils data base;
http://terrapreta.bioenergylists.org/?q=node

NASA's Dr, James Hansen new Global warming solutions paper cites Biochar land management as central to success.
http://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/0804/0804.1126.pdf

The many new university programs & field studies

The International Biochar Initiative Conference Sept 8 in New Castle;
http://www.biochar-international.org/ibi2008conference/aboutibi2008conference.html

Given the current "Crisis" atmosphere concerning energy, soil sustainability, food vs. Biofuels, and Climate Change what other subject addresses them all?

Biochar, the modern version of an ancient Amazonian agricultural practice called Terra Preta (black earth), is gaining widespread credibility as a way to address world hunger, climate change, rural poverty, deforestation, and energy shortages… SIMULTANEOUSLY!

This technology represents the most comprehensive, low cost, and productive approach to long term stewardship and sustainability.
Terra Preta Soils a process for Carbon Negative Bio fuels, massive Carbon sequestration,10X Lower Methane & N2O soil emissions, and 3X Fertility Too.

Every 1 ton of Biomass yields 1/3 ton Charcoal for soil Sequestration in an ever growing , virtuous energy cycle

Carbon to the Soil, the only ubiquitous and economic place to put it.
Comment 5 of 14
No image available
October 29, 2008
if we want to be sustainable we should direclty use electricity in electric cars with minimum loss than using it to produce biofuels which burn even at lesser efficiency in gasoline cars.
Comment 6 of 14
No image available
October 29, 2008
What is the energy needed for the process? Energy efficiency is what we need.
Comment 7 of 14
No image available
October 29, 2008
65% of Agave tequilana weber's fibre is cellulose. Other agave species goes up to 72%. We don't need to cut down more trees!

Our enhanced variety (cultivar) of Agave produces two hundred tonnes of biomass per hectare per year, equivalent to 26 tonnes of cellulose. Around 3 million tonnes of agave dry fibre are wasted in Mexico every year. There will be an overproduction of one million tonnes of agave plants for 2009.

Agave produces 4X more cellulose than the fastest-gfrowing Eucalyptus, and 2X more dry biomass than the GMO poplar tree or switchgrass

When the technology for cellulosic ethanol is ready, agave will be there.
agaveproject2@gmail.com
Comment 8 of 14
No image available
October 29, 2008
Perhaps someone would like to explain how, if all this biomass is used for fuel, they expect to be able to maintain the tilth of our soil?

It remains just as insane to burn plant parts that contribute to good soil quality as it does to burn the fruit parts we'd otherwise eat.

Biofuels are assumed to be renewable. They are, only up to a point. The net cost will turn out to be our reduced capacity to grow anything together with growing competition for fresh water.

When are we going to resolve to use energy sources that don't degrade anything: solar, wind, tide?

Beavercreek, OR
Comment 9 of 14
No image available
October 29, 2008
Maybe there is a mash by-product that can be returned for soil fertility.

Could we replace growing cellulus in soil with using the wild hyacinth weed cellulus that almost choked all the San Francisco bay harbors?

Hyacinth only uses polution in the water to grow.

Lets work it out together.
Comment 10 of 14
No image available
October 30, 2008
I was kinda like kidding about the trees because I know they are renewable and forgot to think about waste wood or what not. On a very large scale though, the best plants would have to be farmed on land that is not used for anything already.
Thanks for the input about CSP. I've read that they do have to be cooled, and that initial plant costs are higher for air cooling. (It seems though, that in the process of turning a turbine, the steam would have to cool as a result). I also read somewhere that in the Middle East, they use salt water to cool such things. So it just may be possible to "feed" two birds..
Comment 11 of 14
No image available
October 30, 2008
What about using sustainable hemp. The hulls and leaves are a perfect example of what is needed in terms of cellulose feedstock. Hemp is easy to grow on any land especially here in Canada since it is legal to do so.

Between the seeds for oil, the hulls and leaves you get twice the bang for you buck - biodiesel or food oils plus cellulose - feedstock for ethanol.

I know quite a bit about obtaining the nessesary license for growing hemp plus I know of Canadian governement funding which will help pay for (25%) of initial investment and another government program which will give an incentive to produce ethanol up to $.10 a liter.

I would like to discuss this with anyone interested. Lets tap this opportunity and resource.

Email me at siltri1@gmail.com
Comment 12 of 14
No image available
October 31, 2008
I just added the following comment to an article in the latest e-zine regarding ethanol from olive stones, I think the same general argument applies to all biomass to ethanol, although the numbers for wood may be slightly better.

The HHV (higher heating value) of ethanol is 29.8MJ/Kg and I have found an article which quotes the heating value of the stones as 17.7MJ/kg, (sounds about right) and on this basis the energy in 5.7Kg of ethanol represents about 9.6% of the energy in the original 100Kg of stones, not particularly good return but it gets worse. My guess is that the ethanol will end up as petrol substitute, in a car with a T2W (tank to wheel) efficiency of about 25% (combined town/highway cycle) so the final energy yield is about 2.5% of the original feedstock.
Alternatively, burn them any other way to produce electricity, even straight burning in a biomass power station should convert at least 35% to electricity. Now use this to run BEV's (battery electric vehicles) operating at 80% T2W efficiency and the combined efficiency is 28%, over eleven times better than the ethanol route!!
In general I would say that bioethanol production is a poor use of biomass energy resources if it ends up in the fuel tanks of cars.
Comment 13 of 14
No image available
November 1, 2008
-------"Perhaps someone would like to explain how, if all this biomass is used for fuel, they expect to be able to maintain the tilth of our soil?"----------

Richard, what do you mean, "tilth"? Do you mean fertility? Forests have been growing for billions of years without intervention from man an have maintained their fertility.

If we were to use forest biomass to produce fuel----biologically speaking it is no different than riding a horse or pulling a cart with oxen. Making ethanol or biodiesel is still using the same ultimate power source in our vehicles that all biological organisms use. The sun.

If we have X total amount of land available to grow trees to make biofuels, and it takes 80 years to grow a forest-----if we cut down 1/80th X per year----and we plant one tree for each tree we cut down, we never run out of trees. If we plant two trees for each tree we cut down, in 80 years we end up with twice as much forest as we have now. Even the Great Plains with only grass supported vast herds of buffalo that took days just to pass by. The capacity of the biological system to catch and store solar energy is prodigious.

I think the concern about water IS correct. Not because water is scarce--but because the human management of water resources has been pretty damned stupid up to now. Water is the ultimate recyclable. It has been humans who have handled its use unwisely. There is PLENTY of water for any use we need----but we need to use it wisely. And reuse it wisely. Dumping toxic poisons in it is not wise.
Comment 14 of 14
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
SkyFuel Second Wind Inc. Solar Technologies Alter Systems, LLC ActSolar Conergy Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo