Photo Credit: University of Illinois
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (22) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
August 1, 2008

Miscanthus Shows Great Potential as Ethanol Feedstock

by Diana Yates, University of Illinios
Illinois, United States [RenewbleEnergyWorld.com]

In the largest field trial of its kind in the United States, researchers have determined that the giant perennial grass Miscanthus x giganteus outperforms current biofuels sources -- by a lot. Using Miscanthus as a feedstock for ethanol production in the U.S. could significantly reduce the acreage dedicated to biofuels while meeting government biofuels production goals, the researchers report.

"Keep in mind that this Miscanthus is completely unimproved, so if we were to do the sorts of things that we've managed to do with corn, where we've increased its yield threefold over the last 50 years, then it's not unreal to think that we could use even less than 10 percent of the available agricultural land."

-- Professor Stephen P. Long, Deputy Director, Energy Biosciences Institute, University of Illinios

Using corn or switchgrass to produce enough ethanol to offset 20 percent of gasoline use — a current White House goal — would take 25 percent of current U.S. cropland out of food production, the researchers report. Getting the same amount of ethanol from Miscanthus would require only 9.3 percent of current agricultural acreage.

"What we've found with Miscanthus is that the amount of biomass generated each year would allow us to produce about 2 1/2 times the amount of ethanol we can produce per acre of corn," said crop sciences professor Stephen P. Long, who led the study. Long is the deputy director of the BP-sponsored Energy Biosciences Institute, a multi-year, multi-institutional initiative aimed at finding low-carbon or carbon-neutral alternatives to petroleum-based fuels. Long is an affiliate of the U. of I.'s Institute for Genomic Biology.

In trials across Illinois, switchgrass, a perennial grass which, like Miscanthus, requires fewer chemical and mechanical inputs than corn, produced only about as much ethanol feedstock per acre as corn, Long said.

"It wasn't that we didn't know how to grow switchgrass because the yields we obtained were actually equal to the best yields that had been obtained elsewhere with switchgrass," he said. Corn yields in Illinois are also among the best in the nation.

"One reason why Miscanthus yields more biomass than corn is that it produces green leaves about six weeks earlier in the growing season," Long said. Miscanthus also stays green until late October in Illinois, while corn leaves wither at the end of August, he said.

The growing season for switchgrass is comparable to that of Miscanthus, but it is not nearly as efficient at converting sunlight to biomass as Miscanthus, Frank Dohleman, a graduate student and co-author on the study, found.

"One of the criticisms of using any biomass as a biofuel source is it has been claimed that plants are not very efficient — about 0.1 percent efficiency of conversion of sunlight into biomass," Long said. "What we show here is on average Miscanthus is in fact about 1 percent efficient, so about 1 percent of sunlight ends up as biomass."

"Keep in mind that when we consider our energy use, a few hours of solar energy falling on the earth are equal to all the energy that people use over a whole year, so you don't really need that high an efficiency to be able to capture that in plant material and make use of it as a biofuel source," he said.

Field trials also showed that Miscanthus is tolerant of poor soil quality, Long said.

"Our highest productivity is actually occurring in the south, on the poorest soils in the state," he said. "So that also shows us that this type of crop may be very good for marginal land or land that is not even being used for crop production."

Because Miscanthus is a perennial grass, it also accumulates much more carbon in the soil than an annual crop such as corn or soybeans, Long said.

"In the context of global change, that's important because it means that by producing a biofuel on that land you're taking carbon out of the atmosphere and putting it into the soil."

Researchers at Illinois are exploring all aspects of biofuels production, from the development of feedstocks such as Miscanthus, to planting, harvest, storage, transport, conversion to biofuels and carbon sequestration.

Using Miscanthus in an agricultural setting has not been without its challenges, Long said. Because it is a sterile hybrid, it must be propagated by planting underground stems, called rhizomes. This was initially a laborious process, Long said, but mechanization allows the team to plant about 15 acres a day. In Europe, where Miscanthus has been grown for more than a decade, patented farm equipment can plant about 50 acres of Miscanthus rhizomes a day, he said.

Once established, Miscanthus returns annually without need for replanting. If harvested in December or January, after nutrients have returned to the soil, it requires little fertilizer.

This sterile form of Miscanthus has not been found to be invasive in Europe or the U.S., Long said.

Many companies are building or operating plants in the U.S. to produce ethanol from lignocellulosic feedstocks, the non-edible parts of plants, and companies are propagating Miscanthus rhizomes for commercial sale, Long said.

Although research has led to improvements in productivity and growers are poised to begin using it as a biofuels crop on a large scale, Miscanthus is in its infancy as an agricultural product, Long said.

"Keep in mind that this Miscanthus is completely unimproved, so if we were to do the sorts of things that we've managed to do with corn, where we've increased its yield threefold over the last 50 years, then it's not unreal to think that we could use even less than 10 percent of the available agricultural land," Long said. "And if you can actually grow it on non-cropland that would be even better."

Diana Yates is life sciences editor at the University of Illinois.

Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (22)
 
No image available
Miss Can't Thus will become illegal to grow soon as congress learns of the affordable potential for energy production.
Step one will cost taxpayers a few thousand in federal grants to prove everything that is wrong and miss can't thus be trusted to common fowlkes and miss can't thus must not be legal..
Step two will cost taxpayers billions paying land owners "Not to Grow" . Miss can't thus be grown without international license from the UN.
Step three will send all traces and genetic material to mars and moon because miss can't thus be allowed to coexist with foreign terrorist oil on international soil per united nations proposals adopted by EU and north american union.
Meanwhile, contratulations!
Comment 1 of 22
No image available
August 1, 2008
I seriously doubt that anyone will ever be able to grow hemp in a desert. I don't believe that any significant amount of hemp production would not interfere with world-wide food production. Actually hemp could be a good food source. Check wikipedia for hemp:http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hemp.
Comment 2 of 22
No image available
Nay! Neigh! Nought! Shame! Shame! Shame on you!
How to ever abuse and destroy the global energy supply from foreign terrorist nations if energy is developed from local, affordable, nonintrusive, environmentally friendly, universally adopted, international certified, UN acknowledged, EU friendly, Russian blessed, international labor, that converts global religion carbon credits to pure, clean oxygen simultaneously removing from federal "pay to not grow" 40 million acres marginal land
Comment 3 of 22
No image available
August 1, 2008
the key word is "arable". hemp according to my best info grows on all sorts of land that cannot support conventional agriculture.
Comment 4 of 22
No image available
August 1, 2008
We have to stop this non-sense of using arable land at 1% solar efficiency when we can use desert land at 20% efficiency or more with existing technologies.

Biofuels cannot be part of the solution to global pollutions and energy independence until we can grow plants in deserts at efficiencies of 10% and more.

Biofuels are part of the problem, not the solution, to rising global pollutions. In addition to that, biofuels inevitably use arable land and push farmers to destroy forests worsening the problem.
Comment 5 of 22
No image available
August 1, 2008
I guess some good news but where is the research and comparative yields on using industrial hemp for biofuels? believe hemp is even more tolerant of rotten soils/ actually improves soils and requires zero inputs.....
Comment 6 of 22
No image available
August 2, 2008
This is fabulous news. Here in eastern Colorado we have hundreds of thousands of acres of land that are currently "unproductive." If this stuff will grow in a dry climate, then it looks like a win/win.
Comment 7 of 22
No image available
August 2, 2008
IF this crop is a profitable, by subsidies or the market place, to grow as a bio-crop on poor soils and unused farm land THEN what will stop corn/wheat/soy bean farmers from converting their lands over to growing it and making even bigger profits than they can on their normal crops???

Nothing. We are right back at:

BIOFUELS = STARVATION AND DEATH FOR THE POOR.
Comment 8 of 22
No image available
August 6, 2008
Here is a better picture of this grass:
http://www.aces.uiuc.edu/news/News_Photos/miscanthus2/pages/miscanthus2.html

Fellows this is a scary step.
First it will be competing with cattle feed production and celebrate monoculture with a capital M.
Second it will require an infrastructure larger than the present US sugar beet industry.
Third, it will take huge quantities of water in a world where we are actually running into shortages of water.

Then there are the adverse side issues: processing plants with ferocious smells, demand for the use of city wastewater, unexpected blooms of fungus, flies and vertebrates, and large fires that the prairies have not seen in over 100 years.

All this brought to you by BP. Didn't we fight 2 wars to get out from under the British?
Comment 9 of 22
No image available
August 6, 2008
How about growing these types of feedstocks on government lands like highway medians and right of ways? That is wasted space if ever there was any. Then the states could use the revenue generated for road improvements. Just a thought.
Comment 10 of 22
No image available
August 6, 2008
I don't think growing this grass will take any feed away from the cattle industry. Once the grass is distilled it is not thrown away, but will be put back into circulation again as feed. And because of the enzymes and yeasts that are added to the mash to make ethanol a much more nutritious feed is given back to the cattle, pigs, whatever. It is a very efficient process. So not only is ethanol being produced, but a feed is being enriched which is better for the cattle than corn. Corn is actually a very inefficient crop to use both for ethanol and as a feed. Cattle have a tougher time digesting corn than any of the other grains available. Their stomachs are actually designed to digest grasses much better than the heavy corn.

Be careful about the propaganda against ethanol, many more benefits are derived from ethanol then just the fuel itself. This (http://www.alcoholcanbeagas.com/) is a wonderful sight to learn more about ethanol and the many benefits from its production.
Comment 11 of 22
No image available
August 6, 2008
MIscanthus x giganteus (MxG) is indeed a good biofuel source, several times better than switchgrass. However, some important points: 1. The variety used must be sterile! Otherwise terrible things can/will happen, 2. There is indeed a great water shortage here, but MxG uses much less water than corn or other biofuel feedstock. It would be even more water efficient if subsurface drip irrigation were used, 3. MxG is touted as being able to be grown on poor land. That might be true, but all the production figures, data, etc. are from good land, 4. If algal biodiesel works out (much more space efficent, water efficient, etc.) there will be a lot of MxG farms that are going out of business.

However, its use to grow the 10-15% ethanol we need to clean up our gas is probably a good idea - a lot better than using food-based feedstocks, which is both immoral and uneconomical.
Comment 12 of 22
No image available
August 6, 2008
If you want some counter-propaganda then I suggest visiting www.energyjustice.net (also notice we aren't trying to sell you anything!)

There are fact sheets on Ethanol as well as Bio-diesel complete with research and footnotes (being updated - email if you want the latest version). Much of the data is backed by information from the corporate shills themselves.

I agree with the above comment that cows are meant to eat grasses and not corn grain, but what about the side effects of this ethanol by-product on their digestive system? Have their been studies? The Dried Distiller's Grains from corn ethanol production as been linked (Kansas State study Dec 2007 "http://www.eurekalert.org/pub_releases/2007-12/ksu-krf120307.php") to increase in E Coli 0157 in our beef cows and from the diary producers I've come in contact with - they won't let their cows near the DDG's.

And that's not to mention how you'd have these Biorefineries for agrofuels become magnets for corporate factory farms. And they themselves need to burn coal or natural gas to distill the fuel. Yes, there are some benefits to ethanol - but many more problems especially when you look at the whole supply chain...like nuclear shills that claim no CO2 and fail to mention CFC (114), which are thousands of times more potent for "global warming."

I checked out that web site and while I am happy with some of the info - at least the busting the ethanol myths page is incomplete. I favor a more holistic view and approach, whereas that page sets up straw men arguments and the information is incomplete.


Also, if anyone has scientific, verifiable, data on Hemp based biofuels I would be very appreciative to have anything sent my way. I am well aware of the benefits, but I don't have any useful information compiled that isn't in video format.
mida@energyjustice.net
Comment 13 of 22
No image available
August 6, 2008
I did read the K-State report, but I'd still like to see some more of the parameters. It is an interest of concern though and I will keep my eyes and ears open for more such stories. That's the first one I've heard.

I don't agree with cutting back speeds or reducing our amount of driving time – even though that will happen. And I don't agree with Al Gore and all of the worrying about the green house effect. I think those issues are a diversion for something else that may be going on behind the scenes. Remember that gasoline is a byproduct of oil not a major product of it - after the oil companies have used everything for fertilizer and medicines, what's left over is used for our autos. Getting away from our dependency upon big oil is what we should be concerned about and I don't see any other types of fuels to use except for ethanol.

My personal opinion is that we have no business with troops overseas and one of these days it's going to come back and bite us in the rear end. When that happens, then we've got a big problem. I think as a nation we need to look at ways of being totally self sufficient and not dependant upon the big oil companies at all. Self sufficiency should be our focus.
Comment 14 of 22
No image available
August 6, 2008
Thanks Joe.

I'm not a Gore fan either for many many reasons and I don't feel up to being political on this board. I also agree that his hype is a big diversion and know that there is something going on behind the curtain.

How can we be self-sufficient? We are dependent on foreign sources just to grow our domestic crops. Between 1991 and 2006, nitrogen-based fertilizer imports tripled, from 14% to 42%. Domestic phosphorus peaked in 1980 and we now import much from China and Morocco has the other prime source available. 80% Potash is imported (albeit from Canada).

I'd like our focus to be on CONSERVATION (icky word, right?) and EFFICIENCY. You'd be surprised how much we could save - I know I was when I looked at the statistics.

With all the politicians trumpeting "Change" - you better believe you'll have to change your style of living soon. We're doing what we can to make it a bit more pleasant for all of us. We're all in this together.

I'd like to read more on progress in algae based biofuels. Instead of wasting time, money, and resources on IGCC, or any new coal or new nuclear - surely we could find a way to get clean concentrated co2 for the feedstock. I'm incredibly skeptical on anything cellulosic or 2nd generation ethanol at this point. And while bio-diesel from used grease is wonderful - it's not viable large scale and I'm tired of genetically modified soy monoculture.
Comment 15 of 22
No image available
August 6, 2008
I'm enthralled by commens such as "there's something going on behond the curtain". Could the poster maybe give a link to some serious backup to let the rest of us know what is going on ?
Comment 16 of 22
No image available
August 6, 2008
Colm - if you have to ask, you'll never know.

And if you're really serious we could discuss elsewhere, particularly because it is off topic.

Truth carries a burden of responsibility and must be respected.
Comment 17 of 22
No image available
August 6, 2008
Biofuels can be made from algue grown in factories requireing 0% of our ariable land. This would make it a tough sell with agricultural interests.
Comment 18 of 22
No image available
August 7, 2008
I know that in my own home and community we're starting to look at ethanol, methane and greenhouses - a combination of using all three to become independent. A group that I volunteer with gleans the local fields when in season and also picks up the culls from our local grocery stores on a daily basis. After we pick up the culls, we re-cull it again to separate the good from the bad and give the good to all of the members and the bad goes to livestock or a compost pile. Unfortunately we are not as efficient as I would like to see it and we are working and struggling to change. If you look at One Accord Food Pantry (http://www.oneaccordfoodpantry.org/), in New York, they have a really good operation going on, even though they too are on tough times. This is what I'm doing to try in my search, to become self sufficient.

Lately I'm hearing too much news about Iran and their so called possible hidden nuclear arsenal, and I'm afraid that another 9-11 is going to happen, but this time it's going to be much worse. This is the reason why I feel so strongly about becoming self sufficient – I think a big change is coming to America. Ethanol, which is a renewable resource will power our vehicles, methane, which is also renewable can fire a turbine for electricity or even be used as a heating and cooking gas, and greenhouses to raise our own food.

On another note, cattails are also a wonderful source for bio-fuels and feed stock.
Comment 19 of 22
No image available
August 7, 2008
We need to use this plant "Arundo Donax" more than an other see info below

Arundo produces an average of 25 tons of high quality fiber per acre twice annually. One of Its most significant uses will be to produce chips for the manufacture of high-grade biofuel pellets or dried chips. Highly significant also is the importance of a crop with a greater than 20 to 25 year growing cycle without annual replanting, and the ability to exclude many costly fertilizers and weed killers which are also an environmental concern, that will return agriculture to a more profitable basis than many crops.

Arundo is an ideal biofuel (8,000 BTU's/lb) that produces methanol from gas diffusion as a byproduct in manufacturing cellulose. The option to gasify this product is to produce independently a valuable energy product.It is possible to utilize new high efficiency gasification systems to convert Arundo into a multitude of different energy sources, such as syngas, standard steam turbine electrical generation, ethanol and bio-diesel.
Comment 20 of 22
No image available
August 27, 2008
Hi Barry, can you give me please some more information about source of this sensational news you've wrote: "Arundo produces an average of 25 tons of high quality fiber per acre twice annually." ? Arundo is a bamboo, empty insite the stalks, and I never heard use bamboo as cultivated crop, even in Asia. I can give all folks news about IDEAL RES CROP - Sida hermaphrodita, if you want. My web: www.bni.com.pl. Presentation is also on demand. roman.molas@gmx.de
Comment 21 of 22
No image available
March 4, 2009
Great story!
Anyone got any info on where I can get seeds to plant Miscanthus here in East Africa? I'm still big on hemp, but am waiting to obtain a friend's hemp permit who's moved on to drilling boreholes. :-)
I've also been reading up on Arundo Donax...looks good too. I'm glad I didn't get into the Jatropha thingy back then. These crops look way more promising.
Please send any info to me at MaxTheITpro[at]gmail.com regarding opportunities to grow this crop in the heart of East Africa (Tanzania, Kenya, Uganda).
Comment 22 of 22
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Conergy Inc. Solarfun American Solar Energy Society Michigan Economic Development Corporation groSolar Financial Research Associates, LLC
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo