Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
Photo Credit: Renner, Joel - INEEL
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (24) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
August 28, 2008

Geothermal Energy's Potential

by Ken Silverstein, Editor-in-Chief, EnergyBiz Insider
Washington, D.C. United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

The presidential candidates are stumping hard. And while energy and environmental issues are getting frequent mentions, both the Republican and Democratic leaders are neglecting one area: geothermal energy.

"This environmental advantage is due to low emissions and the small overall footprint of the entire geothermal system, which results because energy capture and extraction is contained entirely underground, and the surface equipment needed for conversion to electricity is relatively compact."

-- Jeff Tester, Professor, MIT Engineering

It now makes up just a sliver of the electricity generation pie. But experts at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology say that enhanced geothermal systems (EGS) could have far wider applications and be especially useful in times of high energy prices and carbon constraints. Not only are the systems much cleaner than fossil fuels but they also provide a continuous flow of energy — all at a competitive prices.

"Geothermal energy could play an important role in our national energy picture as a non-carbon-based energy source," says Nafi Toksoz, professor of geophysics at MIT. "It's a very large resource and has the potential to be a significant contributor to the energy needs of this country." Geothermal now provides less than 1 percent of the world's power, he says, although could supply as much as 20 percent in the coming decades.

To get there, the MIT panel says that the tools to perfect deep drilling and water flow through the underground navigation system are needed. MIT Engineering Professor Jeff Tester and panel member David Blackwell, professor of geophysics at Southern Methodist University in Texas, also point out that geothermal resources are available nationwide. But the highest-grade sites are in western states where hot rocks are closer to the surface, requiring less drilling and thereby reducing exploration costs.

The EGS study says that several wells must be drilled to reach those hot rocks. Once there, those wells must then be linked with natural or induced fractures in the rock to allow the water to flow through. Water is pumped via the wells through these fractures in the hot rock and up to the surface to run electric generators at the surface. Unlike conventional fossil-fuel power plants that burn coal, natural gas or oil, no fuel would be required. To that end, the panel says that the environmental effects of geothermal power are "markedly lower" than either fossil fuels or nuclear power. And unlike wind and solar systems, a geothermal plant works night and day.

"This environmental advantage is due to low emissions and the small overall footprint of the entire geothermal system, which results because energy capture and extraction is contained entirely underground, and the surface equipment needed for conversion to electricity is relatively compact," says Tester.

Commercial Scale

It's not an easy objective. It costs a lot of money to drill wells in large part because explorers need to drill deep into the earth, often 5,000 feet or more below the earth's surface.

MIT's report also notes that meeting water requirements for geothermal plants may be an issue, particularly in arid regions. Further, the water that is used to create electricity much be kept separate from drinking water supplies to prevent contamination.  Additionally, the potential for seismic risk from fluid injection needs to be carefully monitored. The cumulative effect of all those obstacles has led skeptics to conclude that geothermal energy will remain a nominal power source.

Others, however, are more upbeat. Some of the same technologies now being used by the oil and gas industries to minimize their environmental footprints can be applied to drilling wells to create geothermal energy. In a carbon constrained world, companies would have the incentive to make such investments.

"The possibility of drilling into these rocks, fracturing them and pumping water in to produce steam has already been shown to be feasible," says MIT's Toksoz. He emphasizes that the same concept could be replicated throughout the nation but that advanced tools are necessary so that it could all be accomplished in commercial-scale.

Closer to Home

Ground source heat pumps are another form of geothermal energy that can be tapped into by households and businesses to meet their heating and cooling needs.  In this application, pipes are buried in the ground at a depth where the temperature of the earth remains constant, usually several meters. 

Because the earth's temperature is always moderate at 50-60 degrees Fahrenheit, these types of heating and cooling systems are less stressed than conventional ones. That conserves a lot of energy when compared to units that use centralized air and heat. Monthly savings could total somewhere between 25 percent and 50 percent of current utility bills. And that's why the federal government has a goal of getting 7 million homes and businesses to use geothermal heat pumps by 2010.

In New Mexico, schools are being retrofitted with geothermal heat pumps that developers say will save as much as 50 percent on energy bills. And the Little Rock, Ark. region is installing geothermal units at several fire stations and one police outpost.  Several schools in Iowa have geothermal heating and cooling systems, as well as at least one in Wisconsin.

Of course, these are pricey too. The U.S. Department of Energy pegs an average home installation at about US $7,500. While that is more than a conventional heating and cooling system, the DOE claims that depending on factors such as climate, soil conditions, system features and financing and incentives, homeowners can expect to recoup their investment in anywhere between two and ten years.

Now that energy topics are taking center stage in the presidential debate, it would be remiss of the candidates not to discuss the possibilities of geothermal energy. Like any burgeoning energy form, it must endure several impediments while also attracting a sizable investment to allow it to reach a critical mass. With several projects underway, the process has begun.

Ken Silverstein is an award-winning journalist who is the editor-in-chief of Energy Central's publication, EnergyBiz Insider. With a background in economics and public policy, he has spent several years writing about the issues that touch the energy and financial sectors, and his work has been published in more than 100 periodicals.

Republished with permission from CyberTech, Inc. EnergyBiz Insider is published three days a week by Energy Central. For more information about Energy Central, or to subscribe to EnergyBiz Insider, other e-newsletters and EnergyBiz magazine, please go to http://www.energycentral.com/.

 

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (24)
 
No image available
I enjoyed reading about the schools and police station.

There should be a hard 20 year push to make all emergency facilities (fire stations, police stations...) independent of the grid. First electrically, then for water with sewage treatment, rain capture and recycling. When the technology improves, fire trucks and police cars should become plug-in hybrids, heavily weighted electrically (30-50 mile radius on electricity alone). The electricity would be produced at the facility with wind, solar, geothermal etc.

Along with this it wouldn't hurt to add schools and all public buildings to the mix. The schools would then better serve as emergency shelters if ever needed for a natural catastrophe.

Prepare and plan ahead should become a national motto.
Comment 1 of 24
No image available
August 29, 2008
Despite what MIT professors might say, deep geothermal wells have difficult-to-quantify risks that the world just does not need. Just as the combustion technology and the chemical technology of the industrial revolution have been accompanied by catastrophic unintended consequences, so can this deep well technology. Pumping water through hot rocks thousands of feet below ground and then bringing the resulting chemical cocktail to the surface, will have consequences that will be deleterious to the living systems of the earth. On the other hand, shallow geothermal heat pumps are a very promising clean technology. They inject heat into the ground in the summer which is recaptured during the winter along with the solar energy that is stored there as well. This very benign technology is already in widespread use in the UK. The U.S. needs to catch up after eight years of the oil companies running the country to ruin. It would be better if they run the country into the ground - pun intended.
Comment 2 of 24
No image available
August 29, 2008
Do not fear geothermal power Mr Cole:) Take a look at the below web site. www.nzgeothermal.org.nz. My country New Zealand has been operating geothermal power stations in NZ for more than 20 years. We use a process called Binary generation, in which you operate two closed loops. One cycling water down to the heat souce, the water comes back and the heat is transfered via aheat exchanger into the turbine closed loop. Safe and clean. In one instance waste heat is captured and sent next door to a massive glasshouse complex which is used to grow produce regaurdless of the out side climate. I am convinced that this is the most likely technology that can be used as a clean base load energy source. Also often overlooked is the economic multiplier of such a site. The jobs and money stay inside the country. 85% of NZ's energy is currently generated by renewable means and the goverment will not allow any coal, gas or petroleum power stations to be built.
Comment 3 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
I am a big Geothermal Development supporter....but I wonder why do that when we can do this?....................
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDJpUVlWK0c
Comment 4 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
This use of the term "geothermal" is misleading in this article. The term is also used to describe the process whereby ground source heat pumps are used for both heating and cooling. GSHP technology is extremely efficient and can be employed anywhere on earth with relatively shallow drilling. While it doesn't generate electricity, it offers homeowners relatively inexpensive heating and cooling using no fossil fuels and minimal electricity (which, of course can be supplied with PV). We need to clearly define WHICH version of geothermal technology we're discussing in these articles.
Comment 5 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
Mr. Cole: Geothermal heat pumps ARE in widespread use in the US and have been for decades. Don't stretch the truth just because you have a political ax to grind.
Comment 6 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
With the latest directional drilling technology and GPS able to pinpoint exactly where the pipes are going, why wouldn't it be possible to drill from two directions and meet in the middle creating a giant closed loop? Then there wouldn't be the need to create fractures to pump the fluid into the ground to generate steam and all the other concerns associated with working below ground.
Comment 7 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
An area that has had almost NO research but sounds extremely promising to me is using abandoned or non-producing oil wells to produce energy by geothermal.

The expensive part(drilling) has already been done. The wells are just sitting there capped off. UT has surveyed 11 west Texas counties and determined 5000MW potential power could be easily generated in the survey area alone. The western half of the state alone has some estimated 600,000 abandoned oil wells.

I've been told that the average temperature of oil at the wellhead is 120*C to 150*C---plenty hot enough to produce easily usable amounts of energy---and very inexpensively considering the expensive drilling is already done.
Comment 8 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
Dominic writes in comment 4:
" am a big Geothermal Development supporter....but I wonder why do that when we can do this?....................
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YDJpUVlWK0c"

This is a perpetual motion machine scam that dates back at least 7 years; geothermal generation actually works....
Comment 9 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
Colin McRae writes in comment 7:
"With the latest directional drilling technology and GPS able to pinpoint exactly where the pipes are going, why wouldn't it be possible to drill from two directions and meet in the middle creating a giant closed loop? Then there wouldn't be the need to create fractures to pump the fluid into the ground to generate steam and all the other concerns associated with working below ground."

In enhanced geothermal energy generation you want to flow water through fractured rock before pumping it back out so that you can extract heat from a large volume of material. You don't get very much heat absorption just from the surface area of the bore holes, so the system would not be practical in the manner you envision.
Comment 10 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
It sounds practical to me. Or another possiblity would be to simply thread flexible pipe down the bore hole----one end stays at the surface, and thread down all the tube you want in a closed loop.. You have a loop---with an intake and out put ends at the surface.
Comment 11 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
Good point Fred. I believe the pipe they drill down with is fairly large bore so a closed loop could go in. You could use a working fluid like ammonia with a lower boiling point in a sytem like that. It might be similar to the Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion systems.
Comment 12 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
Heat transfer doesn't not necessarily need to be by fluids either, gases can also transfer heat. There are also a number of refrigerant gas/liquids like the ammonia that you suggest----they could be individually chosen to suit the temperture range of the site being worked with.
Comment 13 of 24
No image available
September 3, 2008
Fred Linn,
The term "Fluid" refers to anything that flows. That is, liquids and gases!
Comment 14 of 24
No image available
September 4, 2008
Re Ground Source Heat Pumps--the most commercial renewable--generally the payback is in the five year range, depending on the source. I did a retrofit using an existing 20 gal. a minute water well (open loop) dumping into a large dry well. However the electric load is very significant. The system is compressor based like a refrigerator or air conditioner. I went from using 1500 gals. of oil per winter to zero. The system is central air in the summer and provides almost half my hot water.
Comment 15 of 24
No image available
September 4, 2008
Can you prove it is a scam?
Comment 16 of 24
No image available
September 4, 2008
I'm a big fan of ground source heat pumps, but $7500/house does not apply to all locales. A bid for my house came in at $53,000 due primarily to rocky soil. This was new construction, not retrofit.
Comment 17 of 24
No image available
September 4, 2008
doggyd---------instead of digging down in the ground, how about laying the pipes out and piling dirt on top? Construction and excavators are always looking for someplace to dump dirt. If there is a low place somewhere on your property, you could have your pipes buried, and level out the landscape at the same time, practically for free with the right negotiations.
Comment 18 of 24
No image available
September 4, 2008
Doggyd:

there are also
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Air_source_heat_pumps
not just:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Geothermal_heat_pump

If your winters are mild, then the former should be enough.
Comment 19 of 24
No image available
September 5, 2008
In comment 17 Dominic Jermano writes concerning a supposed perpetual motion machine claimed by Australian "inventors" (and grifters) Christie and Brits:

"Can you prove it is a scam?"

This is clearly a perpetual motion machine of the first kind, which violates the laws of physics. You might want to read:
http://www.skeptics.com.au/journal/2001/3_lutec1.pdf
for some discussion.
Comment 20 of 24
No image available
September 11, 2008
What amount of electrical power is required to power the heat pump in a ground source heat pump system? If it is in spec with photovoltaic solar arrays couldn't you just power the heat pump with a solar / battery source and have a true zero net energy zero carbon heating system?
Comment 21 of 24
No image available
September 13, 2008
Rob, I can tell you that that the running wattage Watersource Heatpump as we call them in the trade, Varies with the size of the Machine, the smallest residential units, about 24,000 btu's will consume about 3500 watts not including the Fluid pump, with the typical largest being a 5ton or 60 to 65,000btuh unit will consume 8500 to 10,000 watts, U really have to contact the manufacturer of your unit, it varies widely, the biggest thing though and most overlooked on projects I'm involved in is the initial inrush or starting current, which can momentarily be 135 to 200amps, depending on the torque of the compressor, newer scroll compressors have lowered this quite a bit, and newer inverter technology (or load matching as some call it) promises better effiecencies, and lower power consumption as they vary the compressor capacity to match the House load, this has been available to the commercial market for many years but is just now being made financially competitive in the Residential market, I look forward to seeling a lot of the systems as as added benefiet is better comfort control as well as lower electric bills
Comment 22 of 24
No image available
September 13, 2008
Sorry, next time I promise to proof read before I submit a comment guys
Comment 23 of 24
No image available
September 15, 2008
Mark:

Thanks for the info. Sounds like you might be able to handle the momentary load with a combination of battery and the scroll compressors, and maybe even out the power consumption using the scrolls with some sort of an adaptive feedback system to sense and adapt to the load. Need some additional info on surface area required for current and near future PV arrays to meet the projected running wattage. Assuming a current shortfall, couldn't this still be augmented by the grid, using green kws to supplement?

>>>rob.
Comment 24 of 24
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Siterra Corporation PeopleSense Consulting LLC GoGreenSolar.com The Strategic Word 3TIER Apollo Solar
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo