Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 15 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

Previous Article
Next Article
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
July 4, 2008

REW Exclusive: Siemens New 3.6 MW Direct-drive "Concept" Wind Turbine

New design could prove a formidable wind technology asset.

by Eize de Vries, Wind Technology Correspondent for REW magazine

Ringkoebing, Denmark [Renewable Energy World magazine]

Will direct drive bring down the cost of energy from large-scale wind turbines? Next week, Siemens Energy will install a highly innovative 3.6-megawatt (MW) direct drive "concept" turbine at a location near Ringkoebing, Denmark, where it will undergo a two-year test period. Renewable Energy World magazine was invited to Denmark to take a look at progress on the assembly of the "concept" and to hear first-hand about Siemens' key strategies and considerations behind this important project.

It was in September 2004 — shortly before its acquisition by German-based Siemens — that the former Bonus Energy erected its geared 3.6-MW wind turbine prototype at a coastal multi-megawatt test site at Høvsøre (Jutland, Denmark).

Featuring a 107-meter rotor, that SWT-3.6-107 has since become one of the company's two top-selling volume products. This huge flagship turbine has also emerged as one of the world's most successful turbines for offshore wind plants. The first 25 offshore turbines became operational in the UK in 2007 and the order book is in the region of 240 units for the coming years. And now Siemens has decided to see how a new, gearless design would fare.

Concept turbine

Chief Technology Officer Henrik Stiesdal explained that he had been working on direct-drive design options since 1999, but project development efforts remained low-key until 2005.

"We have been producing geared wind turbines since 1980 and despite occasional issues over the years we have always been — and remain — happy with the technology. However, we also realize that direct-drive wind turbines may become competitive with geared turbines for large turbine sizes and we want to get hands-on experience with direct-drive technology in order to conclude whether it can be made competitive with geared technology, and if so from what power level. At the end of the day it can be boiled down to the question whether direct-drive technology offers any substantial added value to SWP customers."

The idea behind the Concept turbine is to change only what is essential. It therefore features a standard SWT-3.6-107 rotor and a functionally comparable twin-bearing main shaft support. Also unchanged are the 690-volt generator, full-power converter, control systems and the tower.

Integrating the direct-drive generator into a proven wind turbine system substantially simplifies the testing arrangement.

"It enables our engineers to focus on generator performance, system reliability and cost-effectiveness during the test period," said Stiesdal, explaining why he prefers to speak of a "concept" turbine rather than a prototype.

"This is not a prototype of a new product; it is the physical manifestation of a technology project. If we decide to turn this into a commercial product then we will run as a second stage a classical R&D project, with design optimizations, etc. But I would also like to stress that such decision has not yet been made, and if it is made it may be for a larger machine."

Recognizable

The 1.3-MW and 2.3-MW Siemens turbine models are all clearly recognizable by a characteristic cylindrical cigar-shaped nacelle, and these familiar nacelle lines now reappear in the 3.6-MW "concept." But unlike several other direct-drive turbine makes and models having the generator located in front the tower, Siemens decided for a different solution.

The fully enclosed cylinder-shaped generator unit is supported by the main shaft rear end and is positioned behind the mainframe and tower. In fact, the generator is now located in what is normally the gearbox position in a Siemens turbine. All direct-drive key components fit neatly into the cylinder-shaped nacelle, which has a 6-meter outer diameter, and a length of "only" 13 meters.

Siemens direct drive powertrain layoutThe fully enclosed air-cooled permanent magnet type generator does not have much free play inside the nacelle, as its outer diameter is of the order of 5.5 meters. The two different generators have weights in the 70-75 metric tons range, and the length is about 2.5 meters. The generator stator is fitted to a left and right-hand torque support attached to the integrated bearing housing. The generator cooling systems and the AC-DC power converter are all located in the nacelle rear.

A second "concept" turbine, featuring a generator of different make, is planned for the test site before the end of the year. UK-based Converteam and the Large Drives Business Unit of the Siemens Industry Sector have each delivered a fully interchangeable generator for one of the two concept turbines.

The "concept" top head mass (combined weight of the nacelle plus rotor) is about 265 metric tons (nacelle 165 metric tons; rotor 100 metric tons) as compared with 235 metric tons for the SWT-3.6-107. One of Stiesdal's future product development goals, provided direct drive is to stay, will be pushing down top head mass to geared-drive turbine levels through product optimization. That will certainly pose a major challenge.

But the impressive "concept" turbine as it was presented in June 2008 already offers plenty of potential to become a formidable wind technology asset for Siemens in the years to come, reducing the cost of energy over a turbine lifetime of 20 years plus.

Look out for Eize de Vries' in-depth report on the new design in the July/August issue of Renewable Energy World magazine.

Add Your Comment 15 Reader Comments
No image available
July 4, 2008
The invention of the self-induction motor by Siemens overcame the size limitation of the permanent magnet motors. So far I only heard of the permanent magnet pump motors of circulating pumps of heating systems that are more efficient since they do not need extra power for the creation of the magnetic field.
How much more efficient is the 3.6 MW turbine due to the permanent magnets compared to the self-induction type?
No image available
July 4, 2008
Mr. de Vries, we are most interested in to know more technical details of this new gearless windturbine, and perhaps some real picture of the nacelle's inside, at least. It seems very interesting this new Siemen's concept, specially when you said, well, they said, that tha main shaft and some other components remain the same that the geared model, I don't think be exactly "the same", the loads conditions are quite different.
Other thing is that I know that Clipper Windpower had troubles on its NY Windfarm, and they stopped the machines. Do you know if they restarted the operation of turbines or the are still dealing with the problem, (which I'm don't know exactly what it was)?

Thanks

Andres (Cuba's Windpower company)
No image available
July 4, 2008
Am I crazy, or did i not read about Clipper Windpower producing a 2.5 MW gearless unit using PMGs instead of the traditional inducted generators?
No image available
July 4, 2008
Eric. I will be looking forward to reading the report. Thank you very much.

adrianakau2aol.com
No image available
July 4, 2008
FYI: I believe there will be an electronic controller enabling these kind of rotors to directly drive off-the-shelve induction motors making them act as grid tie generator (without the need gearbox and converter/inverter). So far we have it tested on single phase induction motors.
Just for you to keep your fingers crossed. Thing is possible. and someone has partially proven it.
Phi (neo-aerodynamic.com)
No image available
July 4, 2008
Hi Guys - AFAIK Enercon Germany have been using Direct Drive annular generators for quite some time. Their latest, and largest, turbine is the E126 has a rotot diameter of 126 meters or 413 feet. The output power has a proven output of 6 Mw and an upper rating of 8 Mw. Detailed here:
http://wood-pellet-ireland.blogspot.com/2008/05/breaking-wind-in-ireland.html
No image available
July 4, 2008
Shamil Ayntrazi --

No, it would in no way "be more feasible for the wind turbine to drive an air compressor, collect the compressed air from more than wind turbine and feed the compressed air to the air inlet of a turbo generator" -- the inefficiencies in energy conversions would render the resulting electricity more expensive with no gains or benefits.

Wind power is already a "a dependable renewable source of energy" today. As one of the fastest growing forms of electricity generation in the world -- representing the second largest form of new generating installations in the U.S. in 2007 (35% of new generation added last year) -- wind power is a mainstream generating source of clean, inexhuastible, domestically-sourced electricity today. But it is NOT a baseload generating technology -- it is not being installed today to replace baseload generating CAPACITY -- wind power is best understood as an ENERGY resource. There is no need to "back up" wind power, there is no need to "firm" the output of wind projects, as a wind project is not considered to be, nor relied upon, to be a baseload generating technology. It is an energy resource, displacing coal and natural gas generation.

It would not be possible to have a situation where "the resulting compressed air would reduce the required amount of fuel to produce the same output", sorry. But what is possible is the continued growth of wind energy that is dependable, affordable, and represents a major new source of clean energy that is already reducing the emissions put into the atmosphere by fossil fuel plants. For every new wind project brought on line, and for every megawatt-hour produced by that plant, there is a megawatt-hour of fossil fuel generation NOT being produced and the emissions reductions associated with backing down these units is increasingly resulting in clearing the air of harmful emissions and global warming consequences.

Learn more at: www.20percentwind.org

Jeff Anthony
AWEA
No image available
July 4, 2008
Credit Suisse took 24% ownership in Composite Technology (Dewinds Parent Company) on June 29 2008, an approximate 55 Million dollar investment by Credit Suisse. Dewinds ground breaking yet simple technology must be the reason why.

Dewind already skips the AC-DC frequency converter technologies that have a mean time between failures of less then two years. With Dewind the power converter, which is responsible for approx 50% of all failures, is no longer needed. As a result, wind farms can generate electricity that matches the quality from conventional power plants and synchronize directly to the grid, just like power plants do.

By eliminating the frequency converter and step-up transformers, the complexity of the wind turbines is reduced significantly. As a result, the probability of failure and downtime decreases, and the reliability increases by more than 30%, with a ground operating failure rate of 30 YEARS!

Synchronous generators permit operation at the medium voltage level without the need for additional components. As a result, the overall efficiency of a wind farm improves by more than 1%.

Moderate initial investment due to less weight.
By incorporating the WinDrive technology, the maximum operating loads in the drivetrain are reduced. In large systems, this translates into material savings of up to 20% for the tower and foundation (steel and cement). Per wind turbine, this means hundreds of tons in weight that can be saved.

For more information visit:
http://www.voithturbo.de/wind-technology.htm
No image available
July 4, 2008
Obviously, there should be an advantage of less maintenance to offset the cost of the power electronics.

Given that the other HAWT components are the same, does the direct drive have greater, lesser or the same ability to handle low speed and high speed winds?
No image available
July 4, 2008
WAOO
Is it more feasible for the wind turbine to drive an air compressor, collect the compressed air from more than wind turbine and feed the compressed air to the air inlet of a turbo generator?
By modulating generator fuel input, a dependable renewable source of energy would be achieved irrespective of availability of wind.
No wind, the turbo generator would generate electric power in a normal way with full fuel consumption.
With wind, the resulting compressed air would reduce the required amount of fuel to produce the same output.
No image available
This shift to a round nacelle is not clear to me from the point of view of the gearless design. Can it be for flange shaped blades as Enercon which claims it increases the yield from the center area of the rotor?
Siemes say in your interesting article will use this concept probably in larger turbines. Is Siemens talking always about offshore or would that be also for on-shore?
On the other hand Siemes split and separates rotor from generator as balancing both weights in front and behind the tower, whereas Enercon or the Korean firm use a compact design almost without separation between hub and generator.
No image available
July 4, 2008
Adrian,

Principles of the direct drive principle versus geared drive will be explained in detail in the upcoming 'in-depth' report on the new Siemens Concept wind turbine design.

Eize de Vries
No image available
July 4, 2008
I wish a more technical explanation could be given on how the "direct drive" concept generator differs from the normal geared turbine. All I understand is that the gears in the geared type are needed to synchronize the generator rpm with the desired voltage and Hz output but that a direct drive system can do the same without gears. My question then is what is to be used to control the direct drive system output?

adrianakau2aol.com
No image available
July 4, 2008
Wow..I never thought a direct drive system would be possible for a generator greater than about ~2MW. I wonder how costly the fully-rated power electronics are; probably a fair amount.
No image available
July 8, 2008
Jeffry Anthony - AWEA
Efficiency in compressing the air is low. However, the resulting compressed air is a relatively cheap renewable energy source leading to dependable output. A new or existing power plant serves as the base load. The compressed air fed to the air inlet of a combustion turbine with fuel injection provides a dependable output as to power, voltage and frequency. Combustion turbines use a good portion of their energy to drive its input air compressor. My proposal is to provide a good portion of this energy from a renewable energy source (wind turbine or wave air pump) in the form of compressed air. This energy of the compressed air has to show somewhere, due to the law of conservation of energy, it would show in the output; therefore at reduce fuel consumption. Super charging air inlet of combustion turbines is a known and proven concept. For details refer to Compressed Air Energy Storage at www.espcinc.com
An ideal power plant consists of three turbines: 1x1/3, 2x2/3 of required output to efficiently provide base, peak and reserve power. The present design of wind turbines should be improved.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
GT Solar Incorporated Comdel Nikkei Business Publications America, Inc. UniRac, Inc. BP Solar Renewable Energy World Asia GreenBeat
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters