Photo Credit: REpower
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (13) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
June 18, 2008

Wind Lifted by Higher Tariffs in Germany

by Jane Burgermeister
Berlin, Germany [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

The wind energy sector in Germany has been given a big boost by an amendment to the country's renewable energy law. Under the new law set to come into force on January 1, 2009, the feed-in tariff for onshore wind farms will be increased from EUR 7.9 to 9.2 cents/kilowatt-hour (kWh) while the tariff for offshore wind will go up to EUR 13 cents/kWh.

"Offshore wind parks are the only renewable energy source that can deliver that kind of growth because the good sites on land have already been taken."

-- Thomas Schnorrenberg, REpower Systems

Thomas Schnorrenberg from REpower Systems AG, one of Germany’s leading manufacturers of wind turbines, said the extra money was needed to revive investment in wind and balance out soaring costs have that have hit profit margins, leaving many projects on the drawing board.

"The new tariff will make building offshore wind parks especially attractive," Schnorrenberg told RenewableEnergyWorld.com.

Large offshore wind parks need to be built if Germany is to meet an ambitious new target to increase electricity from renewable sources to at least 27 percent by 2020 — a target also encased in this June’s amendment to the country’s renewable energy law.

Constructing wind parks in the seas in the north of Germany did not pay off under the old tariff scheme, and so investors have put plans for 25,000 MW of installed offshore wind capacity on ice.

However, the new, higher tariff will now make going forward with the construction of large wind parks at sea lucrative, Schnorrenberg said.

As an incentive to speedy action, the tariff has been increased to 15 cents/kWh in cases where construction on an offshore wind park begins before 2015.

The German Wind Energy Association (BWE) has estimated that 45,000 MW of modern wind capacity will need to be installed to generate 110 billion kWh of electricity by 2020 if the government is to reach its target of having about one third of the country’s electricity coming from clean sources by 2020.

With the potential of hydropower more or less exhausted in Germany — just about every river that can have a dam has one, Schnorrenberg said — and solar power still very expensive, wind power remains the best option for increasing clean electricity.

The BWE has calculated that 3,500 MW of new wind capacity needs to be installed each year from now on — double the capacity of 1,667 MW installed in 2007.

"Offshore wind parks are the only renewable energy source that can deliver that kind of growth because the good sites on land have already been taken," Schnorrenberg said.

He estimated that wind turbines located in the sea and benefiting from the steady winds there could generate electricity for up to 4,000 hours per year. That means, 25,000 MW of offshore installed capacity could supply 11% to 13% of Germany’s electricity needs by 2020, much more than the equivalent amount on land.

Wind turbines on land generate electricity for an average of 1,700 hours a year, though this figure can rise to 2,200 hours on the best coastal sites.

In 2007, a total of 22,247 MW of wind capacity was installed on land in Germany, producing 7 percent of the country’s electricity and accounting for two thirds of all the renewable electricity production.

The June amendment also gives an incentive to replacing older wind turbines on land with new, more efficient turbines.

A typical 500-kW turbine from the mid-1990's in a medium location generates 1.1 million kWh of electricity while a modern 2000-kW wind turbine generates six times more electricity or 6.6 million kWh.

It is important to extract the most energy possible from the existing wind farms on land given the lack of room for expansion, Schnorrenberg said. He also said that profits generated by more efficient wind turbines have been cancelled out by rising prices for steel and copper and other components.

In 2007, the wind energy market in Germany shrank by 25 percent compared to 2006, bucking the global trend for rapid growth according to the German Wind Energy Institute (DEWI).

More than 80 percent of the cost of building a wind turbine falls on steel. However, the spot price of steel has doubled since 2004 while the price of copper has tripled, hitting wind energy producers hard.

Unlike Spain or France, Germany has no mechanism for compensating wind power producers for increases in raw materials or costs embedded in its renewable energy law.  That was why an amendment to the law was introduced in June to update wind power tariffs. REpower’s main problem will be how to meet the expected surge in demand for new wind turbines, especially offshore, Schnorrenberg said.

However, the amendment did not contain any incentives for installing micro wind turbines — predicted to be the next big growth sector in the renewable energy market.

"The use of decentralized small wind turbines could deliver an additional cost-effective and customer friendly source of potential electricity in as far as optimized turbines in large quantities can be manufactured," a report from BWE said.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (13)
 
No image available
June 18, 2008
"why do we keep looking for open spaces to kill off when we have billions of structures without any generation capacity on them?"

Because the wind resource on buildings in cities is quite poor and therefore decentralized small rooftop wind turbines are inefficient and a waste of everyone's money.
Comment 1 of 13
No image available
June 18, 2008
Wheres that Schmidt guy?
Comment 2 of 13
No image available
the most important part of the article is tossed in as an afterthought at the end:

However, the amendment did not contain any incentives for installing micro wind turbines — predicted to be the next big growth sector in the renewable energy market.

"The use of decentralised small wind turbines could deliver an additional cost effective and customer friendly source of potential electricity in as far as optimised turbines in large quantities can be manufactured," a report from BWE said.


why do we keep looking for open spaces to kill off when we have billions of structures without any generation capacity on them? time for a new paradigm that prioritizes point-of-use and protects wilderness.
Comment 3 of 13
No image available
June 18, 2008
Note that the prices are given in Euro "cents/kwh". To convert to US cents multiply Euro cents by 1.56 (from June 18) .
Comment 4 of 13
No image available
June 20, 2008
That load factor is more like 25%, and that wind may not be used.
Wind is a supplement, not a substitute.
Comment 5 of 13
No image available
June 20, 2008
Paul,
I recall a recent article and subsequent comments that discussed it. This isn't it but it's a start:

http://www.renewableenergyworld.com/rea/news/story?id=52687

As I recall, the solar incentive was disproportional to the solar resource available in Germany.
Comment 6 of 13
No image available
June 20, 2008
I noticed they increased the tarrif for wind but decreased it for solar. Anyone know why?
Comment 7 of 13
No image available
June 20, 2008
Yes, wind has an important role to play, but in declaring the benefits to the grid we should remember the load factor which, on average, is 30% - 35%.
Comment 8 of 13
No image available
June 20, 2008
The only way to succeed is to create wind power systems which are cost justified without government incentives. We have NG, Next Generation Wind designs and business models, that do exactly that, and have an objective $.05/kWh (US$). We do not have the huge overheads, or need to regain the investment cap, just go forward. We will accept government incentives, but are not dependent on them. Sannerprojects Inc Target / Beta installations may not be Germany. Wind has all the favorable fundies, including it does not shut down at night (like Solar), and succumbs to proven engineering resources, and models. R Dylan said it, The Answer My friend is blowing in the Wind! JRIAM1945@aol.com.
Comment 9 of 13
No image available
June 20, 2008
The article talks about wind power generated, not about the power actually used by the grid. In Denmark most of the wind power can't be used by the grid at the time it's generated; it has to be dumped off to Norway, Sweden, etc. The article also doesn't talk about the backup capacity that has to be installed.
Cost for off shore wind installation is apparently in the range of $5,000 per KW.
Comment 10 of 13
No image available
June 21, 2008
rolf -- that is totally misleading, wind is a substitute not a supplement. In simplest terms at the moment.

If you have an expensive gas or diesel resource, you can avoid burning much of that fuel by using a wind turbine as a hedge against burning that fuel.

Then you can upsize your wind installation and dump some of that into advanced storage such as graphite storage being used here in Australia, vanadium redox battereis (canada/australia and now in Ireland) or compressed air.

All these are examples of electrical storage. Another way renewables are being introduced to complement each other is, wind power is being installed + large scale photovoltaics -- sured up (backed up) by Solar thermal with storage. Solar thermal with storage includes - power tower with direct graphite storage, ammonia thermochemical disassociation and salt based storage as being used in spain.

Wind power is probably one of the cheapest energy sources on the planet. Turbines are cheap and readily available. In the German sea their capacity factor is 50%. On land in Tasmania, South Australia and New Zealand their capacity factor is 50%. This means -- lots of electricity for not much cost.

Matthew
Campaign Director
Beyond Zero Emissions
Comment 11 of 13
No image available
June 22, 2008
The Copenhagen Post January 1, 2007:

"ENERGY GIANTS SAY WIND POWER IS HOT AIR"

"The country's energy companies are not convinced that wind power is the way of the future. Management at Denmark's energy companies, DONG Energy and Vattenfall, do not subscribe to the current mindset that wind energy will be especially prominent in the future, reported national public broadcaster DR. The companies believe that coal-powered electricity will still be the largest supplier of the nation's energy, despite the trend toward environmentally friendly sources. 'Wind energy can't solve the energy problem in the near future because it's too unstable and possibly too expensive,' said Anders Eldrup, chief executive of Dong Energy [Denmark's largest energy company]." [cut]

http://www.stopillwind.org/downloads/WhyWindWontWork.pdf
Comment 12 of 13
No image available
June 22, 2008
Both Rolf and Peter post misleading comments about the Capacity Factor for wind power -- as if the capacity factors for wind (which range from 20% to 50% depending on location) are somehow indicative of a detriment or troublesome aspect of wind power. Nothing could be further from the truth -- it is simply an indication of the fact that the wind does not blow at the maximum speed at which a given turbine is rated for a given wind resource. It is like saying natural-gas fired peakers are somehow deficient or failing to perform because they only operate for tens or hundreds of hours a year, instead of generating electricity at 100% power year-round. Natural gas fired peakers operate only a fraction of the time, because that is how they are designed and economically-justified and engineered to perform.

The same is true of wind turbine generators, which obviously only generate electricity when the wind is blowing -- they are rated (their capacity in megawatts, just like a natural gas peaker plant) for what they CAN generate when the wind is blowing the strongest, but they generate at this maximum output only certain times during the year (again, the same as a peaker unit).

So when a capacity factor of a wind project is quoted as 40%, that is a reflect of the wind resource AND the turbine technology employed at that location, and nothing more. The posts above seem to imply it is somehow a problem to be dealt with, which is nowhere near the case, and is reflective of a general ignorance on wind power, for those who do not understand the technology and how it is being integrated in increasingly large amounts in many countries around the world, including the U.S. and Denmark.

And Rolf's comments mischaracterize the situation in Denmark to a large extent, too. A good resoure to learn more about how wind is being integrated around the world can be found at this website: www.uwig.org

Jeff Anthony
American Wind Energy Association
Comment 13 of 13
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
SunWize Technologies UL University OPEL Solar, Inc. KACO new energy, Inc. Atlantic Wind & Solar Inc. Magnum Energy Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo