Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

UK Launches New Blueprint for Renewables

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"The industry has a very short space of time with which to meet challenging targets. There are still gaps and anomalies that need to be addressed with fresh polices. The key missing factor is a greater sense of urgency. We have only twelve years left and government still wants to use two of those talking about it."

-- Philip Wolfe, Executive Director, Renewable Energy Association
4 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 4
June 30, 2008
Friends,

A word of caution about what is meant by "renewables" in the UK. Either the emphasis on renewables is peripheral to nuclear, or lip service when you see where UK leadership intends for the money to flow:

"Gordon Brown ...flew to an emergency meeting in the Middle East to tell them to increase output and invest in renewable energy projects in Britain. [June 23]

"[Brown] said that by 2050 the world would need 1,000 nuclear power stations, 700,000 new large wind turbines, and a 600 per cent increase in solar, biomass and hydro-power."

And what about the RAB's report suggesting a mere 15% renewables by 2020 (only 10% for transport)?

"2020 VISION – How the UK can meet its target of 15% renewable energy"

Sorry, I'm not impressed that this will adequately address the UK's steep oil decline -- http://www.energycrisis.co.uk/ -- and I wonder if the nuclear advocates are using the renewables enthusiasm to mask their initiative to falsely claim moral high ground on CO2 mitigation.
Comment
2 of 4
July 1, 2008
I followed up [http://www.berr.gov.uk/files/file46799.pdf] and discovered a very thorough renewable energy policy framework put forward by the RAB. Thoughtfully, the government has made a clear appeal for comments by September 26th. I encourage members of the solar community to download the report and submit comments.

Deep flaw: Assumption that the price of oil will be $70/bbl in 2020. Similar delusions are expressed or inferred as to future availability of oil, gas, coal (far past peak in the UK) and nuclear (uranium).

My suspicions [comment 1 above] about emphasis on nuclear power were confirmed:

"Today a third of UK carbon emissions result from electricity generation. By
2050, we expect a range of low-carbon generating technologies (renewables, nuclear and CCS) to be playing a part in delivering a largely decarbonised electricity generation mix." [pg 226]

Nuclear is not a low-carbon option: http://www.energycrisis.co.uk/nuclear/. CCS (Carbon Capture and Storage) remains a myth.

Huge oversight: Virtually no consideration was given to photovoltaics.

But it goes far beyond anything yet produced in the USA or by individual states (e.g., California).
Comment
3 of 4
July 3, 2008
New UK patent No 0811584.2 filed june 25th 2008 might be of interest. Patent seeks to improve efficiency of Virtical Axis Wind Turbines (VAWT) by surrounding one half of the upright rotor with a wind deflector shield that rotates around the VAWT following the wind direction. The Deflector shield prevents drag as the vanes of the rotor turn into the wind. Inventor envisages three VAWT mounted on large floating off shore platform. When flotation pods are mounted on the side of platform the wave energy is captured and transferred by hydraulics to central generator on platform. A sea rotor is being designed to harness the energy from the currents passing under the platform. Three sources of energy will come together and be transferred by huydraulic drives to one large easily accessible generator. The platform will be known as a Combined Renewable Energy Production Platform (CREPP). Iventor is seeking commercial interest. VAWT with deflector shield suitable for location on top of buildings and mounting on ocean going ships and tankers.Deflector shield can be located in position that is less than efficient in very windy conditions allowing optimum energy yield at all times. More information email persey@upcottfarm.fsnet.co.uk
Comment
4 of 4
July 3, 2008
Can we also not think of making minor changes in our living style to reduce the use of energy? For example, so much wrapping material is beng used for almost every thing; particularly cloths which could be reduced. so many disposable items could be done away with such as ball point pens, razors, etc. We could also consider using natural produts such as cotton, jute, etc to reduce production and use of synthetic fibres.

There can be many ways to reduce the per capita energy use prevalent in the developed countries. I am not against having comfortable life but prevalent per capita energy use in the U.S. should not be acceptable to rational people.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

David Appleyard

View David Appleyard's Profile
About: David Appleyard is Chief Editor of Renewable Energy World. He also currently holds the position of Chief Editor for sister publication Hydro Review Worldwide.... more »

Advertise With Us

Konica Minolta Sensing Americas, Inc EnPower Systems Inc. Planet Solar Inc Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. FC Business Intelligence Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America SolarTech Solar Leadership Summit 2012
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters