Nominate Your Favorite Renewable Energy Project for The 2009 Excellence in Renewable Energy Awards
click here for more information
Close
 
Photo Credit: VRB Power Systems
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (21) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
June 10, 2008

Storage Boosts the Power of Renewable Energy

by Lynda O'Malley, York University
California, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

Pressing concerns about how to integrate large amounts of renewable energy into the grid was the topic at the recently held Electricity Storage Association's Annual Meeting in California. At the meeting, leading companies, manufacturers, utilities and policy developers gathered under the motto "Electricity Storage: Predictable Power in a Cleantech World."

"Grid-scale storage is here now. Storage should be deployed now at the gigawatt (GW) scale...where capacity, ancillary services and energy time-shifting are clearly needed."

-- Ed Cazalet, MegaWatt Storage Farms.

During the conference experts showed how energy storage can play a variety of roles in firming up renewables at different time scales, i.e. from moment to moment, daily, weekly and seasonally. The presentations showed how storage options are essential for expanding renewable energy sources, stabilizing the grid, ensuring a continuity of supply, increasing energy autonomy and mediating against intermittent power production.

As storage technology advances, decision makers are starting to create a more favorable policy environment for innovators. For example, the U.S. Energy Storage Technology Advancement Act of 2007 recognizes the crucial roles that storage can play.

"This bill is the first official recognition of the importance of energy storage by Congress," said Imre Gyuk, Manager of Energy Storage Systems Research with the Department of Energy. "It is only an authorization bill and thus carries no appropriated funding, but it is a wonderful platform for future requests for storage research, demonstrations and development."

The act establishes an Advisory Committee (the Energy Storage Advisory Council), and authorizes funds for a basic and an applied research program of US $50 million and $80 million, respectively, for each fiscal year from 2009 to 2014. It also provides US $100 million each year for up to four energy storage research centers; US $30 million a year for energy storage demonstration projects and vehicle energy storage demonstration; and US $5 million a year for 10 years for secondary applications of electric drive vehicles.

Reaction to the act has been positive and the storage industry is beginning to take off.

"Grid-scale storage is here now," said Ed Cazalet of MegaWatt Storage Farms. "Storage should be deployed now at the gigawatt (GW) scale...where capacity, ancillary services and energy time-shifting are clearly needed."

Storage projects can be sourced close to loads, on the grid or at the generating facility. In his presentation, Cazalet emphasized that the demand-pull from large-scale commercial deployment will encourage manufacturing investment, lower costs through volume production (economies of scale) and lead to the commercialization of advanced technologies.

The benefits of storage are significant, especially in integrating distributed generation. Storage protects against mistakes in forecasting, removes barriers in connecting renewable sources to a variety of grids, shifts demand peaks by storing off-peak energy to sell back to the grid during peak times, provides frequency regulation and deters expensive grid upgrades.

With current costs on average of US $1000 to 1500 per kW installed (see CaISO's "Integration of Renewable Resources" report), storage application companies realize the importance of gaining multiple revenue streams so that the technologies will come down in cost through volume production and experience. However, for some storage technologies like pumped hydro storage, costs range from US 0.1 to 2 cents per kWh (see ESA's Technology Comparisons, Capital Cost). Analysts say that governments need to create practical incentives so that storage options can be rapidly expanded to support large deployments of wind and solar power at great scale.

Jim Kelly of Southern California Edison defined storage as the "game changer" of the industry, allowing utilities to "inventory" electricity for the first time. SCE has proposed installing 250 MW of utility-owned rooftop solar PV on large commercial rooftops, claiming that this will transform the U.S. PV market, while utilizing unused rooftops. Kelly asserted that if storage was coupled with PV it could shift the peak from noon to later in the afternoon, remove intermittent output and provide emergency back-up power.

In addition, since substantial wind resource capacity is often present at the fringes of existing grids and because fluctuating wind speeds can produce substantial variations in wind energy generation over wide areas, analysts also note that forecasting needs to be combined with rapid-cycle energy storage to smooth intermittency and better integrate renewable resources into the grid.

VRB Power Systems, a Canadian storage company is doing just that. VRB vanadium flow battery technology is already smoothing wind turbine output for remote power hybrid wind-diesel applications in northern Canada and Alaska and providing frequency regulation, voltage support and blackstart capability.

These locations have turned to wind power because electricity costs have become unreasonably high due to the growing costs of diesel generation and to gain the environmental benefits associated with a renewable resource. A VRB flow battery is introduced to the hybrid wind-diesel system to firm up the wind power and to ensure that the generator runs on the most efficient setting. "With the current high cost of diesel in these remote communities, the pay-back for investments in storage is very attractive," said Brian Beck of VRB Power Systems. VRB claims that solar can also be added to this system.

With over 200 megawatts (MW) of NaS batteries installed worldwide, Japan-based NGK Insulators, Ltd is another battery storage company hoping to capitalize on that rapidly growing market. The company's NaS batteries, used mainly for load leveling, enable companies to sell cheap off-peak wind power during peak times, thereby fetching a higher price. There are 34 MW of these batteries being installed near the 51-MW Rokkasho wind farm, making it the largest combined wind and storage project in Japan. Stored indoors to protect them from the corrosive salty air of the region, 17 sets of 2-MW NaS battery units (each battery unit consists of 40 50-kW modules) are monitored alongside the weather and the Rokkasho wind farm in a control center.

New technological applications such as the sophisticated vanadium flow batteries of VRB Power and the NaS systems of NGK combined with a variety of other storage options such as pumped hydro and compressed air systems demonstrate that the intermittency concerns often associated with renewables like wind and solar are quickly becoming manageable issues.

Lynda O'Malley is currently completing a Masters degree focusing on Renewable Energy Solutions at York University. She is also contributing researcher for the Pembina Institute, a Canadian policy research and advocacy organization specializing in sustainable energy solutions. Ms. O'Malley is also organizing the Storage and Smart Grids workshop for the 7th World Wind Energy Conference taking place in Kingston, Ontario June 24th-26th, 2008.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (21)
 
No image available
June 10, 2008
For storage of wind generated power applications, there is an important distinction between the VRB's vanadium based flow batteries and NaS's sodium sulfur batteries.

The key difference lies within the battery's respective ability to accurately determine its state of charge.

A "gusty" wind environment is characterized by its constant charge/discharge/charge/discharge cycles -- often thousands of times per day.

Sodium sulfur battery technology is not able to accurately determine its state of charge which leads to this battery type being potentially overcharged, which is damaging to the membranes in the cells.

The vanadium based technology, on the other hand, can easily measure this state of charge so no danger of overcharging exists.

The bottom line, given the gusting nature of what blows, is that wind is just not part of NaS's game.
Comment 1 of 21
No image available
June 10, 2008
A compelling advantage of utilizing combustible natural substances is that the energy stored in most hydrocarbon fuels does not self-discharge. (Self-discharge is the natural dissipation of stored energy.) This means that very long term storage, without loss is possible. Nearly all other forms of energy storage self-discharge their stored energy over a period of days, weeks months or years. There are exceptions to this, but understanding these requires the realization that ultimately energy is not an end in itself, but is applied to provide a valuable end product.

One of the complaints about the use of renewable energy has been that because of its variable availability, a means of storage is required to make it economically viable. If we can make the jump to understanding that energy is stored in durable processed materials, we can begin to understand a strategy that is viable right now. We can start now by storing energy in recycled materials and if we have a surplus of refined materials we can be stockpiling them for the future.

The energy stored in durable, refined materials does not self-discharge except over a very long period of time. Only the long term natural forces of corrosion, erosion and chemical breakdown or the destruction of war can release it. The more energy we can store in these end-uses that do not self-discharge, the less energy we need to store in costly self-discharging storage devices.

For example, we can store renewable energy by locating plants for recycling valuable feedstock materials to their pure state at the site of renewable energy generators (on-site location reduces transmission losses, couples the value-added products to the electrical producer, and makes possible automated, smart systems that allow the surpluses that are frequently available from RE systems to be profitably deployed.

.For more information see the Eco-Industrial Revolution: http://lightontheearth.blogspot.com/
Comment 2 of 21
June 11, 2008
I agree with Mr. Goggin that we can use the existing methods of storage that are in place to augment the lows in renewable production. We have a long way to go before there is grid saturation of solar and wind electricity, and the avoided energy demand brought about by using solar thermal for water and space heating. Then, when there is enough PV for PIE cars to recharge and hydrolized water to hydrogen in storage we can make other devices.
This really is a wonderful age to be witnessing. My body's cells aren't as durable as the ones in my PV.
Comment 3 of 21
No image available
June 11, 2008
Battery costs are coming down.

In VRB's 2007 Annual Rpt they detail what I believe may be a major development in the eventual commercialization of their VRB-ESS technology.

With regards to battery's stack development, they reported that an injection molded frame was developed...at 1/10 the cost of the previous machined PVC frames...and get this...resulting in a 50% overall cost reduction.

Apparently they eliminated all sub-assembly steps and have gone to a single final assembly operation that reduces both labor and floor space requirements.

They're also reporting that they've gone to a more modular system and will build up big stacks by using 5kW "unit cells" allowing for even greater economies of scale.

And by implication, they can build batteries faster...

To my way of thinking, anytime a manufacturer can reduce costs so significantly, it's a HUGE development.

The other major cost is one of these batteries is the vanadium itself -- some 40% of the total price. A buyer can recover that cost as the vanadium can be resold at the battery's eventual end of life.

Encouragingly, costs are coming down and we have still haven't even reached the state of mass production yet.

But storage has other benefits besides cutting back on "waste" as correctly noted by J. Cole.

With storage, you can also arbitrage when you purchase electricity and buy when rates are cheapest for subsequent later use when rates and demand are high.

Here's an example of how a California telecom is using storage for both its required backup facility and to reduce its business cost: http://siliconinvestor.advfn.com/readmsg.aspx?msgid=24668890
Comment 4 of 21
No image available
June 11, 2008
It is important to understand that ALL energy generators are periodically in surplus. This means that they cannot use their full generating capacity, so they must be shut down or throttled back. Large heat turbines cannot quickly be turned on and off, so even when demand is low they must still be run utilizing significant amounts of fuel.

Wind, solar and all renewable energy generators except those that store the energy (hydro-power) are frequently in surplus. The full amount that they can generate cannot be used. Without storage, that capacity is wasted.

We must end our long-term habit of wastefulness. We must turn surpluses of energy into useful short, medium, and long-term means of storage. Manufacturing durable products and materials is a great way to store surplus energy. Smart systems with automated processes that utilize surplus energy can utilize all extra energy that is generated and thereby waste nothing. This is a huge business opportunity awaiting visionary investors.

http://lightontheearth.blogspot.com/
Comment 5 of 21
No image available
June 11, 2008
Thank you for the interesting report on the Energy Storage Association's Annual Meeting. However, I wanted to point out that many in the clean energy community would take issue with the statement that "storage options are essential for expanding renewable energy sources." European countries like Denmark, Spain, and Germany have successfully integrated large amounts of wind energy without having to install additional amounts of energy storage. Similarly, numerous studies in the U.S. have concluded that wind energy can provide 20% or more of our electricity without any need for energy storage.

How is this possible? The secret lies in using the sources of flexibility that are already present on the electric grid. Grid operators constantly accommodate variability in electricity demand and supply by increasing and decreasing the output of flexible generators -- power plants that can rapidly change their level of output. In this way, the water kept behind a hydroelectric dam and the natural gas held in a pipeline is effectively used as energy storage, with operators releasing this energy when it is needed and storing it when it is not.

These sources of flexibility are already used to accommodate rapid changes in electricity demand that occur as people turn appliances on and off, as well as GW-scale changes in electricity supply that can occur in a fraction of a second if a large power plant goes offline. In contrast, changes in wind output occur very slowly over the course of an hour or even hours, so it is relatively easy to use these existing sources of flexibility to accommodate wind's variability.

In addition, many changes in wind output actually cancel out opposite changes in electricity demand. For this reason, it makes more sense for energy storage to be viewed as a system resource that can help even out the aggregate variability of all generators and all demand on the electric grid, not as a dedicated resource for a single generator or load.
Comment 6 of 21
No image available
June 11, 2008
Co-generated desalination/solar steam units produce both water and power from sunlight without consumption of fuel. Superheated water can be stored in a variety of ways to continue steam generated power when the sun goes down.

We actually have more water than we know what to do with. Drafting ocean water as a raw material for desalination, with re-distribution of refined water for agro/retail use can serve to ameliorate rising sea levels due to global warming, and solve many of the problems associated with ongoing drought.
This concept is particularly suited to the Southwestern states and conceivably could produce enough water to re-hydrate the west.

Solar power, and desalination methods, as developed as some products are, are still in their infancy.

Problem is that solar systems are being installed piece meal by various local entities. No one has as yet linked solar/desalination on a large scale into a multi-state system. The Federal Gov't. needs to become pro-active in this. Onesy-twosey, here and there just won't get us to where we need to be. Macro-Environmental solutions need to be developed.
Comment 7 of 21
No image available
June 11, 2008
A simple way to store energy is thermally- both hot and cold. Every house and many buildings should have thermal storage tanks that can be heated or cooled (depending on the season) during times of extra generating capacity from wind and pv. To provide a home with 3KW of heating for a continuous 12 hours, a storage tank that is only a 4.6 foot cube is required.
Using an ice making machine, ice or chilled water can be stored for air conditioning. With heat recovery on the ice machine, hot water or space heating can be obtained. If you want more storage, use bigger tanks or store the energy in an insulated volume of ground. Now that you have your storage, get some solar thermal collectors and make chilled water or ice outdoors over the winter. Don't get to independent by producing your own energy and then start growing your own food because that is capitalistic blasphemy.
Comment 8 of 21
No image available
June 11, 2008
One idea is that in the future we will drive electrical powered (fuel-cell and/or battery) transport. Could these types of vehicle have a duel role be used for storage (or part of the storage) solution?

Solar thermal electrical plant have been designed and built with storage, they can then supply energy to the grid at times of high demand. As the energy is stored as heat the electricity can be supplied after the sun has set, though the storage period of this technology maybe limited to days.

If longer term storage is needed pumped hydro is an option. The initial investement can be expensive but the expensive civil infrastructure well built and maintained can last over 100 years.
Comment 9 of 21
No image available
June 11, 2008
Fifteen years ago I devised a method of storing the energy that involved very little cost, utilising waste. At the time there was aparrently no call for it except in remote places off the grid.

The method used old tyres and strong ground anchors. No complex chemicals or dangers, labour to construct tyre cylinders could utilise prisoners and no energy is lost in converting the captured energy to electricity twice.

Cheap, reliable and simple. As there is probably no fortune to be made in it there was no interest.

Just how it works I leave to your ingenuity. But I assure you that it does.

If anyone wants to use it go ahead. I wish you luck.
Comment 10 of 21
No image available
June 11, 2008
As to the flow batteries, these are pretty cool, the electrolyte doesn't ever wear out, but the membranes that separate the charged from the discharged electrolyte eventually (I think 10 years) does. Since the charged electrolyte is chemically the same as the discharged, there isn't any problem of mixing two chemicals and wearing out. The storage tanks and pumps are pretty durable as well, so it is just the membrane that need to be replaced.

As to the toxicity of the electrolyte and membranes, I don't really know.
Comment 11 of 21
No image available
June 11, 2008
My 2 cents: Over the long term:
1) Thermal solar can be built now with relatively cheap thermal storage, but thermal plants are big and expensive.
2) PV will get cheaper and easier to build than thermal, but hard (expensive)to store the electrical energy.
3) Why not use the PV for daytime base power, and bulk up the thermal storage at the thermal plants, and generate base power at the thermal plants in the evening and at night? Solar around the clock.

Secondly, dam based hydro storage is really cheap, but hard to build (you need two dams nearby). But why not build big water storage tanks on say, a mesa, one at the top, one at the bottom, pump the water up when there is extra wind, and let it run down when you need it. Environmentally relatively benign, kind of ugly though.

Batteries are expensive, and likely to remain so, better to use them as frequency regulation, along with flywheels.
Comment 12 of 21
No image available
June 11, 2008
How much do these batteries cost, how long do they last and how toxic are they when they reach their use by date and need to be recycled.
Comment 13 of 21
No image available
June 12, 2008
There has been some quantitative work done comparing wind generated power with and without storage.

Sustainable Energy Ireland (SEI) studied 17 VRB-ESS installations (some running since 1996, so this is by no means an unproven technology). The report was done in conjunction with the Tapbury wind farm in Eire and is available at www.vrbpower.com under the "whiteapers" section.

SEI concludes that the availability of a VRB-ESS is better than 98%, which is equivalent to good baseload generating assets
(and better than such assets as gas-fired turbines).

The operating life of a VRB-ESS is greater than 10 years, and the storage system has a 70% round trip efficiency (meaning that 1 MWh of energy stored to the battery results in 0.7 MWh of useful energy being put into the grid when required, which is equivalent to a lead-acid battery system).

The most important conclusion within the SEI report is the level of return generated by a VRB-ESS. If the proposed 2 MW/12 MWh VRB-ESS were internally financed by Tapbury, the project would have a 11.7% internal rate of return. Generally, acceptable given the hurdle rates in the wind industry are typically 8-9%.

However, if appropriate gearing is applied, the IRR jumps to 17.5%.That any component of a windfarm can generate a 17.5% IRR is, in this industry, unheard of.

Wind power is typically bought at lower rates because the buyer doesn't not have a guarantee of a consistent constant power that is required. This has meant that utilities have still had to include some backup generating capacity which has historically been along conventional generation technologies. That cost money and has meant wind power is usually bought at a significantly lower price that power from coal or hydrocarbon sources.

Storage smooths out wind and enables wind to be what the industry call a "firm" power.

IRR numbers of 17.5% beg one question: is "storage" the tail wagging a much larger dog?
Comment 14 of 21
No image available
June 12, 2008
็Storage still off in the future? True if you're talking about mass utilization, but a number projects are already off and running.

A major utility, Progress Energy, and the University of South Florida just commission two projects using solar power combined with storage capacity.

Here's the link to Tampa Bay's Channel 10 video news coverage: http://usfweb3.usf.edu/absolutenm/templates/?a=671&z=38.
Comment 15 of 21
No image available
June 12, 2008
Ms. O'Malley:
Good review. We are designing and will soon build a 24/7 400 MWe solar-hydrogen power plant in So. California. Hydrogen is the best way to store energy for smoothing out the wind or for night time production. The cost for building the 400 MWe plant is about 1/6th that of an equivalent nuclear power plant.

Denmark has just started to build their "hydrogen valley" for storing and smoothing out their vast windpower generation. We are advancing the "state of the art" on water electrolysis approaching 90% efficiency without expensive platinum metal.

Batteries cost too much and their lifetime is half that of fuel cells.

We have openings for solar engineers and chemical engineers with hydrogen experience.
Dr. Warren Reynolds, Eco-Engineers, Inc. w.d.reynolds@att.net
Comment 16 of 21
No image available
June 12, 2008
Michael Goggin's comment is very cogent. I've read that Denmark for example, uses Sweden's hydro resource as a huge storage battery, selling to them excess wind power, and buying it back when needed.

His comment about viewing storage as a "system resource" is very interesting, what this means is big storage operators can "buy low and sell high", thereby giving wind operators a market for their excess power, even if it is at a lower price.

As he mentioned, storage is still off in the future, as the current system is able to absorb up to 20% of wind or solar before needing more storage using backup gas generators, hydro, etc. Someday (soon I hope) we will see the age when solar + wind + storage provide baseload power, and fossil fuels just provide peaking power.
Comment 17 of 21
No image available
June 14, 2008
Wind integration costs have been documented in studies to be around $ 5 / MWhr in locations where robust, geographically large markets exist. (In smaller, isolated systems, wind integration costs are higher). Until energy storage technologies can match $ 5 / MWhr, it is far more economical and beneficial to utility customers to use the existing grid flexibility and system resources to account for the variable output of wind energy generation.

The future of energy storage is bright at the point in the future when costs can be brought down significantly -- but then only as a system resource, not by sub-optimizing the benefits of pairing individual energy storage projects with individuals wind generation projects. The benefits of energy storage are the greatest when they are fully integrated into the grid so that multiple stakeholders can benefit from it as a system resource.

Similarly, wind energy generation is best integrated with a robust and flexible system to accomodate the variable nature of its output. Pairing it today with any energy storage technology only serves to increase the costs of wind energy with no commensurate benefits.

Jeff Anthony
American Wind Energy Association
Comment 18 of 21
No image available
June 20, 2008
The American Wind Energy Association make the case that, "...storage technology only serves to increase the costs of wind energy with no commensurate benefits."

But isn't the real question about the degree of wind penetration into the grid?

Al levels of around 10% or less, yes, you can use several factors such as reserve, frequency control and the grid infrastructure to support wind's volatility.

All without storage.

Once wind penetration levels reach 15%, volatility becomes a real problem. Storage is needed if wind energy is to become "firm." The SEI Irish study has shown that wind, coupled storage, puts costs in the 8 - 9 cents/kWh range. Importantly with a 90% firmness.

Revenue is also crucial. Utilities can't inventory electricity, so wind in significant quantities has had to be 'backed up' with some traditional firm power to meet peak demand requirements. That's a cost and that's why discounts of up to 35% have been applied to the buying rates for intermittent wind.

Bottom line: if you want wind to play a significant role in global power generation, it needs to be firm.

Goggin points to the EU: "...Denmark...have successfully integrated large amounts of wind energy without having to install additional amounts of energy storage."

Well 40% of Danish wind power is exported FREE to Germany which acts as a big battery. But is something starting to rot in Denmark? Their link to Germany has become overloaded and they will be charged for this "balancing" from next year.

The grid must be seen its totality. In the EU, it's tied tightly together; hardly the case in the USA.

While our AWEA lobbyists fight detractors that banish wind as too volatile, I would posit that the road of "wind + storage" makes a more comprehensive case for the significant potential for wind to obtain a larger percentage of the world's electrical capacity.

But what do I know of the very particular kind of wind that emanates from Washington?
Comment 19 of 21
No image available
June 24, 2008
Kevin,

You are correct that at very high levels of wind penetration, energy storage may become an attractive option for the electric grid. However, this is not likely to occur until the penetration of wind energy on the U.S. electric grid drastically increases from its current level. The U.S. Department of Energy recently released a major report that concluded that the U.S. can obtain 20% of its electricity from wind energy by 2030 without the need for energy storage. While we are excited by advances in energy storage technology, transmission limitations and other obstacles to continued renewable energy growth are more pressing issues for the foreseeable future.

There is also no reason to think that wind energy needs to be "firmed" or "backed up." Wind energy is primarily an energy resource and not a capacity resource, meaning that it is primarily used to reduce fuel consumption, not meet peak demand. As my colleague Jeff mentioned, a number of studies have documented that it is far more economically efficient to use other generators and other sources of flexibility on the grid to provide capacity as needed to balance supply with demand than to couple wind generators with storage.

Finally, compared to Europe, the sheer geographic size of the U.S. and the corresponding diversity of our wind resources gives us a strong advantage when it comes to integrating wind energy. For example, if on a certain day there isn't much wind in one region, there's a good chance that there will be above average wind somewhere else to make up for it. You are correct that a robust electric grid with strong interconnections between neighboring regions makes it significantly easier to integrate wind energy (in addition to reducing the cost of electricity and making the grid more reliable), which is why building a more robust grid is one of AWEA's major near-term policy goals.
Comment 20 of 21
No image available
July 3, 2008
One of the major issues with vanadium redox batteries is the large amounts of vanadium used. It's not that common, and much of it comes from purifying oil. So, with peak oil kicking in, there's going to be less vanadium. The viability of VRBs as wholesale bulk energy storage systems lies in this availiability of vanadium, which is uncertain. Because vanadium cost as a percentage of total is so high, cost cannot go up much to make new deposits economical.
Comment 21 of 21
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
martinHerzfeld GreenBeat Southwest Windpower Prism Solar Technologies, Inc ABS Energy Research VentureBeat
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo