Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

New Source for Biofuels Discovered

May 5, 2008   |   6 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
""The huge expense in making cellulosic ethanol and biofuels is in using enzymes and mechanical methods to break cellulose down. Using the cyanobacteria escapes these expensive processes."

-- Dr. Dr. David Nobles Jr., University of Texas at Austin
6 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 6
May 7, 2008
Since all that is being taken off the system is sugars and cellulose (in other words, Hydrogen and Carbon), once the system has been started, it shouldn't need any more inputs of phosphates sulphates and all the other 'ates' that bacteria need to grow. One question though. These bacteria need sunshine to grow which implies open channels, possibly enclosed in a green house. Are they extremophyls growing in exceedingly high salinity (like dunaliella) or high concentrations of bicarbonate (like spirollina) and if not, how are the cultures going to be kept uncontaminated.
Comment
2 of 6
May 7, 2008
There seems to be 2 problems with this algae; (1) It takes too much area to do anything significant. Oil producing bacteria could concievably produce the fuel we need from only aroung 15,000 square miles of ponds according to the Aquatic Species Study that the government did for 20 years. That's only about 1/4 of the government owned land in Nevada, (2) Water in ponds evaporates (up to .4" per hot day), and must be replaced. When using salt water, increased saltiness results, which would probably kill the algae eventually.

My hope for algae is a quick-dividing oil producing algae (for biodiesel), whose residual material can be used for food, either animal or human - or both. I don't know of one yet, but I hope they keep looking. We need both more energy and more foodstuff to feed the people of the world.
Comment
3 of 6
May 7, 2008
Outstanding! The solutions are out there. We need only look for them. The only disturbing part is the application for patents. Although in this day and age a patent is often not worth the paper it took to apply for it. Technology like this needs to be readily available at a nominal cost if less efficient or less desirable methods of fuel production are to be replaced in the near term. We need to get away from our collective desire to be the next Microsoft and work for the betterment of all. We often hear of the need for another Apollo or Manhatten Project to solve our energy problems. I would agree, but those brilliant researchers didn't sell their discoveries to the highest bidders. I shutter to think where we would be if they had.
Comment
4 of 6
May 8, 2008
This is very exciting news - at least on an oil for fuel replacement front.

But I'm sad to see the note on the patent application. America has a long history of ingenius people making something of themselves. But I'm willing to bet that some portion of that research was funded with State or Federal money. So, the tax payers paid for the research, then have to pay extra to get rights to use the results.

Go to the library or Amazon.com and read

University Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education.
by Jennifer Washburn.
Comment
5 of 6
May 11, 2008
Lucas is right, it is impractical. An interesting ploy to promote research funding. If the people who approve research funds were half as smart as the researchers we could get a lot bigger bang for our bucks. I am all in favor of funding advanced degrees but lets stop promoting crazy ideas in the name of research. I am sorry, but I have never seen a University based funded research proposal that was anything more than a bad smell in the wind.
Comment
6 of 6
May 23, 2008
Nice comment Herman,

You and Lucas are on the same page I am. Let me be clear, I am very happy for the researchers. I think their discovery has merit and some applicability. Do I see it as our energy salvation? No I do not.

I have seen countless research projects and studies over the years that "had all the answers". I can recall none that ever lived up to their press reports. I too am tired of paying for the professor and his students to do the research, and then paying again for the final product which typically doesn't work as well as claimed. Let's spend that money on open market research and business incubators. Let's spend it on tax incentives and write offs for new solar installations for homes and business. Let us try to use our limited funding to do the most good.

P.S.- I found an article from South Africa where a company there had claimed to have licensed this technology from the American company above. They (the South African company) had used it as a investment scheme and had then defrauded the investors. The American company has broken all ties with them, but it provides an example of how these developments can be abused.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Cantsink Manufacturing Solar Electric Power Association AREDAY The Stella Group, Ltd. SolarTech Solar Leadership Summit 2012 Total Energy USA
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters