Photo Credit: Richard Santos, the University of Texas at Austin
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (6) View image gallery Image Gallery (3) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
May 5, 2008

New Source for Biofuels Discovered

Texas, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

A newly created microbe produces cellulose that can be turned into ethanol and other biofuels, report scientists from The University of Texas at Austin. The scientists say the microbe could provide a significant portion of the nation's transportation fuel if production can be scaled up.

""The huge expense in making cellulosic ethanol and biofuels is in using enzymes and mechanical methods to break cellulose down. Using the cyanobacteria escapes these expensive processes."

-- Dr. Dr. David Nobles Jr., University of Texas at Austin

Along with cellulose, the cyanobacteria developed by Professor R. Malcolm Brown Jr. and Dr. David Nobles Jr. secrete glucose and sucrose. These simple sugars are the major sources used to produce ethanol.

"The cyanobacterium is potentially a very inexpensive source for sugars to use for ethanol and designer fuels," says Nobles, a research associate in the Section of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology.

Brown and Nobles say their cyanobacteria can be grown in production facilities on non-agricultural lands using salty water unsuitable for human consumption or crops.

Other key findings include:

  • The new cyanobacteria use sunlight as an energy source to produce and excrete sugars and cellulose.

  • Glucose, cellulose and sucrose can be continually harvested without harming or destroying the cyanobacteria (harvesting cellulose and sugars from true algae or crops, like corn and sugarcane, requires killing the organisms and using enzymes and mechanical methods to extract the sugars).

  • Cyanobacteria that can fix atmospheric nitrogen can be grown without petroleum-based fertilizer input.

Nobles made the new cyanobacteria (also known as blue-green algae) by giving them a set of cellulose-making genes from a non-photosynthetic "vinegar" bacterium, Acetobacter xylinum, well known as a prolific cellulose producer.

The new cyanobacteria produce a relatively pure, gel-like form of cellulose that can be broken down easily into glucose.

"The problem with cellulose harvested from plants is that it's difficult to break down because it's highly crystalline and mixed with lignins [for structure] and other compounds," Nobles says.

He was surprised to discover that the cyanobacteria also secrete large amounts of glucose or sucrose, sugars that can be directly harvested from the organisms.

 


A photosynthetic cyanobacterium with chlorophyll (red) and the cellulose material (blue) it produced.

"The huge expense in making cellulosic ethanol and biofuels is in using enzymes and mechanical methods to break cellulose down," says Nobles. "Using the cyanobacteria escapes these expensive processes."

 

Sources being used or considered for ethanol production in the United States include switchgrass and wood (cellulose), corn (glucose) and sugarcane (sucrose). True algae are also being developed for biodiesel production.

Brown sees a major benefit in using cyanobacteria to produce ethanol is a reduction in the amount of arable land turned over to fuel production and decreased pressure on forests.

"The pressure is on all these corn farmers to produce corn for non-food sources," says Brown, the Johnson & Johnson Centennial Chair in Plant Cell Biology. "That same demand, for sucrose, is now being put on Brazil to open up more of the Amazon rainforest to produce more sugarcane for our growing energy needs. We don't want to do that. You'll never get the forests back."

Brown and Nobles calculate that the approximate area needed to produce ethanol with corn to fuel all U.S. transportation needs is around 820,000 square miles, an area almost the size of the entire Midwest.

They hypothesize they could produce an equal amount of ethanol using an area half that size with the cyanobacteria based on current levels of productivity in the lab, but they caution that there is a lot of work ahead before cyanobacteria can provide such fuel in the field. Work with laboratory scale photobioreactors has shown the potential for a 17-fold increase in productivity. If this can be achieved in the field and on a large scale, only 3.5 percent of the area growing corn could be used for cyanobacterial biofuels.

Cyanobacteria are just one of many potential solutions for renewable energy, says Brown.

"There will be many avenues to become completely energy independent, and we want to be part of the overall effort," Brown says. "Petroleum is a precious commodity. We should be using it to make useful products, not just burning it and turning it into carbon dioxide."

Brown and Nobles are now researching the best methods to scale up efficient and cost-effective production of cyanobacteria. Two patent applications on the research were recently published in the United States Patent and Trade Office.

Image Gallery (3)
 
Reader Comments (6)
 
No image available
May 7, 2008
Since all that is being taken off the system is sugars and cellulose (in other words, Hydrogen and Carbon), once the system has been started, it shouldn't need any more inputs of phosphates sulphates and all the other 'ates' that bacteria need to grow. One question though. These bacteria need sunshine to grow which implies open channels, possibly enclosed in a green house. Are they extremophyls growing in exceedingly high salinity (like dunaliella) or high concentrations of bicarbonate (like spirollina) and if not, how are the cultures going to be kept uncontaminated.
Comment 1 of 6
No image available
May 7, 2008
There seems to be 2 problems with this algae; (1) It takes too much area to do anything significant. Oil producing bacteria could concievably produce the fuel we need from only aroung 15,000 square miles of ponds according to the Aquatic Species Study that the government did for 20 years. That's only about 1/4 of the government owned land in Nevada, (2) Water in ponds evaporates (up to .4" per hot day), and must be replaced. When using salt water, increased saltiness results, which would probably kill the algae eventually.

My hope for algae is a quick-dividing oil producing algae (for biodiesel), whose residual material can be used for food, either animal or human - or both. I don't know of one yet, but I hope they keep looking. We need both more energy and more foodstuff to feed the people of the world.
Comment 2 of 6
No image available
May 7, 2008
Outstanding! The solutions are out there. We need only look for them. The only disturbing part is the application for patents. Although in this day and age a patent is often not worth the paper it took to apply for it. Technology like this needs to be readily available at a nominal cost if less efficient or less desirable methods of fuel production are to be replaced in the near term. We need to get away from our collective desire to be the next Microsoft and work for the betterment of all. We often hear of the need for another Apollo or Manhatten Project to solve our energy problems. I would agree, but those brilliant researchers didn't sell their discoveries to the highest bidders. I shutter to think where we would be if they had.
Comment 3 of 6
No image available
May 8, 2008
This is very exciting news - at least on an oil for fuel replacement front.

But I'm sad to see the note on the patent application. America has a long history of ingenius people making something of themselves. But I'm willing to bet that some portion of that research was funded with State or Federal money. So, the tax payers paid for the research, then have to pay extra to get rights to use the results.

Go to the library or Amazon.com and read

University Inc.: The Corporate Corruption of Higher Education.
by Jennifer Washburn.
Comment 4 of 6
No image available
May 11, 2008
Lucas is right, it is impractical. An interesting ploy to promote research funding. If the people who approve research funds were half as smart as the researchers we could get a lot bigger bang for our bucks. I am all in favor of funding advanced degrees but lets stop promoting crazy ideas in the name of research. I am sorry, but I have never seen a University based funded research proposal that was anything more than a bad smell in the wind.
Comment 5 of 6
No image available
May 23, 2008
Nice comment Herman,

You and Lucas are on the same page I am. Let me be clear, I am very happy for the researchers. I think their discovery has merit and some applicability. Do I see it as our energy salvation? No I do not.

I have seen countless research projects and studies over the years that "had all the answers". I can recall none that ever lived up to their press reports. I too am tired of paying for the professor and his students to do the research, and then paying again for the final product which typically doesn't work as well as claimed. Let's spend that money on open market research and business incubators. Let's spend it on tax incentives and write offs for new solar installations for homes and business. Let us try to use our limited funding to do the most good.

P.S.- I found an article from South Africa where a company there had claimed to have licensed this technology from the American company above. They (the South African company) had used it as a investment scheme and had then defrauded the investors. The American company has broken all ties with them, but it provides an example of how these developments can be abused.
Comment 6 of 6
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
OPEL Solar, Inc. ExxonMobil Lubricants & Specialties Europe PennEnergy Virtual Energy Forum Financial Research Associates, LLC The Stella Group, Ltd.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo