Photo Credit: IBM
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (13) View image gallery Image Gallery (2) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
May 28, 2008

IBM Research Could Lead to Reduced Costs in Solar Farm Technology

New York, United States [RenewableEnergyWorld.com]

Last week, IBM announced a research breakthrough in photovoltaics (PV) technology that could significantly reduce the cost of harnessing the sun's power for electricity.

By borrowing innovations from its own R&D in cooling computer chips, the team was able to cool the solar cell from greater than 1,600 degrees Celsius to just 85 degrees Celsius.

In the same way that children in science class use a magnifying glass to burn a leaf, IBM scientists are using a large lens to concentrate the sun's power, capturing a record 230 watts onto a centimeter square solar cell, in a technology known as concentrator photovoltaics, or CPV. That energy is then converted into 70 watts of usable electrical power, about five times the electrical power density generated by typical cells using CPV technology in solar farms.

If it can overcome additional challenges to move this project out of the lab, IBM believes it can significantly reduce the cost of a typical CPV-based system. By using a much lower number of photovoltaic cells in a solar farm and concentrating more light onto each cell using larger lenses, IBM's system enables a significant cost advantage in terms of a lesser number of total components.

For instance, by moving from a 200 sun system ("one sun" is a measurement equal to the solar power incident at noon on a clear summer day), where about 20 watts per square centimeter of power is concentrated onto the cell, to a 2,300 sun system, where approximately 230 watts per square centimeter are concentrated onto the cell system, the IBM system cuts the number of photovoltaic cells and other components by a factor of 10.

"We believe IBM can bring unique skills from our vast experience in semiconductors and nanotechnology to the important field of alternative energy research," said Dr. Supratik Guha, the scientist leading photovoltaics activities at IBM Research. "This is one of many exploratory research projects incubating in our labs where we can drive big change for an entire industry while advancing the basic underlying science of solar cell technology."

The trick lies in IBM's ability to cool the tiny solar cell. Concentrating the equivalent of 2,000 suns on such a small area generates enough heat to melt stainless steel, something the researchers experienced first hand in their experiments. But by borrowing innovations from its own R&D in cooling computer chips, the team was able to cool the solar cell from greater than 1,600 degrees Celsius to just 85 degrees Celsius.

The initial results of this project were presented at the 33rd IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists conference last week, where the IBM researchers explained in detail how their liquid metal cooling interface is able to transfer heat from the solar cell to a copper cooling plate much more efficiently than anything else available today.

The IBM research team developed a system that achieved promising results by coupling a commercial solar cell to an advanced IBM liquid metal thermal cooling system using methods developed for the microprocessor industry.

Specifically, the IBM team used a very thin layer of a liquid metal made of a gallium and indium compound that they applied between the chip and a cooling block. Such layers, called thermal interface layers, transfer the heat from the chip to the cooling block so that the chip temperature can be kept low. The company says that its liquid metal solution offers the best thermal performance available today, at low costs, and the technology was successfully developed by IBM to cool high power computer chips earlier.

While concentrator-based photovoltaics technologies have been around since the 1970s, they have received renewed interest in recent times. With very high concentrations, they have the potential to offer the lowest-cost solar electricity for large-scale power generation, provided the temperature of the cells can be kept low, and cheap and efficient optics can be developed for concentrating the light to very high levels.


Credit: IBM

IBM is exploring four main areas of photovoltaic research: using current technologies to develop cheaper and more efficient silicon solar cells, developing new solution-processed thin-film photovoltaic devices, concentrator photovoltaics and future generation photovoltaic architectures based upon nanostructures such as semiconductor quantum dots and nanowires.

The goal of the projects is to develop efficient photovoltaic structures that would reduce the cost, minimize the complexity and improve the flexibility of producing solar electric power.

Image Gallery (2)
 
Reader Comments (13)
 
No image available
May 28, 2008
Pretty cool.
Comment 1 of 13
No image available
May 29, 2008
Such a logical next step.
Comment 2 of 13
No image available
May 30, 2008
Pardon me for being a tadd sceptical but with such a system you need, as they reported, a cooling system, probably involving a 'heat pipe', and a heat sink to take up all this heat (water cooling perhaps or large radiators). Yu need a tracking system since the array has to always be exactly facing the sun. You have to space the units quite far apart so that as they track they don't shade each other. You probably have to mount the unit on the ground rather than on a roof or if you go for a roof mount, you may have to do some serious strenthening of the roof to take all this equipment. With all the moving parts, your maintenance costs are going to be greater than for simple solar panels that just sit there. There are lots of things that work but aren't economically feasible.
Comment 3 of 13
No image available
May 30, 2008
Why must we always find ways to take simple elegant ideas and complicate them. Putting solar panels on every south facing roof doesn't require cooling and doesn't enrich the power companies
Comment 4 of 13
No image available
May 30, 2008
Isrealis have developed a coating that goes to concentrate light . This uses nano technology. Same way reports have come that an attempt of similar type has also been acomplished in Banglore labs by scientists.The coating is applied to the top of the panel.It has been reported that upto 95% of the UV radiation can be captured and made use of.The cell effeciency goes up substantially.
We use only UV radiation in PV cell based systems, there is lot of other energy like infrared which we use in other devices such as solar water heaters,.How about building devices that use full energy from the sun both UV and Infrared.
If IBM develops such focusing lenses which split the two radiation in different directions then I think the cooling problem on PV cells could vanish.
I believe Diamonds could be explored for this a-pplication.
Comment 5 of 13
No image available
May 30, 2008
The object appears to be a 'T' shape with a lens to the left with a perpendicular solar panel.

Does that mean light enters the panel from both sides?

That would limit opportunities to harvest the heat, since the panels surfaces would have to be unobstructed
Comment 6 of 13
No image available
May 30, 2008
If they keep the PV cell at 85C the waste heat is low grade and hard to utilize, especially at such small scale.

Going from 1 sun to 200 suns reduces PV cell area by 99.5%. Going from 1 sun to 2300 suns reduces PV cell area by 99.95%. Does that extra 0.45% reduction cost-justify the fancy cooling system and much higher precision lenses and motors? I suspect not but I wish them well.
Comment 7 of 13
No image available
May 30, 2008
John Groweg is right, why doesn't the article say anything about the great potential for more energy production from the heat that is transferred away from the solar cell?
Comment 8 of 13
No image available
May 31, 2008
=========================================
doggydogworld wrote:
"If they keep the PV cell at 85C the waste heat is low grade and hard to utilize, especially at such small scale."

--> This system is for SOLAR FARMS - massive arrays of attached concentrators. The picture is just a lab demonstration unit. If used in conjunction with an industrial, commercial, school, hospital, etc facility, the 60C boost from ambient temperature provides superb pre-heat or final heat.
===========================================

doggydogworld wrote:
"Going from 1 sun to 200 suns reduces PV cell area by 99.5%. Going from 1 sun to 2300 suns reduces PV cell area by 99.95%. Does that extra 0.45% reduction cost-justify the fancy cooling system and much higher precision lenses and motors? I suspect not but I wish them well."

You completely miss the point. It is not the area of a cell, it is that "the IBM system cuts the NUMBER of photovoltaic cells and other components by a factor of 10. "

Think about it: A 2000 time concentrator collects the same energy as TEN small 200 time concentrators. One large lens or mirror vs 10 smaller lenses or mirrors. One 1cm PV cell vs 10 1cm cells.
Comment 9 of 13
No image available
June 1, 2008
Why must we always find ways to take simple elegant ideas and complicate them. Putting solar panels on every south facing roof doesn't require cooling and doesn't enrich the power companies

Amen Brother Donald
Not mention all the dollars spent on R&D always tring to "reinvent the wheel." I would rather see the lower prices on the existing polycrystalline PV modules that we were all but promised 7 years ago. How much does it actually cost to make a 100 watt polycrystalline PV module anyway. I know that, at a lot of these RE stores, the price tags are over $500. U.S.. Unless of course you afford to purchase an entire 18 wheeler load at a time.

It would seem that Photovoltaics has been placed out of reach of the working man. Unless of course he seeks government assistance.
What was it we were being told? Something to the effect of, " As PV becomes more popular and moves into the public sector, we should see prices start to fall."
Looks to me like somebody "dropped the ball," especially where this so called "shortage of raw materials" campaign appears in the big picture.
Comment 10 of 13
No image available
June 3, 2008
It seems a little odd that the material for making solar cells is in such short supply. Isn't the raw material that stuff we sit on at the beach.

For some applications such as solar powered satelites and even solar cars, the Watts per Square metre is pretty important but as Thomas implied, for many applications, the Dollars per watt is far more important. I think part of the problem is all the new developments in the offing. Despite the huge demand for solar, people are reluctant to invest in new factories with the existing solar panel technology because they fear they will be made obsolete overnight if one of the new technologies achieves its long awaited potential.
Comment 11 of 13
No image available
June 3, 2008
I thought of that Idea years ago, and IBM turned my suggestion down. What a bunch IBummers. crooks and liars, but at least a good idea finally being projected
Comment 12 of 13
No image available
June 11, 2008
A company called SUNRGI has announced similar devices.
I believe one who splits the infrared and UV radiation first will be the winner.
I believe there are already attempts of this type.Is it that simple ?
Think over it. You can then use all the energy.
Comment 13 of 13
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Green Power Labs Inc. PennEnergy Bella Energy EFD American Solar Energy Society ReflecTech, Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo