Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Creating Renewable Energy from Living Organisms

By Stephen Lacey, Staff Writer
April 4, 2008   |   5 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
Nature, it seems, has much to teach about the efficiency of energy conversion and consumption.
5 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 5
April 9, 2008
Whatever the outcome, our insistence on every level needs to be on conservation through improved efficiencies and reductions in overall consumptions. This is our first, easiest means to a cleaner, greener world. Additionally, it only makes sense that as we work to develop these differing processes, we implement energy support with solar panels and wind farms to create the energy needed for such developments (develop greenly). This way we are not creating additional loads on our existing energy infrastructure, necessitating the expansion of fossil fuel usage (particularly coal) to augment. As for me and mine, we'll see you out there on our bikes, of course... JD Howell, Eugene, OR. Visit us at www.Cut20.blogspot.com for ideas on reducing your carbon footprint via commuting by bicycle...
Comment
2 of 5
April 9, 2008
i sincerely hope that these processes are given priority, and achieve success very soon. The insane use of food for fuel, where 800 million people are on the brink of starvation every day, must stop! There have already been food riots in Mexico, Egypt, and now Haiti. These poor people live off agricultural surplusses, which ethanol and biodiesel have reduced to only a 6-week supply - and we're between harvests! So, please acelerate your efforts, and save perhaps 200 million lives. Thanks in advance.
Comment
3 of 5
April 15, 2008
There is some promise to these technologies, but also serious limitations that investors and environmentalists alike should heed. Companies like Verenium claim to be green - because their algae units absorb carbon emissions from, for example, a factory smokestack. However, these carbon offsets are temporary and quickly wasted because they are used to create fuel which is then combusted to produce carbon emissions. Verenium wants to make money, and that's their right as a private corporation. However, their claim to being green is misleading. A truly green approach is one that makes little to no money - take Verenium's algae, install it at point sources, and then use the algae for purposes other than creating yet another carbon-based fuel source. But this doesn't make the company much money. In spite of the folks that laud praises on ventures mentioned, they don't really do much good for the environment except for filling in a small gap in the energy market as oil prices rise each week.

Solar power, and intermediate technologies such as true hybrid automobiles (not the junk that Ford is making), are much more realistic players in the new energy economy. We cannot forget that biomass fuels (whether made from algae, switchgrass, corn or sugar cane) still involve putting carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases back into the environment.
Comment
4 of 5
April 23, 2008
Hybrid batteries have a major carbon and waste footprint. Corn is used for food. Why go to all this trouble when Cannabis Americana (hemp or ditch weed) can be grown almost anywhere in the USA? I am sick of this plant being associated with Cannabis Sativa or Indica when it could be a great resource for this country. It not only recycles carbon dioxide into oxygen but also rejunvenates the soil. It does not get you stoned! It's good for rope and fuel biomass.
Comment
5 of 5
April 30, 2008
I agree with Ken's comments. The main reason that hemp is not being promoted is that it's not backed by the huge industry players and their DC lobbyists - we're talking AMD, Cargill, etc. They are not in the hemp market which is relatively tiny compared to feed corn and seeds, for example. Hemp is going to have to make a much larger case for itself in Washington and in the markets, but it's an uphill battle because it's not backed by the huge corporations in a way that corn is. Again, remember my previous comment which is that biomass fuels are not necessarily good for the environment. "Grow it and burn it" adds CO2 to the atmosphere and we're back at the same place as before. We need to focus on demand reduction, efficiency, and investing money in true alternatives. US policy should be putting serious RandD money into thin-film PV, battery research, wind, hydrogen, and efficiency. Some combination of these are the future of global energy, not biomass fuels.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

SolarEdge Technologies WindPole Ventures, LLC Texas Combined Heat & Power Initiative Comdel AEG Power Solutions Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group Cantsink Manufacturing
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters