Some say governments move too slowly and that bureaucracies can impede progress. But just last month the Santa Barbara City Council and staff bucked the stereotype and moved to approve a potentially momentous change in the building code. With broad support from developers, architects, contractors and the environmental community, the City increased the energy-efficiency standards for all new construction. Importantly, the project moved from conception to implementation in just over a year, beginning with a lecture by architect Ed Mazria, the founder of the Architecture 2030 Challenge and concluding with the City approving its new ordinance in October. Upon review by the California Energy Commission, the ordinance will become effective early this year.
Buildings in our region constitute about 40 percent of our total energy use and greenhouse gas emissions — and local governments have jurisdiction over building codes. Under the Architecture 2030 Challenge spearheaded by Mazria, all new buildings and retrofits should use 50 percent less fossil fuel than national averages. By decreasing energy use in buildings, we can have a significant impact and curtail global warming.
The Challenge is a gradual process that calls for a 60 percent decrease in fossil fuel use by 2010, a 70 percent decrease in 2015, and so forth until we reach carbon-neutrality in 2030 (using no fossil fuels to operate buildings). The City's new ordinance takes the first step and sets a standard for all residential new construction to be 20 percent more efficient than today's Title 24 and all commercial new construction be 10 percent more efficient.
These slightly tighter standards will meet the first step of the Challenge because of California's already stringent energy efficiency code: Title 24. Enacted in 1978 to keep demand for fossil fuels down and save consumers money on energy bills, Title 24 has slowly ratcheted up energy efficiency standards over the years, which has helped California's per-capita electricity use stay the same as it was in the 1970s. In contrast, the rest of the U.S. has seen per-capita use over the last 30 years rise by 50 percent. The energy saving we have seen, and the energy savings we will realize in the future, are beneficial for our environment, our health and our pocketbooks.
The Architecture 2030 Coalition, a group chaired and coordinated by the Community Environmental Council that included the American Institute of Architects Santa Barbara Chapter, the Santa Barbara Contractors Association, Built Green Santa Barbara and the Sustainability Project, worked with the City as it conducted its work on the ordinance. Due in part to the coalition's efforts, the ordinance was supported broadly in the community and by the City Council, which voted unanimously to implement the ordinance.
By working collaboratively, the community, staff and Council were able to pass a significant piece of legislation that will enact real change by reducing emissions of greenhouse gases, air pollutants and fossil fuel use. Together, this will help maintain the quality of life we have come to expect in Santa Barbara, while saving money on electricity and gas bills.
State government, through the Public Utilities Commission, is moving in the same direction by directing the utilities (Southern California Edison and the Southern California Gas Company in our area) to use their energy-efficiency funding to achieve zero net energy homes by 2020. This is a very ambitious, but achievable, goal. The Public Utilities Commission also recently required the utilities to use their funding to achieve zero net energy in new commercial construction by 2030. "Zero net energy" means that buildings, on an average annual basis, use literally no external energy.
The utilities manage about $2 billion every three years to increase energy-efficiency throughout the state, paid for by a small charge on our utility bills. With these new decisions from the Public Utilities Commission, the utilities will now aggressively ramp up their efforts to reduce energy use in new construction and reduce greenhouse gas emissions.
Governor Schwarzenegger and the Legislature also approved AB 32, the Global Warming Solutions Act, in 2006, which requires the state to return to 1990 emissions levels by 2020. The utilities energy-efficiency programs will be a key factor in achieving this goal.
Santa Barbara has now taken the lead on this issue and is showing other local governments what is possible, given support from the community. Additional incentives provided by state government and the utilities will help local governments achieve dramatic improvements in energy efficiency over time — a perfect carrot and stick approach to achieving real change on the ground.
The Community Environmental Council has also published a 133-page report entitled, A New Energy Direction: A Blueprint for Santa Barbara County as part of the CEC's Fossil Free by '33 campaign. The report can be downloaded here.
Megan Birney is a Senior Program Associate with the Community Environmental Council. Tam Hunt, who collaborated on both the report and this article, is the Energy Program Director and Attorney. More information on CEC's programs can be found at www.fossilfreeby33.org.
The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.
I am glad the standards were adopted. But to say the govt. will not impede progress doesn't understand bureaucracies.
What will happen is that each new building will now need to pass a building inspection on the energy efficiency standards. The waiting list for inspections will be long because there will not be enough inspectors (tight budgets). You can just imagine what will happen when a building fails on one or two items......
Not to be a pessimist, but I have full confidence the govt. can impede anything it tries to improve. Remember the 1 Million Solar Roofs? This initiative was impeded eyes closed and one hand tied behind their back.
A good step forward. The "net" in zero net energy is because zero electricity use depends on the availability of "net metering" for PV projects, where a system is sized to provide the amount of electricity that a structure needs on an annual basis. This means over-production in the summer, and under-production in the winter, with the goal being to consume a net zero electricity over a year's time.
Also, if heated water is required in a zero energy building, it must include a solar water heating system. Heating water with PV is not a cost-effective proposition, and despite the rhetoric surrounding instantaneous water heaters, they still consume natural gas or electricity to heat water.Easy there Rick,
The idea behind zero energy structures is that buildings produce the energy they need by using photovoltaic panels, passive solar heating, active hot water heating, daylighting, etc.
Additionally, the buildings' energy needs are minimized through design, by using: insulation, day lighting, high efficiency fixtures, etc.
"Zero net energy" means that buildings, on an average annual basis, use literally no external energy
What the heck does that mean?
To get an average of zero there has to be no external energy use.
Not zero net or any other weasel words but none.
I really wonder who was consulted on this.Were the people who will be buying there buildings asked if they want to live and work in closed system buildings?
Remember the sick buildings of past years.
Stop makin' sense. Elderly folks, such as myself, might need oxygen after reading a story like this.
This is where it all begins... build it efficiently in the first place. It doesn't make any sense to air condition a tent.
The "governments move slowly," and "bureaucracies can impede progress," comment made me harken to the good ol' days when I approached the Santa Barbara and Ventura County Boards of Supervisors to promote solar water back in 1979. They lived up to their name... they were bored. Better late than never. Soon, they might consider plug-in electric/hybrid vehicles w/photovoltaic bus & carports for all city/county & public transportortation vehicles. Keep on Truckin'.
Great work in Santa Barbara,
Here in Holland we are working to make the national government make Holland durable faster. Our group is called Transformenergy.
Mail us for more info:
We make a personal energy overview.
Good work Megan Birney!!!!!