Photo Credit: DOE / EERE
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (26) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
December 10, 2007

Germany to Require Renewables for New Homes in 2009

by Jane Burgermeister, Contributing Writer
Berlin, Germany

All new homes built in Germany from January 1st 2009 will be required to install renewable energy heating systems under a new law called the Renewable Energies Heating Law (Erneubare-Energien-Warmegesetz).

The government is allocating 350 million euros [US $517 million] each year in grants for homeowners to install renewable energy systems such as solar panels, wood pellet stoves and boilers and heat pumps.

Homeowners will have to use renewable energy sources to meet 14% of a household's total energy consumption for heating and domestic hot water.

"The heating sector is the sleeping giant of renewable energy," Thomas Hagbeck of the German Federal Environmental Agency tells RenewableEnergyAccess.com.

"Using renewable energy for heating homes will not only significantly cut greenhouse emissions but also reduce heating bills as oil and gas prices surge," he says.

Heating buildings accounts for 40% of the total energy consumption in the country. Renewables currently account for about 6% of the energy sources used for heating buildings. The new government legislation targets an increase in the use of renewables for heating to 14% by 2020.

Existing houses will also have to be remodeled to incorporate renewable-energy-based heating systems from 2010 on. For old houses, 10% of the heating and domestic hot water energy needs will have to be provided by renewables.

"The Renewable Energy Law gave a big boost to the renewable energy sector when it came to generating electricity in Germany and this law will give the same big boost when it comes to heating," says Hagbeck.

The use of renewable energy sources for electricity increased 300% in the last ten years in Germany while the use of renewables for heating increased by only 40% over the same period.

It is estimated that updating energy performance in buildings could save 50 billion euros [US $73.9 billion] in heating costs in Germany up to 2020 alone.

According to a German government source, houses built in the 1960s use on average four times more energy for heating than updated, energy-efficient houses, which need 5 to 6 liters of heating oil for each square meter a year. Meanwhile, oil prices in Germany have tripled since 2001.

The government is allocating 350 million euros [US $517 million] each year in grants for homeowners to install renewable energy systems such as solar panels, wood pellet stoves and boilers and heat pumps.

Most homeowners are expected to choose solar panels. Under the new regulations, the size of the solar panel required will depend on the size of the house: solar panels will need to have an area equal to 4% of the total area of a house.

Fines of up to 500,000 euros [US $739,000] will face anyone who fails to switch their heating systems.

Also, the government is launching a program to improve insulation in the country's housing stock, and to cut back on energy waste.

The introduction of new energy ratings for all houses in 2008 will be further incentive to homeowners in Germany to invest in energy efficiency to protect the value of their houses, analysts say.

The state of Baden-Württemberg in southern Germany has already passed a law requiring all building plans for new houses submitted after April 1st 2008 to include renewable energy heating systems.

People building new homes there will have to install a renewable heating technology that can provide 20% of the household's heating and domestic hot water needs.

Energy used for heating homes in Baden-Württemberg accounts for 33% of the 72 million tons of carbon emitted by the state each year, officials say.

Many of the 2.2 million homes built in Baden-Württemberg before 1977 use 7 times more energy for heating than updated, energy-efficient homes, according to Claudia Rist of the Climate Protection and Energy Agency Baden-Württemberg (Klimaschutz-und Energieagentur Baden-Württemberg).

The German federal government's new renewable energy heating law, which is set to be passed by parliament next year, is part of a comprehensive package of measures that aims to reduce the country's carbon emissions by 40% by 2020 when compared to 1990.

It is estimated that the package will cost 31 billion euros [US $45.8 billion] a year to implement. But the costs will be offset by savings of 36 billion euros [US $53.2 billion] a year from lower bills for coal, oil and gas, experts say.

Jane Burgermeister is a freelance writer based in Vienna, Austria.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (26)
 
No image available
December 10, 2007
Jane, a supplementary question:
Will ground or air heat pumps count towards the renewable quota?
Comment 1 of 26
No image available
December 10, 2007
Jane: Some questions: Any idea how much of the cost of RE heating systems the government grant will cover? Do you mean solar PV or solar thermal for heating? I guess it could be either.. Is the government's goal to reduce carbon levels to 1990 levels, or 40% below that? Mark
Comment 2 of 26
No image available
December 11, 2007
Hi David,

To answer your question: heat pumps do count towards the renewable quota.

Cheers, Jane
Comment 3 of 26
No image available
December 11, 2007
Hi Mark,

Just to answer your questions

1. Homeowners have to apply individually for grants so the amount the govenment will reimburse will vary.

The overall amount the government is allocating in grants is 350 million euros in 2008 and 500 million euros each year from 2009 to 2012.

2. Yes, any solar energy system is covered

3. The government plans to reduce carbon emissions by 40 per cent below the 1990 level.

Cheers, Jane
Comment 4 of 26
No image available
December 11, 2007
?? no mention in article that I can see of the American being dumb.
Why so sensitive? How about dealing with the actual issues? Most people and most nations get some things right and some things wrong - if the theory of global warming is correct then there is a lot to learn from the German approach.
Chill!
Comment 5 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
Jane:
Thanks for this article. Many aren't aware that the German (and for that matter the entire European) market for solar thermal technologies is huge, both in $/Euros, and in energy produced. See the ESTIF publication: http://www.estif.org/fileadmin/downloads/Solar_Thermal_Markets_in_Europe_2006.pdf

Question: Is the law language available in English?
Comment 6 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
Sorry...... Mr. Grazier.
Comment 7 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
Mr. Glazier-

I had not realized that coal was a "clean source of energy." Can you supply us a reference for this? I would love to see clean coal! I read in Chemical and Engineering News that it would take about 30% of a plant's capacity to separate and compress the CO2 for sequestration, which does not sound too economical, either.
Comment 8 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
I personally find the German Government's attempt to force feed "renewable energy" on German homeowners as a waste of money. None of the "RE" forms are efficient because they all need grid-fed electricity to function. Coal and nuclear generation of electricity is the only clean and efficient source of energy for heating homes and buildings.
Comment 9 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
Love or hate the Germans, one thing is for sure. You have to admire them: The Germans --DO-- while others talk. When all the pro's and cons are considered the future is where Germany is looking and what they spend on renewable energy now will pay them back with interest later:
As a nation Germany always worries me, but you have to hand it to them when it comes to putting their money where their mouth is:

Actually, it would not be a bad idea for the rest of the world to follow Germany's lead:
Comment 10 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
Good for Germany for actually doing something constructive towards addressing our changing climate. Compliments to Environment Minister Sigmar Gabriel for taking a stand against Paula Dobriansky, the Under Secretary of State for the United Corporations of America (UCA) or formerly the United States of America. Her sole purpose is to promote delay and inaction on every other country's part so that the UCA does not look as bad.

What is wrong with creating jobs outside of the oil and coal sector? What is wrong with taking some caution with our CO2 pollution in the atmosphere just in case it really is causing damage? What is wrong with making our own energy?

Southern Company, an electric company in the American southeast, is lobbying hard to kill the renewable energy requirement in the U.S. Energy Bill Senate vote for tomorrow. This is where the American people are lost in our own government- it is a government by the corporations.
Comment 11 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
The equivalent of 4% of your floor area in solar panels (heat or electric) seems rather modest. Why not cover your whole South facing roof in panels. In new houses, you use panels as the roof covering, saving the cost of conventional roofing. Advantages are huge.
*You save the cost of retrofitting (always expensive) when you decide you should have put more panels up in the first place.
*The country as a whole gains security from the interned effect (natural or man made disasters can not knock out the net easily)
*You save on transmission losses since power on average is generated closer to the users
*The household may generate a small income, especially for the retired couple when the kids are out of the home and they can do their baking, hoovering etc during the day when the sun shines.
*With the much greater uptake of solar panels, the price is likely to come down (the government could bulk buy and pass on the savings)
*it could all be done on the Berkley plan (previous article)
Comment 12 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
I suspect almost all of these systems will end up being solar domestic hot water systems. Note that the standard requires 4% of the floor area be solar panels. Homes in Germany are smaller than in the US, but assuming a 2000 sq. ft. home, that works out to 80 s.f. of panel, or two 4'x10' solar hot water panels. That is typically what's required for a domestic solar hot water system that can meet 50-60% of the home's year-round domestic hot water needs.

Because hydronic space heating systems that use domestic water heaters as their heat source are common in Europe, this concept would allow the solar component to contribute some to the winter space heating, too.
Comment 13 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
Jane,

It always refreshing to hear about the German's path toward renewable energy. Can't wait till the special interest groups and the politic's move out of the way toward a path such as Germany has taken.
Listed Green has taken a similar path toward this type of sustainability and hopes that our "elevating" of energy efficiency and innovative building, including solar power and many other methods will help the USA "catch up" with the European's and elsewhere.

Dave
Listed Green
Comment 14 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
This subsidy is quite small compared to the billions of dollars thrown down the Iraq oil war rat hole, yet it promises to truly pay energy security and climate mitigation dividends for a long time. Smart Germans, indeed.
Comment 15 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
I agree with Mr. Monk. Other thing that the purely economical analysis other people is doing here and not considering is that Germany is developing with these measures a very profitable renewable energy industry that generates a lot of workplaces. Contrary to the oil industry and their interests that prevail in US-politics, which concentrate every year more money in the pockets of a few oil-chefs and that year with year will employ less people. So what happens when oil reaches peak production and oil incomes start dwindling as well? The US will find that renewables would have been a great investment after all.

But then again, climate change and peak oil is all fuzzy math. Or is it?
Comment 16 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
The economics are spelled out well, contrary to one comment above. "It is estimated that the package will cost 31 billion euros a year to implement. But the costs will be offset by savings of 36 billion euros a year from lower bills for coal, oil and gas, experts say." This is what Germany has been doing for a long time. Tax and spend but ultimately save. It has a bad name with politicians [including UK where I am] because the taxing bit loses votes - BUT IT WORKS. I cannot afford to improve my house, but I can afford a bit extra tax, and would welcome it if it was to be spent on a scheme like this.
Comment 17 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
It is indeed encouraging to read this article.
Recently, in response to a question, Sen. McCain answered that the primary reason that the United States had not done more to combat global warming was because of the influence of special interests, mainly coal and petroleum corporations. I take it the German government is not as susceptible to control by special interests as the American government? How does the German government work, in regards to lobbyists. Are they a big problem, like they are here in the U.S.?
Comment 18 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
I too applaud the German leadership in renewable energy.
(I'm not sure why Mr. Berry refers to people who care to help our planet which is on life support as "suckers", though perhaps freeloading is his way.)

The Germans have lead the way in solar and once again here.
Comment 19 of 26
No image available
December 12, 2007
In contrast to Mr Berry, I applaud the German approach. The effects of man-induced global warming are blatently apparent and just a quick read through the naturally conservative IPCC-report provide all the reason in the world to assist the market in dealing with this challenge. As we still are making rather half-hearted attempts to internalise the true costs of environmental degradation into our traditional economic systems, other tools and assistance are needed. I recommend Mark Lynas book "Six degrees" for motivation!
Comment 20 of 26
No image available
December 13, 2007
BP, Shell, GE, Big Oil & Coal bought up all the solar cell and ship them outside the US. Smart move for greedy companies like Southern, AEP, TVA.
Where can I purchase 100 watts solar in Tennessee? Canada, California - yes. Other sites in the US? Nowhere. Prove me wrong. Please prove me wrong.
Comment 21 of 26
No image available
December 13, 2007
Germany's decision is a good example for EU North-East states.
Lithuanian people use approx. 25 cubics of natural gas for heating each square meter houseroom in cold season from october till april. Citizens living in old houses, builded till 1990, use 4-5 times more fuel. Suming up the situation that most of our country population use firewood, peat, coal, of course emission of CO2 and smoke-black in atmosphere is large. Now our government substantially does not support and stimulate implementation sytems of solar photvoltaic, Solar heating, Geothermal heating systems in Lithuania. Citizens, homeowners must be stimulated through state taxing and direct financial support systems.
We welcome German government with sutch important and useful initiative!

Sigitas Cemeska
Vilnius, Lithuania
Comment 22 of 26
No image available
December 13, 2007
We all have to admit that: (i) our easy life using fossil fuells for mostly everything will sooner or later come to an end, and (ii) various solar power tools (PV panels, solar heaters, and wind turbines) will have to play more and more an important role in satisfying our household (and then transportation - via hydrogen produced via solar) energy needs.

Having said this, for now, good Federal/State/Local stick/incentives are a must, until (i) general public realizes the importance and advantages of solar power, and the price ratio between solar/conventional energy unit improves.
Comment 23 of 26
No image available
December 13, 2007
1.
With the huge proportion of the cost of any product being energy and with fossil fuels becoming more and more expensive, a country which has invested heavily in ever cheapening renewables will have a great advantage on the world market. Germany will be in the forfront of these countries. As William Bunter said, you have to hand it to them.

2.
UCA - United Corporations of Americe - is that going to catch on as a classic or what? Who can we credit for hitting the nail squarely on the head???
Comment 24 of 26
No image available
December 14, 2007
Hello Jane, Your story was very encouraging & motivating. We'd like to share it with others in our local area to get people thinking about talking to our politicians to do similar things here in Canada. Would you give us permission to pass your article along to our local papers as part of a letter to the editor that we would write? Canada has so much to learn from what Germany has been doing & we'd like to spread your good news around as much as possible. Thanks...and Seasons Greetings.
Comment 25 of 26
No image available
December 15, 2007
==To answer your question: heat pumps do count towards the renewable quota.==

Now that part kicks ass.

Since Heat pumps are perhaps the most effective way to do this, especially in colder climates.
Comment 26 of 26
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
UL University Alteris Renewables The Stella Group, Ltd. ABS Energy Research Magnum Energy Inc. National Hydrogen Association
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo