Photo Credit: CU Biodiesel
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (13) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
October 19, 2007

Examining the World's Potential to Produce Biodiesel

Researchers rank 226 countries according to their potential to make large volumes of biodiesel at low cost.
by Madeline Fisher

What do the countries of Thailand, Uruguay and Ghana have in common? They all could become leading producers of biodiesel, says a study from the University of Wisconsin-Madison Nelson Institute for Environmental Studies.

"We're not suggesting that all exported vegetable oil should be converted into biodiesel, because that would fundamentally upset the food supply. We're looking at this more from each individual country's perspective: They're already exporting one thing, could they be exporting something else?"

-- Tracey Holloway, Researcher, University of Wisconsin-Madison

The ease of manufacturing biodiesel from vegetable oils and animal fats has made it one of the most promising, near-term alternatives to fossil fuels.

Seeking to understand which nations are best positioned today to enter the burgeoning biodiesel market, researchers Matt Johnston and Tracey Holloway of the Nelson Institute's Center for Sustainability and the Global Environment (SAGE) ranked 226 countries according to their potential to make large volumes of biodiesel at low cost.

Scheduled for inclusion in the Oct. 24 journal Environmental Science and Technology, the analysis uncovered many of the usual suspects, including the United States, a top soybean grower; and Brazil, already a major biodiesel producer. The Netherlands, Germany, Belgium and Spain also cracked the top ten in overall volume potential.

But the researchers say the study's true motivation was to identify developing countries that already export significant amounts of vegetable oil for profit, but may not have considered refining it into biodiesel. By exporting biodiesel—a higher value commodity—these countries could improve their trade balances, says Johnston, or use the fuel to offset their own energy needs.

"A lot of these countries don't have any petroleum resources and so they're having to import petroleum," he says. "At the same time, they're exporting vegetable oil that they could be turning into biodiesel and using domestically."

Overall, the study ranked Malaysia, Thailand, Colombia, Uruguay and Ghana as the developing nations most likely to attract biodiesel investment, not only because of their strong agricultural industries, but also due to their relative safety and stability, lack of debt, among other economic factors.

Johnston emphasizes, however, that the set of criteria he and Holloway used is just one among many.

"As long as they're profitable and have large volumes of vegetable oils, all the countries on our list—even if they aren't on our top ten list—they could do this," he says.

The idea for the analysis first struck Johnston on a visit to a remote island of Fiji, where people rely primarily on petroleum diesel to run generators for electricity. Transported in by boat, the fuel cost the equivalent of $20 per gallon. Meanwhile, the islanders were growing coconuts and processing them into oil that sold for 50 cents a liter.

"The price disparity was just incredible," says Johnston, "and it prompted me to think about where else in the world countries might have this biofuels potential, but not necessarily realize it."

At the same time, many agencies—chief among them the United Nations - have raised concerns about the biofuel industry's possible impact on the world's poor, as vegetable oils, now used for food, are increasingly diverted to fuel production. Rampant growth of biofuels could also negatively affect the environment; a soaring demand for palm oil, for example, has already led to deforestation in Southeast Asia.

By highlighting the places in the world where biodiesel development will likely happen, Johnston and Holloway hope their analysis will help people foresee these problems and make plans to mitigate them.

"We're not saying, 'There's all this potential out there, go get it,'" says Johnston. "Instead, we're looking at which vegetable oil feed stocks are most likely to be affected and which countries will most likely be doing this at a large-scale. That way, we can anticipate some of the impacts, as opposed to having to react after the fact."

Of all the vegetable oils and animal fats examined in the study, soybean and palm oil were by far the most common. In fact, the world's top five soybean and palm oil producers—Malaysia, Indonesia, Argentina, the United States and Brazil—accounted for 80 percent of the potential global biodiesel production, the researchers found.

Based on current export volumes of vegetable oil from 119 countries, Johnston also estimated that a grand total of 51 billion liters of biodiesel could be produced annually—enough to meet roughly 4-5 percent of the world's existing demand for petroleum diesel. Yet, although interesting, these numbers aren't the main point.

"We're not suggesting that all exported vegetable oil should be converted into biodiesel, because that would fundamentally upset the food supply," says Holloway. "We're looking at this more from each individual country's perspective: They're already exporting one thing, could they be exporting something else?"

Because the study employed data from online, public sources—primarily the Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations Statistics Division—Holloway points out that any country could repeat the calculations or do its own analysis of the biodiesel opportunity. And she and Johnston hope they will.

"I'd love to see some of these development opportunities come to fruition for some of these countries," Johnston says.

Madeline Fisher is a staff writer at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (13)
 
No image available
October 19, 2007
Good article.
Comment 1 of 13
No image available
October 20, 2007
==a grand total of 13.47 billion gallons of biodiesel could be produced annually
enough to meet roughly 4-5 percent of the world's existing demand for petroleum diesel.
Assuming no vegetable oil is exported for food==

So basically we're looking at a net total of 4-5%
ASSUMING you export no vegetable oil for food.

What the **** is with these delussions of granduer that we are going to replace all our fuel supply with biodiesel and ethanol.
Vehicle miles traveled is expected to double by 2025. Double demand!

By the time we could even scale up that far we're talking 1% of our fuel needs met by biodiesel at best.
We could get a greater decrease in petroleum consumption just by inflating our tires better.
Thats pathetic.

And for that we figure we should mow down rainforrests like they were blades of grass, just for the fringe benefit of a couple drops of fuel on the world scale.

It's both sad and alarming that people would put so much faith in biofuels.
Comment 2 of 13
No image available
October 20, 2007
Just what we need.
More wanton destruction inside tropical forrests.

That'd do wonders for INCREASING our emissions of greenhouse gases. :(
http://greyfalcon.net/palmoil
http://greyfalcon.net/tropics3

If you don't care about anything but solving peak oil, we might as well turn coal into diesel. It would be less harmful.
http://greyfalcon.net/lcarough7.png
Comment 3 of 13
No image available
October 21, 2007
This is one of the reasons that Going Green Expos has scheduled a B to B expo in Accra Ghana for November 2008. Ghana is the gateway to the largest English speaking market outide of North America.
Comment 4 of 13
No image available
October 22, 2007
==Before you continue your rant, remember that this article is focused on just one small aspect of the big picture. Everyone knows that we need all kinds of RE, conservation, carbon sequestration, etc.==

Thats the trick though.

It's not a matter of "some good" versus "more good"
It's an issue of a "lot of bad" versus "more good"

BioFuels, with very very very few exceptions increase the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. (About the only exception being cellulosic elephant grass, and potentially algae processed in a closed loop system with heavy water recycling. Neither of which are in commercial production anywhere on the planet.)

It's not a small aspect of *anything* to reduce global warming.

http://greyfalcon.net/n2ostudy.png

_

Unless of course we are trying to solve peak oil at the detriment of global warming.

If thats the approach, then turning coal into a liquid is a fine solution.
Comment 5 of 13
No image available
October 24, 2007
The vegetable oil they are presently exporting is used for food. Fat has 4 times the caloric content of sugar, so is especially important in third-world nation's food supply. And does anybody think that if more money can be made producing energy than for producing food, that food won't go by the wayside? Not in the ADM world of today!
Comment 6 of 13
No image available
October 24, 2007
I'm not a big fan of bio-fuels but John said it best. There will not be one single solution. In remote locaitons where the sources are readiliy available, it will work fine.

This is not a solution for fuel/energy world wide.
Comment 7 of 13
No image available
October 24, 2007
Any energy with the prefix "bio" must depend on photosynthesis. At best about one watt per square meter can be stored in biomass. At a world-wide energy annual consumption of about 500 quads, all the eath's crop land will not make a dent in that energy use. I wish writers would specify "Joules of biofuel per hectare-year."
Comment 8 of 13
No image available
October 24, 2007
My family has a farm in Africa. There is enough waste product from the crops to make
all the fuel we need and then some. The key really is to empower the local farmer.
if we can save the $2000 a month that we spend on fuel and pay that to our workers
for making biofuel it's a good start.
Comment 9 of 13
No image available
October 25, 2007
This article was very timely one for Renewable Energy Centre, Mithradham, Kochi, India because we exhibit a Biodiesel Car from Merciden Benz - India at our centre as a part of our yearly programme, Global Village Action Week. Thank you.

Prof. Dr. George Peter
Director, Mithradham.
Comment 10 of 13
No image available
October 26, 2007
re:
=="Joules of biofuel per hectare-year."==

I'd prefer they do it in Newton-Meters per Hectare per Year.
Or basically a sunlight-to-torque comparison.

3-6% solar energy captured by biomass
32% energy left after Fischer Tropsch processing
88% energy left after distributing it
15-40% energy-to-torque with the engine
TOTAL = 0.127%-to-0.676% sunlight-to-torque

Even if we had some magic vegetable which operates at 100% of the potential photosynthetic capacity.
11% solar energy captured by biomass
32% energy left after Fischer Tropsch processing
88% energy left after distributing it
15-40% energy-to-torque with the engine
TOTAL = 0.465-to-1.24% sunlight-to-torque
http://greyfalcon.net/sugarsolar

Which is pretty sad compared to:
10-50% solar energy captured by solar electric
85% energy left after distribution
80-90% energy-to-torque with an electric engine
TOTAL = 6.800%-to-38.250% sunlight-to-torque
Comment 11 of 13
No image available
October 27, 2007
Dear Sir,
This is a great articles, to combat climate change and hope the same fire disaster in California do not repeat
somewhere else.There is an urgent need to reduce fossil
fuel consumption.
Regards,
Ron Tan
www.infernofuel.com
Comment 12 of 13
No image available
November 21, 2007
Considering the US has lost 4,000 soldiers to a war for oil, and estimates show that between 10,000 to 60,000 citizens die each year from vehicle emissions ... how can anyone support a stand for walking away from a biofuel industry that is barely a decade old.

At one time they said the same thing about NASA, it cost too much. Biofuels will improve, but it will not advance without some market, take the market away and rely on fossil fuels until there aren't any left. Now that is an advanced strategy.
Comment 13 of 13
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Energy Ocean Conference High Sun Engineering ReflecTech, Inc. NESEA National Semiconductor Clayton Power
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo