Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Examining the World's Potential to Produce Biodiesel

By Madeline Fisher
October 19, 2007   |   13 Comments
Researchers rank 226 countries according to their potential to make large volumes of biodiesel at low cost.

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"We're not suggesting that all exported vegetable oil should be converted into biodiesel, because that would fundamentally upset the food supply. We're looking at this more from each individual country's perspective: They're already exporting one thing, could they be exporting something else?"

-- Tracey Holloway, Researcher, University of Wisconsin-Madison
13 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 13
October 19, 2007
Good article.
Comment
2 of 13
October 20, 2007
==a grand total of 13.47 billion gallons of biodiesel could be produced annually
enough to meet roughly 4-5 percent of the world's existing demand for petroleum diesel.
Assuming no vegetable oil is exported for food==

So basically we're looking at a net total of 4-5%
ASSUMING you export no vegetable oil for food.

What the **** is with these delussions of granduer that we are going to replace all our fuel supply with biodiesel and ethanol.
Vehicle miles traveled is expected to double by 2025. Double demand!

By the time we could even scale up that far we're talking 1% of our fuel needs met by biodiesel at best.
We could get a greater decrease in petroleum consumption just by inflating our tires better.
Thats pathetic.

And for that we figure we should mow down rainforrests like they were blades of grass, just for the fringe benefit of a couple drops of fuel on the world scale.

It's both sad and alarming that people would put so much faith in biofuels.
Comment
3 of 13
October 20, 2007
Just what we need.
More wanton destruction inside tropical forrests.

That'd do wonders for INCREASING our emissions of greenhouse gases. :(
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/palmoil">http://greyfalcon.net/palmoil</a>
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/tropics3">http://greyfalcon.net/tropics3</a>

If you don't care about anything but solving peak oil, we might as well turn coal into diesel. It would be less harmful.
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/lcarough7.png">http://greyfalcon.net/lcarough7.png</a>
Comment
4 of 13
October 21, 2007
This is one of the reasons that Going Green Expos has scheduled a B to B expo in Accra Ghana for November 2008. Ghana is the gateway to the largest English speaking market outide of North America.
Comment
5 of 13
October 22, 2007
==Before you continue your rant, remember that this article is focused on just one small aspect of the big picture. Everyone knows that we need all kinds of RE, conservation, carbon sequestration, etc.==

Thats the trick though.

It's not a matter of "some good" versus "more good"
It's an issue of a "lot of bad" versus "more good"

BioFuels, with very very very few exceptions increase the amount of greenhouse gases in the atmosphere. (About the only exception being cellulosic elephant grass, and potentially algae processed in a closed loop system with heavy water recycling. Neither of which are in commercial production anywhere on the planet.)

It's not a small aspect of *anything* to reduce global warming.

<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/n2ostudy.png">http://greyfalcon.net/n2ostudy.png</a>

_

Unless of course we are trying to solve peak oil at the detriment of global warming.

If thats the approach, then turning coal into a liquid is a fine solution.
Comment
6 of 13
October 24, 2007
The vegetable oil they are presently exporting is used for food. Fat has 4 times the caloric content of sugar, so is especially important in third-world nation's food supply. And does anybody think that if more money can be made producing energy than for producing food, that food won't go by the wayside? Not in the ADM world of today!
Comment
7 of 13
October 24, 2007
I'm not a big fan of bio-fuels but John said it best. There will not be one single solution. In remote locaitons where the sources are readiliy available, it will work fine.

This is not a solution for fuel/energy world wide.
Comment
8 of 13
October 24, 2007
Any energy with the prefix "bio" must depend on photosynthesis. At best about one watt per square meter can be stored in biomass. At a world-wide energy annual consumption of about 500 quads, all the eath's crop land will not make a dent in that energy use. I wish writers would specify "Joules of biofuel per hectare-year."
Comment
9 of 13
October 24, 2007
My family has a farm in Africa. There is enough waste product from the crops to make
all the fuel we need and then some. The key really is to empower the local farmer.
if we can save the $2000 a month that we spend on fuel and pay that to our workers
for making biofuel it's a good start.
Comment
10 of 13
October 25, 2007
This article was very timely one for Renewable Energy Centre, Mithradham, Kochi, India because we exhibit a Biodiesel Car from Merciden Benz - India at our centre as a part of our yearly programme, Global Village Action Week. Thank you.

Prof. Dr. George Peter
Director, Mithradham.
Comment
11 of 13
October 26, 2007
re:
=="Joules of biofuel per hectare-year."==

I'd prefer they do it in Newton-Meters per Hectare per Year.
Or basically a sunlight-to-torque comparison.

3-6% solar energy captured by biomass
32% energy left after Fischer Tropsch processing
88% energy left after distributing it
15-40% energy-to-torque with the engine
TOTAL = 0.127%-to-0.676% sunlight-to-torque

Even if we had some magic vegetable which operates at 100% of the potential photosynthetic capacity.
11% solar energy captured by biomass
32% energy left after Fischer Tropsch processing
88% energy left after distributing it
15-40% energy-to-torque with the engine
TOTAL = 0.465-to-1.24% sunlight-to-torque
<a href="http://greyfalcon.net/sugarsolar">http://greyfalcon.net/sugarsolar</a>

Which is pretty sad compared to:
10-50% solar energy captured by solar electric
85% energy left after distribution
80-90% energy-to-torque with an electric engine
TOTAL = 6.800%-to-38.250% sunlight-to-torque
Comment
12 of 13
October 27, 2007
Dear Sir,
This is a great articles, to combat climate change and hope the same fire disaster in California do not repeat
somewhere else.There is an urgent need to reduce fossil
fuel consumption.
Regards,
Ron Tan
www.infernofuel.com
Comment
13 of 13
November 21, 2007
Considering the US has lost 4,000 soldiers to a war for oil, and estimates show that between 10,000 to 60,000 citizens die each year from vehicle emissions ... how can anyone support a stand for walking away from a biofuel industry that is barely a decade old.

At one time they said the same thing about NASA, it cost too much. Biofuels will improve, but it will not advance without some market, take the market away and rely on fossil fuels until there aren't any left. Now that is an advanced strategy.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

HelioSage The Switch Valentin Software, Inc - providing Solar Design Software GoGreenSolar.com Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut) Mannvit DHL Global Forwarding - Renewable Energy Sector
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters