Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Berkeley Offers Residents Unique Financing Option for Solar

October 30, 2007   |   16 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
"Berkeley's proposal is brilliant because it removes the number one roadblock to solar, the high up front costs...If Berkeley makes this work, I have no doubt it will be replicated all over the state and the nation."

-- Dan Kammen, Professor, UC Berkeley Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory
16 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 16
October 31, 2007
Solar bond financing is politically easy because it is a form of self-taxation. Homeowners would chose to go the bond financed route because of the lower interest rates. Non-participants would pay nothing. The negative is the lien against the home. It might make it harder to sell the home and lenders would need some education. We did something similar in Honolulu with tax increment financing , which could be used to put solar on all new developments. We also did zero to 2% interest loans for low-come families using CDBG funds for solar and Energy Star appliances. Great paybacks with high energy costs in Hawaii and lots of great sun!
Comment
2 of 16
October 31, 2007
As long as solar energy is not made affordable to the masses, it will take a long time before it becomes available and that's unfortunate because the sun is there and being wasted when it could be the renewable source of energy for all. Robert H. Tippenhauer
Comment
3 of 16
October 31, 2007
I like the idea. We need more SOLAR. I am sure it is coming. We just have to keep talkin about it.
We need to get off of coal and oil energy dependence in all ares of our lives.
Comment
4 of 16
October 31, 2007
This is an outstanding idea! Especially during the current credit crunch, getting a 2nd mortgage or refinancing to pay for the large up-front cost of a PV system complicates matters. Having bond-based funding from the city (or any government entity) can benefit the homeowners, the environment, and neighbors who all rely on the electrical grid which can get overtaxed during peak demand. Kudos to Berkeley for once again demonstrating peaceful options during a time of war.
Comment
5 of 16
October 31, 2007
In this case, individual property owners would contract directly with qualified private solar installers and contractors for energy efficiency and solar projects on their building.

Looks like they're not leaving the important energy efficiency or SDHW parts out of the equation.

Sun beats on silicon dioxide- produces usable energy. Doesn't get any lower tech than that. Nuclear & coal, now that's high tech. Sexy is in the eye of the beholder. One hurdle we face is selling folks on the unsexiness of modules on their roofs. We have to convince them that saving money in the long run and contributing to a healthy environment & economy is supersexy.
Comment
6 of 16
October 31, 2007
Well Todd,
Here in Sacramento, being SMUD territory, what you described is pretty much what happens. The easiest rebates to get for SMUD ratepayers are for energy efficiency upgrades, such as new efficient lighting, HVAC upgrades, and solar hot water. The state solar PV rebates are a lot more complicated, and take a long time to get your money.
Comment
7 of 16
October 31, 2007
If the public is going to subsidize energy production then we should be sure to subsidize the methods that provide the biggest energy return per dollar invested. This means conservation and efficiency upgrades first, SDWH second and PV last.

Yes, conservation and waste reduction are not as sexy as a bunch of high tech photovoltaic modules on the roof, but if we are talking about sustainability (and that is the real issue behind resource depletion) throwing a bunch of high tech and energy intensive PVs on the roof to compensate for waste, inefficiency and mindless consumption is more of the same brain dead thinking that got us into this energy mess to begin with.

Todd Cory
Mt. Shasta Energy Services
Comment
8 of 16
October 31, 2007
Now imagine how much less pollution would be in the air if every city in America adopted a program like this....
And how much money would the average American family save on electricity costs every year, thereby adding more discretionary income to the economy?
Comment
9 of 16
November 1, 2007
Mr cory and anyone concerned about losing out on the chance to install efficiency measures because it helps has to realize that california spent 80 million dollars per year through out the 90's and most likely still is and not one year was cost effective. The problem is verifiable energy savings. The lack of cost effectiveness by non profits is why finding away back to creating a free market energy savings system will encourage savings based on profit if savings are realized. When it comes down to it, the utilities just do not want to actually save energy.I hope this works and I would love to put it into play in my home state of Maine. Read Performance contracting for low income conservation ACEEE 93 Policy manual. Sell conserved energy, sell conserved pollution, the market is there and viable if the utilities and oil company's actually want to save.
Comment
10 of 16
November 1, 2007
Might there be a tendency for installers to raise their fees over time in cities where this program is implemented, since there might be less price pressure and negotiation? Otherwise, it sounds amazing.
Comment
11 of 16
November 2, 2007
There are going to be some good ripple effects from a city doing this. This gets the attention of other energy suppliers and prompts them to reassess the mindset of the consumer. Hopefully this precedence will push towards more fruitful energy alternatives.
Comment
12 of 16
November 4, 2007
add in the money not wasted by a homeowner, who dosen't have to throw out a refrigerator full of food after the next power outage. that type of saveings is what thrills me sexy like. also the chance to run electric space heaters (with the best fire protection senceability i can muster up)to keep the heating bills under control.even a starter system like i read about the other day($ 600) would help towards smaller goals like that. no its not efficent but it is a step. no second mortgage needed.$600+labor-$200frige loss x 3 poweratages + if there is now power outages, i can run a porno with my wife for free on my dvd player= sexy
Comment
13 of 16
November 5, 2007
saddly mr hughes that is why the powers that be will not make that happen untill the sun pays more taxes
Comment
14 of 16
November 5, 2007
Brilliant. And just imagine when you get your first purely electric car with a 200 or so mile range. You will have your own "gas pump" on your roof.
Comment
15 of 16
November 7, 2007
cackle snort cackle!!! Probably true

Think what a great pension plan having solar panels is. Only you start getting your pension from the day your panels start operating. The crafty retired couple with the kids out of the house and now at home during the day will do their baking, hoovering and so forth during the day when the sun shines and avoid the price differential between the purchase and sale of power. They should end up with a small net income. The government should allow money in government pension plans to be used to buy solar equipment since it is such a good pension plan. (We wish) Blog "mtkass" "Solar Electric - the government role"
Comment
16 of 16
October 13, 2008
Hi everyone...I am John from Mexico..I have seen your forum...Nice information provided here which is very useful to everyone....If Berkeley makes this work, I have no doubt it will be replicated all over the state and the nation....thanks for posting...Let me know more about this.....
==================================================================
simmons
Houses for sale in Berkeley, CA
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

PLANSEE SE SunWize Technologies Westinghouse Solar ClearEnergy Inc. Alpha Technologies Solar Energy International (SEI) American Wind Energy Association
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters