Photo Credit: Solar Depot
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (16) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
October 30, 2007

Berkeley Offers Residents Unique Financing Option for Solar

Berkeley, California [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

The City of Berkeley, California is set to become the first city in the U.S. to allow property owners to pay for solar system installation and energy efficiency improvements as a long-term assessment on their individual property tax bill.

"Berkeley's proposal is brilliant because it removes the number one roadblock to solar, the high up front costs...If Berkeley makes this work, I have no doubt it will be replicated all over the state and the nation."

-- Dan Kammen, Professor, UC Berkeley Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory

Berkeley Mayor Tom Bates will ask the City Council to approve the framework for a "Sustainable Energy Financing District" at their November 6th Council meeting. 

The City's plan eliminates the two major financial hurdles to solar electric and solar hot water systems—the high upfront cost and the possibility that those costs will not be recovered when the property is sold. If approved, the program could begin operating next year.

"Nearly every expert we have worked with on this financing initiative believes it can fundamentally change the market for solar," said Bates. "There are more than 400 solar installations in Berkeley today. With this program, I think we can install thousands of solar systems over the next decade and go a long way to meeting our greenhouse gas emission reduction targets."

UC Berkeley Professor Dan Kammen, who directs the University's Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory, will be assisting the City in developing the program.

"Berkeley's proposal is brilliant because it removes the number one roadblock to solar, the high up front costs. It also allows property owners to take advantage of the City's ability to find the best rates," said Kammen. "If Berkeley makes this work, I have no doubt it will be replicated all over the state and the nation."

The Sustainable Energy Financing District is being developed as part of the City's implementation of Measure G—last year's ballot measure setting greenhouse gas reduction targets for Berkeley and directing the Mayor to lead the development of a plan to meet those targets. The first complete draft of the Climate Action Plan will to be released for public comment in mid-November.

The financing mechanism is loosely based on existing "underground utility districts" where the City serves as the financing agent for a neighborhood when they move utility poles and wires underground.

In this case, individual property owners would contract directly with qualified private solar installers and contractors for energy efficiency and solar projects on their building. The City provides the funding for the project from a bond or loan fund that it repays through assessments on participating property owners' tax bills for 20 years.

No property owner would pay an assessment unless they had work done on their property as part of the program. Those who choose to pay for solar and energy efficiency work through this program would pay only for the cost of their project, interest, and a small administrative fee.

"Nearly every day we meet potential customers who think they can't afford a solar energy system. With Berkeley's financing plan in place, just about any home or business owner who can afford to pay their utility bill every month should be able to go solar," said Gary Gerber, President of Sun Light & Power, a solar installation company in Berkeley.

The Financing District solves many of the financial hurdles facing property owners. First, there would be little upfront cost to the property owner. Second, the total cost of the solar system and energy improvements may be less when compared to financing through a traditional equity line or mortgage refinancing because the well-secured bond will provide lower interest rates than is commercially available. Third, the tax assessment is transferable between owners.

Therefore, if you sell your property prior to the end of the 20-year repayment period, the next owner takes over the assessment as part of their property tax bill.

Property owners and their contractors would be required to agree to certain terms and conditions mandating energy efficiency steps, appropriate warranties, and other performance measures to take advantage of the financing.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (16)
 
No image available
October 31, 2007
Solar bond financing is politically easy because it is a form of self-taxation. Homeowners would chose to go the bond financed route because of the lower interest rates. Non-participants would pay nothing. The negative is the lien against the home. It might make it harder to sell the home and lenders would need some education. We did something similar in Honolulu with tax increment financing , which could be used to put solar on all new developments. We also did zero to 2% interest loans for low-come families using CDBG funds for solar and Energy Star appliances. Great paybacks with high energy costs in Hawaii and lots of great sun!
Comment 1 of 16
No image available
October 31, 2007
As long as solar energy is not made affordable to the masses, it will take a long time before it becomes available and that's unfortunate because the sun is there and being wasted when it could be the renewable source of energy for all. Robert H. Tippenhauer
Comment 2 of 16
No image available
October 31, 2007
I like the idea. We need more SOLAR. I am sure it is coming. We just have to keep talkin about it.
We need to get off of coal and oil energy dependence in all ares of our lives.
Comment 3 of 16
No image available
October 31, 2007
This is an outstanding idea! Especially during the current credit crunch, getting a 2nd mortgage or refinancing to pay for the large up-front cost of a PV system complicates matters. Having bond-based funding from the city (or any government entity) can benefit the homeowners, the environment, and neighbors who all rely on the electrical grid which can get overtaxed during peak demand. Kudos to Berkeley for once again demonstrating peaceful options during a time of war.
Comment 4 of 16
No image available
October 31, 2007
In this case, individual property owners would contract directly with qualified private solar installers and contractors for energy efficiency and solar projects on their building.

Looks like they're not leaving the important energy efficiency or SDHW parts out of the equation.

Sun beats on silicon dioxide- produces usable energy. Doesn't get any lower tech than that. Nuclear & coal, now that's high tech. Sexy is in the eye of the beholder. One hurdle we face is selling folks on the unsexiness of modules on their roofs. We have to convince them that saving money in the long run and contributing to a healthy environment & economy is supersexy.
Comment 5 of 16
No image available
October 31, 2007
Well Todd,
Here in Sacramento, being SMUD territory, what you described is pretty much what happens. The easiest rebates to get for SMUD ratepayers are for energy efficiency upgrades, such as new efficient lighting, HVAC upgrades, and solar hot water. The state solar PV rebates are a lot more complicated, and take a long time to get your money.
Comment 6 of 16
No image available
October 31, 2007
If the public is going to subsidize energy production then we should be sure to subsidize the methods that provide the biggest energy return per dollar invested. This means conservation and efficiency upgrades first, SDWH second and PV last.

Yes, conservation and waste reduction are not as sexy as a bunch of high tech photovoltaic modules on the roof, but if we are talking about sustainability (and that is the real issue behind resource depletion) throwing a bunch of high tech and energy intensive PVs on the roof to compensate for waste, inefficiency and mindless consumption is more of the same brain dead thinking that got us into this energy mess to begin with.

Todd Cory
Mt. Shasta Energy Services
Comment 7 of 16
No image available
October 31, 2007
Now imagine how much less pollution would be in the air if every city in America adopted a program like this....
And how much money would the average American family save on electricity costs every year, thereby adding more discretionary income to the economy?
Comment 8 of 16
No image available
November 1, 2007
Mr cory and anyone concerned about losing out on the chance to install efficiency measures because it helps has to realize that california spent 80 million dollars per year through out the 90's and most likely still is and not one year was cost effective. The problem is verifiable energy savings. The lack of cost effectiveness by non profits is why finding away back to creating a free market energy savings system will encourage savings based on profit if savings are realized. When it comes down to it, the utilities just do not want to actually save energy.I hope this works and I would love to put it into play in my home state of Maine. Read Performance contracting for low income conservation ACEEE 93 Policy manual. Sell conserved energy, sell conserved pollution, the market is there and viable if the utilities and oil company's actually want to save.
Comment 9 of 16
No image available
November 1, 2007
Might there be a tendency for installers to raise their fees over time in cities where this program is implemented, since there might be less price pressure and negotiation? Otherwise, it sounds amazing.
Comment 10 of 16
No image available
November 2, 2007
There are going to be some good ripple effects from a city doing this. This gets the attention of other energy suppliers and prompts them to reassess the mindset of the consumer. Hopefully this precedence will push towards more fruitful energy alternatives.
Comment 11 of 16
No image available
November 4, 2007
add in the money not wasted by a homeowner, who dosen't have to throw out a refrigerator full of food after the next power outage. that type of saveings is what thrills me sexy like. also the chance to run electric space heaters (with the best fire protection senceability i can muster up)to keep the heating bills under control.even a starter system like i read about the other day($ 600) would help towards smaller goals like that. no its not efficent but it is a step. no second mortgage needed.$600+labor-$200frige loss x 3 poweratages + if there is now power outages, i can run a porno with my wife for free on my dvd player= sexy
Comment 12 of 16
No image available
November 5, 2007
saddly mr hughes that is why the powers that be will not make that happen untill the sun pays more taxes
Comment 13 of 16
No image available
November 5, 2007
Brilliant. And just imagine when you get your first purely electric car with a 200 or so mile range. You will have your own "gas pump" on your roof.
Comment 14 of 16
No image available
November 7, 2007
cackle snort cackle!!! Probably true

Think what a great pension plan having solar panels is. Only you start getting your pension from the day your panels start operating. The crafty retired couple with the kids out of the house and now at home during the day will do their baking, hoovering and so forth during the day when the sun shines and avoid the price differential between the purchase and sale of power. They should end up with a small net income. The government should allow money in government pension plans to be used to buy solar equipment since it is such a good pension plan. (We wish) Blog "mtkass" "Solar Electric - the government role"
Comment 15 of 16
No image available
October 13, 2008
Hi everyone...I am John from Mexico..I have seen your forum...Nice information provided here which is very useful to everyone....If Berkeley makes this work, I have no doubt it will be replicated all over the state and the nation....thanks for posting...Let me know more about this.....
==================================================================
simmons
Houses for sale in Berkeley, CA
Comment 16 of 16
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
bees - bioenergy events & services focus solar GlobalData Atlantic Wind & Solar Inc. Sonobond Ultrasonics martinHerzfeld
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo