article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (9) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
August 7, 2007

What's the Funding Outlook for DOE's Geothermal Program in 2008?

I understand the Department of Energy Geothermal Program received only limited funds in 2007. What's the outlook for 2008? -- Sandy M., Washington DC

Sandy, you’re right: the Department of Energy (DOE) Geothermal Technologies Program was funded at only $5 million for the fiscal year 2007, compared with $22.3 million in 2006. To you and me, $23 million might sound like a lot of money. But putting this number in perspective, America spends more than $13 million per hour on foreign oil, according to the National Resource Defense Council (NRDC).

Let me begin by offering some basic information on the budget process. The first step involves the White House: the administration will make recommendations about how our tax dollars should be spent. The House of Representatives Appropriations Committee will then offer their budget recommendations. The Senate Appropriations Committee will meet separately and review the House bill, at which time amendments may be added or the entire bill may be substituted for a revised Senate version. Then the House and Senate will come together in conference to produce a compromise bill that will be voted on in both the House and Senate. Finally, if the bill is approved by both bodies, it will complete the circle, and move on to the president’s desk for signature.  

For the 2008 process, the Geothermal Program has already received the White House’s recommended zero funding—a repeat from 2007. The House Appropriations Committee, however, has recommended funding at $44.3 million for DOE’s Geothermal Research Program in FY 2008—39.3 million above the 2007 level of $5 million.

When the House Appropriations funding levels were made publicly available, a press release on the Committee website read: “Today, we again face an energy crisis, only this time it is coupled with the enormous challenge of addressing the reality of global climate change. This bill attempts to face these twin crises with over three billion dollars to address global climate change—researching its effects and working on technologies to slow it down—and investment in renewable energy programs that both reduce greenhouse gases and help our nation meet its energy needs.”

The Senate subsequently funded the Geothermal Technologies program at $25 million.  

The House and Senate will meet in conference in the coming months, where they will put together a single spending bill that will, once passed by both bodies, move on to the president’s desk for signature.

Although Congressional support for geothermal energy remains strong, the president has recently issued warnings that he will veto any appropriations legislation that exceeds his budget recommendations.

Besides the appropriations process, both the House and Senate are considering legislation to authorize an advanced geothermal energy research program for the Department of Energy. These bills will play an important role in ensuring that the Department uses funds for the geothermal program effectively.

On the House side, The Advanced Geothermal Energy Research and Development Act (HR 2304), sponsored by Rep. McNerney (D-CA), passed on June 6 with bipartisan support in The House Science Subcommittee on Energy and Environment. The Subcommittee summarized the geothermal research provisions of HR 2304:
        • Authorizes $80 million a year, from fiscal years 2008 through 2012;
        • Establishes an “industry-coupled exploratory drilling” program, which is a cost-shared program with industry partners to demonstrate and apply advanced exploration technologies;
        • Provides for the creation of two centers of technology transfer as information clearinghouses for the geothermal industry;
        • Addresses R&D for Enhanced Geothermal Systems, in which no naturally occurring fluid source or reservoir is available; thus a reservoir must be created to extract hot water or steam.

On the Senate side, The National Geothermal Initiative Act of 2007 (S. 1534) has been introduced by Sen. Jeff Bingaman, (D-NM), as an amendment to the energy bill. The amendment sets a goal of getting 15 % of U.S. electricity from geothermal by 2030 and authorizes $75 million next year for geothermal research, then $110 million per year through at least 2012.  

Our hope is that Congress will restore funding for a strong DOE geothermal research program, and provide a new mandate for the program by also passing authorizing legislation that lays out a bold new vision for moving forward. Both restored funding and authorizing legislation are possible this year, but we still have significant obstacles to overcome, including possible presidential vetoes.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (9)
 
No image available
August 8, 2007
There is no need to drill very far in Yellowstone to get geothermal energy. What the heck do these people think "Old Faithful" is?  Or am I wromg to think that those geysers are hot water?
Comment 1 of 9
No image available
August 8, 2007

To update Karl's article, the McNerny EGS bill, HR 2304, was incorporated into the House's overall energy bill, HR 3221 ("New Direction for Energy Independence, National Security, and Consumer Protection Act").

This was passed on August 4 (see vote here), along with HR 2776 ("Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2007" see vote here).


Comment 2 of 9
No image available
August 8, 2007

The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) recently published a report tiled, Geothermal -- The Energy Under Our Feet, which estimates that co-produced and geopressured resources could supply as much as 70,000 MW of new power -- 10% of our total national electric power needs -- in the next 20 years.  

Southern Methodist University (SMU) researchers have documented the large amounts of hot water produced by existing oil and gas wells. In West Texas, for example, for every barrel of oil produced, nearly 100 barrels of hot water are co-produced. In 2002, Texas produced over 12 billion barrels of waste (often hot) water as a byproduct of oil and gas extraction, which was reinjected into the ground at a cost to the producer.

"The Future of Geothermal Energy – Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century," a report prepared by an MIT-led interdisciplinary panel, was released to the public January 22, 2007.  According to the report, “geothermal energy from EGS represents a large, indigenous resource that can provide base-load electric power and heat at a level that can have a major impact on the United States, while incurring minimal environmental impacts. With a reasonable investment in R&D, EGS could provide 100 GWe or more of cost-competitive generating capacity in the next 50 years. Further, EGS provides a secure source of power for the long term that would help protect America against economic instabilities resulting from fuel price fluctuations or supply disruptions. Most of the key technical requirements to make EGS work economically over a wide area of the country are in effect, with remaining goals easily within reach. This achievement could provide performance verification at a commercial scale within a 10- to 15-year period nationwide.”

 

Worldwide, there is huge potential for geothermal as a clean energy source.  The Bush administration is doing everything in its power to squash R&D because geothermal energy solutions would seriously cut into the profits of the big oil and coal industries.  It’s time that we stand up to big oil and coal and move away from dirty and deadly fossil fuels to clean renewable energy.  Geothermal is just one of many solutions.


Comment 3 of 9
No image available
August 8, 2007

Will the recent action of Congress to shift $15 billion from Oil Pork to renewables help the development of Geothermal?

If Lil Bush doesn't veto the bill, then maybe Geothermal can be developed the way it should be.


Comment 4 of 9
No image available
August 8, 2007

After looking at the new Andasol CSP plant here in Spain which is very ugly and huge, and seeing the environmental destruction of coal, gas and oil mining in New Mexico, and the unsolved contamination risks and huge costs of nuclear power, it makes sense to work harder on Geothermal.

The only issue I have heard bad about geothermal, is that a pilot project in Basil, Switzerland, seemed to have triggered an earthquake.

I wonder whose hidden economic/political agenda is being served by not funding geothermal research? Granted I don't know a lot about geothermal, but it seems great. Lots of heat to produce electricity, small environmental footprint, and always available, 24/7. Maybe because it is TOO good, and will put the coal/oil/gas/nuclear/solar/wind people out of business? Please correct these assumptions if you know better!

 


Comment 5 of 9
No image available
August 8, 2007
An excellent article. It is frightening how the big oil and coal interests have succeeded in getting the government to waste billions on research for unpromising projects like "clean coal" and hydrogen while virtually nothing is spent on geothermal power, which could usher in a new age of plentiful, clean energy. Geothermal works right now and can compete with clean coal power in the Western United States. It can compete in the east if new techniques are developed as outlined in the MIT report. Unlike wind and solar, geothermal worts 24/7 to provide baseload power. Geothermal plants could be built much faster than nuclear plants which will require decades to design and build. It is a crime that funding is virtually zero.
Comment 6 of 9
No image available
August 9, 2007
The potential of geothermal, especially deep rocks geothermal, as outlined in the January MIT Report, is huge. I come at this from a climate change perspective, and the importance of developing this baseload power source can not be over-estimated.

Compared to other energy sources, however, such as solar, wind, and even landfill gas, geothermal has had almost no media attention, no NGO activist attention, and therefore has no traction.

I see the need for a global alliance of geothermal supporters, from USA, Australia, Germany, and wherever else the technical homework has been done, and for an organized funded effort to get geothermal into the public debate.

Whether it is to tackle climate change, address peak oil, or homeland security, geothermal is crucially important.

-Guy Dauncey, Victoria, Canada, www.earthfuture.com
Comment 7 of 9
No image available
August 9, 2007
You are banding around figures of a few tens of millions of dollars.  Get real.  We hear quoted in the news extimates that America is spending a billion dollars a day in Iraq.  I find this hard to believe but suppose that it is only half of this amount.  It wasn't to stop terrorism - this was clearly disproven.  It wasn't to eliminate weapons of mass distruction - this was clearly disproven - so what do we have left.  We have left securing the energy supply of America.  Would someone please calculate how much renewable energy we could now be generating if all the money spent only on the most recent gulf war had been spent on wind generators, water current generators, wave generators, efficient light bulbs, solar panels for heating domestic water and so forth ad nauseum.  Would there now be any need for America to secure her overseas energy resources.  With demand for oil based products that much lowered, would liquid fuel not now be much cheaper all over the world and .......if this money had been spent on these renewable energy generators and energy saving devices, how many people would now be alive who aren't.
Comment 8 of 9
No image available
October 14, 2007
The underfunding of geothermal development seems to be a worldwide problem. Both China and India have very active programs to develop wind and solar power, yet geothermal is barely mentioned. they presently have only 30 MW of geothermal power developed compared to 5000 MW of wind.
For 2010, their 5 yr plan projects only an additional 25-50 MW of geothermal power! Insignificant compared to the 3000-5000 MW goal for wind power!
Look at this Chinese alt-energy conference with NO MENTION of geothermal:
http://www.alt-power.com/en/overview.php
India has a similar dismal record for geothermal awareness. It seems that the geothermal industry has done a terrible job of selling themselves.
Comment 9 of 9
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
SolarCraft Global Marine Renewable Energy Conference Photovoltaics World The Wall Street Green Trading Summit IX Applied Materials 3TIER
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo