I understand the Department of Energy Geothermal Program received only limited funds in 2007. What's the outlook for 2008? -- Sandy M., Washington DC
To update Karl's article, the McNerny EGS bill, HR 2304, was incorporated into the House's overall energy bill, HR 3221 ("New Direction for Energy Independence, National Security, and Consumer Protection Act").
This was passed on August 4 (see vote here), along with HR 2776 ("Renewable Energy and Energy Conservation Tax Act of 2007" see vote here).
The National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL) recently published a report tiled, Geothermal -- The Energy Under Our Feet, which estimates that co-produced and geopressured resources could supply as much as 70,000 MW of new power -- 10% of our total national electric power needs -- in the next 20 years.
Southern Methodist University (SMU) researchers have documented the large amounts of hot water produced by existing oil and gas wells. In West Texas, for example, for every barrel of oil produced, nearly 100 barrels of hot water are co-produced. In 2002, Texas produced over 12 billion barrels of waste (often hot) water as a byproduct of oil and gas extraction, which was reinjected into the ground at a cost to the producer.
"The Future of Geothermal Energy – Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century," a report prepared by an MIT-led interdisciplinary panel, was released to the public January 22, 2007. According to the report, “geothermal energy from EGS represents a large, indigenous resource that can provide base-load electric power and heat at a level that can have a major impact on the United States, while incurring minimal environmental impacts. With a reasonable investment in R&D, EGS could provide 100 GWe or more of cost-competitive generating capacity in the next 50 years. Further, EGS provides a secure source of power for the long term that would help protect America against economic instabilities resulting from fuel price fluctuations or supply disruptions. Most of the key technical requirements to make EGS work economically over a wide area of the country are in effect, with remaining goals easily within reach. This achievement could provide performance verification at a commercial scale within a 10- to 15-year period nationwide.”
Worldwide, there is huge potential for geothermal as a clean energy source. The Bush administration is doing everything in its power to squash R&D because geothermal energy solutions would seriously cut into the profits of the big oil and coal industries. It’s time that we stand up to big oil and coal and move away from dirty and deadly fossil fuels to clean renewable energy. Geothermal is just one of many solutions.
Will the recent action of Congress to shift $15 billion from Oil Pork to renewables help the development of Geothermal?
If Lil Bush doesn't veto the bill, then maybe Geothermal can be developed the way it should be.
After looking at the new Andasol CSP plant here in Spain which is very ugly and huge, and seeing the environmental destruction of coal, gas and oil mining in New Mexico, and the unsolved contamination risks and huge costs of nuclear power, it makes sense to work harder on Geothermal.
The only issue I have heard bad about geothermal, is that a pilot project in Basil, Switzerland, seemed to have triggered an earthquake.
I wonder whose hidden economic/political agenda is being served by not funding geothermal research? Granted I don't know a lot about geothermal, but it seems great. Lots of heat to produce electricity, small environmental footprint, and always available, 24/7. Maybe because it is TOO good, and will put the coal/oil/gas/nuclear/solar/wind people out of business? Please correct these assumptions if you know better!