Photo Credit: House.gov
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (6) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
August 2, 2007

Last Chance: RPS Vote Looming in House

Washington, DC [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Business, farm, labor, environmental leaders and congressional members gathered on Capitol Hill this week in a last-minute push to garner support for the National renewable portfolio standard (RPS) legislation up for debate on the U.S. House of Representatives floor. The vote, however, will come down to the wire since Congress will adjourn for its August recess after Friday.

"The renewable energy goals are significant, but not overly burdensome for states as it gives them flexibility to achieve these goals. An RES will benefit farmers, save consumers money, reduce air pollution, and increase reliability and energy security."

-- Rep. Mark Udall, U.S. House of Representatives, co-chair of the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Caucus

The National RPS, also referred to as a renewable electricity standard (RES), legislation requiring utilities to obtain 15 percent of the electricity from renewable energy sources by 2020—or to purchase renewable energy credits from others to help meet the 20 percent requirement—will be offered as an amendment to the House Energy package recently unveiled by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).

Based on a stand-alone measure first introduced in the House in 2002 by Rep. Tom Udall (D-NM), and co-sponsored by Reps. Todd Platts (R. PA), the amendment has since continued gaining broad, bipartisan support. To-date, the legislation has 154 cosponsors.

Opponents of the amendment, however, have recently launched a campaign asserting that the Udall-Platts amendment would lead to higher costs for consumers, in particular in the Southeast. In fact, the cost allegations "don't stand up to scrutiny," said Gregory Wetstone, senior director for governmental and public affairs for the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA).

The Southeast, which imports most of the fuel it uses for power generation (natural gas, coal, and uranium) would benefit from these lower prices along with the rest of the nation.

"The vote on a renewable energy standard...is a landmark referendum on the direction of the nation's energy policy," said Wetstone. "It's not every day that Congress has an opportunity to save reduce energy costs, promote our security, spur job creation, and reduce pollution."

Wood Mackenzie, a non-partisan energy research firm, estimates that a 15% RPS would lead to a net savings of $100 billion for U.S. consumers over the next 20 years, and that wholesale power prices would decrease by 7% to 11%, compared to a business-as-usual scenario.

"The opportunity for innovation in the renewable energy industry is extremely high, making it one of the most attractive and fastest-growing sectors for venture capital investment," said Mark Heesen, president of the National Venture Capital Association.

More than 20 individual states have enacted a successful RES or RPS, but this state-by-state legislation has drawbacks since utilities are naturally reluctant to absorb the cost of renewables on an uneven basis. A federally-instituted standard that applies across the country, on the other hand, would allow utilities to operate on a more even playing field when sourcing their power.

 

StateAmountYearOrganization Administering RPS
Arizona 15% 2025 Arizona Corporation Commission
California 20% 2010 California Energy Commission
Colorado 20% 2020 Colorado Public Utilities Commission
Connecticut 23% 2020 Department of Public Utility Control
District of Columbia 11% 2022 DC Public Service Commission
Delaware 10% 2019 Delaware Energy Office
Hawaii 20% 2020 Hawaii Strategic Industries Division
Iowa 105 MW   Iowa Utilities Board
Illinois* 25% 2017 Illinois Department of Commerce
Massachusetts 4% 2009 Massachusetts Division of Energy Resources
Maryland 9.5% 2022 Maryland Public Service Commission
Maine 10%2017Maine Public Utilities Commission
Minnesota 25%2025 Minnesota Department of Commerce
Missouri*11%2020Missouri Public Service Commission
Montana 15% 2015 Montana Public Service Commission
New Hampshire 23.8%2025New Hampshire Office of Energy and Planning
New Jersey 22.5% 2021 New Jersey Board of Public Utilities
New Mexico 20% 2020 New Mexico Public Regulation Commission
Nevada 20% 2015 Public Utilities Commission of Nevada
New York 24% 2013 New York Public Service Commission
Oregon 25% 2025 Oregon Energy Office
Pennsylvania 18% 2020 Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission
Rhode Island 15% 2020 Rhode Island Public Utilities Commission
Texas 5,880 MW 2015 Public Utility Commission of Texas
Vermont* 10% 2013 Vermont Department of Public Service
Virginia*12%2022Virginia Department of Mines, Minterals, and Energy
Washington 15% 2020 Washington Secretary of State
Wisconsin 10% 2015 Public Service Commission of Wisconsin
*Four states, Illinois, Missouri, Virginia, and Vermont, have set voluntary goals for adopting renewable energy instead of portfolio standards with binding targets.

 

"We believe an RES will create public benefits for everyone. The renewable energy goals are significant, but not overly burdensome for states as it gives them flexibility to achieve these goals. An RES will benefit farmers, save consumers money, reduce air pollution, and increase reliability and energy security," said Rep. Mark Udall who is co-chair of the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Caucus.

The coalition of sponsors who have been successfully working to bring support for the House passage of an RPS are Representatives Ciro Rodriguez, Mark Udall, Diana DeGette, Frank Pallone, Chris Van Hollen and Henry Waxman. The legislation is actively supported by numerous organizations, including the Union of Concerned Scientists, National Farmers Union, the American Wind Energy Association, United Steelworkers Union, National Venture Capital Association, League of Conservation Voters, US PIRG, Audubon, the League of Conservation Voters, the Sierra Club and many more.

Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (6)
 
No image available
August 2, 2007
Carbon-based energies have long been being subsidized, supported with billions of research dollars, earmarked, and otherwise coddled  with everything BUT  rebates.  If given an even playing field, not to mention factoring in the true costs of either going to war for oil or removing mountains for coal and the greenhouse gasses of both, alternative energies will no longer be "alternative".  
Comment 1 of 6
No image available
August 2, 2007
I don't want any government to mandate standards or provide rebates.  I want technology to make that unnecessary.  I want alternate energy to compete with carbon-based energy on a face-to-face basis.  We're not far from there and RPS might make us give up. Not the way to go!
Comment 2 of 6
No image available
August 3, 2007

The North Carolina General Assembly just passed RPS legislation this week, and the governor is expected to sign it shortly.  Duke Energy and Progress Energy were active participants in drafting this bill, so they realize that there are, indeed, sufficient renewable energy assets in the southeast to make mandates feasible.  Major thanks to the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association and to Environmental Defense who played key roles in the negotiations with many stakeholders to achieve this historic victory!


Comment 3 of 6
August 3, 2007
Keep in mind the three basic funding categories involved: subsidies for purchasing renewable systems, renewables reasearch, and energy conservation. Tax dollars spent toward research and energy conservation funds a lasting, cumulative benefit, while offering tax rebates for installed systems, although important for jump starting the process, doesn't "pay forward" to the extent of the other categories.
Comment 4 of 6
No image available
August 3, 2007

Both of you make valid comments.  Sometimes I think that we should rid of the department of energy all together and let the market decide what happens next. 

Growing industry on an artificial market is definitly not sustainable... but unless we do something, the powers that be would rather put up "clean" coal power generation facilities and invest in nuclear and other environmentally problematic facilities.

We also must beware not to put all of our eggs in one basket... solar and wind are cool now, but who knows what could come at us in the future?  I just think about myself being so excited about corn and soy based fuel a few years ago and how my views are changed now. Those feedstocks aren't so great... but extracting fuel from algea with soundwaves? That's rad.

All in all, less government intervention is ideal... but the world is not ideal.  The solar markets are dominated by demand in countries with huge government financial backing... and to compete with them is tough on our own.

I can't make up my mind.  Someone please help.


Comment 5 of 6
No image available
August 4, 2007

We have a very agressive RPS in CA and so far our government is holding the utilities to it.  Remember any federal RPS needs to be a floor.  States need to be able to clearly exceed the federal standard and target greater percentages of renewables. 


Comment 6 of 6
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. National Hydropower Association Ferraz Shawmut ACE European Group Photovoltaics World HUBER+SUHNER
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo