Business, farm, labor, environmental leaders and congressional members gathered on Capitol Hill this week in a last-minute push to garner support for the National renewable portfolio standard (RPS) legislation up for debate on the U.S. House of Representatives floor. The vote, however, will come down to the wire since Congress will adjourn for its August recess after Friday.
"The renewable energy goals are significant, but not overly burdensome for states as it gives them flexibility to achieve these goals. An RES will benefit farmers, save consumers money, reduce air pollution, and increase reliability and energy security."
-- Rep. Mark Udall, U.S. House of Representatives, co-chair of the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Caucus
The National RPS, also referred to as a renewable electricity standard (RES), legislation requiring utilities to obtain 15 percent of the electricity from renewable energy sources by 2020—or to purchase renewable energy credits from others to help meet the 20 percent requirement—will be offered as an amendment to the House Energy package recently unveiled by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA).
Based on a stand-alone measure first introduced in the House in 2002 by Rep. Tom Udall (D-NM), and co-sponsored by Reps. Todd Platts (R. PA), the amendment has since continued gaining broad, bipartisan support. To-date, the legislation has 154 cosponsors.
Opponents of the amendment, however, have recently launched a campaign asserting that the Udall-Platts amendment would lead to higher costs for consumers, in particular in the Southeast. In fact, the cost allegations "don't stand up to scrutiny," said Gregory Wetstone, senior director for governmental and public affairs for the American Wind Energy Association (AWEA).
The Southeast, which imports most of the fuel it uses for power generation (natural gas, coal, and uranium) would benefit from these lower prices along with the rest of the nation.
"The vote on a renewable energy standard...is a landmark referendum on the direction of the nation's energy policy," said Wetstone. "It's not every day that Congress has an opportunity to save reduce energy costs, promote our security, spur job creation, and reduce pollution."
Wood Mackenzie, a non-partisan energy research firm, estimates that a 15% RPS would lead to a net savings of $100 billion for U.S. consumers over the next 20 years, and that wholesale power prices would decrease by 7% to 11%, compared to a business-as-usual scenario.
"The opportunity for innovation in the renewable energy industry is extremely high, making it one of the most attractive and fastest-growing sectors for venture capital investment," said Mark Heesen, president of the National Venture Capital Association.
More than 20 individual states have enacted a successful RES or RPS, but this state-by-state legislation has drawbacks since utilities are naturally reluctant to absorb the cost of renewables on an uneven basis. A federally-instituted standard that applies across the country, on the other hand, would allow utilities to operate on a more even playing field when sourcing their power.
"We believe an RES will create public benefits for everyone. The renewable energy goals are significant, but not overly burdensome for states as it gives them flexibility to achieve these goals. An RES will benefit farmers, save consumers money, reduce air pollution, and increase reliability and energy security," said Rep. Mark Udall who is co-chair of the Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency Caucus.
The coalition of sponsors who have been successfully working to bring support for the House passage of an RPS are Representatives Ciro Rodriguez, Mark Udall, Diana DeGette, Frank Pallone, Chris Van Hollen and Henry Waxman. The legislation is actively supported by numerous organizations, including the Union of Concerned Scientists, National Farmers Union, the American Wind Energy Association, United Steelworkers Union, National Venture Capital Association, League of Conservation Voters, US PIRG, Audubon, the League of Conservation Voters, the Sierra Club and many more.
The North Carolina General Assembly just passed RPS legislation this week, and the governor is expected to sign it shortly. Duke Energy and Progress Energy were active participants in drafting this bill, so they realize that there are, indeed, sufficient renewable energy assets in the southeast to make mandates feasible. Major thanks to the North Carolina Sustainable Energy Association and to Environmental Defense who played key roles in the negotiations with many stakeholders to achieve this historic victory!
Both of you make valid comments. Sometimes I think that we should rid of the department of energy all together and let the market decide what happens next.
Growing industry on an artificial market is definitly not sustainable... but unless we do something, the powers that be would rather put up "clean" coal power generation facilities and invest in nuclear and other environmentally problematic facilities.
We also must beware not to put all of our eggs in one basket... solar and wind are cool now, but who knows what could come at us in the future? I just think about myself being so excited about corn and soy based fuel a few years ago and how my views are changed now. Those feedstocks aren't so great... but extracting fuel from algea with soundwaves? That's rad.
All in all, less government intervention is ideal... but the world is not ideal. The solar markets are dominated by demand in countries with huge government financial backing... and to compete with them is tough on our own.
I can't make up my mind. Someone please help.
We have a very agressive RPS in CA and so far our government is holding the utilities to it. Remember any federal RPS needs to be a floor. States need to be able to clearly exceed the federal standard and target greater percentages of renewables.