Photo Credit: DW-World.de
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (13) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
August 24, 2007

German Biodiesel Industry Peaks, Trouble Ahead

by Jane Burgermeister, Contributing Writer
Vienna, Austria [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Germany's biodiesel production capacity is set to rise to a record 5 million tons in 2007, but analysts have warned that the boom in the country's biodiesel industry is coming to an end after the industry failed to block the government from rolling back a key tax relief scheme in court this July.

"More pure biodiesel would require a new network of petrol stations to be built and for car engines to be modified, and that doesn't make economic sense. We would like to see the second generation biofuels developed as soon as possible."

-- Tobias Dunow, Spokesperson for the German Environment Ministry

Starting in 2004, the German government exempted biofuels from taxes in a bid to reduce CO2 emissions—and introduced a raft of subsidies that sparked a rapid expansion of the biodiesel industry, the biggest in the world. Boosted by high oil prices, biodiesel sales in Germany rose to 2.8 million tons in 2006, accounting for almost 5 percent of the country's total transport fuel sales.

But biodiesel industry sources in Germany estimate that only about half the 5 million ton capacity will be used in 2007 following a dramatic slump in demand after taxes on biofuels were introduced. The government made the move in response to a ruling by the European Commission that Germany's tax relief scheme overcompensated biofuel producers.

"The biodiesel industry has peaked; capacity has grown very quickly and outstripped production and now some companies might even go bankrupt as the industry consolidates," Norbert Allnoch, director of the International Economic Platform for Renewable Energies (IWR Internationales Wirtschaftsforum Regenerative Energien), an independent research body located in Munster, told RenewableEnergyAccess.com.

The Berlin government is nonetheless continuing to target support to the one biodiesel used in a blend with convention diesel fuel—1.5 million tons in 2006. On January 1, 2007, the government made it legally binding for all fuel companies to add 5 percent biodiesel to conventional diesel sold on their forecourts and so eased the simultaneous imposition of the tax of 47 euro cents on every liter of biodiesel for blends.

As a result of the requirement, Germany is set to meet the European Union's target for biofuel use of 5.75% in 2010. It is estimated that biofuels saved Germany 12.7 million tons of C02 in 2006. Another 1.3 million tons of pure biodiesel was sold in Germany on the open market in 2006, and it is these sales that have been hammered by the new taxes amounting to 9 euro cents introduced in August last year.

"Pure biodiesel is not competitive when taxes are put on it, especially if the oil price falls," Karin Retzlaff from the Association of German Biofuel Industry (Verband der Deutschen Biokraftstoffindustrie), told RenewableEnergyAccess.com.

This is a problem since customers of pure biodiesel are mainly transport companies that are looking to reduce the fuel bills of their huge fleets of lorries by tanking with the cheapest fuel wherever they find it.

"The price difference right now is already critical for pure biodiesel but we fear that sales will drop even more next year," said Retzlaff.

A liter of biodiesel was 5 euro cents cheaper than conventional diesel at the petrol stations in Germany on Friday, August 17th, 2007, but a liter of biodiesel gives 5 to 7 percent less energy than the equivalent in diesel.

Taxes on pure biodiesel are set to increase further by 6 cents every year starting on January 1, 2008 and to reach 44 euro cents a liter by 2012, Retzlaff said.

Future of Pure Biodiesel in Germany Bleak
"Biodiesel producers will need to find new export markets to make up for the drop in demand in Germany, but there are opportunities, for example, in eastern and southern Europe," said Alloch.

In addition to the new taxes, it is predicted that biodiesel producers will be squeezed by a rise in the price of rapeseed. Rapeseed oil is the raw material that is used to produce more than 70 percent of biodiesel in Germany.

"The reports we are getting are that the harvest this year has been poor and the rapeseed has a low oil content." Retzlaff said. "Higher rapeseed prices will make biodiesel producers uncompetitive even if oil prices rise."

In 2006, rapeseed was grown on about 1.5 million hectares of land in Germany, or 11 percent of the total agricultural land area; approximately 7.0 million hectares was used to grow crops for food.

Imported soybean and palm oil made up another 20 percent of the raw material for biodiesel.

"Looking to the future, more set-aside land in Germany and also in the European Union will probably be needed to produce crops for food because of poor harvests due to climate change, and so there is not much room for expanding the production of rapeseed," Allnoch said.

The environmental advantages of growing rapeseed for biodiesel have also been hotly debated. A recent study by scientists claimed that the amount of nitrous oxide produced by rapeseed is more damaging to the earth's atmosphere than the equivalent amount of CO2 produced by burning conventional fossil fuels in vehicles.

Tobias Dunow, spokesperson for the German environment ministry, said that the key objective of the government is accelerating the development of a second generation of biofuels.

"More pure biodiesel would require a new network of petrol stations to be built and for car engines to be modified, and that doesn't make economic sense," Dunow told RenewableEnergyAccess.com. "We would like to see the second generation biofuels developed as soon as possible."

Dunow said the government is looking at technologies such as Biomass-To-Liquid processing.

Allnoch predicted that biodiesel would remain an important part of Germany's energy mix until the second generation of biofuels comes onto the market in 2015 or later.

"Biodiesel is an important fuel in our transition to the next generation of biofuels," he said. "The experience that has been gathered in producing biodiesel will pave the way for the second and third generation technologies, but these technologies might not be the perfect solution either."

In 2006, Germany used 28,200,000 tons of diesel for transport fuel, 21,800,000 tons of petrol, 2.5 million tons of biodiesel, 1,080,000 tonnes of plant oil and 480,000 tons of bioethanol.

Image Gallery (1)
 
Reader Comments (13)
 
No image available
August 24, 2007
Great. Bio-fuels are a disaster already starving the world.
Comment 1 of 13
No image available
August 25, 2007

The Corporations and the Government favor Biofuels and Hydrogen because it generates revenue for both factions. It would be difficult to tax the "Home Grown" electricity used to charge the batteries in a plug in hybrid or an electric vehicle.  Biofuels are a disaster.

Christina Nelson


Comment 2 of 13
No image available
August 29, 2007
I'm impressed. Knowledgeable readers submit intelligent informed comments & concerns. Jeff, 8 solid gal/bu or 10 liquid gal/bu. Mixed liquid & solids can not be measured. Chris, All problems will be solved with the eleven Unified North American Hwys I-35 & I-69 (google) + NAFTA. Taxes for local generation, Christina, is smartly packaged as "reverse metering". Tom, the gov taxes the rich and distributes to the poor. EP & Paul, ADM (Archer Mid Dan) deserves 50% of all US subsidies. Farmers are forced $2/bu, max.  ann, John, Travis, The US gov takes CARE of global individuals. Watch out for non-USA governments. Local renewable energy fed people until 1908. 1908-2008 the US fed everyone that didn't starve.  2008 forward - Revert to local renewable energy or be totally dependent on food, nakedness, shelters and energy from One World Unified, EU, Unified North America, Un-Asia, African Union, Soviet Socialist.
Comment 3 of 13
No image available
August 29, 2007
This is a tribute to the inefficiency of government. Spend millions on subsidies and research grants to promote a tecnology and then kill it with taxes.
Comment 4 of 13
No image available
August 29, 2007
Or another solution would be to tax palm oil under the North Atlantic Free Trade Agreement - It would ensure shorter production miles and a there smaller carbon footprint ?

Algae as carbon sequestration may even be carbon negative as it uses co2 to photosynthesise too !

They may say I'm a dreamer...
Comment 5 of 13
No image available
August 29, 2007

Biodiesels are not "starving the world", in fact it's the opposite problem.  CARE just started refusing US food donations because the over abundance of food  commodities was depressing prices for local farmers.

 If the US put those excess crops into bio fuels, you'd satisfy both the 3rd world farmer and the excess capacity issues domestically.  

 "starving the world"?  Please.


Comment 6 of 13
No image available
August 29, 2007
Can anyone convert tons of biodiesel to gallons?  Is the nitrous oxide a result of synthetic fertilization of rapeseed? What about  crop rotations with nitrogen fixing plants to replace  synthetic fertlizer?
Comment 7 of 13
No image available
August 29, 2007

Now is the time?  Subsidies to the agricultural industry should have ended decades ago.  They should have also ended for other industries. 

One hypocritical problem I see often on this forum is that in one sentence there is a call for an end to subsidies to various industries.  Yet the very next breath there are complaints about a lack of subsidies for RE.  I personally believe subsidies should not be use for any industry.  Even as much as I want us to convert to RE, I believe market forces need to drive it and not subsidies.

 


Comment 8 of 13
No image available
August 29, 2007
Now is the time for the US to take similar action to end the massive subsidies to agro-businesses, end the tax breaks on bio-fuels and to adopt the same policies that Brazil followed to become energy independent, exploration for and production of crude oil both on-shore and off-shore without artificial restraints.
Comment 9 of 13
No image available
August 29, 2007
First generation feedstocks are soon to be yesterday's news and once algae and jatropha come on line, there will be a shift in the aggregate supply of biofuel feedstocks which I hope and pray will price foodcrops out of feasibility for fuel production.

Biofuels are not a disaster just because first generation feedstocks are a stumbling block - they are the only viable alternative to crude oil and the resource wars for it.
Comment 10 of 13
August 30, 2007

Biodiesel--feeding the planet to our cars

http://gristmill.grist.org/story/2007/8/25/155612/133

Algae is no closer than fusion power:

http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/2007/05/algal-biodiesel-fact-or-fiction.html

Brazil is not a model for the US

http://i-r-squared.blogspot.com/2006/06/lessons-from-brazil.html

The most highly respected journal in academia, Science just published a peer reviewed study that shows biofuels are worse for CO2 overall than fossil fuels

http://environment.newscientist.com/article/dn12496-forget-biofuels--burn-oil-and-plant-forests-instead.html

http://www.biodieselrealitycheck.com

 


Comment 11 of 13
No image available
August 30, 2007
So its safe to say that "disaster" is a somewhat knee - jerk reaction and an alternative to thinking before speaking ?

Not all biofuels are the same, not all people working in the industry are in it for the money.

Amen.
Comment 12 of 13
No image available
September 11, 2007
Stop confusing first generation feedstocks with Biofuels, Jatropha and Karanj are up and coming as is Algae.

www.algaelink.com

What would you prefer - Biofuels, heavy oils or tar sands ?

Because they are the realistic alternatives to mineral oil and the wars caused by it.

There is also the issue of affordability,

China's economy is growing at 11% per annum

Their demand for oil is growing at 40% a year - driving global aggregate demand for oil by 2.5% a year.

Oil which may have reached peak production already.

When supply fails to meet demand - prices rise,
In the UK we already pay over $7 a gallon, the rest of the world aren't as lucky as those of us from world leading rich nations.

There are many reasons to support biofuels and the benefits they bring - the environmental benefits being just one of many.
Comment 13 of 13
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Prism Solar Technologies, Inc PennWell Corporation Hydro Group National Hydrogen Association GoGreenSolar.com EC Harris LLP Energy Ocean Conference
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo