Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

U.S. Offshore Wind Score: 3 Hits, 0 Runs

By Chris Stimpson & Charles Kleekamp
July 13, 2007   |   3 Comments
Second part of a two-part series on U.S. and international wind energy developments.

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
So, if we count wind farms in the permitting stage (Cape Wind and LIPA) as hits, and wind farms under proposal (Delaware and Hull) as half-hits, we can give Team America a total of three hits. No runs yet, and here, perhaps, is why not: in the case of Delaware and Rhode Island, we have state governments providing a lead; with LIPA, it's a regional authority, with Cape Wind it's a private developer and with Hull it's a single town.
3 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 3
July 13, 2007
<p>One more.</p><p>Texas: South Padre Island project.</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Proposed -&gt; OK&nbsp; </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Land leased -&gt; OK</p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Press release and media coverrage -&gt; very heavy. </p><p>&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Then . . . quit. (citing not making money) </p>
Comment
2 of 3
July 13, 2007
<p>Delaware and Rhode Island have included a critical step in building a successful wind energy initiative: public education.</p><p>Despite our own biases toward renewable energy, it's important to understand that &quot;everything is bad&quot; when it comes to putting any energy production facility in someone's backyard.&nbsp; Wind farms meet with resistance because of very real issues of noise, view encroachment, strobe effects, etc.&nbsp; Given the choice of a wind farm off the back deck vs. nothing at all, it's not surprising that many people choose to fight the wind project.</p><p>Education programs help the general public understand the real choices.&nbsp; Given our ever-growing appetite for power, where should it come from?&nbsp; Would it be better to put a coal fired plant in their backyard?&nbsp; How about a nuclear reactor?&nbsp; Once people understand the options for where their power comes from, along with the pros and cons of each approach, I think we'll see greater buy-in - if not proud enthusiasm - for those rotating blades in the distance.</p>
Comment
3 of 3
July 30, 2007
Re: the NY project, this is the first I've read that a power purchase agreement has been signed by LIPA and FPL. I don't believe that to be true. The reason it hasn't been signed is because neither LIPA nor FPL have been upfront with ratepayers about the cost of the agreement. FPL was selected as the winning bid at $365 million; however, the price has gone up to $697 million, a figure which does not include interconnection and decommissioning costs to be borne by LIPA.&nbsp; There is a great deal of &quot;sticker shock&quot; being felt by ratepayers, coupled with the memory of the Shoreham nuclear plant that was built but never ran. Long Islanders will be paying for Shoreham for a long time.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

AltEnergyStocks HUBER+SUHNER AG Schletter Inc. Schiller Concepts NREC Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition IntertechPira
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters