Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

Majority of Americans Favor Solar on New Homes

June 1, 2007   |   14 Comments

Do you like this news?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 
82 percent say that a decrease in monthly energy bills is their primary motivation for installing solar power; other respondents indicated it was to reduce overall energy usage (79 percent), reduce oil dependence (77 percent) or because it is a secure source of energy (75 percent).
14 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 14
June 1, 2007
DC powered applainces and lights sound nice and would save on power for conversion.

The problem is that DC requires larger and larger copper wire to send electricity farther. The copper starts to get really expensive, like dollars per foot to send wire for each plug.

I doubt the payback for the larger wire will offset for the cost of conversion from dc to ac. If you add the cost of the solar system to the cost of the wires ($40,000 to $50,000) est, it might exceed the value of the rest of the house.

I like being energy efficient, but conservation should be used when its cost effective or nearly cost effective. Otherwise , you or the government are just over paying for things so as to feel good.
Comment
2 of 14
June 1, 2007
In California, we are blessed with having to pay $.39 per kwh for retail electrical after you pass your "normal use". If you have a pool, ac, electric water/space heater, then you are over "normal use".

Since owning a home, I have never been under the normal use. I now have a pool and ac, so my bills are $100 in the winter and over $300 in the Summer. I have roughly calculated that I could get back to my "normal use" and amount for about $28,000 or about 12 years.
Comment
3 of 14
June 1, 2007
It would help the economics of PV if builders realized that any home appliance that runs on a switching power supply can run on DC. This includes PCs, printers, TVs, compact fluorescent light bulbs, incandescent light bulbs.
AC is required for appliances that have induction motors: refrigerators, clothes & dish washers.
Comment
4 of 14
June 1, 2007
Now if people could rent their panels???
Comment
5 of 14
June 1, 2007
now Teco in Tampa has thrown another Obstacle into Solar Power by installing Digital Meters,that CHARGES you retail price for the Power You push back!!!

corporate Criminals,everywhere you look!
Comment
6 of 14
June 1, 2007
12 years??? You must be from a state that offers very heavy subsidies.... In a state like PA you are over 25 years usually for PV...

.....Bill
Comment
7 of 14
June 1, 2007
Wow, energy prices are up so people are interested in ways on saving on energy!

Who would have guess that?

Also, this survey gerenalize all solar including cost effective solar pool and prohibitally expensive pv solar for electricity.

I bet they didn't ask, "Are you interested in solar PVs that will power your home for free, except it will take 12 years to pay back the intial investment without including interest?" That answer would be NO.
Comment
8 of 14
June 6, 2007
There is a key development that will make solar rooves on new houses financially feasable.  Namely the development of long-run solar panels that replace roof cladding instead of going on top of roof cladding.  By  reducing the price of solar by the price of the conventional roof cladding the breakthrough to financial viability will be made.  Solar tiles already exist to replace conventional roof tiles but long-run will be the key.
Comment
9 of 14
June 6, 2007
<p align="left"><strong>Finding an inexpensive and reliable source of energy is a challenge in many developed and developing countries.Renewable energy benefits from being independent of fuel prices. At the same time<font face="Times New Roman (Arabic)"> </font>the costs of<font face="Times New Roman (Arabic)"> </font>solar PhotoVoltaic (PV) systems keep on reducing and as advances in Building Integration (BI) techniques continue to be made there is growing interest in grid connected BIPV systems. However, the application of solar<font face="Times New Roman (Arabic)"> </font>PV<font face="Times New Roman (Arabic)"> </font>and<font face="Times New Roman (Arabic)"> </font>Thermal (PV/T) cogeneration system in residential buildings is particularly interesting because it demonstrates several advantages compared with conventional BIPV system<font face="Times New Roman (Arabic)">.</font> A typical PV/T system will reduce the need for conventional water heating by about two thirds. Heating water with the sun also means long-term benefits, such as being cushioned from future fuel shortages and price increases, and environmental benefits.<font face="Arial" size="2"> </font>When a PV/T system replaces an electric water heater, the electricity displaced over 20 years represents more than 50 tons of avoided carbon dioxide emissions alone. </strong></p>
Comment
10 of 14
June 6, 2007
Of course most people favor there being a solar &quot;option' on new construction.&nbsp; Why not? - it's only an &quot;option&quot; for those who choose to exercise it.&nbsp;But, they never asked the question - would you be willing to invest $30,000-$40,000 for a solar installation on your next residence. Nor, did they ask the question - should solar installations be mandated on new homes? Those are the real questions - not questions without any required commitment.
Comment
11 of 14
June 6, 2007
The key is net-metering.&nbsp; If it is allowed, solar is desirable.&nbsp; If not, wait until the utility is forced by law to agree.
Comment
12 of 14
June 6, 2007
<p>Just some thoughts about &quot;cost effective&quot;.&nbsp; How cost effective are the problems that are being caused by our past energy choices.&nbsp; These energy &quot;choices&quot; were manipulated by big business and government subsidies.&nbsp; That means you have been manipulated.&nbsp; The true cost of energy has been hidden because subsidies for the &quot;Sin&quot; fuels (the whole lot of them) are given under the counter.&nbsp; Solar energy and efficiency subsidies are usually given to home owners and businesses after manket, above table.&nbsp; This effects our perception of what is &quot;conventional and affordable&quot; and&nbsp; the thought that solar is expensive and for the future.... so we can put it off another day and not buy.&nbsp; If you are hooked on only getting high returns, comment elsewhere.&nbsp; A 20 year payback can also be viewed as 5% return (depending on what costs/incentives/interest is included or not).&nbsp; I can live with that and even less.&nbsp; The discussion is shifting from a payback analysis to a quality of life choice for us and our children.&nbsp; Join US.</p><p>&nbsp;</p><p>&nbsp;</p>
Comment
13 of 14
June 9, 2007
<p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal">&nbsp;</p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">We need to rethink global and local energy.</span></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">With photovoltaic we pay for the tools to extract, store and distribute electricity.</span></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">The energy is free. </span></span></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Tools are the commodity not kilowatts.</span></span></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">We make the tools, sell the tools, repair&nbsp;&amp; replace the tools.</span></span></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">We need to change the conversation about carbon and energy.</span></span></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Carbon based fuels have an end game.</span></span></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Renewables don't exist in a bubble of time.</span></span></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">When our tools become the lowest cost route to capturing energy&nbsp;the carbon problem will take care of itself.</span></span></p><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">We need a new world view about energy, that;<span>&nbsp; </span></span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Has no expiration date;</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Acts as a foundation for all those that come after us;</span><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Builds on abundance, not plunder;</span> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">Opens doors to greater possibilities.</span></p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">This article shows, most people get it.</span></span></p><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial"></span></span>&nbsp;</span> <p style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt" class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size: 10pt; font-family: Arial">I know, I'm preaching to the choir.</span></p>
Comment
14 of 14
July 27, 2007
We often find people raisng concerns that a 10 to 12 year payback for solar power&nbsp;is too long. To that I say, what is the payback with the utility? Well, there isn't one. The fact is that you have two choices, either throw your money away month after month, or get a system and have the savings pay off the investment. Also, since solar modules carry 25 year warranties with a life expectancy in excess of 50 years, you would be foolish not to go solar. 12 year pay off with at least 13 years of free energy. So while some may say that people wouldn't support solar power installations if they knew the payoff, I say they would if they took into account all factors and did a real analysis.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Advertise With Us

KYOCERA Solar, Inc. Solaire Generation Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA, Inc. OTTI - Ostbayerisches Techn. Transfer Institute Hydrogen Education Foundation Natural Power AltE
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters