Photo Credit: California Energy Commission
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (14) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
June 1, 2007

Majority of Americans Favor Solar on New Homes

San Francisco, California [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

According to a recent Roper survey commissioned by Sharp Electronics Corporation, nearly 90 percent of Americans think that solar electricity should be an option for all new home construction, up significantly from one year ago (79 percent). Three-quarters of survey respondents perceive solar power to be more important than ever, evidence that Americans recognize the value of solar as a clean, renewable form of energy.

82 percent say that a decrease in monthly energy bills is their primary motivation for installing solar power; other respondents indicated it was to reduce overall energy usage (79 percent), reduce oil dependence (77 percent) or because it is a secure source of energy (75 percent).

The survey was conducted in May of this year among 1,004 adults to measure their perceptions of solar power.

"More and more, consumers are interested in solar energy, as the results of this survey clearly show. The message from consumers to homebuilders is clear -- builders can differentiate themselves while satisfying customer needs by offering solar electricity on any home they build," said Ron Kenedi, vice president, Solar Energy Solutions Group, Sharp Electronics Corporation.

Even as consumers embrace the technology, they are not fully aware of its capabilities and they have misconceptions about how a solar energy system works in a home. Survey respondents were more likely to recognize solar could turn lights on (82 percent) and heat bath water (82 percent) or a swimming pool (80 percent), than power common electric devices like computers or appliances (71 percent).

There is a gap in understanding that solar electricity operates just like regular electricity and is the same kind of electricity that a local utility company provides.

"As the world's leading solar manufacturer, Sharp views this uncertainty as a strong reason for educating the public about the features and benefits of solar energy. It can power everything from air conditioning and computers to appliances and vacuums; consumers need to understand why it makes sense, both financially and for the environment," added Kenedi.

Sharp recently launched a unique awareness campaign under the tagline "Hello Sunshine" designed to demystify solar electricity for consumers. Components of the campaign appear in newspaper ads, Internet search results and web page banners -- even a colorful traveling education trailer that will move from town to town throughout California increasing awareness and understanding of solar electricity.

The survey also revealed that the financial benefits of solar energy play an instrumental role in a consumer's decisions about solar electricity. Saving money on monthly energy bills was the primary motivation for consumers to install a solar system, with 84 percent of respondents citing this over any other reason.

More than half of respondents said they would be more interested in learning about solar energy for their homes, if the system would cost them zero money down and they would start enjoying an immediate payback in the form of lower energy bills.

The findings of the survey include:

• 87 percent feel that homebuilders should offer solar power as an option for all new homes; older Americans are less enthusiastic, with 77 percent of those over age 65 supporting solar on new homes.

• Respondents understand that solar power can be used to turn the lights on (82 percent), heat bath water (82 percent) or heat a swimming pool (80 percent).

• Respondents are less likely to understand that solar can power electric devices such as computers or appliances (71 percent).

• Americans over age 65 are least likely to recognize this functionality (56 percent).

• Those in the Northeast (63 percent) and Midwest (65 percent) were significantly less likely to identify this functionality for solar energy, compared to those in the South (75 percent) and West (78 percent).

• 82 percent say that a decrease in monthly energy bills is their primary motivation for installing solar power; other respondents indicated it was to reduce overall energy usage (79 percent), reduce oil dependence (77 percent) or because it is a secure source of energy (75 percent).

• 56 percent would be interested in learning more about solar for their homes if the system could be obtained for zero money down and their utility bills would be lowered right away.

• Younger adults, ages 25-34, are more encouraged by monetary savings, with 67 percent expressing interest in solar.

Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (14)
 
No image available
June 1, 2007
DC powered applainces and lights sound nice and would save on power for conversion.

The problem is that DC requires larger and larger copper wire to send electricity farther. The copper starts to get really expensive, like dollars per foot to send wire for each plug.

I doubt the payback for the larger wire will offset for the cost of conversion from dc to ac. If you add the cost of the solar system to the cost of the wires ($40,000 to $50,000) est, it might exceed the value of the rest of the house.

I like being energy efficient, but conservation should be used when its cost effective or nearly cost effective. Otherwise , you or the government are just over paying for things so as to feel good.
Comment 1 of 14
No image available
June 1, 2007
In California, we are blessed with having to pay $.39 per kwh for retail electrical after you pass your "normal use". If you have a pool, ac, electric water/space heater, then you are over "normal use".

Since owning a home, I have never been under the normal use. I now have a pool and ac, so my bills are $100 in the winter and over $300 in the Summer. I have roughly calculated that I could get back to my "normal use" and amount for about $28,000 or about 12 years.
Comment 2 of 14
No image available
June 1, 2007
It would help the economics of PV if builders realized that any home appliance that runs on a switching power supply can run on DC. This includes PCs, printers, TVs, compact fluorescent light bulbs, incandescent light bulbs.
AC is required for appliances that have induction motors: refrigerators, clothes & dish washers.
Comment 3 of 14
No image available
June 1, 2007
Now if people could rent their panels???
Comment 4 of 14
No image available
June 1, 2007
now Teco in Tampa has thrown another Obstacle into Solar Power by installing Digital Meters,that CHARGES you retail price for the Power You push back!!!

corporate Criminals,everywhere you look!
Comment 5 of 14
June 1, 2007
12 years??? You must be from a state that offers very heavy subsidies.... In a state like PA you are over 25 years usually for PV...

.....Bill
Comment 6 of 14
No image available
June 1, 2007
Wow, energy prices are up so people are interested in ways on saving on energy!

Who would have guess that?

Also, this survey gerenalize all solar including cost effective solar pool and prohibitally expensive pv solar for electricity.

I bet they didn't ask, "Are you interested in solar PVs that will power your home for free, except it will take 12 years to pay back the intial investment without including interest?" That answer would be NO.
Comment 7 of 14
No image available
June 6, 2007
There is a key development that will make solar rooves on new houses financially feasable.  Namely the development of long-run solar panels that replace roof cladding instead of going on top of roof cladding.  By  reducing the price of solar by the price of the conventional roof cladding the breakthrough to financial viability will be made.  Solar tiles already exist to replace conventional roof tiles but long-run will be the key.
Comment 8 of 14
No image available
June 6, 2007

Finding an inexpensive and reliable source of energy is a challenge in many developed and developing countries.Renewable energy benefits from being independent of fuel prices. At the same time the costs of solar PhotoVoltaic (PV) systems keep on reducing and as advances in Building Integration (BI) techniques continue to be made there is growing interest in grid connected BIPV systems. However, the application of solar PV and Thermal (PV/T) cogeneration system in residential buildings is particularly interesting because it demonstrates several advantages compared with conventional BIPV system. A typical PV/T system will reduce the need for conventional water heating by about two thirds. Heating water with the sun also means long-term benefits, such as being cushioned from future fuel shortages and price increases, and environmental benefits. When a PV/T system replaces an electric water heater, the electricity displaced over 20 years represents more than 50 tons of avoided carbon dioxide emissions alone.


Comment 9 of 14
No image available
June 6, 2007
Of course most people favor there being a solar "option' on new construction.  Why not? - it's only an "option" for those who choose to exercise it. But, they never asked the question - would you be willing to invest $30,000-$40,000 for a solar installation on your next residence. Nor, did they ask the question - should solar installations be mandated on new homes? Those are the real questions - not questions without any required commitment.
Comment 10 of 14
No image available
June 6, 2007
The key is net-metering.  If it is allowed, solar is desirable.  If not, wait until the utility is forced by law to agree.
Comment 11 of 14
No image available
June 6, 2007

Just some thoughts about "cost effective".  How cost effective are the problems that are being caused by our past energy choices.  These energy "choices" were manipulated by big business and government subsidies.  That means you have been manipulated.  The true cost of energy has been hidden because subsidies for the "Sin" fuels (the whole lot of them) are given under the counter.  Solar energy and efficiency subsidies are usually given to home owners and businesses after manket, above table.  This effects our perception of what is "conventional and affordable" and  the thought that solar is expensive and for the future.... so we can put it off another day and not buy.  If you are hooked on only getting high returns, comment elsewhere.  A 20 year payback can also be viewed as 5% return (depending on what costs/incentives/interest is included or not).  I can live with that and even less.  The discussion is shifting from a payback analysis to a quality of life choice for us and our children.  Join US.

 

 


Comment 12 of 14
No image available
June 9, 2007

 

We need to rethink global and local energy.

With photovoltaic we pay for the tools to extract, store and distribute electricity.

The energy is free.

Tools are the commodity not kilowatts.

We make the tools, sell the tools, repair & replace the tools.

We need to change the conversation about carbon and energy.

Carbon based fuels have an end game.

Renewables don't exist in a bubble of time.

When our tools become the lowest cost route to capturing energy the carbon problem will take care of itself.

We need a new world view about energy, that;  Has no expiration date;Acts as a foundation for all those that come after us;Builds on abundance, not plunder;

Opens doors to greater possibilities.

This article shows, most people get it.

 

I know, I'm preaching to the choir.


Comment 13 of 14
No image available
July 27, 2007
We often find people raisng concerns that a 10 to 12 year payback for solar power is too long. To that I say, what is the payback with the utility? Well, there isn't one. The fact is that you have two choices, either throw your money away month after month, or get a system and have the savings pay off the investment. Also, since solar modules carry 25 year warranties with a life expectancy in excess of 50 years, you would be foolish not to go solar. 12 year pay off with at least 13 years of free energy. So while some may say that people wouldn't support solar power installations if they knew the payoff, I say they would if they took into account all factors and did a real analysis.
Comment 14 of 14
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Green Power Labs Inc. GoGreenSolar.com Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group EC Harris LLP EnerWorks Inc. Solar Living Institute
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo