Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 11 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

Previous Article
Next Article
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
June 22, 2007

Clean Energy Act Passes, $32 B Tax Package & RPS Amendment Rejected

by Sara Parker, Staff Writer

Washington, DC [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

In a flurry of activity, the U.S. Senate voted down two amendments yesterday that would have created $32 billion worth of energy tax incentives and a National Renewable Energy Portfolio (RPS) requiring utilities to generate 15% of electricity from renewables by 2020. Later that same evening however, the Senate passed H.R. 6, the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007, 65-27.

"Ultimately, we are still optimistic. We have developed a strong and vocal group of solar champions in Congress, and the solar ITC provisions passed by the two tax committees clearly demonstrate recognition that Congress must enact a long-term solar energy policy."

-- Rhone Resch, Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA), president

The Clean Energy Act of 2007 is designed to reduce U.S. dependency on foreign oil by investing in clean, renewable resources, promoting new emerging energy technologies, developing greater efficiency and creating a Strategic Energy Efficiency and Renewables Reserve.

But two key amendments that would have provided billions of dollars worth of incentives and revenue for the U.S. renewable energy industry were rejected. The Energy Tax Package—approved by the U.S. Senate Finance Committee and House Ways & Mean committee earlier this week—contained a five-year extension of the tax credit for the production of electricity from wind, geothermal, biomass as well as the solar ITC extension.

Introduced by Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), the National Journal's Congress Daily reported today that supporters of the "Baucus Amendment" were unable to get the 60 votes needed to limit debate and attach it to the larger bill.

"The tax provisions were rejected due to controversy over the revenue raisers or ‘pay-fors' in the bill. Under current rules, any tax cuts that decrease tax revenue to the Treasury have to be paid for through some other offsetting measure," said Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) President Rhone Resch in a statement released today.

"Ultimately, we are still optimistic," concluded Resch. "We have developed a strong and vocal group of solar champions in Congress, and the solar ITC provisions passed by the two tax committees clearly demonstrate recognition that Congress must enact a long-term solar energy policy. The reasons for failure are unrelated to the solar provisions and while we are disappointed that the provisions are not passing now, we are confident that we will succeed in the end."

A spokesman in Senator Bingaman's office also confirmed this morning that Bingaman's RPS proposal was included in a list of amendments officially ruled dead yesterday for "not being germane" to the bill.

For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Add Your Comment 11 Reader Comments
No image available
June 23, 2007

The headlines here read "Republicans kill renewable energy tax credits". Let's use this next election to remove those Senators and Congressmen still in the pockets of big oil.


No image available
June 23, 2007
This again shows that this government is playing into the hands of the rich american oil industry. If this doesn't stop America will never be energy independent and will have to fight more wars all over the middleeast just to secure oil supplies and also to fill coffers of the rich American oil industry. Sep 11 is long forgotten and so is terrorism. America has decided to rely on middleeast oil which finances the terrorists there and at the same time pollute the environment. 30 billion dollars is a small amount compared to the 1 trillion america is expected to spend on Iraq war. Are american sleeping?
No image available
June 24, 2007

did you know there is an industry that bought a race car, sets of battery, and a charging system (with pat. for all of these things) from a small group of inventers that were demonstrating the power of there batteries in a race car proving they could run at high speed long dist race on one charge

this car could run a nascar race on one charge of the batt only needing to stop for tires and washing the windshield   the charging system could fully charge these batt in less then 15 min these batt could hold there charge with over 95% cap for 50 years the charging system was so big it took four flatbeds to move


No image available
June 24, 2007

Here we have a prime example of sick legislation by sick legislatures. I really don't think they are deserving of our trust. This slip-shod legislation is of little or no benefit to our country and these senators have acted in a most shameful way by compromising our country down the corporate controlled oil drain. Where is your intestinal fortitude, senators? Why don't you represent the people who voted you into office? 

No. It seems that oil is your bosom buddy and the people of the US must continue to be treated as subserviant to the oil barons.

adrianakau2aol.com


No image available
June 25, 2007
You know what is really amazing about this.  Harry Reid voted against this...poor poor poor.  Certainly getting closer though, 3 votes from this happening...gives me hope that the discussion will slowly lead to action.
No image available
June 27, 2007

Interesting, but I am not sure I follow.

First of all how does the requirements for the utilities cost money for the treasury?

Second, I we would use $32B in tax credits, that would mean a generated business of at least $100B. So there will be profits to tax, salaries to tax and sales tax. What would the actual net flow of tax money be? Anyone?
Looking for a solution - just impose a federal tax on electricity that equals the $32B ormore to finance also other incentives for renewable energy.


No image available
June 27, 2007
The RPS defeat is a great loss. It would "incentivize" utilities to finally get serious about doing something constructive except raising rates. However, it would also require congress to give direction and not handouts which is way too much to expect from the current group.
No image available
June 27, 2007

Rejecting the tax credits is not about "big oil".  It is simply politics.  The reason you have politicians on both sides voting against this was:

"Under current rules, any tax cuts that decrease tax revenue to the Treasury have to be paid for through some other offsetting measure"

No politician wants to cut spending on any existing program that would negatively impact his or her district to fund the tax cuts for this program.  We shouldn't be waiting on the government to do something we can do better.  Read the other article: Investment trends & the global RE market.

This is something we can count on.  Not politicians.


No image available
June 27, 2007
THREE CHEERS FOR THE CORRUPT CONGRESS!!! They did the right things, even if it was for the wrong reasons.  Tax benefits and renewable portfolio standards would be a complete waste of money until the US first creates a fair power industry like the EU by:1) in regulated markets, offer everyone the same fair price. 2) in deregulated markets, make genuine efforts to create fair competition.
No image available
June 27, 2007
Anything  but implement.  They will continue to put money forth for research.  There is so much research money out there, but what we need is implementation money. There are a lot of really good technologies already out there (Prism Solar, DyeSol) that if implemented now would go a long way toward  achieving energy independence.  But no, we need to study and research.  Stupid lawmakers.
No image available
June 28, 2007

My comment on incentives for alternative fuels has always been the same:  Reduce or eliminate petroleum subsidies, remove tax breaks, let the price of gasoline reflect the REAL cost, watch cellulosic ethanol plants pop up at every landfill/dump site in the country.

 


Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Shanghai New Energy Industry Association Thompson Technology Industries, Inc. (TTI) Standard Solar Inc. SolarCraft Solar Technologies Atlantic Wind & Solar Inc. Conserval Systems (SolarWall)
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters