Photo Credit: Cheryl Senter, New Hampshire Public Radio
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (20) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
April 20, 2007

The Economic Impact of Renewable Energy

Peterborough, New Hampshire [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

When the Fraser Paper Mill shut down in the northern New Hampshire city of Berlin in 2006, many people wondered how the city would recover.

"We found that you get three to five times the amount of jobs in the renewables area than you do in fossil fuels."

-- Dan Kammen, University of California, Berkeley, Director of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory

The mill, which had been in operation for over 100 years, was vital to the economic stability of the community. The mill's closure evaporated hundreds of jobs, tens of thousands of dollars in tax revenue and closed the book on a century of history built around the paper industry.

Now, as New Hampshire is poised to pass a renewable portfolio standard (RPS) later this spring, a new chapter of economic progress based on renewable energy is unfolding for the city of Berlin.

LaidLaw Energy Group, a New York-based developer of independent renewable power plants, has proposed turning the Fraser Paper Mill into a 50 megawatt (MW) capacity biomass electrical generation facility that will utilize woodchips. Because the mill's infrastructure is well suited for developing a power plant, it will be easier and cheaper for the company to construct the facility.

If completed in 2008 as planned, the biomass facility will create approximately 500 indirect and 40 direct jobs in timber-rich Coos County where Berlin is located. While a power plant will require much less labor than the old paper mill, 540 jobs are a welcome addition to the area.

"Clearly this project would help the local economy and many of the folks who have relied on the paper industry over the years," said Berlin City Manager Patrick MacQueen. "This project will be great for job creation and actually maintaining the jobs that get built."

A University of New Hampshire study released this February titled, "Economic Impact of a New Hampshire Renewable Portfolio Standard," concluded that an adoption of 20 percent renewable energy will create thousands of jobs with wages much higher than the current state average, generate over $1 million in state revenue, and provide a "newfound opportunity for NH residents to start businesses."

Former New Hampshire Congressman Charlie Bass, who recently joined Laidlaw Energy Group as Special Advisor to company President and CEO Michael Bartoszek, said that renewable energy projects like the Berlin biomass plant are important for economic growth and stability in the state.

"I've always been active in supporting alternative energy sources, so I'm excited to be involved with [the Berlin] project. Developments like this will truly benefit the state of New Hampshire and the rest of our country," Bass said.

Additional studies released over the last decade have indicated that a large-scale transition by the U.S. into a clean energy economy would significantly benefit the country by creating hundreds of thousands of domestic jobs, generate tens of billions of dollars in federal and state tax revenues, and help revitalize struggling communities.

According to a 2004 meta-analysis from of the Renewable and Appropriate Energy Laboratory (RAEL) at the University of California, Berkeley, which examined 13 studies on the economic benefits of renewable energy, approximately 240,000 jobs could be created and maintained if the country passed a 20 percent by 2020 RPS. If the U.S. relied solely on fossil fuels, the country would only maintain around 75,000 jobs.

"We found that you get three to five times the amount of jobs in the renewables area than you do in fossil fuels," said Dan Kammen, director of RAEL and co-author of the meta-analysis. "The finding was not that there's some incredibly intrinsic, wonderful feature about renewables, even though I might think there is. It was that these benefits go to the first victors."

That means local communities and states must act now in order to be part of the expected job growth.

The employment opportunities created by the renewable energy sector will be diverse -- ranging from indirect manufacturing and construction jobs to direct facility design, operation and maintenance jobs. States like California, Texas, and others in the Midwest that have been most aggressive in supporting the solar, wind and biofuel industries are going to see the largest growth in those employment areas noted Kammen.

For example, communities in the Midwestern Corn Belt are seeing a considerable economic boom because of the rapid growth of the biofuel industries. A report released this February found that the ethanol industry created over 163,000 direct and indirect jobs, generated $4.9 billion in federal, state and local taxes and reduced the federal trade deficit by $11.2 billion in 2006.

"The renewable fuels industry is creating economic activity, it's creating jobs, it's generating income, it's generating tax revenue and it's paying for itself," said John Urbanchuk, Director of LECG LLC and author of the ethanol report. "And since most of these plants are located in rural areas, they are a significant impetus to rural economic development and economic growth."

When the U.S. finally adopts high amounts of renewable energy, there will undoubtedly be jobs lost in the fossil fuel industries. But the country won't restructure itself overnight, so companies and workers will have time to adapt to the evolving energy landscape.

"Most of the big energy companies are rich -- they are big and diversified. There are efforts going on among all the big oil companies to invest heavily in renewables. So I think you're not going to see job losses, you're going to see a shift, with the one exception of coal if the industry doesn't get on board with finding a way to make coal as close to carbon neutral as possible," said Kammen.

When Laidlaw finishes the 50 MW biomass plant in Berlin, the renovated paper mill will be a symbol for the new wave of economic development based on clean energy that is gradually emerging in the U.S. Now it's up to states and local communities to decide whether they want to be part of the growth.

"There is simply too much talk and not enough action right now," said former Congressman Bass. "Developing projects like the one in Berlin is how you change the paradigm."
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (20)
 
No image available
April 20, 2007
Clean Energy, New Jobs

New jobs for many people in alternative energy,
Revitalizing communities by cooperative strategy,
Reaching out for avenues in clean power production,
Will help rural communities with unemployment reduction,
All across America shines bright hope for all,
A new way of life is promised and will help us recall,
We're people who are used to solving problems that arise,
We're not afraid of changes, that you may surmise,
We dig our heels into the ground and start where we've been halted,
To move into renewables for they are what we've wanted,
Oil, coal and gas are here to stay awhile as power friends,
But not forever, keep in mind, we need some fresh new blends.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 1 of 20
No image available
April 20, 2007
Nice article - thanks for updating all on this!
Comment 2 of 20
April 20, 2007
Wayne,
The plant will use waste woodchips from timber harvesting operations in northern New Hampshire. It is unclear if the fuel will come from anywhere else.
Sorry I didn't make that more clear before. It's now changed. Thanks!
-Stephen Lacey
Comment 3 of 20
No image available
April 20, 2007
An interesting article but what are they actually using for fuel? Wood ..?
Comment 4 of 20
No image available
April 21, 2007
Jim, you are 100% right. It is not clean energy if wood chips are used but then again, it would not be considered fossil energy, though the amounts of CO2 released would be on par with coal. Probably the sulfur content might be lower with wood than with some of the coals but burning wood does produce harmful fumes as is evident by the harm done to women and children in poor places such as Africa and India.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 5 of 20
No image available
April 21, 2007
If they are using wood chips, then this is not "clean" energy though it is renewable.

I would speculate that the CO2 released per kwh would be roughly on par with coal and wood.
Comment 6 of 20
April 22, 2007
Gentlemen,

According to Laidlaw Energy, "the emissions from the facility will be maintained at an unprecedented low level through the use of highly advanced, second generation emissions controls that are expected to enable the plant to qualify for the renewable energy programs of various states in the Northeast and allow for the sale of Renewable Energy Credits (RECs)."

Therefore, while there will indeed be emissions, I suspect it will be cleaner than coal-fired power plants, many of which do not implement such strict controls.

Also, Laidlaw is looking to partner with another company to occupy the rest of the site so that the occupant could use some of the electricity and waste heat from the plant. Laidlaw says they are considering many types of partnerships, one of which is for a biofuel application.
Comment 7 of 20
No image available
April 22, 2007
Excuse COMMENT HOG STATUS OF CRAZY PHIL....however, sounds like a great location for "spent heat" to enable a great deal of "gardens", nursuries, flower growth, WINTER "WONDERLANDS " !!! Somebody just might figure out a way to make ON-SITE-FERTILIZER OR CHARCOAL OR UPSCALE "BRICQUETS" FOR COOKERS.....ETC. Was it Henry Ford...looking for safety glass...who said...GIVE ME 5 ENGINEERS WHO DO NOT KNOW....IT CANNOT BE DONE !!!! History shows Henry got his Glass !!!
Comment 8 of 20
No image available
April 22, 2007
NOTE: At IP Georgetown SC in ca. 1975 one of the Chemists ran a test using ground-up garbage in one of the boilers....he said it was very close to the same BTU output as wood chips...just a little more particulate matter residuals in the boiler....MARRY UP THE OLD PAPERMILL WITH HIGH TEC TRASH RECOVERY a la St. Lewis Mo......you might just really have something that would not only meet the spoken goals....maybe double or triple them...maybe <*///><
Comment 9 of 20
No image available
April 22, 2007
Help me please...are we saying...there is no technology that can help "economically" reduce-its-carbon-footprint : either now or in the future ????? This power plant will operate with no scrubbers, no filters, no reclaimers, no recovery devices whatever ????>? Solar and/or Wind CANNOT offset the "cost" of high-tec CARBON CAPTURE...having spent a few electrical years at IP-Georgetown SC....the entire mill had at least 50 great spots for solar or wind installations that could "pay" for new tecnology....if such exists ???most paper mills...not all have great water resourses, perfect forwww.pyronsolar.comtechnology. <*///><
Comment 10 of 20
No image available
April 25, 2007
I have a few quick comments:
First, while energy from biomass may be renewable, it's not as clean as some other sources. The use of forests for producing timber for long-lived buildings effectively sequesters CO2, it's better than a CO2 neutral process. Creating more markets for biomass typically changes how a forest is managed. In the first biomass boom in Maine, we saw indiscriminate clearcutting with all of it going to hog fuel (the colloquial term for biomass). These are also typically rather low efficiency ways to use biomass. In fact, using pellets in a stove in your home is a much more effective use of the resource.

The comment on burning trash misses the mark. You might write a story about the revitalization of Old Town, ME, where the paper mill has been replaced by a "biomass boiler" aka trash incinerator. It's a dirty business, with the focus on burning trash from Mass, not on producing clean renewable energy.
Comment 11 of 20
No image available
April 25, 2007
Question: Where did our soil come from and where is it going to come from in the future, if we strip every ounce of biomass from every field and forest to burn it? If we had an efficient means of putting the ash back on the land, this might not be a big problem, but I can't see that happening. I'm not just trying to be a smart-ass, this is a real question.
Comment 12 of 20
No image available
April 25, 2007
There is no economic point for using straight timber for fuel as it has other feasible uses and is too costly as well. Thus, I don´t believe it could contribute to deforestation, at least in the case mentioned.

I hope that the energy will be utilized in a district heating scheme as well, otherwise it would be a severe waste of resources. Combined heat and power is the most cost efficient of all since an enormous ammount of heat is being produced anyways.
Comment 13 of 20
No image available
April 25, 2007
I want to add just a few comments, though I have more.. :)

Biomass, in whatever form is 100% renewable and CO2 NEUTRAL - this means that CO2 was harvested (in the form of wood) from the natural ecosystem and then returned to the atmosphere as a gas which is then taken up again by more biological organisms later.

Biomass can be grown as a crop, especially in the form of solix - a member of the willow tree/bush family. Solix grow incredibly fast and can be harvested yearly.

Solix are also especially apt at cleaning the soil from pollutants, that is they take them up in their roots and send along up into the plant. The crop is harvested, processed into pellets or chips and then used as fuel. When the biomass is burned, the filters in the plant´s emissions system can absorb the pollutants,and then can be deoposited in a sealed landfill.
Comment 14 of 20
No image available
April 25, 2007
For all the high-tech talk of biomass, it is still just burning wood, and lots of it, for inefficient energy production. Pyrolysis, anaerobic digestion for methane, or cellulosic, though admittedly more high-tech [more jobs?], would surely get better energy returns from wood waste. I would also suggest that "wood waste" is not necessarily "waste" if it decomposes and replenishes forest soils.
Comment 15 of 20
No image available
April 25, 2007
Gentlemen,

I think you may be overlooking the main advantage of wood vs. coal-based power generation. With wood, the CO2 generated is absorbed again by a new crop of trees. With coal you are releasing copious amounts of CO2 that has been stored for millions of years. I can't speak to the relase of any other particulate matter in wood but I'm inclined to believe it is significantly cleaner than coal.

My concern with wood-based power is that I see no mechanism for preventing wood-based power from accelerating deforestation. The US has been remarkably willing to cut down trees for paper, furniture, housing and many other products. How much more willing will we be when wood also produces our electricity? The LaidLaw plant will use "wood chips", presumably from forestry waste. Who will ensure that use remains limited to this existing waste, particulary when the idea becomes more popular and firms compete for a dwindling supply of surplus waste?
Comment 16 of 20
No image available
April 26, 2007
Mrs. Hutter,
I am no Chemist but I am a teacher, "wood produces more polutants than coal"
A. numerically the count of polutants
B. by weight
C. by "polutant strength"
D. percentage of origional mass converted to polutants

I am certain, clean vs. dirty coal would have very different values...I would be interested in these questionsmather_2001jr@yahoo.com THANKS
Comment 17 of 20
No image available
April 26, 2007
Burning wood releases more pollutants than coal. Scrubbers remove the Sulphur and Nitrogen pollutants by dissolving them into water. The resulting water is then polluted and must be dealt with. My husband is an engineering manager that works for a company that installs industrial scrubbers. The burning of any fossil fuels still creates real environmental hazards --the only thing that really changes is the state they are in (i.e. gas, solid or liquid form). New technologies will have to be developed in order for the burning of anything to be truly "clean".

The renewed use of the paper mill plant in New Hampshire is a reasonable SHORT term use of the facility and will need to be converted again as technologies are developed and legislations change to reflect tighter and tighter standards.
Comment 18 of 20
No image available
April 26, 2007
GENTLEMAN AND LADIES:

Soil comments, Mr. S. McMeekin....Penn State Uni has be working for years on soil reclamation particularly in strip mineing. I am sure they have expertese in this area. Soil Science College, State College, PA.
Old Town ME. "incinerator"...I hope they took some ques from the St. Lewis MO. process....over 30 years "developed" (-ing), A few years back : 100 thousand USD's in coins recovered and 800 thousand USD's electricity sold back to the CITY on an annual basis...JUST FROM TRASH ! The technology is out there...I have forgotten the name of the book and the man...help me...read it as a child: it was the story of the brilliant man who guided with lots of help AMERICA'S gearing up to fight WWII MODERN ARMS AND FREE MEN I think was the title...got to be 50 years ago. A WE ARE AT WAR AND B WE WISH TO REMAIN FREE AND C WE DESPERATELY NEED A PLAN w/ DETERMINATION ! RESPECTFULLYmather_2001jr@yahoo.com
<*///><
Comment 19 of 20
No image available
November 30, 2007
This is interesting. Some say biomass is worse than coal some say its the same, and some say its less. I thought engineers dealt with scientific evidence. It would be nice to get the facts straight. If your not sure, say so.
As one person said here, if we're burning we're polluting.
Comment 20 of 20
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Alteris Renewables Johnson Controls, Inc. groSolar Aries Power & Industrial Solar Power International 2009 Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo