Renewable Energy Solar Energy Wind Energy Geothermal Energy Bioenergy Hydropower
 

How Does Energy Efficiency Relate to Renewable Energy?

By Scott Sklar
April 24, 2007   |   18 Comments

Do you like this opinion & commentary?

Email   Bookmark Bookmark   Print   Feed   Share
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

18 Reader Comments
Comment
1 of 18
April 25, 2007
SPEND THE FIRST DOLLAR ON CONSERVATION- INSULATION, HIGH PERFORMANCE FENESTRATION, KILL VAMPIRES, PARASITICS, ADD SMART STATS AND PIR SWITCHES, ETC.

THE SECOND ON WASTE RECOVERY (HEAT, WATER, POWER, ETC.).

THE THIRD ON ENERGY EFFICIENCY (ANYTHING THAT SWALLOWS ENERGY IN THE PROJECT SHOULD BE ONE OF THE TOP ENERGY STAR RATED.

THE FOURTH ON PASSIVE SOLAR, DESIGN AS IF NATURE MATTERS AND RESPECT THE NATURAL ENERGY FLOWS OF THE GIVEN SITE AND INCLUDE APPROPRIATE VEGETATION IN DEVELOPING THE SITE PLAN TO OPTIMIZE MICRO CLIMATE PRECONDITIONING AND WHILE YOU ARE AT IT, CONSIDER BEING A VEGETARIAN TO LIGHTEN YOUR PERSONAL CARBON FOOTPRIN.

AND THE FIFTH ON ACTIVE SOLAR, TO ME THIS LAST SECTION INCLUDES EARTH COUPLED OR WATER SOURCE HEAT PUMP TECHNOLOGY AS WELL AS SOLAR THERMAL AND PHOTOVOLTAIC SYSTEMS.

ADHERE TO THIS LIST, THEN THE REMAINING LOADS WILL BE SMALL (<5% OF CONVENTIONAL); PICK THAT UP WITH GREEN TAGS.
Comment
2 of 18
April 25, 2007
ONE OF MY LATE GREAT MENTORS, RICHARD L. CROWTHER, FAIA TAUGHT ME 30 SOME ODD YEARS AGO WHEN TALKING TO ME ABOUT THE BUILT ENVIRONMENT SAID, "THAT IF YOU HAVE FIVE DOLLARS TO SPEND, SPEND THE FIRST DOLLAR ON ENERGY CONSERVATION, SPEND THE SECOND DOLLAR ON ENERGY CONSERVATION, SPEND THE THIRD DOLLAR ON ENERGY CONSERVATION, SPEND THE FORTH DOLLAR ON PASSIVE SOLAR ENERGY AND THE FIFTH DOLLAR ON ACTIVE SOLAR AND THE REMAINING LOAD WOULD BE SO EXTREMELY SMALL THAT IT CAN BE PICKED UP WITH FOSSILS WITHOUT GUILT".

THIS BASIC ADVISE STILL HOLDS TRUE TODAY ONLY I WOULD CHANGE THE WORDING TO BE MORE CONTEMPORARY.

See next comment for a continuation.
Comment
3 of 18
April 25, 2007
At a recent solar energy conference a representative of a major PV company was selling me a system by telling me that with their system I would never have to worry about saving energy again. I could use as much as I wanted for whatever I wanted because I was producing it all for free. I had noticed him telling everyone who came to his company's booth the same thing. So I was interested in this company's approach to selling solar. He asked me what I did and told him I developed and managed energy conservation and efficiency programs and he said,"We are going to put you out of business!" What kind of male bovine feces is this? Especially from a rep of one of the major PV companies in on Earth!
Comment
4 of 18
April 25, 2007
Does anyone have any information on how efficiency would effect the costs for renewable energy and/or traditional energy production?
Comment
5 of 18
April 25, 2007
Don't forget Commercial, High Rise, Government, Municipal, Transportation, Educational and Industrial Buildings.
Keith Campbell
Comment
6 of 18
April 25, 2007
There was no answer about solar-thermal which is a highly efficient way to capture solar energy, which can be used in a variety of ways. The old fashioned hot water heaters have been around since the 1920's. Residential/commercial solar-thermal is hot in Europe, but has virtually been used in the U.S. only to heat swimming pools. That may soon change. There's lots of solar-thermal energy around - about 20 times more than we can use. What's been holding solar-thermal back is that it needed to be large-scale to be cost-effective; and off-the-grid power is still cheap.
Comment
7 of 18
April 25, 2007
I installed a solar hot water system recently, and it works great! Bought used hot water panels (plenty out there), a new, stainless steel hot water storage tank, and plenty of copper tubing. The whole setup cost about $3000 and took a couple of weekends to do yourself. Now, our hot water boiler is shut off completely for the sunny days and we have plenty of hot water. At $660/tank of oil, I am anticipating payback within 10 years! But with the 45% tax incentives, maybe in only 5 years!
Comment
8 of 18
April 25, 2007
All of the improvements mentioned by Mr. Sklar require varying degrees of financial commitment by the businessman or homeowner. For schools, churches and low-income housing apartment owners, that's next to impossible. Perhaps the question should be "How can renewable energy pay for ALL your energy efficiency improvements?" The answer is simple - the patented BSE energy debit card.

Bill Brobeck
Chief Technical Officer
Brobeck Solar Energy LLC
http://www.brobecksolarenergy.com/
Comment
9 of 18
April 25, 2007
I understand that there is a new (old) method of producing concrete that requires far less energy than the methods used today. Is anyone out there familiar with the process and quality of the product?
Comment
10 of 18
April 25, 2007
One very building method that I have been using that fits into both category is ICFs / Insulated Concrete Forms.

Yes you do have to pay for them, but after a few years they will pay for themselves in Energy $avings, and will then continue to pay you back in Energy $avings dividends forever.

Modern ICF buildings save between 40% & 80% heating & cooling requirements.
Now thats what I call Conservation.
They are also extremely Energy Efficient.

They also Never Rot, are Hurricane-Proof, Tornado-Proof,
Mold-Proof, Fire-Proof, Draft-Proof, Sound-Proof, and a few more.

The National & ICC code should mandate double the current R-Values, and oppose the NAHAB & Oil Lobbiests.
Orienting all new homes South should also be Mandated.
The early Greeks used Passive solar, & said only a fool would build their house not facing the sun.

Tim Lyden
Comment
11 of 18
April 25, 2007
I am not quite sure why renewables have been getting so much interest these days as opposed to energy efficiency. I guess it is a sexier thing for politicians. We manufacture energy efficient lighting for industrial spaces (warehouses, mfg, school gyms...) Paybacks at 4,000 hrs per year with no incentives, tax credits... are about 4.3 years and less than 2 in a 24/7 facility. By contrast solar water heaters have about a 30 yr simple payback and about 80 yr for PV (all at .07/kwh). There is still a ton of energy efficiency out there, even in rebate rich states with high energy costs
www.energywisegroup.com
Comment
12 of 18
April 25, 2007
Your answer doesn't address the question as to how renewable energy relates to efficiency. And, your answer does not discuss building renewable energy projects that are more efficient than the typical fossil fueled, nuclear or other renewables such as wind, solar etc. The one source of energy that fits that description
would be to develop the country's hydro potential which has an efficiency greater than 90 %. Estimates show that the potential is nearly 20,000 MW without the construction of new dams. I guess that we shouldn't be surprised by this oversight since Renewable Energy Access has only sporadically mentioned hydropower and has no expert or advocate, as far as I know, on the subject.
Comment
13 of 18
April 25, 2007
The terms "energy efficiency" and "conservation" are used interchangeably in the question and answer on this topic. These two concepts are not the same.

The DOE defines the terms this way: Energy conservation is any behavior that results in the use of less energy. Energy efficiency is the use of technology that requires less energy to perform the same function

Turning of a light OFF is an act of conservation. Installing a compact fluorescent bulb is an investment in energy efficiency. Conservation is free - energy efficiency is not. Energy efficiency requires an energy input - conservation does not (except our own energy).

In times of limited energy and financial resources, we should be focusing heavily on conservation. Put up a clothesline instead of buying a new Energy Star clothes dryer. Use the money you would have spent on the dryer to insulate your attic.

Ed
Comment
14 of 18
April 25, 2007
Its interesting that you didn't mention the work of Amory Lovins and the Rocky Mountain Institute here. Quite some years ago, Lovins was pushing energy conservation strongly and as a means of avoiding the necessity for building more power plants. You also didn't mention all of the phantom loads in our houses that consume just a few watts while appearing to be powered off. This applies to any device that is operated by a remote control. While these items seem insignificant, a few watts multiplied by millions of households totals the output of a major generating station.
Comment
15 of 18
April 25, 2007
The Alliance to Save Energy link above is incorrect. It should be http://www.ase.org/

m
Comment
16 of 18
April 25, 2007
I so agree, it is difficult to make old houses as air tight as new, but some of the panelizd houses you can buy now, on steel frames with thick insulated panels come with energystar rated windows and doors and are virtually air tight. I think the old way of building stick frame draughty houses has got to end. The ancients built with adobe (USA)and cob (Uk) and whereas this is labor intensive, and not always geographically possible, a steel frame house can be put up in a few days wherever you live. I think this a way forward.
Comment
17 of 18
May 16, 2007
I have been very concerned with the conservation problem, especially since I found out that construction, demolition, building and maintaining buildings and homes uses 50% of the worlds energy, whereas vehicle fuel only uses 25%. Also a DOE official reports that energy saved is twice as valuable as energy produced. Therefore I have developed a strong interest in superinsulated straw bale homes. See my article at: http://ecobusinesslinks.com/straw_bale/straw_bale_solar_sustainable_development.htm
Comment
18 of 18
May 16, 2007
Jack, here's a good site for you:

http://www.findsolar.com/index.php?page=rightforme&subpage=efficiency

For a more detailed set of good info, go to:

www.findsolar.com

Save this site, as it is the best one source site that is helpful in planning/analysis and calculating the benefits of Renewable Energy.
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In

Scott Sklar

View Scott Sklar's Profile
About: Scott, founder and president of The Stella Group, Ltd., in Washington, DC, is the Chair of the Steering Committee of the Sustainable Energy Coalition and serves... more »

Advertise With Us

KYOCERA Solar, Inc. Sharp Solar Energy Solutions Group EnPower Systems Inc. AltEnergyStocks Yingli Green Energy Americas, Inc. Mersen (formerly Ferraz Shawmut) SolarNexus
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
PennWell
Renewable Energy World Magazine North America Renewable Energy World Magazine International Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo North America Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Europe Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Asia Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo India Renewable Energy World Conference & Expo Africa
RenewableEnergyWorld.com Photovoltaics World Magazine Solar Power Gen Conference & Expo Hydro Review Magazine Hydro Review World Magazine
HydroVision International HydroVision Brazil HydroVision India HydroVision Russia
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters