article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (5) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
March 19, 2007

Issue Attention Cycle & Renewable Energy

by Christopher A. Simon, Ph.D., University of Nevada

Public policy issues have a way of waxing and waning. Issues often become of interest to citizens when there is a real or perceived crisis. In public health, for instance, recent concern about the HPV virus led state legislatures and governors in Texas, and elsewhere, to pursue statewide immunization programs. Political commentary for and against the proposed solution raged in our print and broadcast media for several weeks.

During the Clinton years, there were increases in funding for programs such as the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL); but, nothing on the order of what had occurred in the late 1970's under President Carter. Large scale public attention to the issue just was not present as car owners revisited gas prices counted in cents rather than dollars.

Now there is relative silence on the issue of HPV immunization as new issues have risen. The stock market concerns us this week. The firing of several federal prosecutors will concern us for the next month. New issues will arise, old issues will fade from our memory.

Millennia ago, Socrates (as recorded in Plato's Republic) predicted this circumstance in democratic societies. Modern political science and public policy studies, scholars have put a label to this phenomenon. Professor Anthony Down's referred to it as the "issue attention cycle."

In his now classic 1972 article "Up and Down with Ecology: The 'Issue Attention Cycle,'" Downs wrote:

"American public attention rarely remains sharply focused upon any one domestic issue for very long - even if it involves a continuing problem of crucial importance to society. Instead, a systematic "issue-attention cycle" seems strongly to influence public attitudes and behavior con-cerning most key domestic problems. Each of these problems suddenly leaps into prominence, remains there for a short time, and then - -though still largely unresolved - gradually fades from the center of public attention. A study of the way this cycle operates provides in-sights into whether public attention is likely to remain sufficiently fo-cused upon any given issue to generate enough political pressure to cause effective change."

As many of us with memories of the 1970's and 1980's can attest, the renewable and alternative energy movements hit a major snag when two major events occurred.

First, President Reagan proposed a new direction in energy policy -- namely, more of the same (i.e., fossil energy). He also proposed advancing nuclear energy which made little visible headway in the wake of the Three Mile Island event in 1979; still in the active memories of the public and policymakers.

Second, fossil energy prices declined, a phenomenon that also occurred in the late 1990s in even more dramatic fashion. Despite the renewal of EPAct in 1992, one could argue that there remained little pressure on President George H.W. Bush or President Clinton to visibly and vigorously pursue alternative or renewable energy solutions.

During the Clinton years, there were increases in funding for programs such as the National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL); but, nothing on the order of what had occurred in the late 1970's under President Carter. Large scale public attention to the issue just was not present as car owners revisited gas prices counted in cents rather than dollars.

In the new millennia, however, everything has changed once again. The events surrounding September 11, 2001, rising fossil energy prices, concerns about global warming, the passage of EPAct of 2005, and the Hydrogen Initiative are all indicative of new movement.

In attending public meetings at Lake Tahoe -- the Sierra Green Business Connection at the Lake is humming right along -- I've witnessed a growing interest in renewable and alternative energy. The public meetings are often attended by vendors with the very latest in renewable energy technology.

Nevertheless, the nagging question remains: will it last this time? In answering this question, a quick review of Northeast news sources might provide us with some guidance. Sources such as the New York Times are more or less standard bearers in print media, so the East Coast papers are a good measure for my purposes.

Graph

I quickly scanned the headlines and lead paragraphs for the following phrases: "renewable energy" and "alternative energy." I then collated these data for six month periods from January 2001 to March 2007 (note: I predicted what would likely occur up through June 2007).

As one will note, the number of times the aforementioned terms are found in the print media sources rises and falls, but the general trend is up, up, up. The trend is particularly positive since the passage of EPAct of 2005 and since the midterm Congressional election in 2006.

My general conclusion is that this time around, we are not likely to be disappointed. By all indications, renewable and alternative energy policy has become a long term resident of the policy agenda. And, with gas prices expected to be well into the three dollar range this coming summer -- with no foreseeable end to this pricing instability -- I believe that energy policy will be on the minds of all age groups and continue its upward trend well into the future.

Source Cited: Downs, Anthony 1972. Up and Down with Ecology: The 'Issue Attention Cycle' The Public Interest, 28 (Summer), pp. 38-50.

Christopher A. Simon is an Associate Professor of Political Science at the University of Nevada, Reno. He is the author of Alternative Energy-Political, Economic, and Social Feasibility and Public Policy-Preferences and Outcomes. He has been published in Public Administration Review, Administration & Society, American Review of Public Administration (with David Nice), Policy Studies Journal (with Nicholas P. Lovrich), Land Use Policy Journal (with John Dobra), and others.
Image Gallery (1)
 

The information and views expressed in this article are those of the author and not necessarily those of RenewableEnergyWorld.com or the companies that advertise on its Web site and other publications.

Reader Comments (5)
 
No image available
March 21, 2007
One must agree with Mr. Keizer(post #1).
Only the most dedicated environmentalist will pay a markedly higher price for "green" energy, when surrounded on all sides by cheap gas and electricity.

Alas, cheap energy is neither a birthright nor an entitlement. Not even for Americans. The earth has shifted beneath our feet.

Technological advancements in RE are a factor. But the reality is that high prices for conventional energy derived from fossil fuels are spurring renewed interest in RE. Indeed, high (conventional)energy prices may be exactly what has been required all along to encourage both efficiency, and renewables.
Comment 1 of 5
March 21, 2007
Another issue, transparency of the information presented by the "industry experts" in the alternative energy field will impact its ultimate success. Remember the lesson learned from the nuclear energy debacle: a cost-effective technology undermined in the end by industry leaders' lack of transparency.

How many articles have we seen recently that announce an incredible gain in PV efficiency or a bio-fuel technology that promises to end the enrgy crisis, only to find at the bottom of the article that economical production is decades away?
Comment 2 of 5
No image available
March 21, 2007
I'm convinced that the only critical issue that ever limited renewables and alternative energy implementation is cost performance.

You simply cannot force people to purchase inefficient, ridiculously expensive technology. They rebel against the policy and reject the technology.

On the other hand, cheap, effective, efficient technology sells itself. Just look at computers.

Now that committed individuals and teams and companies have pushed wind power to the point where it is cost competitive, there are wind power projects everywhere.

As soon as cost competitive PV escapes the laboratory, we'll see many more rooftops paved with solar power shingles.

Look at http://www.technologyreview.com/Energy/18415/
for one interesting project.

Enjoy!
Comment 3 of 5
No image available
March 24, 2007
I think that the future trend for renewable energy development will be much on the wax and less on the wane. As we become more cogniscent of the fact that our lives as well as our life styles are integrally wound with energy production, we have no choice except to take positive action to insure necessary future sources. The price factor is critical but there is no stopping of the movement toward renewable sources. Try as they might, oil company leaders will have to retreat from their "no replacement for oil" stance. It is inevitable.

The light at the end of the tunnel is becoming visable. We cannot forever be under the dominance of fossils but will be able to separate ourselves one day from this umbelical cord. Time passes quickly and technological advances are showing us that we cannot nor do we really wish to live in the way of the past.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 4 of 5
No image available
March 24, 2007
Citizenre has dealt with this cost factor...Is the hue and cry the establishment protecting the status que? ("Let them eat cake")
Comment 5 of 5
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
BP Solar OutBack Power Systems ExxonMobil Lubricants & Specialties Europe Conserval Systems (SolarWall) Atlantic Wind & Solar Inc. FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo