article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (15) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
February 21, 2007

The Economic, Social & Technological Case for Renewable Energy

Herman Scheer, the architect of the German feed law, presents his vision on a book tour throughout the U.S. and Canada through February 27.

For 200 years industrial civilization has relied on the combustion of abundant and cheap carbon fuels. But continued reliance has had perilous consequences. On the one hand there is the insecurity of relying on the world's most unstable region -- the Middle East -- compounded by the imminence of peak oil, growing scarcity and mounting prices. On the other, the potentially cataclysmic consequences of continuing to burn fossil fuels, as the evidence of accelerating climate change shows.

"In urging an acceleration of the transition to renewable energy, Scheer exposes the fallacies surrounding the current paradigm and looks beyond the purely environmental benefits to outline the path to energy security."

-- Lester Brown, Earth Policy Institute, president

Recently, the truth about these consequences have reached a broader audience than usual: Al Gore's movie, "An Inconvenient Truth," transformed the dry and distant scientific discussions about climate change into an emotional appealing story that has infiltrated mainstream consciousness; The Stern-Report has shown economists that combating climate change is not a romantic ecological luxury, but a must to keep the costs lower than dealing with the impending consequences; the fourth IPCC report 2007 has given once again the scientific proof to policy makers that climate change is a reality and man-made.

All of these messages have actually been around for decades, but had not found a broad dissemination to create a substantial change in political, economic or consumption behavior.

Yet there is a solution: to make the transition to renewable sources of energy and distributed, decentralized energy generation. It is a model that has been proven, technologically, commercially and politically, as Hermann Scheer illustrates in his new book, Energy Autonomy: The Economic, Social & Technological Case for Renewable Energy.

The architect of the German feed law -- and member of the German Bundestag (Parliament), president of Eurosolar and General Chairman of the World Council for Renewable Energy (WCRE) -- Scheer has not only provided strategies for energy autonomy and the broad implementation of renewable energy, but also practical solutions that have proven to be a great success in Germany.

The 100,000 Solar Roof Program, the German Renewable Energy Act (EEG) and the tax exemption of Biofuels are just a few examples of policies pushed through by Scheer. These policies have created the biggest markets for renewable energy so far in the world -- and enabled independent players to secure sufficient financial resources for investing in new renewable energy technologies and production sites.

The progress already: the renewable energy industry is a multi-billion Euro industry with high growth rates.

"Hermann Scheer -- principal architect of the policies that converted cloudy Germany into the world's leading market for solar energy -- demonstrates that the German model can and must be replicated in every nation that aspires toward a healthy, peaceful future," said Denis Hayes, former director of the U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.

In Energy Autonomy, Scheer provides a multidimensional program for:

* independent energy availability where it is consumed, instead of growing dependence on depleting resources and unstable energy producing regions of the world.

* political decentralization and promotion schemes for renewable energies instead of international top-down approaches that cannot recognize the local nature of renewable energies and regional particularities.

* open and wide investments by many new players in the technological, financial and private field stimulated by market introduction programs like the German EEG instead of investment controlled and steered by governmental programs or by half-committed conventional energy companies.

* diversity of renewable energy technologies, and regions of implementation instead of market harmonization towards the most competitive renewable energy technology at present.

* taking ecological responsibility by promoting renewable energy instead of being indifferent towards the environmental benefits of renewable energy and only calculating the costs.

"In urging an acceleration of the transition to renewable energy," said Lester Brown, president of the Earth Policy Institute, "Scheer exposes the fallacies surrounding the current paradigm and looks beyond the purely environmental benefits to outline the path to energy security."

Those who are interested in hearing more about Scheer's practical visions and solutions can join him on his North American book tour, which kicked off in San Francisco on February 15th and will end on February 27th at the U.N. Foundation in New York City.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (15)
 
No image available
February 23, 2007
We are still at the problem of economic viability. Those that can afford to by their energy 30 years in advance are looking for a return ON their investment not only a Return OF their investment. To change the economics the design of the utility must be fully thought out from where one places the collectors, how ones transmits the energy to the consumer.

The solution ISN'T to decenteralize the power distribution or even live at a lower standard of living. To get SELL-ABLE spin-off benefits to subsidize the cost of the required infrastructure may require having a higher standard of living & even appear more wastefull.

Mandating 20% of the utilities sell-able energy comes from Renewable Sources means our cost of energy skyrockets to cover the cost of the infrastructure, or the suppliers of the Renewable Energy is subsidizing the cost by aborbing the capital costs.
Comment 1 of 15
No image available
February 23, 2007
Ahead of the US but only replaces "head in the sand" with "have your cake and eat it". Industrial civilization is fundamentally non-viable. All natural sustainable ecosystems recycle EVERYTHING. "Renewable Energy" is an illusion. At best it will delay our demise.
Comment 2 of 15
No image available
February 23, 2007
Few people recognize the immensity of the energy problem, and "renewables." If you define "renewables" as agriculturally grown fuels, it is simply unrealistic. Enough land doesn't exist. However, an alternative energy solution does exist - total electrification, with the power being generated by "renewable" solar, wind, geothermal, etc. There is about 20 times the amount of usable solar energy falling on us, than we presently use. If we were all-electric (heating, cooling, cooking, hot water, railroads, even commuter cars) the "energy crisis" would disappear, and we wouldn't run out of petroleum in 2050. Think how much carbon-based energy would be replaced. And when 40% efficient solar panels become real, most of it could be generated at home - but not now. The only other thing needed - mandate 35 MPG on the highway, by putting smaller engines in passenger cars.
Comment 3 of 15
February 23, 2007
Hi Christina Nelson. Well put!! and right on the money...

.....Bill
Comment 4 of 15
No image available
February 23, 2007
We are not one of the "Green Advertizing Execs"
We are the real "solar boys" ready to implement what others are just talking.

However, when we talk via our "Politically Correct Web Site" many others do not want to admit it.
Nor, they want to put down on the table one red penny to get off-the ground solar power plants.

Exept, one of the best in the World agencies, the California Public Utilities Commission. They care about solar boys and can overide others "discretionary decissions"
Comment 5 of 15
No image available
February 23, 2007
Without a counterpart like Mr. Scheer here in the US, we, the people must do it ourselves. Where is the "Renewable Energy" Cable channel? Where are the Green Advertising Execs that can make people feel that they need to embrace Renewables. If they can make people embarrassed to drive there kids to school in anything but a Hummer (Seen the ad?) then they can certainly do the same for Renewables. Where is the Solar thermal turbine?
Comment 6 of 15
No image available
February 23, 2007
-continue-Page 2 of 2

It appears that all that noise is just that. The big interest power (coal/fossil) generators are not just going to shut down their plants. They spent $billions.

On the other hand, we shall stop terming solar power as renewable, green, and whatever other, good to hear name. We have to termed the solar electric power cogeneration as "Mandated Energy", if is to comply with these Bills, codified into law.

Otherwise, we are just talking, and we are just getting deaf with both years, due to many "Christmas Bells ringing in our years".
Comment 7 of 15
No image available
February 23, 2007
Just a note form Nick Panchev, CEO Ecosystem Solar Electric, Corp.
www.esecorp.org

Plenty of exuberant talk, but hardly any real action.
So many Bills in Senate and so many initiatives, but that is again just talk, even codified into law.
The years of 2017, 2020, 2030 an on an on.

In the meantime there are, not in 2017-2030, but right now,solar electric power cogenerating companies, like we are, ready to implement what they and what we say will do.

However, conflicting, in major way are these Bills vs. environmental laws, which either prevent the development of solar power plants, or simply by paying exuberant fees to mitigate, results in such developments being economically unfeasible.

So, can we just stop the talk and walk the walk?
Indubitably, we have to collide due to hurdles and such hurdles have to be resolved by virtue of Lis Pendens. Unfortunately, we have to place in the front line of this battle our attorneys.
Comment 8 of 15
No image available
February 23, 2007
Great to hear we have humans that can actually think! Yes social reform in the major power centers of the world need to change. Al Gore seems to have been able to reach this center when others before him have not. From what I see there is an epeck battle taking place right now. Good(green energy) vs Bad (fossil, nuclear) Lets revisit the smaller community model. Ech community can be self sufficient in energy requirements by implementing any and all green energy that is available to them. While we're at it lets bury or find a way to get rid of the power lines! I may have a way to do the latter.

Ian Bowhey
Comment 9 of 15
No image available
February 24, 2007
I attended a book signing and Dr. Scheer spoke for ~30 minutes. It was very enlightening. I am expecting a link of the video from this speech to be sent to me. If you are interested email me at millermtu@hotmail.com and I will forward it on. I will try to post is here, but I am not sure how soon I will get the link.
Comment 10 of 15
No image available
February 24, 2007
On A Day Like Today

On a day like today, coal and oil lead the way but their fighting a losing cause,
When the sources decline and climate isn't fine then the carbons will be going away,
For the momentum will swing from carbon loaded fuels, and big boys will find the've got to change their rules,
As destructive to air, the fossils have to care by responding to future laws.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 11 of 15
No image available
February 26, 2007
Why do none of you attempt to think outside the box to change the economics of Renewable Energy? Yes it will take 2 international governments to allow sell-able spin-off benefits to be created. Their doing what is required would do the due diligence for the investors while publizing both the real need & the solution.

Many talk about Renewable Energy as if it can be done by a flip of a switch. To create the capacity to build the infrastructure required to replace the energy shortfall over night would be diliberately forgetting the listens learned from ENRON & Global Crossing. Granted the press NEVER bring up the reason they did the illegal finacial deals. They were hoping that with time the paying demand would catch up with the cost of the installed infrastructure cost.
Comment 12 of 15
No image available
February 27, 2007
"Industrial civilization is fundamentally non-viable. All natural sustainable ecosystems recycle EVERYTHING. "Renewable Energy" is an illusion. At best it will delay our demise.

This is beautiful, sigable. I'm going to steal it and use it in other forums OK? I'll list Brian Marsden as the author, I promise. I live off-grid and completely agree with this statement. Al Gore makes movies telling us all how we should behave and uses 100x more electricity than I do in one day. I simply cannot get behind this whole mandated carbon-tax, global warming, climate change thing, and I've tried, really! It just doesn't feel right to me. The reasons I went off-grid are none of the reasons promoted by the media today.

Something is wrong here, I can't put my finger on it, but I have this gut feeling that it is wrong.
Comment 13 of 15
No image available
February 28, 2007
Bob,off-grid, I applaud you.

What is wrong is that we are tip-toeing around what the utility and oil companies want, instead of what we really need, decentralized power generated at or near the point of use. The politicians are trying to make everyone happy. There is no point at which the oil/utility companies will get there investments back if we run out of oil, gas, coal, etc. If they admit this will happen in 40yrs then no one will invest in them and their stock will crash. So they cannot admit to the fact that it has been proved that renewables can replace 100% of our needs.

I am working my way off-grid as soon as I can.
Comment 14 of 15
No image available
March 5, 2007
We have been "talking " a lot about sustainability and renewables etc since last, say, at least 20 years ,if not more.
It is time that, like Germany, all industrialised and industialising countries set out their own programs for "renewablizing" and ACT accordingly.
The earlier the better.


Comment 15 of 15
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
UL University altPOWER, Inc. ULVAC Technologies, Inc. VentureBeat Spire Corporation Second Wind Inc.
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo