In this week's program, Stephen Lacey examines the debate over Citizenre. The company's business model and claims have sparked a lot of controversy in the solar industry over the last couple of months, and we'll have a look at why the company has been exposed to so much criticism.
Hmm, I just read 276 comments in this thread and was interested enough in the conversation to register so I could post some comments. After logging in, there are now only 132 comments. Why did all the most recent ones disappear?
Well, regardless, here are my thoughts.
First, we are all Earthlings here and are all best served went we remain polite and constructive in our discourse. For the most part, the contributors here get high marks in that and I appreciate it. (Have to ding you a point or two Ben for occasionally being a tad too strident for my taste, but I do find your commentary logical and persuasive. And I do believe your intention is to help the CRE true believers avoid getting hurt.)
On the flip side of that coin, I find the self reinforcing "great plan" comments by the CRE faithful to be a bit disingenuous. I have heard no one beyond the self invested refer to this as a "great plan." I am personally not convinced it is even a workable plan, much less a "great" one. But neither am I convinced that there is any conscious intent to do wrong. If there is a market niche here that CRE is able to fill, that is great and I hope you all live happily and comfortably ever after.
However, the main point to me has been entirely missed. I am a "home-owner" (read I have the right to live in my house as long as my $3000/mo mortgage payments are made in a timely fashion) and consider myself to be a green. I want, and intend to have, a solar energy system in the near future. But I am not looking to exchange energy vendors or "lock-in" my already unbearably high energy expenditures ($400 - $600/mo.) I am looking to reduce my costs in the long run and do so in an ecologically friendly way. I am looking to disengage myself from corporations who serve their own best interests, not my best interests. While CRE addresses the environmentally friendly part of the equation, it is just a different company to send the monthly check to, forever. No sale.
In conclusion, while I am skeptical that CRE can deliver on their promises, I wish them well and hope they succeed. But even if they do, their model does not address my needs, and, I suspect, probably not the needs of the majority of CA "homeowners." Pitch me again when you have a Rent To Own solution.
May all our futures be green...Tom