Photo Credit: USA.gov
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (15) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
February 6, 2007

Bush Allocates $1 Billion to Renewable Energy

U.S. Department of Energy FY 08 budget includes $179 million for the President's Biofuels Initiative.
Washington, DC [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Out of the $24.3 billion requested by President Bush for the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Fiscal 2008 budget, approximately $1.2 billion will be allocated to the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy -- up $60 million or 5 percent from 2007.

"We applaud the Administration for continuing to support the President's Solar America Initiative (SAI) at robust funding levels. ...At the same time, the administration's request funds solar water heating research at just $2 million and concentrating solar power at just $9 million. It is important that Congress recognize the vital contributions that these technologies can make to our energy security."

-- Rhone Resch, Solar Energy Industries Association(SEIA), President

The 2008 budget request includes $179 million for the Biofuels Initiative (an increase of $29 million or 19 percent from 2007), which is designed to help the U.S. reduce gasoline consumption by 20 percent in ten years and make cellulosic ethanol cost-competitive by 2012 through research and development of biomass made from switch grass, wood chips and corn stalks.

The budget also calls for expansion in key energy programs that focus on developing clean and renewable energy including vehicle efficiency technology, $176 million; the Solar America Initiative, $148 million; hydrogen technology, $213 million (includes fuel cell development); and wind projects, $40 million.

"We applaud the Administration for continuing to support the President's Solar America Initiative (SAI) at robust funding levels. The Administration's FY 2008 budget request calls for $137 million in funding for the SAI, a major new R&D effort to achieve cost-competitive solar energy technologies across all market sectors by 2015," said Rhone Resch, president of the Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA).

"At the same time, the administration's request funds solar water heating research at just $2 million and concentrating solar power at just $9 million. It is important that Congress recognize the vital contributions that these technologies can make to our energy security, by providing funding for concentrating solar power and solar heating / lighting programs at $25 million and $15 million, respectively. Moreover, the budget does not include a long-term extension of the Federal solar investment tax credits, which is the single most important policy affecting solar development. We urge Congress to enact an eight-year extension of the Federal solar investment tax credits as contained in H.R. 550., the Securing America's Energy Independence Act of 2007," continued Resch.

In addition, President Bush's FY 2008 budget requests $8.4 million to operate an Office of Loan Guarantees and the ability to expand the DOE's loan volume limitation to $9 billion. Congress has already approved $4 billion for the loan program, which is designed to provide loans to companies developing alternative energy sources

"This is an extremely important and positive move by the administration to drive the portfolio of clean energy technologies into the marketplace. And if leveraged with State programs including System Benefit Trust Funds, Clean Air Act Implementation Funds (SIPs), and State Renewable Energy Portfolio Standards, will further scale-up and accelerate renewable energy markets," said Scott Sklar, The Stella Group, Ltd., Washington, DC.

"[SEIA supports] the budget request to fund the Title XVII loan guarantee program with up to $9 billion in funding, which has the potential to fund large-scale innovative solar power projects," said Resch.

The DOE 2008 budget request also includes $2.7 billion, a 26 percent increase above the FY 2007 request of $2.1 billion, and 53 percent above FY 2006, to advance President Bush's Advanced Energy Initiative, which he unveiled in his 2006 State of the Union Address. The initiative seeks to reduce U.S. dependence on foreign sources of energy and transform the national energy economy by promoting the development of cleaner sources of electricity production and to accelerate the deployment of renewable energy technologies, such as biomass, hydrogen, and solar energy; clean coal technologies through FutureGen; and nuclear energy technologies, through the Global Nuclear Energy Partnership.

Although the AEI does not classify nuclear power as a renewable resource, in a letter sent to the White House last month, more than 100 environmental leaders, business owners and energy policy organizations refuted President Bush's oft-stated claim that "nuclear power is a renewable source of energy."

"Please be advised that nuclear power is neither a renewable nor a clean source of energy. For that matter, oil, coal, and natural gas are also not renewable or clean sources of energy. Nuclear power and fossil fuels are environmentally polluting and non-renewable sources of energy that produce long-term radioactive wastes and/or greenhouse gas emissions. The primary renewable sources of energy are biomass (e.g., biofuels, biopower), geothermal, solar, water (e.g., hydropower, tidal, wave, ocean currents) and wind," stated the letter.

The groups object to the President's efforts to revive the nuclear industry by defining it as "renewable" so that it might be included in a future federal Renewable Energy Portfolio Standard or supported by federal tax incentives or research and development programs specifically designed to promote renewable energy technologies.

Along with the DOE, a portion of the U.S. Department of Agriculture FY2008 budget will be allocated to renewable energy projects across the country. This budget includes $397 million for energy projects, an increase of $161 million over 2007. Of this increase, $132 million is for Rural Development renewable energy investments through guaranteed loans and grants, and other efforts.

The remaining increase of $29 million supports research and development activities to enhance bioenergy feedstocks and improve conversion technologies for cellulosic ethanol. It does not, however, include the $1.6 billion request for new funding cited in the Administration's 2007 Farm Bill Proposals.

"The President's agriculture budget provides important resources that are necessary to promote economic opportunities and to preserve our commitment to our farmers, ranchers, rural citizens, and families in need," said Agriculture Secretary Mike Johanns. "This budget aims to enhance our country's vibrant [agriculture] economy, advance renewable energy, protect America's food supply, improve nutrition and health and conserve our natural resources."

The budget request submitted Monday by the White House to Congress is the first step in the annual appropriations process. Over the next several months, the House of Representatives and the Senate will proceed with the actual work of writing the federal budget. But the White House numbers serve as recommendations to Congress that could set the parameters of the budget debate.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (15)
 
No image available
February 6, 2007
I hear what your saying US Friend, re: war expenditures. If we had spent the amount of money that we've poured into Iraq on developing renewable energy in the US, we wouldn't be fighting a war in the first place. We need to get our priorities straight.
Comment 1 of 15
No image available
February 6, 2007
Considering the nuclear industry has recieved over 110 billion in research and subsidies over the last 60 years from the US government, its fair.
Comment 2 of 15
No image available
February 6, 2007
One Billion,...we spend one billion dollars every 9 days for the war effort. Are we gonna need to build Noah's Freekin' ark in 75 years and grow gills or what?

We're not treating the energy problem with any serious money. Look what Germany has done with it's ability to create 750mW of energy produced by PV i 2005 and 2006.

Why can't we lead,....in anything in this country. We don't need to pay actors millions of dollars to do what "literally anyone can do". Lets pay companies to produce more efficient solar cells, and hire engineers to do the testing not untrained laborers! Scientists test, laborers labor. Remember that DayStar.
Comment 3 of 15
No image available
February 6, 2007
I'm not sure if the disbursement of these funds is fair,
but have they totally forgotten about fusion energy
research ?
boB
Comment 4 of 15
No image available
February 7, 2007
We need to work togather. I live in fl. Ihave been using wind and solar to power my house since1994.
If I can do this why cant more people get with the program..I have been trying to get more people off the grid, It is up to every one . Send your ideas to hobo1@695online.com thank you
Comment 5 of 15
No image available
February 7, 2007
I agree with Frederick, we as a manufacture and supplier of solar water heating systems, designed and developed by me over 15 years, now manufacture under licence in China. China where 16 million solar hot water systems to date are installed to date.

Stop looking to governments and your desparate need to gain tax breaks, its not going to happen.
We ignore the piddling grants which the Blair government offers, some $60 million over 3 years across 5 technologies while $110 billion is being invested in our Nuclear deterrant

Its time the working clases of this world made their own decision in securing tax free energy for life for their homes and familiy to enjoy now, not when it suites governments.

I am bringing to the Vegas exhibition our method of sales, our proven and growing solar water heating system, best around and affordable with no tax breaks.
Comment 6 of 15
No image available
February 7, 2007
Apparently,

Most of you that have left comments must be a part of the "Bush Bashing Democrats" with your views that it is the Federal Governments "job" to take care of every problem that the USA faces.

So, as Democrats you will be for the raising taxes for alternative energy resources???

Have we forgotten all of the state funding that has been allocated for alternative energy research? - OR - what about some of the worlds richest that have invested billions of dollars in alternative energy research?

I am all for alternative energy resources BUT: . . . .

It has to start with us as a nation! How many times in your daily driving do you see one person in their vehicle - What a waste of energy!!!

As far as the US Friend Comment:

You feel pretty safe don't you?
Why do you think that we have not been attacked again?

It's called the WAR Effort!
Comment 7 of 15
No image available
February 7, 2007
I can only agree with "US FRIEND" in his condemnation of the miserley sums offered by the Bush administration for renewable energy science: Its obvious the Bush Government is not serious in its attempts to change the course of Energy history in the USA: The piddling amounts of money offered will do little to encourage serious studies into enegy efficiency: The USA is going to have to play catch up to Europe and will still be burning fossil fuels when Europe is running on Clean and Green: America has lost a lot of its commercial courage: We are becoming a technological backwater:
Comment 8 of 15
No image available
February 8, 2007
The first step to overcoming a problem is recognizing you have a problem, right?
(aka America's Addiction to Oil and Global Warming - both are (finally) recognized at the national level)

The second step is finding alternative solutions to that problem
(aka $1 billion renewable energy budget)
These problems aren't solved with one quick stroke of a keypad - it occassionally requires baby-steps, however immediately necessary these solutions may be.

The third step is forgiving yourself and letting go. We've already recognized the past failures and are trying to make up for those failures - let's get focused on the current process. Less talking, more doing.
Comment 9 of 15
No image available
February 8, 2007
If Renewables is to take off like a WIZ BAM . Then what we need to do is to put forth all the money twards advertizing and using celebrities to promote and display how they can be independant. Not just by fuel but also with funding staying at home the money will stay in the pocket book and teach us how to be self supporting.
The same for energy , home heating , security , and food . We can seperate our selfs from fueling or feeding terorists . Instead of just being dependant on substances that cause grief and misory .
It is time to show the people of the world how to protect and serve our enviroment . Just as you clean house .
Comment 10 of 15
No image available
February 8, 2007
$1,000,000,000 FOR RENEWABLE ENERGY AND HUNDREDS OF BILLIONS OF DOLLARS IN A WASTE OF ENERGY AND RESOURCES?

http://www.iht.com/articles/2007/02/08/opinion/ediraq.php
Comment 11 of 15
No image available
February 8, 2007
For this country to appear serious about implementing an alternative to gasoline, more of the fuel tax money should be utilized to solve our energy problem. The building of an alternative fuel infrastructure is very much half hearted given the enormity of these fuel tax revenues. Unfortunately the lifestyles of many American families will suffer due to the price of energy. How is it that there is no sense of urgency by our government to solve the problem with one swift blow? It can be done with our fuel tax revenues.

The fuel tax money that is collected proceeds straight into the general fund, there it loses IDENTITY?

http://www.surfacecommission.gov/08%20HTF%20Mechanics_Carolyn%20Edwards.ppt#373,11,Slide 11
Comment 12 of 15
No image available
February 8, 2007
The Department of Energy reports that approximately 146,000,000,000 gallons of gasoline are consumed every year by Americans. At an average state and federal tax rate of $0.39 per gallon, approximately $56,940,000,000.00 in revenues will be collected every year. Why not put more of those American red cents to work by implementing an alternative to crude oil right this instant?

http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/oog/info/twip/twip_gasoline.html

http://www.taxadmin.org/FTA/rate/motor_fl.html
Comment 13 of 15
No image available
February 11, 2007
Let's not delude ourselves. With defence spending taking up close to 50% of the national budget when service of the national debt incurred by massive borrowing is included, this war for oil control is no "security", is in real terms vastly more expensive than current renewable funding, and has alienated us in the world. It's time to start investing in real "homeland security".
Comment 14 of 15
No image available
February 25, 2007
Fusion Energy Research (to the best of my knowledge) can't be used for military purpose - so why invest there? ;)
Comment 15 of 15
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
EFD Michigan Economic Development Corporation Atlantic Wind & Solar Inc. Ocean Renewable Energy Coalition OPEL Solar, Inc. The Wall Street Green Trading Summit IX
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo