Photo Credit: Solix Biofuels
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (30) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
January 26, 2007

Making Biofuel from Pond Scum

by Shelley Schlender

Oil-rich plants such as soy may offer a cleaner energy alternative to diesel fuel, but Jim Sears says these food crops can't meet all our diesel needs. The Colorado-based entrepreneur says, even in America's bountiful croplands, farmers couldn't grow enough oilseed crops to meet demand.

"It is about 1,000 times more efficient to produce fuel from algae than it is from an irrigated crop. There's enough water even in the desert from natural rainfall to support this technology."

-- Jim Sears, Solix Biofuels, Founder

"Right now," [Sears] points out, "if we were to use all the normal sources we know about, such as canola oil, soy, things like this to make biodiesel, the industry thinks they could make 3.7 billion liters a year. That sounds like a lot, but Americans currently use 227 billion liters of diesel a year."

Fortunately, Sears says, an unconventional crop could produce 100 times more biodiesel per hectare than either canola or soy. It can thrive in places where other crops can't grow at all, and it only requires the equivalent of 5 centimeters of rain a year. It's algae, a small but familiar plant, usually seen as a green scum that forms on ponds or aquarium glass.

To demonstrate his crop's potential, Sears leads the way inside a former coal-fired electric power plant, now the Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory at Colorado State University (CSU). CSU and Sears' small company, Solix Biofuels, have teamed up for this research.

Sears passes a two-story tall engine that may soon be running on his biodiesel, and heads to a quieter room where test batches of algae grow in glass beakers. The water ranges from pale yellow to soft Irish green, thanks to millions of microscopic algae.

Biologist Nick Rancis lifts a favorite specimen. "Here we have a species of green algae that grows in fresh water. As you can see, it grows very high density. You can't even see through it when you hold it up to the light." He says this strain produces enormous amounts of fat: up to 50 percent of its body weight. And while producing oil from soy or canola generally requires a three to five-month growing season, some algae are so prolific, over half a batch can be harvested for oil production every day. "They can double or triple overnight," Rancis says.

For industrial production, the researchers are designing enormous growing troughs, wider than two trucks side by side, as long as a football field, and grouped by the thousands around processing plants. In this way, Sears says, algae could supply all the U.S. diesel power on a fraction of the nation's farmland, just one percent of the 400 million hectares now under cultivation.

"Actually we wouldn't have to convert any of our arable land," [Sears] observes. "We could use desert land to grow this algae. It doesn't require good soil. Just flat land, carbon dioxide and sunlight."

Carbon dioxide helps algae grow fast and fat, so the team plans to siphon it from fossil fuel power plant exhaust, which will reduce greenhouse gas emissions. And Sears says there are other ways to get the gas. "It would actually start with biomass such as switch grass or wood, where in some countries are the only type of fuel that they have anyway. In that case, the grass, the trees, the wood is pulling the carbon dioxide out of the air, then we burn it as fuel and feed the carbon dioxide to the algae."

He stresses that no carbon will be added to the atmosphere during all these energy conversion steps, making biofuel from algae is a truly carbon-neutral technology. "It's essentially solar powered fuel."

To conserve water, the growing troughs are sealed. The algae grows under a clear plastic lid that allows in plenty of sunlight, but keeps the water the plants are floating in from evaporating. "It is about 1,000 times more efficient to produce fuel from algae than it is from an irrigated crop," Sears says. "There's enough water even in the desert from natural rainfall to support this technology."

Affordable biodiesel is an important focus of the research team, and Bryan Willson, who directs this Engines and Energy Conversion Lab, says the projections look promising. "We believe the technology could be cost competitive with $50 a barrel oil, which is basically where we are right now. Even last year, we were up to $70 a barrel."

Because building a vast new production system is an enormous undertaking, Sears predicts that it will be five to ten years before biodiesel from algae becomes commonplace. However, Eric Jarvis, a senior scientist at the National Renewable Energy Lab, cautions that it may take longer. "I wouldn't expect it to meet a large demand for diesel in that time frame, but I'm hoping to see some good demonstration projects in the next 5 to 10 years." He adds that in the last two years, interest in developing systems for biodiesel from algae has grown tremendously, and he gets phone calls every week from people trying to get into this area.

Whether it takes five years, a decade or a little longer, Jim Sears says he's certain that biodiesel from algae will become commonplace. He calls it "by far the most scalable and reasonable way to make biofuels in the future in an endlessly sustainable method."

As he considers that future, a train whistle sounds in the distance. "That train is the train that used to bring the coal to this power plant," he comments, adding "it is one of the future customers."

The National Renewable Energy Lab plans to step up their development of biodiesel from algae within the year, and they estimates that along with Colorado State and Solix Biofuels, roughly a dozen other groups around the world are developing similar projects, increasing the likelihood that someday soon, clean-burning algae biodiesel will be the fuel of choice for trucks, boats . . . and trains.

Shelley Schlender is a freelance radio journalist whose features have aired nationally on Living on Earth, Making Contact, Free Speech Radio News, and Sprouts. Her radio features have aired internationally on The Voice of America.

This article was reprinted from the January 22, 2007 edition of Voice of America, voanews.com.

Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (30)
 
No image available
January 26, 2007
What's the point of saying that oil is 50% of the dry weight when it's the separation of the water that is one of the energy intensive processes involved in turning algae in to biodiesel? If algae is 98% water, (I can't remember the exact number. I believe it's between 95.5% and 99.9% water), then it would take 800 lbs of algae to get 16 lbs of algae dry weight or 8 lbs or oil, (roughly 1 gallon). While 800 lbs is not tons, it's not an insignificant amount.

If it were easy, we'd already be doing it instead of using soybeans, but I hope we will get there soon.

As for evaporation, the article clearly says "To conserve water, the growing troughs are sealed. The algae grows under a clear plastic lid that allows in plenty of sunlight, but keeps the water the plants are floating in from evaporating. "
Comment 1 of 30
No image available
January 26, 2007
Oops. That Lake Powell.
Comment 2 of 30
No image available
January 26, 2007
There will be moisture loss but the amount of moisture lost at any given time will probably have negligible impact. Lakes power and Meade haven't turned southern Utah into a jungle and they store massive amounts of water. The evaporative losses must be huge.

BTW, when I lived in AZ I was struck at how many allergens are in the air there. In particular, plant parts are pretty high there as I recall.
Comment 3 of 30
No image available
January 26, 2007
You folks forget there is another problem with the desert area, Temperature.I will use arizona as my example, I am almost sure it is very hot ( >100 F) in the Arizona deserts about 4 to 6 months out of a year.
This technology can harm as well as help, if they did do this there is moisture loss i bet. In my humble opinion the technology could possibly Terra-form the desert to a Hot humid environment as well.
Jungles in the Arizona anyone?

Arizona is the place most severe allergy affected people go to escape the deluge of pollen because it is dry, hot, and it kills pollen spores. I hope people will make this technology but think of a better place to put it.

Thanks
D~W
Comment 4 of 30
No image available
January 26, 2007
We aren't going to solve the alternative transportation fuel (renewable sourced) problem overnight. However, algae is certainly worth large scale commercial and research "experiments" especially relative to corn-based ethanol. Even if the algae-based $50/barrel cost is off by a factor of 2 and it cost $100/barrel, I'd still rather pay more for fuel produced in the USA (not Mexico) than send my money off the Middle East.
Comment 5 of 30
No image available
January 26, 2007
If these algae are up to 50% fat then how can that be true? You wouldn't need tonnes (dry weight) of scum to produce a gallon of oil.
Comment 6 of 30
No image available
January 26, 2007
This will be most easily implemented in Mexico in the same ponds where Spirulena is grown; but the economics are horrific!

It takes tones of scum and a lot of pressure to squeeze out a gallon of oil...and we are still left importing oil from Mexico because of the growing cost.

There is a bright spot...growing the scum in sewerage treatment plant settling ponds...maybe.
Comment 7 of 30
No image available
January 27, 2007
Can the oil/water mix be presssed out from wet algae? Then everyone is forgeting what is left after pressing,press cake that would make good hog feed. Hog manure to biodigester. Separate methane from CO2. Co2 to algae growing operation. Metane to power the operation. Efluent is used to grow algae. A school child could design a better system than proposed.
Comment 8 of 30
January 27, 2007
Isn't interssting how new alternative energy "things" are always five and 10 years away. Five and ten years ago they were 5 and 10 years away. And here we are today still 5 and 10 years away, and 5 and 10 years from now we will be 5 to 10 years away.

What was it Bush said in his SU, "clean coal and clean safe nuclear"... get the picture....
Comment 9 of 30
No image available
January 27, 2007
I thought airplanes could run on diesel but they were not mentioned as prospective customers for bio-diesel. There is a lot of pollution created by planes.
Comment 10 of 30
No image available
January 27, 2007
I still think we would do far better to focus our efforts on growing algae for biodiesel on nutrient-rich wastewater, as is currently being done in New Zealand.
Comment 11 of 30
No image available
January 28, 2007
We've got to get rid of hydrocarbon fuels and this includes renewable biofuels and anything else containing carbon that oxidizes as a means of energy production - we are destroying the biosphere of this planet with the rapidly rising levels of CO2 in the atmosphere. We need to focus our collective energies on developing other promising energy sources such as magnetics or hydrogen. There is no future for us in replacing crude oil with another kind of oil.
Comment 12 of 30
No image available
January 29, 2007
This posting seems to have elicited quite a number of political replies, rather than scientific ones.

I would like to hear more from people who are actually engaged in researching this field. Are there people from NREL or Colorado State University who might like to comment on here? I would appreciate it.
Comment 13 of 30
No image available
January 30, 2007
"We've got to get rid of hydrocarbon fuels and this includes renewable biofuels and anything else containing carbon that oxidizes as a means of energy production"

I agree with William Farver. We must somehow get away from burning carbon based fuels, no matter the source because this has caused global warming and will continue to do so. Switching from fossil oil to bio oil or to ethanol will not solve the problem. The conversion of coal into liquid fuels or converting engines to burn natural gas doesn't help either.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 14 of 30
No image available
January 30, 2007
I just saw a 1 hr show on the History Channel about Coal. They said we have 250 years worth of coal in the US. Here are a few problems and solutions.

(1) Getting rid of 90% of the sulfer can be accomplished just by washing East coast coal, West coast has 10 times less sulfer. The sulfer can then be processed from the water.

(2) Getting rid of the Carbon Dioxide they collect is a problem for Global Warming. Instead of pumping in underground, use it for the sealed pond scum and it will convert it to Oxygen and produce oil for fuel.

(3) Gasification of coal is even cleaner, and the ultimate use, several processes are under study.
Comment 15 of 30
No image available
January 31, 2007
Understand there is a lot of potential for biodiesel and alchohol from algea. I just see a better production from trying to grow it in a skyscaper fasion than from trying with a horizontal troughs or ponds. It also will help with the coal and gas fired plants that are in production today. If the goverment were to mandate terrifs and put the money towards companies that for finacial purposes could not afford installing the system so they could install the systems. And when in production and making surplus to then adapt a revenue for other companies.
Comment 16 of 30
No image available
January 31, 2007
Instead of using the troughs why not use clear plastic fence tubes or glass tubes. Understand that sun light will only penatrate threw an inch of algea. It also stops the chance of evaporation and will harnes the CO2 and stir the algea so you can use a larger tube for growing algea. It can also be installed vertically so there is no limmit to hieght and maximize the use of light and space.
Comment 17 of 30
No image available
January 31, 2007
Thank you Peter Jensen and Charles Adams.

"A school child could design a better system than proposed."!?! I think that maybe the researchers working on this have got a little bit more knowledge and expertise in this area than your average school child. Or any of us.
Comment 18 of 30
No image available
January 31, 2007
I would say MISSOURI is the place to grow algae rich bio-fuels "ITS GOT A HOT VERY HUMID CLIMATE MOST OF THE YEAR,just what you need for growing algae.
Comment 19 of 30
No image available
January 31, 2007
" What we need is a whole lot of people who are not exxperts in why it can't be done"
Henry Ford or words to that effect
Comment 20 of 30
No image available
January 31, 2007
I have available free of charge, my research paper which I did last fall at Montana State University, entitled, MONTANA SYNERGY, LLP; BUSINESS PLAN FOR COMMERCIAL PRODUCTION OF ALGAE FOR FOOD AND FUEL USING PHOTOBIOREACTOR TECHNOLOGY.
Send me an email.
Jim Miller
jimmiller5417@yahoo.com
Comment 21 of 30
No image available
January 31, 2007
The algae can be pressed wet using less energy than pressing oil seeds. After pressing, the sugars in the algae can be fermented and distilled to ethanol. The remainder is a high protein animal food or high nitrogen fertilizer. In the future, our protein, biodiesel, ethanol, plastics, dyes, medicines and other products will all come from algae.
Comment 22 of 30
No image available
January 31, 2007
CO2 sequestration is the best application for this technology.CO2 is the greatest cause of global warming.
Algae love CO2...it is one of the main foods for their growth. The current idea of pumping billions of tons of CO2 underground is asking for trouble due to potential leaking back into the atmosphere. If the oil conversion process is not economical then the algae can be used as fertilizer & animal feed.

Green Fuel Technologies & GS Clean Tech are 2 companies that are also working on commercialization of this technology.
Comment 23 of 30
No image available
February 14, 2007
Hi,
I think it is absolutely fab that you guys have come up with a renewable energy source.
I think there are tonnes of research going on across the globe for a source of "Clean" energy just as much as bio energy. Whether or not this particular fuel is clean or not, it is a step closer to helping the environment we live in, compared to that of simple drilling and the over extending of our current resources. So for that I applaud the great work done here.
No one went from the earth straight to the moon. So maybe we need to support such ventures as it may lead to something far better in the furture, and yes I also agree that time is limited. I'm sure the scientists who looked at "Bio" replacements intedned good from the start, and I'm convinced that they are not at the finnish line yet!!. So with a bit of support and money from such ventures we may get to the finnish line faster.

Well Done!

M.Wragg
Australia.
Comment 24 of 30
No image available
June 2, 2007
Its the need of the hour it will be a great help to the globe If anybody empowers me with the right knowledge i want to implement in India. Paul Koti paulkoti@yahoo.com
Comment 25 of 30
No image available
September 2, 2008
It would be wonderful to leave the politics out of the discussion, including the blatant fallacy of man made global warming. However, politics being what they are it may actually drive our government to do something about our energy needs.

Here is a link to some very good information on the process of algae for energy. It answers many of the questions asked above.

http://cc.pubco.net/www.valcent.net/i/misc/Vertigro/Vertigro.mov
Comment 26 of 30
No image available
October 16, 2008
Some great ideas in these threads. Most of the ideas seem to be a little narrowly focused, "leave politics out of this", "Global warming fallacy". Whether or not CO2 levels are linked to climate change is beside the point. CO2 levels have demonstrably risen during the age of fossil fuel man.

What we need is for humans to allow themselves economic transparency. For hundreds of years, human progress has been fueled by the earths stored Carbon Reserves. When we say we have an oil based economy, we are really saying we have a carbon based economy.

We have changed the location of the earths carbon reserves (i.e. our bank account) from underground storage to the atmospheric CO2. In the process, we utilized stored solar energy. Our credit line of stored carbon molecule energy is getting lower every day.

Fortunately, there is a natural mechanism for utilizing atmospheric CO2 and current solar energy to supply our energy needs in perpetuity. The mechanism is called photosynthesis. Solar panels are not a new concept to the Earth. Photosynthetic plants and algae mastered this technology eons ago.

To the proponents of "clean oil and nuclear power". Coal is a continuation of our carbon credit spending. It has provided us with a valuable energy source that has allowed us to progress to out current state of technological advancement, but it is antiquated technology that ultimately can only offer a finite energy supply. Clean nuclear energy is a misnomer. Would you allow your children to play near spent nuclear fuel? How about your descendants for the next 10,000 years.

Fuel production from photosynthetic sources is a necessary step in human evolution. We can wait until our carbon credit limit has run out, in which case an infrastructure shift will be exceedingly difficult (imagine building a modern city with a team of horse and oxen), or we can use foresight and begin the transition now.
Comment 27 of 30
No image available
October 17, 2008
PROSPECTS FOR THE BIODIESEL INDUSTRY
By Jim Miller

Where we've been.
The biodiesel industry has reached a crisis point. The demand for biodiesel has promoted the construction of a large number of biodiesel plants. These refineries use the oils from many plants, but especially soy. The cost of seed oil has risen dramatically because of the rise in petrodiesel costs to farm and the demand for ethanol as an additive to gasoline. Ethanol is used in the processing of biodiesel.

In Europe, many of the biodiesel plants have been moth-balled because of the high cost of oil seed oil. Imperim Renewables, Gray's Harbor WA, is finishing a 100,000 million gallon per year plant, with no assured source of vegetable oil. They are reluctant to import palm oil because of the adverse ecological impact of the palm plantations. Other refineries are facing the same supply issues.

The favored source of oil, algal oil, has been touted as the liquid fuel source of the future – and indeed it is. Most early investors put their money up to fund the construction of algae farms. Guess what? They proved they could grow algae using a wide variety of technologies.
Comment 28 of 30
No image available
October 17, 2008
Dear Renewable Energy folks:

I have discovered the key elements to extract algal oil from Chlorella Vulgaris and I am probably the only person who knows how to do it.

Please read the attached PROSPECTS FOR THE BIODIESEL INDUSTRY. (only part of which is above)  [ http://algaloildiesel.wetpaint.com/page/PROSPECTS+FOR+THE+BIODIESEL+INDUSTRY ]After reading the article, please navigate to Algal Oil Diesel's website [ http://algaloildiesel.wetpaint.com/ ] which has descriptions of the emerging science and technology on how to open Chlorella Vulgaris and extact the algaloil, using low energy at high volume production levels.  Despite my best efforts and Google, I have not found any information source which has created the cell bomb technology such as to facilitate low cost, mass algal oil extraction. 

Best Regards,

Jim Miller
jimmiller5417@yahoo.com
Comment 29 of 30
No image available
January 4, 2009
You know, I'm going to be honest here, I never really bothered to look up biofuels or bothered to investigate other sources of energy until my stupid science teacher assigned a project to us.

But seriously, this is really weird and totally interesting. I mean, we could generate enough energy to supply the US if we just grew enough algae? That's freaking insane.

Maybe I'll talk to my teacher about setting up our own little lab experiment with algae.
Comment 30 of 30
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
Trina Solar Ltd. Solectria Renewables LLC GT Solar Incorporated altPOWER, Inc. Solar Living Institute bees - bioenergy events & services
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo