Photo Credit: Iowa Stored Energy Park
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (11) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
January 12, 2007

Iowa to Combine Wind Energy & CAES Technology

Ankeny, Iowa [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Backed by the U.S. Department of Energy, a group of municipal utilities in Iowa and surrounding states are planning to build a new energy park that would integrate a 75-150 megawatt wind farm with Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) technology.

"A study commissioned by [Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities] several years ago suggested that municipal's needs in the future would include intermediate generation. At about the same time, we became acquainted with CAES technology, which is an intermediate resource... We put it all together and have been working on it ever since."

-- Kent Holst, Iowa Stored Energy Park, Development Director

The proposed project, known as the Iowa Stored Energy Park (IESP), will use low-cost, off-peak electricity -- and wind energy that is not being sold on the grid at that time -- to store air in an underground geologic structure of porous rock located 3,000 feet underground, beneath layers of impermeable cap rock. The air will be injected under pressure, pushing back water stored in the rock.

The rock will hold air much like a sponge holds water. Then, as demand for electricity rises, the stored air will be released, heated, and used to drive generators -- in turn producing electricity for residents in Iowa, Minnesota and the Dakotas.

"Iowa is a leader in wind production but we have not developed a feasible way to store the abundant energy produced by wind. ISEP is the solution for storing energy. The project just makes sense. As an Iowan, I want to keep the clean and healthy quality of life here. The Iowa Stored Energy Park will provide needed electricity for our state, and also be environmentally friendly. We all want to lessen our dependence on fossil fuels. ISEP helps us accomplish that as well," said John Bilsten, general manager for the Algona Municipal Utilities.

Although CAES has been in use for over 20 years -- and similar methods are used to store natural gas underground in numerous parts of the world -- currently cavern air storage is only used in two other locations. The first CAES plant, a 290 MW facility, was started up in Huntorf, Germany in 1978, and a 110 MW plant commenced operation in McIntosh, Alabama in 1991.

In 2003, interested members of the Iowa Association of Municipal Utilities (IAMU), a group representing publicly owned utilities, formed a study committee to develop the concept of the ISEP. Several underground rock structures in Iowa were investigated, and within the past six weeks, studies confirmed that a site in Dallas Center, Iowa, has the adequate size, depth, and cap rock structure - all necessary geologic features - to allow development of the project to proceed.

"A study commissioned by IAMU several years ago suggested that municipal's needs in the future would include intermediate generation. At about the same time, we became acquainted with CAES technology, which is an intermediate resource. Finally, Bob Haug, Executive Director of IAMU, suggested that combining wind energy for compression with CAES would be a logical combination. We put it all together and have been working on it ever since," said Kent Holst, Development Director of the Iowa Stored Energy Park.

While the U.S. Department of Energy is fully backing the project, with both research and financial support, the board of trustees for ISEP is also working to secure additional funding from investors for further development. The cost of the storage infrastructure, generating facility, and associated components is estimated at $200,000-225,000. This does not include any wind facilities, said Holst.

Further studies of the site are now underway, and Holst hopes that construction on the park will commence in two years. The project is expected to be fully operational and providing electricity to Iowa and surrounding states by May 2011.

"It's a milestone for Iowa. It's a milestone for the Department of Energy. And, it's a milestone for the country. The Iowa Stored Energy Park could be a role model for other states and it could help the United States become a greener country," Imre Gyuk, Energy Storage Research Program Manager for the U.S. Department of Energy.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (11)
 
No image available
January 12, 2007
Are we sure we want to displace groundwater from the underground rock? Comments on the possible effects on the soil would be appreciated.
Comment 1 of 11
No image available
January 14, 2007
Compressed Air Energy Storage (CAES) technology is certainly a much better use of underground gas storage than CO2 sequestering which to me makes no more sense than the underground storage of nuclear wastes. It is good to use a geological resource to aid in the energy production-storage-release cycle so that we will be able to move away from carbon burning and nuclear power facilities toward clean and sustainable production of power.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 2 of 11
No image available
January 17, 2007
Caverns are Precious

Storage of winds could be solved by compression,
When strong winds are blowing there's no blade regression,
Compressing the air, a good energy storage,
It's one way to save with renewable forage,
We need to dispose of the pulsating beast,
To straighten the throb, stopping power decrease,
To hold back the energy far under the ground,
Releasing compression when top winds are down,
Spinning fresh turbines that serve to replace,
And remove intermittent wind energy's face,
The caverns are precious and useful this way,
Providing us energy night time and day.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 3 of 11
No image available
January 17, 2007
I doubt they would be doing the project if it was a risk to the aquifer, given what a valuable resource it is. They could also use tanks for CAES. I do not know how they compare economically. While geologic formations may have large volumes, you can get tanks up to much higher pressures.
Comment 4 of 11
No image available
January 17, 2007
I know 3000 feet seems very deep but I'm still concerned about displacement of the water in this porous rock and how it may effect moisture closer to the surface. I agree pumping CO2 deep underground makes little sense. There are ecosystems down there and I suspect we are interdependent with them is ways that are currently poorly understood. Also molecules of forty or more CO2 atoms popularly known as "buckyballs" have possible nanotech applications. It would be better to find another way to sequester CO2 and perhaps store surplus wind electricity in batteries or fuel cells.
Comment 5 of 11
No image available
January 18, 2007
There is a similar CAES system in active use in Alabama. It stores air at about 1500psi in an old mine and releases the air down to about 600psi in order to meet peaking demands. The CAES systems do rely on heating the air with natural gas or other fuel before returning it to the turbine for power generation, so the system may not be totally renewable energy based depending on the fuel used. However, the CAES approach does seem to be an economical way to utilize large ammounts of energy that would otherwise be lost. Perhaps the Iowa project could employ a biomass fuel to keep net carbon to zero.
Comment 6 of 11
No image available
January 24, 2007
This seems worth trying on a limited scale to see how it works. Assess it based on real performance and experience and then see if it makes sense to do more projects like this.
Comment 7 of 11
No image available
January 31, 2007
Having read with great interest the storage techniques of commpressed air from wind, I can only with great anticipation await the future outcome of this technology: It may help if the boffins of this technology would consider using atomizers to give the released air greater power and impact at its final destination:
Comment 8 of 11
No image available
February 28, 2007
To address the original comment I think that the CAES storage concept has been in use for a long time in a different form. I believe that this is the same way that natural gas is stored. I would think if that has not affected the groundwater compressed air would not either. If I am incorrect about the natural gas storage I would like to know.
Comment 9 of 11
No image available
March 30, 2007
Sequestering CO2 makes better sense if you realize that it can be used to puch oil out of formations that have been exhausted of natural gas to provide that pressure. I have read in another venue that oil companies will buy all the CO2 you can bring to those old oil (stripper) wells.
This method, air pressure storage, makes way better sense than waiting for batteries to store electricity from the wind. It removes the variability from the stored energy, making the engineering to generate electricity rather straightforward.
I have yet to hear about the practicality of doing it at the residential level at a reasonable cost.
Comment 10 of 11
No image available
April 2, 2007
A few thoughts and corrections.The Alabama project stores the air in a solution mined cavern in a salt dome. Storing air in deep saline aquifers, is no different that storing natural gas in a similar manner.About 75 % of the Continental US is suitable for storage in one manner or another.
There are concepts to expand the air from storage without being contaminated by combustion gases.The wind energy contribution can therefore be kept "green". The combustion of natural gas in a Gasturbine, where the exhaust heat is used to raise the temperature of the stored air before expansion.The combination of very low GT pollution and zero wind energy pollution makes a very desirable power generating plant.
Smaller CAES systems, while more expensive, are proposed see www.eniswindgen.com here you will find many solutions to using adiabatic expansion, i.e no fossil fuel.
Comment 11 of 11
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
ABS Energy Research OPEL Solar, Inc. Solar Living Institute Rolls Battery Engineering Renewable Energy World North America NESEA
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo