Article Tools
Email This Story Share This Story Add to Bookmarks Printer Friendly Version 15 Comments
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

Previous Article
Next Article
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
October 19, 2006

The Rebirth of Concentrating Photovoltaics

by Stephen Lacey, RenewableEnergyAccess.com

San Jose, California [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

The Concentrating Photovoltaics (CPV) industry will soon take up a larger share of the solar market as technology improves, investment pours in and cost comes down, according to leading CPV manufacturers at the Solar Power 2006 conference and expo.

"There is very big growth happening in this market because CPV is offering lower cost electricity. There have been many innovations in the industry, so we are rapidly lowering cost. This technology is here to stay."

-- Raed Sherif, SpectroLab

CPV uses lenses to concentrate sunlight onto photovoltaic cells, allowing for a decrease in cell size. Because a CPV module needs less cell material than a traditional PV module, it is cost effective to use higher quality cells to increase efficiency. However, the technology makes up a very small portion of the solar industry.

The CPV industry, which has not experienced much growth in the last decade, is now poised for a breakthrough in the near future. Exhibitors showing their products at the San Jose Convention Center are excited about the potential for CPV in the solar market.

"Concentrators have been pretty negligible in the market place. But as the technology becomes economical, new investment comes in and the solar industry fragments, CPV is starting to see some major progress," said Brad Hines, CEO of Practical Instruments.

Hines was showing off Practical Instruments' Heliotube technology on the exhibition floor. The rooftop module consists of rows of miniature solar panels in aluminum troughs. Glass panels that cover the troughs concentrate light onto the cells. The technology, said Hines, uses around 85 percent less PV material than traditional solar cells, dramatically reducing cost. Hines estimated that around a third of calls to his office come from consumers who are interested in CPV.

"We are creating a bigger pie for the entire solar industry," said Lee Johnson, Vice President of Business Development at Stellaris Corporation.

Stellaris was promoting its Clear Power technology -- a transparent CPV module that was created for easy integration into building design. Johnson said that architects and builders have been responding positively to the Clean Power module, which will be on the market in 2008.

"Aesthetics are one of the most important factors for an installation. Because of this product and others, we are reaching people who might never have considered solar before," said Johnson.

Indeed, new technologies like these are raising CPV out of a period of stagnation. Raed Sherif, head of terrestrial products at SpectroLab, said that concentrators will play a major role in making solar cost competitive with fossil fuels.

"There is very big growth happening in this market because CPV is offering lower cost electricity," Sherif explained. "There have been many innovations in the industry, so we are rapidly lowering cost. This technology is here to stay."

Those who are at Solar Power 2006 representing CPV are positive about the future of their market. As awareness for CVP among consumers grows, the technology will get more efficient, more aesthetically pleasing, and of course, more affordable.
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Add Your Comment 15 Reader Comments
No image available
October 19, 2006
Hey,

You can find partial information on costs and efficiency in MIT Tech Review http://www.technologyreview.com/read_article.aspx?id=17246&ch=energy
No image available
October 19, 2006
Jim,

Astute observation. Can anyone make a cost comparison between these and traditional PV cells?
No image available
October 19, 2006
I notice that there is no numerical information for costs per panel or improvements in amount of kwh.
No image available
October 20, 2006
Difuse light can be focused, that is simple physics. The image may not be clear because it will be of difuse clouds but the light and its inherent energy will be concentrated on a smaller area so a smaller collecter is required.

Renewable energy is science based and it pays to get the science right!

roytindle@gmail.com
No image available
October 20, 2006
Why is it said that CPV is not applied and not cost effective?
I think CPV has a good future. especially when the manufacturing of cells is a bottleneck.
I found a non-US supplier that delivers 33 kW units at a lower price per W. than "traditional" (=old fashoned?) PV.

Much regards, Hans Jansen.
Coaching Energy Environment Development
October 20, 2006
Any system that requires concentrated focus loses nearly all its output under even a light cloud cover. Diffused light won't focus. Verify yourself with a magnifying glass.

Applications should be limited to desert-dry (low cloud cover) climates and this should be stated in product information.

No intention to put down this product! Just want people to understand where it is economical and where it isn't.
No image available
October 20, 2006
It's great to see these products coming back. I think one of the problems they experienced in the past was a shortened life due to the heat build-up involved. Stellaris' website says their products can cogenerate heat, so maybe that issue has been addressed.
No image available
October 20, 2006
If cost effective, would be good for many institutions such as Hospitals, Academic institutions and other centres of excellence in Uganda where power supply is available for less than 12 hrs/day. P'se keep us posted with further developments that make this cheaper than traditional solar. Thanks
No image available
October 21, 2006
I've noticed that many of these CPV units contain plastic, cheaper now, but more expensive in the long run unless they can withstand 30 years of UV. The Stirling dish idea seems to be more durable. All solar tech needs full sunlight to be cost effective since that is where the 800 -1,000 watts per square meter comes from.
No image available
October 23, 2006
that is why i try to push solar power. it seems to be a way for faster results because things wont have to change. they will be built new out of new ideas, not only todays science (which i aplaude) but the high school kid who sees solar panels on the school roof and dose this years science fair project on how to cook a chicken with solar. not fighting 50 years of dominance by the auto industry/big oil/til1-20-08. mabey the next president will see it.
No image available
October 23, 2006
the profit will come. solar is the furture.in spite of this countrys lack of leadership in the renewalable energy issue. i see ford lost billions agian today. it will take years for their actions aginst theu.a.w. to show fruit. every time ford and gm fired a designer on the drawing board to pay for a high schhol dropout the outrageious money and benifits. now that trend can be reversed but it will take too long. retooling, training a replacement work force, concept devlopement, r and d
No image available
October 23, 2006
Windy: diffuse light can indeed be focused. There are a number of "omnidirectional" arrangements like the compound convex parabolic lens that have a fairly wide amgle of acceptance. In fact, a few of the CPV modules are designed for fixed-mount passive tracking.

As far as cost the only two vendors I see actually selling product are green and gold with the suncube in AU and micropv here in the U.S. greenandgold's cost savings are evident, micropv is still in the "call for prices" mode.
No image available
October 29, 2006
The compound concentrators are like
LEDs in reverse, and accept light from
wide directions at once, though at the
micro level slightly unevenly. See:
Nonimaging Optics, ISBN: 0127597514
We are developing software for this.
No image available
November 1, 2006
The Acceptance Angle specifies how far
from perpendicular the sun's rays can be
for collection. Removing shade from outside
that incidence angle makes no difference,
allowing collectors to be in tighter spots.
We recommend supporting these devices.
No image available
November 12, 2006
Alanod Alumminum has introduced at Solar Power 2006 in San Jose outdoor durable reflecting aluminum products which are envisioned to be used in a wide variety of PV Concentrating application. Low cost, high reflectivity, and ease of fabrication of these metal mirrors hold great promise in this application. For more information contact asabel@alanod.com
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
groSolar Navigant Consulting Second Wind Inc. KYOCERA Solar, Inc. FRONIUS USA LLC  Solar Electronics Division Krannich Solar Inc. Solectria Renewables LLC
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network
Twitter Facebook Linked In RSS Feeds e-Newsletters