New Look, Same Great Website.
Be on the lookout for our re-design for 2010 launching Friday, March 12!

Close
 
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (15) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
September 12, 2006

Why Isn't Butanol More Prevalent?

I was wondering if butanol is a more efficient fuel than ethanol and, if so, why don't we hear more about it? -- Robert M., Kansas City, MO

Butanol is a four-carbon alcohol. Alcohols also include methanol (1-carbon), ethanol (2-carbon) and propanol (3-carbon). Butanol is used primarily as an industrial solvent. The worldwide market is about 350 million gallons per year with the U.S. market accounting for about 220 million gallons per year. Butanol currently sells for about $3.70 per gallon in bulk (barge). Butanol can also be a replacement for gasoline as a fuel without major engine modifications and can be shipped through existing fuel pipelines. Butanol has a high energy content (110,000 Btu per gallon for butanol vs. 84,000 Btu per gallon for ethanol). Gasoline contains about 115,000 Btu's per gallon. Butanol is six times less "evaporative" than ethanol and 13.5 times less evaporative than gasoline, making it safer to use as an oxygenate in Arizona, California and other states, thereby eliminating the need for very special blends during the summer and winter months. Even the U.S. Department of Energy funded a study of butanol, under a federal DOE/STTR grant from the Department of Energy through the Small Business program (DE-F-G02-00ER86106), in association with Dr. S.T. Yang of the Ohio State University. There has been little to no effort to promote butanol as an alternate fuel because of historically low yields and low concentrations of butanol compared to those of ethanol; that is, for each bushel of corn you would garner (1.3) gallons of butanol (0.7) gallons of acetone and (0.13) gallons of ethanol with concentrations of 1-2%. Butanol is presently manufactured from petroleum. Historically (early 1900s - 1950s) it was manufactured from corn and molasses in a fermentation process that also produced acetone and ethanol known as an ABE (acetone, butanol, ethanol) fermentation. However, as demand for butanol increased, production by fermentation declined mainly because the price of petroleum dropped below that of sugar when the U.S. lost its low-cost supply from Cuba around 1954. If you compared ABE yield to that of the yeast ethanol fermentation process, the yeast process yields 2.5 gallons of ethanol from a bushel of corn; with concentrations of 10-15% it becomes very clear why ethanol is considered a better alternative fuel source over butanol. One company, Environmental Energy Inc. (EEI) has developed and patented technology that they believe overcomes the limitations that have to date kept the cost of butanol production from corn and other forms biomass high. EEI claims they can produce 2.5 gallons of butanol from corn with no acetone or ethanol, whereas most other processes have not been able to achieve better than 1.3 to 1.9 gallons of butanol per bushel and still utilize an ABE process. Some experts in the automotive industry have been publicly praising butanol, so don't count it out by any means, as new flex-fueled vehicles come to market. -- Scott Sklar Scott Sklar is President of The Stella Group in Washington, DC, a distributed energy marketing and policy firm. Scott, co-author of "A Consumer Guide to Solar Energy," uses solar technologies for heating and power at his home in Virginia. Have a question? Please contact Scott regarding new products, technologies or experiences for future Q&A columns.
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (15)
 
No image available
September 13, 2006
Is there any info available on Environmental Energy Inc, EEI ?
Comment 1 of 15
No image available
September 13, 2006
Butanol has excellent attributes as a fuel alternate for gasoline rich mixtures and the advent of efficient means to produce it from biomass is encouraging news. One attribute that I have not read about lately is the subjective issue of odor. (Have you smelled it yet?) Pure butanol has a characteristic fairly pungent (fusel oil-like) but not unpleasant odor, whereas butyric acid (oxidized butanol) has a rancid odor.
Comment 2 of 15
No image available
September 13, 2006
Butanol looks to be an excellent transition
renewable for all those cars that won't be able to
use biodiesel, which appears to be the choice of the future, or electricity, if a practical battery is ever invented.
Comment 3 of 15
No image available
September 13, 2006
This view looks set to change with the ABF/DuPont/BP initiative to convert sugar to Butanol in the UK. This is the first commercial biobutanol plant - although in practice first commercial really means pilot. Much like production from cellulose until some technical problems and scale is achieved costs will be high but it would be expected that this will not be for long. Butanol is very exciting because it provides another cheap way of moving crop. For example think of the Alaskan pipelines and cellulose supply, but there are interesting areas of the world where sugar plants may also be sited.
Comment 4 of 15
No image available
September 14, 2006
The other thing which is wrong with the Butanol is Congress has not declared it an Alternative Fuel Source. I specifically asked for a clarification on this from the IRS guy who was in charge of this type of program and the education surrounding this. He specifically pointed to the legislation and the wording. Butanol in order to get a credit needs to be included on the list. At the present time only petroleum based alternative fuels are included on the list. Alcohol, diesel, kerosene, etc. Ethanol is not one of the alternatives which surprised me. And then it did not surprise me because of the Petroleum lobby efforts.
Comment 5 of 15
No image available
September 14, 2006
As butanol consists of 4 carbon atoms,more CO2 will be generated compare to Methane.

Hence from CO2 point of view Methane is preferred over Butanol.

Further Hydrogen is preferred to Methane.

P.J.LAKHAPATE
plakhapate@rediffmail.com
Comment 6 of 15
No image available
September 18, 2006
For those interested in reading Environmental Energy Inc's report, here's a link to to it in the DOE's Office of Scientific & Technical Information database:
http://www.osti.gov/bridge/product.biblio.jsp?osti_id=843183
Comment 7 of 15
No image available
September 18, 2006
Hum begs too question how much carbon does a 4 carbon fuel cause a vehicle to spew into the atmosphere?

Butanol also still has the potential to starve the world to feed our machines. Alternative energy is not just about finding a replacement for gasoline it is about making our earth greener and polluting it less. Butanol to me has no place in our quest.

D~W
Comment 8 of 15
No image available
September 21, 2006
We have lost our way regarding our use of ethanol. It made some sense as an MTBE replacement, but makes no sense as a wholesale gasoline replacement.

When you see ADM and Cargill lining up at the trough you can bet that the broad benefits to rural communities will be stolen by the carpetbaggers.

Butanol has a lot of promise, but is currently not politically correct. It ought to be. It addresses a broad range of problems, produces more energy per unit of input (H2 and butanol are outputs), will cost less than ethanol, can be made from any biomass, contaning starches/sugars, has high energy content, lhigh octane, ow vapor pressure, low corrosivity, have potential for use as a hydrogen carrier (10 H atoms per molecule), is renewable, could be produced in distributed biorefineries scattered across the landscape, and can be used in 1-100% blends without modification to existing fuel systems/engines and without loss of performance. Read around at butanol.com).
Comment 9 of 15
No image available
October 21, 2006
1. Any word on butanol from cellulose? This should be available, since at least some ethanol from cellulose processes are two-stage (the first stage makes fermentable sugars from the cellulose).


2. When the fuels (and hence their carbon atoms) come from biomass (and hence CO2 in the air), the additional carbon atoms in a molecule of butanol (vs. ethanol) should not cause additional overall greenhouse gas emissions.

Comment 10 of 15
No image available
October 31, 2007
The website: www.butanol.com has some very interesting information on a bioreaction process that is superior to ABE fermentation that BP/Dupont is using in several ways. It can produce more butanol per bushel of corn and produces excess hydrogen that can be collected and sold as a byproduct. I do not see why there isnt more extensive research going into this process.
Comment 11 of 15
No image available
October 31, 2007
You are very right, Ron. Nobody here should be complaining about the fact that butanol, having more Carbon chains than Ethanol, will release more CO2 into the air. What is not realized is that because the source for butanol comes from plants which extract CO2 from the atmosphere, the net amount of CO2 gas released into the atmosphere is either none or very little. I say very little because I cannot deny the fact that some energy will be used up in the manufacturing process. However, the amount of pollution in comparison to gasoline is very little.
Comment 12 of 15
No image available
December 4, 2007
Problems with butanol:
The fermentation and purification is not as trivial as EEI makes it sound. The microbes (various Clostridia spp.) only produce butanol up to around 2% before they die off.
Although butanol does not mix with water very well it does mix with water up to 7.7 - 9.1% requiring an energy intensive step to separate the butanol and water.

That being said: some of the Clostridia spp. have some endogenous cellulase activity, although its not as efficient as the enzymes being developed by iogen/verenium-cellunol etc. All in all it seems like it requires more research. We are toying with the idea of starting a company researching it more: karmafuel.com.
Mike Hannon
Comment 13 of 15
No image available
March 30, 2008

The previous comment does not reflect what EEI is doing. The quoted numbers reflect old science, not the process that David Ramey has prototyped. Ethanol has no chance of replacing sufficient liquid fuels, fast enough, to keep industrial economies from going down hard. Too little, too late. Where will the fuel come from to run the gasoline fueled trucks and cars that cannot use ethanol above ~10%? We don't have decades left to play around in the laboratory or to replace the existing vehicle inventory.

 


Comment 14 of 15
No image available
February 2, 2009
I was wondering about the benefits about using butanol with fuel cells?
Comment 15 of 15
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
DuPont Photovoltaic Solutions Solar Power International 2009 ExxonMobil Lubricants & Specialties Europe Energy Storage Summit PennEnergy Solar Living Institute
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo