Photo Credit: Purdue News Service
article tools
Increase Text Size Increase Text Size Decreate Text Size Decrease Text Size
Share Email This Story Share Share This Story Reader comments Reader Comments (11) View image gallery Image Gallery (1) Add to favorites Add to Bookmarks Printer friendly version Printer Friendly Version
Article Tool Sponsor:

Advertise with us

More Jobs
0 ratings - Sign-in to rate this article
September 22, 2006

New Corn-to-Ethanol Process Promises Lower Costs, Environmental Benefits

West Lafayette, Indiana [RenewableEnergyAccess.com]

Purdue University scientists have developed an environmentally friendly, cost-effective method for creating ethanol from corn. Using a machine originally designed to make plastics, the new Chen-Xu Method grinds the corn kernels and then liquefies the starch with high temperatures.

"The total operating cost of a Chen-Xu Method ethanol plant should be much less than that of a wet-milling plant, and total equipment investment is less than half. And with proper planning and management, total equipment investment should be less than that of a dry-milling plant."

-- Chen-Xu, Purdue University, professor

The process produces about 2.85 gallons of ethanol for every bushel of corn processed. That output is slightly higher than current methods, but the same process that creates the ethanol also creates other marketable products. The team that developed the technology was led by professor Li-fu Chen and research assistant Qin Xu, both from the Purdue food science department.

"Our process, which we are calling the Chen-Xu Method, not only makes ethanol, but products that are fit for human consumption," said Chen. "This process also produces corn oil, corn fiber, gluten and zein, which is a protein that can be used in the manufacture of plastics so that the containers are good for the environment because they are biodegradable and easily decompose. The containers would actually be edible, although there probably wouldn't be much market for that."

The Purdue Research Foundation has licensed the technology to Bio Processing Technology Inc., which was formed to bring inventions from Chen and Xu to the marketplace.

"One of the common methods of manufacturing ethanol, called dry milling, is often the cause of air pollutants by drying and storage of DDG, a byproduct of the process," he noted. "Another method -- wet milling -- produces an odor because it requires the input of sulfur dioxide. The Chen-Xu Method eliminates both issues, and the only odor comes from the smell of the corn and yeast fermentation."

With the Chen-Xu Method, the water input required by wet milling is reduced by 90%, wastewater output is cut by 95%, and electricity use is reduced by 47%. It also meets federal Clean Air Act standards, eliminating costs that other methods incur in meeting environmental regulations, said Chen.

"The total operating cost of a Chen-Xu Method ethanol plant should be much less than that of a wet-milling plant, and total equipment investment is less than half," said Chen. "And with proper planning and management, total equipment investment should be less than that of a dry-milling plant."

Funding for the work came from industry donations and one year of support from the Value-Added Grant Program of the Indiana State Department of Agriculture. Chen said the next step for the fledgling company is to commercialize the technology worldwide. The technology was licensed to Bio Processing Technology Inc. through the Office of Technology Commercialization, a division of Purdue Research Foundation.
Image Gallery (1)
 
For Further Information
Please Note: RenewableEnergyWorld.com does not endorse the sites behind these links. We offer them for your additional research. Following these links will open a new browser window.
Reader Comments (11)
 
No image available
September 22, 2006
The other byproducts are what intriques me. We must not forget, plastics come from petroleum. This combination makes this technology highly desireable in my opinion.
Comment 1 of 11
No image available
September 22, 2006
I don't see corn ethanol being the future of ethanol, but
certainly anything that makes production cheaper, less
polluting, and more efficient has got to be a good thing.

Would this technique have any application in making
ethanol from cellulose?
Comment 2 of 11
No image available
September 23, 2006
I think that we should concentrate more on getting rid of low mpg cars and trucks. Motors are highly inefficient and I think it selfish on our part to use alcohol produced from corn to run wastefully in vehicles when we know that there are billions of starving people in the world who would benefit from the corn.

adrianakau@aol.com
Comment 3 of 11
No image available
September 24, 2006
This is a very interesting article in the fact that it proves that ethanol technology is advancing at a very rapid rate.

I can see cost effective cellulosic ethanol production coming very soon.

I too agree that the by-products of this manufacturing process are very intriguing to say the least; this may just make the plastics industry sit up and take notice as well.

Frederick Musser
Editor of e85Tips.com
Comment 4 of 11
No image available
September 24, 2006
No offense Adrian, but you can't just get rid of low milage cars. Even if new ones that are highly efficient are produced today, used ones still exsist and it's more wasteful to not use an existing vehicle that's already had money poured into it's design and production than it is to find a cheaper alternative to fuel it. Plus most of us(myself included...) are completely unable to afford the newer hybrid vehicles at this time, it's just completely out of the average consumers reach.

I agree though that the by-products are more interesting than the corn ethanol, while that's a jumpstart for the alternative energy industry, you'll probably see ethnaol from cellulose(it's 3AM I don't feel likes spell checking) and bio-diesel from sources like alge take off in the long run.
Comment 5 of 11
No image available
September 25, 2006


"This year cars, not people, will claim most of the increase in world grain consumption. The problem is simple: It takes a whole lot of agricultural produce to create a modest amount of automotive fuel." -
(source: Peak
Oil.org
)




"The grain required to fill a 25-gallon SUV gas tank with ethanol, for instance, could feed one person for a year. If today's entire U.S. grain harvest were converted into fuel for cars, it would still satisfy less than one-sixth of U.S. demand." - Lester Brown PLAN B: Save Our Planet


Comment 6 of 11
No image available
September 25, 2006
Adrian,

While your comment about world hunger is valid, it should also be recalled that for decades the US has subsidized farmers NOT to grow corn so as keep a floor on prices. At some point biofuels would be expected to "eat" into the world's food supply, if the choice is government subsidizes for fallow ground or ethanol, however, I believe ethanol would be preferable.

If a sufficient world food supply is available, I would also wonder whether having a valuable cash crop (that is not illegal) might even benefit some poorer areas. This seems as at least anecdotally to be the case in Brazil with ethanol and now biodiesel.
Of course such a situation would almost certainly take up the spare capacity in world food production before all fuel needs are met, however, a development such as cellulosic ethanol could potentially really prove to be a boon for many poorer more agrarian parts of the world.
Comment 7 of 11
No image available
September 27, 2006
I think this is a perfect example of how much innovation is possible with all of the newer alternative energy technologies in development. So many times have I heard the arguement that such and such technology is not cost effective, or not efficient, etc...but with substantial investments finally being placed into renewable energy, along with a long-overdue public concern, I would expect many more breakthrough methods of producing alternative fuels and renewable energy in the near future.

Keep up the good work Purdue engineers.
Comment 8 of 11
No image available
September 27, 2006
Great job, Dr. Chen. As an owner of forestland, I am waiting for thermo-chemical cellulosic ethanol technology to be commercialized to create a new market for the huge volume of excess pine timber that we have in the South. Until then, let's continue to help our farmers and produce home-grown fuels.
Gene Quick
Comment 9 of 11
No image available
September 27, 2006
Adrian:
Hunderds of Billions of dollars of farm subsidies have been paid by US and EU governments. Why? Because food producer prices are too low. Because with those low prices farmers cannot survive. Sugar is trading 80% below its high, and corn and wheat 60% below their peak prices. And that's without adjusting for inflation. Do that, and they're are trading at around 5% of their peak prices. within the last 25 years farmers around the world had to live with a disastrous market.
Comment 10 of 11
No image available
March 27, 2007
Just wondering if anyone knows a cite i can go to, to find opinions of why corn ethanol would be better than other sources of ethanol??? I personally think switchgrass would be better, I was just wondering because i'm doing a research paper comparing the 2
Comment 11 of 11
Add Your Comment

Registered users, please make sure to Sign-In. We and others want to know your ideas and opinions. If you are not yet Registered -- it's quick and easy. Just click below.
Thanks!

Register Now   Sign-In
Featured Total Access Partners
Click company logos to learn more
The Stella Group, Ltd. Midwest Renewable Energy Association NESEA Aries Power & Industrial Canadian Solar Inc. 3TIER
WORLD'S #1 RENEWABLE ENERGY NETWORK
World's #1 Renewable Energy Network Logo